dynamic memory allocation to a struct type [duplicate]










1
















This question already has an answer here:



  • c++ memory error when using malloc/realloc/free on std::string

    2 answers



I am trying to allocate memory to structure dynamically but i am getting error while allocation the memory dynamically



#include <string>

using namespace std;

#define MAX_GRADES 5

typedef struct _Student

string id;
string name;
double grades[MAX_GRADES];
double average;
Student;

Student *update_list;

int main()

Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
return 0;





main.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
main.cpp:26:24: error: expected primary-expression before ‘)’ token
Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(Student));
^









share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Alan Birtles, Baum mit Augen c++
Users with the  c++ badge can single-handedly close c++ questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Nov 18 '18 at 20:06


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 1





    Important note: std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

    – user4581301
    Nov 14 '18 at 6:46















1
















This question already has an answer here:



  • c++ memory error when using malloc/realloc/free on std::string

    2 answers



I am trying to allocate memory to structure dynamically but i am getting error while allocation the memory dynamically



#include <string>

using namespace std;

#define MAX_GRADES 5

typedef struct _Student

string id;
string name;
double grades[MAX_GRADES];
double average;
Student;

Student *update_list;

int main()

Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
return 0;





main.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
main.cpp:26:24: error: expected primary-expression before ‘)’ token
Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(Student));
^









share|improve this question















marked as duplicate by Alan Birtles, Baum mit Augen c++
Users with the  c++ badge can single-handedly close c++ questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Nov 18 '18 at 20:06


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • 1





    Important note: std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

    – user4581301
    Nov 14 '18 at 6:46













1












1








1









This question already has an answer here:



  • c++ memory error when using malloc/realloc/free on std::string

    2 answers



I am trying to allocate memory to structure dynamically but i am getting error while allocation the memory dynamically



#include <string>

using namespace std;

#define MAX_GRADES 5

typedef struct _Student

string id;
string name;
double grades[MAX_GRADES];
double average;
Student;

Student *update_list;

int main()

Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
return 0;





main.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
main.cpp:26:24: error: expected primary-expression before ‘)’ token
Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(Student));
^









share|improve this question

















This question already has an answer here:



  • c++ memory error when using malloc/realloc/free on std::string

    2 answers



I am trying to allocate memory to structure dynamically but i am getting error while allocation the memory dynamically



#include <string>

using namespace std;

#define MAX_GRADES 5

typedef struct _Student

string id;
string name;
double grades[MAX_GRADES];
double average;
Student;

Student *update_list;

int main()

Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
return 0;





main.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
main.cpp:26:24: error: expected primary-expression before ‘)’ token
Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(Student));
^




This question already has an answer here:



  • c++ memory error when using malloc/realloc/free on std::string

    2 answers







c++






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 14 '18 at 6:15









Mat

165k29313344




165k29313344










asked Nov 14 '18 at 6:12









user9622995user9622995

254




254




marked as duplicate by Alan Birtles, Baum mit Augen c++
Users with the  c++ badge can single-handedly close c++ questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Nov 18 '18 at 20:06


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Alan Birtles, Baum mit Augen c++
Users with the  c++ badge can single-handedly close c++ questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();

);
);
);
Nov 18 '18 at 20:06


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 1





    Important note: std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

    – user4581301
    Nov 14 '18 at 6:46












  • 1





    Important note: std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

    – user4581301
    Nov 14 '18 at 6:46







1




1





Important note: std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

– user4581301
Nov 14 '18 at 6:46





Important note: std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

– user4581301
Nov 14 '18 at 6:46












6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















3















Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));




(*Student) is not a type, you want (Student*). Also, sizeof n gives the size of a pointer on your system, not the size needed for one or more Students. Correct way:



Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(*n));


However, as pointed out in the answer of user4581301, your Student is not POD so you have to use new to ensure constructors are being called:



Student *n = new Student;


or, if you want more than one Student



Student *n = new Student[42];


Please remember that all memory allocated using new must be deallocated using delete and all memory allocated using new with delete.



But the use of raw owning pointers is considered bad practice and should be avoided in favour of smart pointers like std::unique_ptr<> and std::shared_ptr<> or containers:



The C++-way would be using std::vector<Student>.

Also, there is no reason to use a typedef for a structure in C++.






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Actually it is not correct to use malloc in allocating memory for an object like in the question, which contains a string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… Use new instead

    – francesco
    Nov 14 '18 at 8:44












  • @francesco Oh, i missed the strings. Assumed it was a POD :/

    – Swordfish
    Nov 14 '18 at 8:46


















4














TL;DR version



Use



Student *n = new Student;


instead of



Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


Explanation



This is a typo



Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
^ wrong side.


You want



Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(n));
^ needs to be here.


This will compile. Normally I would leave a comment and vote to close but there are two things wrong with this solution that you'll find at runtime.




  1. n is a pointer. sizeof(n) will give the size of a pointer which is guaranteed to be shorter than a string (unless the string implementation is incredibly awesome and doing things I can't even imagine). You would want sizeof(*n) to get the size of a Student if the next point didn't render this point useless.


  2. std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

Use new here or do not dynamically allocate at all.






share|improve this answer






























    1














    There are three mistakes in your code:



    • The cast right before malloc should be (Student *): this is the correct type of n, i.e., a pointer to Student.

    • The size to allocate is sizeof(Student): sizeof(n) would give you the size of a pointer, most probably too small for Student.

    • Most important: you should never use malloc to allocate memory for a struct which contains a complex object like a string. You must use instead new, see the discussion here.

    A correct code would be



    #include <string>

    using namespace std;

    #define MAX_GRADES 5

    struct Student

    string id;
    string name;
    double grades[MAX_GRADES];
    double average;
    ;

    Student *update_list;

    int main()

    Student *n = new Student;

    delete n;
    return 0;



    I have added a delete n at the end: it is not necessarily to run the code correctly, but it is a good practice to not forget to delete the allocated memory.



    Even better, rather than using a #define to fix the size of the array grades you should use a template parameter: in this way MAX_GRADES does not propagate in all the following code. Finally, in general it is better to avoid using namespace std; in the header part. This is because, if you ever split the declaration of Student in a separate header file, than every code file which include such a header will "inherit" the using namespace std; which could, possibly, collide with other included headers.



    In summary an even better version of your code is



    #include <string>

    template <unsigned int MAX_GRADES>
    struct Student

    std::string id;
    std::string name;
    double grades[MAX_GRADES];
    double average;
    ;

    Student<5> *update_list;

    int main()

    Student<5> *n = new Student<5>;

    delete n;
    return 0;






    share|improve this answer
































      0














      The problem is in this part of the code:



      int main()

      Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
      return 0;



      Understanding that '*' operator is an indirection operator in C++ would help in identifying the problem.
      https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/caaw7h5s.aspx



      You are not trying to extract value of Student structure, instead you are trying to type cast void * returned from malloc. Correct way to do it is:



      Student *n = new Student (correct C++ way of doing things - using new operator)



      This will give you a pointer to dynamically created Student structure. If you intend to create a dynamic array of Student, you would do:



      Student *n = new Student[5]



      Depending on your usage, you might want to consider an easy and C++ STL way of doing as: std::vector<Student> or std::list<Student>.



      Look up for STL (Standard Template Libraries) in C++ and you should be able to get more details.






      share|improve this answer

























      • You cannot use malloc to allocate an object like Student which contains a complex type string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… You must use new instead.

        – francesco
        Nov 14 '18 at 8:58












      • Thanks for pointing it out, have modified my answer accordingly. Although malloc works its not the right way of doing it in C++. It would not call the constructor etc. It might still work in this case as it is a simple struct. But yes, what you said is a good practice to follow in C++

        – Shrikanth N
        Nov 14 '18 at 11:32












      • Just to be clear: in this case malloc does not work because the struct here contains a string. A code with malloc will compile, but it will not correctly call the constructor of string, hence paving the way for undefined behavior of segmentation fault.

        – francesco
        Nov 14 '18 at 17:16












      • Undefined behaviour is truly insidious. I would fall on my knees and praise any deity who used their divine powers to make un-or improperly initialized pointers always segfault. Yes, segfault is the most likely outcome on a modern CPU, but the less likely cases tend to be subtle and cause damage to the program that is extremely hard to diagnose. The worst among these do no visible damage and appear to work until they fail catastrophically at the worst possible time.

        – user4581301
        Nov 14 '18 at 18:42


















      -2














      If you are in c++, don't use "malloc" to allocate memory if you can use "new":



      Student* student = new Student();


      In addition to allocating space, "new" will also call the struct's constructor which will allow for initialization. The syntax is also less error-prone.



      You'll also notice my variable naming. In my example I chose "student" instead of "n" because it's more descriptive to the reader.






      share|improve this answer
































        -2














        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


        1. malloc() return the point type "void*", should be converted to the type you need, the type of "n" is "Student *" ,not the "*Student".


        2. the parameter of the malloc() is byte of memory. sizeof() is an operator to calculate bytes in C++, you should use sizeof(Student) here.
          I suggest to use this line:



          Student *n = (Student *) malloc(sizeof(Student));







        share|improve this answer

























        • I'm not sure why this answer got down-voted as it is a correct answer.

          – MaddawgX9
          Nov 14 '18 at 21:13











        • It is not incorrect to use malloc to allocate memory, see the other answers above.

          – francesco
          Nov 15 '18 at 5:26

















        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3















        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));




        (*Student) is not a type, you want (Student*). Also, sizeof n gives the size of a pointer on your system, not the size needed for one or more Students. Correct way:



        Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(*n));


        However, as pointed out in the answer of user4581301, your Student is not POD so you have to use new to ensure constructors are being called:



        Student *n = new Student;


        or, if you want more than one Student



        Student *n = new Student[42];


        Please remember that all memory allocated using new must be deallocated using delete and all memory allocated using new with delete.



        But the use of raw owning pointers is considered bad practice and should be avoided in favour of smart pointers like std::unique_ptr<> and std::shared_ptr<> or containers:



        The C++-way would be using std::vector<Student>.

        Also, there is no reason to use a typedef for a structure in C++.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 1





          Actually it is not correct to use malloc in allocating memory for an object like in the question, which contains a string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… Use new instead

          – francesco
          Nov 14 '18 at 8:44












        • @francesco Oh, i missed the strings. Assumed it was a POD :/

          – Swordfish
          Nov 14 '18 at 8:46















        3















        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));




        (*Student) is not a type, you want (Student*). Also, sizeof n gives the size of a pointer on your system, not the size needed for one or more Students. Correct way:



        Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(*n));


        However, as pointed out in the answer of user4581301, your Student is not POD so you have to use new to ensure constructors are being called:



        Student *n = new Student;


        or, if you want more than one Student



        Student *n = new Student[42];


        Please remember that all memory allocated using new must be deallocated using delete and all memory allocated using new with delete.



        But the use of raw owning pointers is considered bad practice and should be avoided in favour of smart pointers like std::unique_ptr<> and std::shared_ptr<> or containers:



        The C++-way would be using std::vector<Student>.

        Also, there is no reason to use a typedef for a structure in C++.






        share|improve this answer




















        • 1





          Actually it is not correct to use malloc in allocating memory for an object like in the question, which contains a string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… Use new instead

          – francesco
          Nov 14 '18 at 8:44












        • @francesco Oh, i missed the strings. Assumed it was a POD :/

          – Swordfish
          Nov 14 '18 at 8:46













        3












        3








        3








        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));




        (*Student) is not a type, you want (Student*). Also, sizeof n gives the size of a pointer on your system, not the size needed for one or more Students. Correct way:



        Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(*n));


        However, as pointed out in the answer of user4581301, your Student is not POD so you have to use new to ensure constructors are being called:



        Student *n = new Student;


        or, if you want more than one Student



        Student *n = new Student[42];


        Please remember that all memory allocated using new must be deallocated using delete and all memory allocated using new with delete.



        But the use of raw owning pointers is considered bad practice and should be avoided in favour of smart pointers like std::unique_ptr<> and std::shared_ptr<> or containers:



        The C++-way would be using std::vector<Student>.

        Also, there is no reason to use a typedef for a structure in C++.






        share|improve this answer
















        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));




        (*Student) is not a type, you want (Student*). Also, sizeof n gives the size of a pointer on your system, not the size needed for one or more Students. Correct way:



        Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(*n));


        However, as pointed out in the answer of user4581301, your Student is not POD so you have to use new to ensure constructors are being called:



        Student *n = new Student;


        or, if you want more than one Student



        Student *n = new Student[42];


        Please remember that all memory allocated using new must be deallocated using delete and all memory allocated using new with delete.



        But the use of raw owning pointers is considered bad practice and should be avoided in favour of smart pointers like std::unique_ptr<> and std::shared_ptr<> or containers:



        The C++-way would be using std::vector<Student>.

        Also, there is no reason to use a typedef for a structure in C++.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 14 '18 at 8:56

























        answered Nov 14 '18 at 6:16









        SwordfishSwordfish

        9,45811436




        9,45811436







        • 1





          Actually it is not correct to use malloc in allocating memory for an object like in the question, which contains a string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… Use new instead

          – francesco
          Nov 14 '18 at 8:44












        • @francesco Oh, i missed the strings. Assumed it was a POD :/

          – Swordfish
          Nov 14 '18 at 8:46












        • 1





          Actually it is not correct to use malloc in allocating memory for an object like in the question, which contains a string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… Use new instead

          – francesco
          Nov 14 '18 at 8:44












        • @francesco Oh, i missed the strings. Assumed it was a POD :/

          – Swordfish
          Nov 14 '18 at 8:46







        1




        1





        Actually it is not correct to use malloc in allocating memory for an object like in the question, which contains a string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… Use new instead

        – francesco
        Nov 14 '18 at 8:44






        Actually it is not correct to use malloc in allocating memory for an object like in the question, which contains a string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… Use new instead

        – francesco
        Nov 14 '18 at 8:44














        @francesco Oh, i missed the strings. Assumed it was a POD :/

        – Swordfish
        Nov 14 '18 at 8:46





        @francesco Oh, i missed the strings. Assumed it was a POD :/

        – Swordfish
        Nov 14 '18 at 8:46













        4














        TL;DR version



        Use



        Student *n = new Student;


        instead of



        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


        Explanation



        This is a typo



        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
        ^ wrong side.


        You want



        Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(n));
        ^ needs to be here.


        This will compile. Normally I would leave a comment and vote to close but there are two things wrong with this solution that you'll find at runtime.




        1. n is a pointer. sizeof(n) will give the size of a pointer which is guaranteed to be shorter than a string (unless the string implementation is incredibly awesome and doing things I can't even imagine). You would want sizeof(*n) to get the size of a Student if the next point didn't render this point useless.


        2. std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

        Use new here or do not dynamically allocate at all.






        share|improve this answer



























          4














          TL;DR version



          Use



          Student *n = new Student;


          instead of



          Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


          Explanation



          This is a typo



          Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
          ^ wrong side.


          You want



          Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(n));
          ^ needs to be here.


          This will compile. Normally I would leave a comment and vote to close but there are two things wrong with this solution that you'll find at runtime.




          1. n is a pointer. sizeof(n) will give the size of a pointer which is guaranteed to be shorter than a string (unless the string implementation is incredibly awesome and doing things I can't even imagine). You would want sizeof(*n) to get the size of a Student if the next point didn't render this point useless.


          2. std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

          Use new here or do not dynamically allocate at all.






          share|improve this answer

























            4












            4








            4







            TL;DR version



            Use



            Student *n = new Student;


            instead of



            Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


            Explanation



            This is a typo



            Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
            ^ wrong side.


            You want



            Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(n));
            ^ needs to be here.


            This will compile. Normally I would leave a comment and vote to close but there are two things wrong with this solution that you'll find at runtime.




            1. n is a pointer. sizeof(n) will give the size of a pointer which is guaranteed to be shorter than a string (unless the string implementation is incredibly awesome and doing things I can't even imagine). You would want sizeof(*n) to get the size of a Student if the next point didn't render this point useless.


            2. std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

            Use new here or do not dynamically allocate at all.






            share|improve this answer













            TL;DR version



            Use



            Student *n = new Student;


            instead of



            Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


            Explanation



            This is a typo



            Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
            ^ wrong side.


            You want



            Student *n = (Student*) malloc(sizeof(n));
            ^ needs to be here.


            This will compile. Normally I would leave a comment and vote to close but there are two things wrong with this solution that you'll find at runtime.




            1. n is a pointer. sizeof(n) will give the size of a pointer which is guaranteed to be shorter than a string (unless the string implementation is incredibly awesome and doing things I can't even imagine). You would want sizeof(*n) to get the size of a Student if the next point didn't render this point useless.


            2. std::string is a fairly complex class. It is only valid if at least one of its many constructors successfully initializes the class. malloc is a C function. C doesn't know what a constructor is, so no string constructor is run. This leaves id and name ticking time bombs waiting to blow your program up. Do not malloc a C++ class unless you know the class is a POD type or will be using placement new before use.

            Use new here or do not dynamically allocate at all.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 14 '18 at 7:00









            user4581301user4581301

            19.9k51831




            19.9k51831





















                1














                There are three mistakes in your code:



                • The cast right before malloc should be (Student *): this is the correct type of n, i.e., a pointer to Student.

                • The size to allocate is sizeof(Student): sizeof(n) would give you the size of a pointer, most probably too small for Student.

                • Most important: you should never use malloc to allocate memory for a struct which contains a complex object like a string. You must use instead new, see the discussion here.

                A correct code would be



                #include <string>

                using namespace std;

                #define MAX_GRADES 5

                struct Student

                string id;
                string name;
                double grades[MAX_GRADES];
                double average;
                ;

                Student *update_list;

                int main()

                Student *n = new Student;

                delete n;
                return 0;



                I have added a delete n at the end: it is not necessarily to run the code correctly, but it is a good practice to not forget to delete the allocated memory.



                Even better, rather than using a #define to fix the size of the array grades you should use a template parameter: in this way MAX_GRADES does not propagate in all the following code. Finally, in general it is better to avoid using namespace std; in the header part. This is because, if you ever split the declaration of Student in a separate header file, than every code file which include such a header will "inherit" the using namespace std; which could, possibly, collide with other included headers.



                In summary an even better version of your code is



                #include <string>

                template <unsigned int MAX_GRADES>
                struct Student

                std::string id;
                std::string name;
                double grades[MAX_GRADES];
                double average;
                ;

                Student<5> *update_list;

                int main()

                Student<5> *n = new Student<5>;

                delete n;
                return 0;






                share|improve this answer





























                  1














                  There are three mistakes in your code:



                  • The cast right before malloc should be (Student *): this is the correct type of n, i.e., a pointer to Student.

                  • The size to allocate is sizeof(Student): sizeof(n) would give you the size of a pointer, most probably too small for Student.

                  • Most important: you should never use malloc to allocate memory for a struct which contains a complex object like a string. You must use instead new, see the discussion here.

                  A correct code would be



                  #include <string>

                  using namespace std;

                  #define MAX_GRADES 5

                  struct Student

                  string id;
                  string name;
                  double grades[MAX_GRADES];
                  double average;
                  ;

                  Student *update_list;

                  int main()

                  Student *n = new Student;

                  delete n;
                  return 0;



                  I have added a delete n at the end: it is not necessarily to run the code correctly, but it is a good practice to not forget to delete the allocated memory.



                  Even better, rather than using a #define to fix the size of the array grades you should use a template parameter: in this way MAX_GRADES does not propagate in all the following code. Finally, in general it is better to avoid using namespace std; in the header part. This is because, if you ever split the declaration of Student in a separate header file, than every code file which include such a header will "inherit" the using namespace std; which could, possibly, collide with other included headers.



                  In summary an even better version of your code is



                  #include <string>

                  template <unsigned int MAX_GRADES>
                  struct Student

                  std::string id;
                  std::string name;
                  double grades[MAX_GRADES];
                  double average;
                  ;

                  Student<5> *update_list;

                  int main()

                  Student<5> *n = new Student<5>;

                  delete n;
                  return 0;






                  share|improve this answer



























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    There are three mistakes in your code:



                    • The cast right before malloc should be (Student *): this is the correct type of n, i.e., a pointer to Student.

                    • The size to allocate is sizeof(Student): sizeof(n) would give you the size of a pointer, most probably too small for Student.

                    • Most important: you should never use malloc to allocate memory for a struct which contains a complex object like a string. You must use instead new, see the discussion here.

                    A correct code would be



                    #include <string>

                    using namespace std;

                    #define MAX_GRADES 5

                    struct Student

                    string id;
                    string name;
                    double grades[MAX_GRADES];
                    double average;
                    ;

                    Student *update_list;

                    int main()

                    Student *n = new Student;

                    delete n;
                    return 0;



                    I have added a delete n at the end: it is not necessarily to run the code correctly, but it is a good practice to not forget to delete the allocated memory.



                    Even better, rather than using a #define to fix the size of the array grades you should use a template parameter: in this way MAX_GRADES does not propagate in all the following code. Finally, in general it is better to avoid using namespace std; in the header part. This is because, if you ever split the declaration of Student in a separate header file, than every code file which include such a header will "inherit" the using namespace std; which could, possibly, collide with other included headers.



                    In summary an even better version of your code is



                    #include <string>

                    template <unsigned int MAX_GRADES>
                    struct Student

                    std::string id;
                    std::string name;
                    double grades[MAX_GRADES];
                    double average;
                    ;

                    Student<5> *update_list;

                    int main()

                    Student<5> *n = new Student<5>;

                    delete n;
                    return 0;






                    share|improve this answer















                    There are three mistakes in your code:



                    • The cast right before malloc should be (Student *): this is the correct type of n, i.e., a pointer to Student.

                    • The size to allocate is sizeof(Student): sizeof(n) would give you the size of a pointer, most probably too small for Student.

                    • Most important: you should never use malloc to allocate memory for a struct which contains a complex object like a string. You must use instead new, see the discussion here.

                    A correct code would be



                    #include <string>

                    using namespace std;

                    #define MAX_GRADES 5

                    struct Student

                    string id;
                    string name;
                    double grades[MAX_GRADES];
                    double average;
                    ;

                    Student *update_list;

                    int main()

                    Student *n = new Student;

                    delete n;
                    return 0;



                    I have added a delete n at the end: it is not necessarily to run the code correctly, but it is a good practice to not forget to delete the allocated memory.



                    Even better, rather than using a #define to fix the size of the array grades you should use a template parameter: in this way MAX_GRADES does not propagate in all the following code. Finally, in general it is better to avoid using namespace std; in the header part. This is because, if you ever split the declaration of Student in a separate header file, than every code file which include such a header will "inherit" the using namespace std; which could, possibly, collide with other included headers.



                    In summary an even better version of your code is



                    #include <string>

                    template <unsigned int MAX_GRADES>
                    struct Student

                    std::string id;
                    std::string name;
                    double grades[MAX_GRADES];
                    double average;
                    ;

                    Student<5> *update_list;

                    int main()

                    Student<5> *n = new Student<5>;

                    delete n;
                    return 0;







                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Nov 14 '18 at 8:42

























                    answered Nov 14 '18 at 6:37









                    francescofrancesco

                    8701212




                    8701212





















                        0














                        The problem is in this part of the code:



                        int main()

                        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
                        return 0;



                        Understanding that '*' operator is an indirection operator in C++ would help in identifying the problem.
                        https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/caaw7h5s.aspx



                        You are not trying to extract value of Student structure, instead you are trying to type cast void * returned from malloc. Correct way to do it is:



                        Student *n = new Student (correct C++ way of doing things - using new operator)



                        This will give you a pointer to dynamically created Student structure. If you intend to create a dynamic array of Student, you would do:



                        Student *n = new Student[5]



                        Depending on your usage, you might want to consider an easy and C++ STL way of doing as: std::vector<Student> or std::list<Student>.



                        Look up for STL (Standard Template Libraries) in C++ and you should be able to get more details.






                        share|improve this answer

























                        • You cannot use malloc to allocate an object like Student which contains a complex type string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… You must use new instead.

                          – francesco
                          Nov 14 '18 at 8:58












                        • Thanks for pointing it out, have modified my answer accordingly. Although malloc works its not the right way of doing it in C++. It would not call the constructor etc. It might still work in this case as it is a simple struct. But yes, what you said is a good practice to follow in C++

                          – Shrikanth N
                          Nov 14 '18 at 11:32












                        • Just to be clear: in this case malloc does not work because the struct here contains a string. A code with malloc will compile, but it will not correctly call the constructor of string, hence paving the way for undefined behavior of segmentation fault.

                          – francesco
                          Nov 14 '18 at 17:16












                        • Undefined behaviour is truly insidious. I would fall on my knees and praise any deity who used their divine powers to make un-or improperly initialized pointers always segfault. Yes, segfault is the most likely outcome on a modern CPU, but the less likely cases tend to be subtle and cause damage to the program that is extremely hard to diagnose. The worst among these do no visible damage and appear to work until they fail catastrophically at the worst possible time.

                          – user4581301
                          Nov 14 '18 at 18:42















                        0














                        The problem is in this part of the code:



                        int main()

                        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
                        return 0;



                        Understanding that '*' operator is an indirection operator in C++ would help in identifying the problem.
                        https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/caaw7h5s.aspx



                        You are not trying to extract value of Student structure, instead you are trying to type cast void * returned from malloc. Correct way to do it is:



                        Student *n = new Student (correct C++ way of doing things - using new operator)



                        This will give you a pointer to dynamically created Student structure. If you intend to create a dynamic array of Student, you would do:



                        Student *n = new Student[5]



                        Depending on your usage, you might want to consider an easy and C++ STL way of doing as: std::vector<Student> or std::list<Student>.



                        Look up for STL (Standard Template Libraries) in C++ and you should be able to get more details.






                        share|improve this answer

























                        • You cannot use malloc to allocate an object like Student which contains a complex type string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… You must use new instead.

                          – francesco
                          Nov 14 '18 at 8:58












                        • Thanks for pointing it out, have modified my answer accordingly. Although malloc works its not the right way of doing it in C++. It would not call the constructor etc. It might still work in this case as it is a simple struct. But yes, what you said is a good practice to follow in C++

                          – Shrikanth N
                          Nov 14 '18 at 11:32












                        • Just to be clear: in this case malloc does not work because the struct here contains a string. A code with malloc will compile, but it will not correctly call the constructor of string, hence paving the way for undefined behavior of segmentation fault.

                          – francesco
                          Nov 14 '18 at 17:16












                        • Undefined behaviour is truly insidious. I would fall on my knees and praise any deity who used their divine powers to make un-or improperly initialized pointers always segfault. Yes, segfault is the most likely outcome on a modern CPU, but the less likely cases tend to be subtle and cause damage to the program that is extremely hard to diagnose. The worst among these do no visible damage and appear to work until they fail catastrophically at the worst possible time.

                          – user4581301
                          Nov 14 '18 at 18:42













                        0












                        0








                        0







                        The problem is in this part of the code:



                        int main()

                        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
                        return 0;



                        Understanding that '*' operator is an indirection operator in C++ would help in identifying the problem.
                        https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/caaw7h5s.aspx



                        You are not trying to extract value of Student structure, instead you are trying to type cast void * returned from malloc. Correct way to do it is:



                        Student *n = new Student (correct C++ way of doing things - using new operator)



                        This will give you a pointer to dynamically created Student structure. If you intend to create a dynamic array of Student, you would do:



                        Student *n = new Student[5]



                        Depending on your usage, you might want to consider an easy and C++ STL way of doing as: std::vector<Student> or std::list<Student>.



                        Look up for STL (Standard Template Libraries) in C++ and you should be able to get more details.






                        share|improve this answer















                        The problem is in this part of the code:



                        int main()

                        Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));
                        return 0;



                        Understanding that '*' operator is an indirection operator in C++ would help in identifying the problem.
                        https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/caaw7h5s.aspx



                        You are not trying to extract value of Student structure, instead you are trying to type cast void * returned from malloc. Correct way to do it is:



                        Student *n = new Student (correct C++ way of doing things - using new operator)



                        This will give you a pointer to dynamically created Student structure. If you intend to create a dynamic array of Student, you would do:



                        Student *n = new Student[5]



                        Depending on your usage, you might want to consider an easy and C++ STL way of doing as: std::vector<Student> or std::list<Student>.



                        Look up for STL (Standard Template Libraries) in C++ and you should be able to get more details.







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited Nov 14 '18 at 11:27

























                        answered Nov 14 '18 at 6:50









                        Shrikanth NShrikanth N

                        510211




                        510211












                        • You cannot use malloc to allocate an object like Student which contains a complex type string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… You must use new instead.

                          – francesco
                          Nov 14 '18 at 8:58












                        • Thanks for pointing it out, have modified my answer accordingly. Although malloc works its not the right way of doing it in C++. It would not call the constructor etc. It might still work in this case as it is a simple struct. But yes, what you said is a good practice to follow in C++

                          – Shrikanth N
                          Nov 14 '18 at 11:32












                        • Just to be clear: in this case malloc does not work because the struct here contains a string. A code with malloc will compile, but it will not correctly call the constructor of string, hence paving the way for undefined behavior of segmentation fault.

                          – francesco
                          Nov 14 '18 at 17:16












                        • Undefined behaviour is truly insidious. I would fall on my knees and praise any deity who used their divine powers to make un-or improperly initialized pointers always segfault. Yes, segfault is the most likely outcome on a modern CPU, but the less likely cases tend to be subtle and cause damage to the program that is extremely hard to diagnose. The worst among these do no visible damage and appear to work until they fail catastrophically at the worst possible time.

                          – user4581301
                          Nov 14 '18 at 18:42

















                        • You cannot use malloc to allocate an object like Student which contains a complex type string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… You must use new instead.

                          – francesco
                          Nov 14 '18 at 8:58












                        • Thanks for pointing it out, have modified my answer accordingly. Although malloc works its not the right way of doing it in C++. It would not call the constructor etc. It might still work in this case as it is a simple struct. But yes, what you said is a good practice to follow in C++

                          – Shrikanth N
                          Nov 14 '18 at 11:32












                        • Just to be clear: in this case malloc does not work because the struct here contains a string. A code with malloc will compile, but it will not correctly call the constructor of string, hence paving the way for undefined behavior of segmentation fault.

                          – francesco
                          Nov 14 '18 at 17:16












                        • Undefined behaviour is truly insidious. I would fall on my knees and praise any deity who used their divine powers to make un-or improperly initialized pointers always segfault. Yes, segfault is the most likely outcome on a modern CPU, but the less likely cases tend to be subtle and cause damage to the program that is extremely hard to diagnose. The worst among these do no visible damage and appear to work until they fail catastrophically at the worst possible time.

                          – user4581301
                          Nov 14 '18 at 18:42
















                        You cannot use malloc to allocate an object like Student which contains a complex type string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… You must use new instead.

                        – francesco
                        Nov 14 '18 at 8:58






                        You cannot use malloc to allocate an object like Student which contains a complex type string. See the discussion stackoverflow.com/questions/40434360/… You must use new instead.

                        – francesco
                        Nov 14 '18 at 8:58














                        Thanks for pointing it out, have modified my answer accordingly. Although malloc works its not the right way of doing it in C++. It would not call the constructor etc. It might still work in this case as it is a simple struct. But yes, what you said is a good practice to follow in C++

                        – Shrikanth N
                        Nov 14 '18 at 11:32






                        Thanks for pointing it out, have modified my answer accordingly. Although malloc works its not the right way of doing it in C++. It would not call the constructor etc. It might still work in this case as it is a simple struct. But yes, what you said is a good practice to follow in C++

                        – Shrikanth N
                        Nov 14 '18 at 11:32














                        Just to be clear: in this case malloc does not work because the struct here contains a string. A code with malloc will compile, but it will not correctly call the constructor of string, hence paving the way for undefined behavior of segmentation fault.

                        – francesco
                        Nov 14 '18 at 17:16






                        Just to be clear: in this case malloc does not work because the struct here contains a string. A code with malloc will compile, but it will not correctly call the constructor of string, hence paving the way for undefined behavior of segmentation fault.

                        – francesco
                        Nov 14 '18 at 17:16














                        Undefined behaviour is truly insidious. I would fall on my knees and praise any deity who used their divine powers to make un-or improperly initialized pointers always segfault. Yes, segfault is the most likely outcome on a modern CPU, but the less likely cases tend to be subtle and cause damage to the program that is extremely hard to diagnose. The worst among these do no visible damage and appear to work until they fail catastrophically at the worst possible time.

                        – user4581301
                        Nov 14 '18 at 18:42





                        Undefined behaviour is truly insidious. I would fall on my knees and praise any deity who used their divine powers to make un-or improperly initialized pointers always segfault. Yes, segfault is the most likely outcome on a modern CPU, but the less likely cases tend to be subtle and cause damage to the program that is extremely hard to diagnose. The worst among these do no visible damage and appear to work until they fail catastrophically at the worst possible time.

                        – user4581301
                        Nov 14 '18 at 18:42











                        -2














                        If you are in c++, don't use "malloc" to allocate memory if you can use "new":



                        Student* student = new Student();


                        In addition to allocating space, "new" will also call the struct's constructor which will allow for initialization. The syntax is also less error-prone.



                        You'll also notice my variable naming. In my example I chose "student" instead of "n" because it's more descriptive to the reader.






                        share|improve this answer





























                          -2














                          If you are in c++, don't use "malloc" to allocate memory if you can use "new":



                          Student* student = new Student();


                          In addition to allocating space, "new" will also call the struct's constructor which will allow for initialization. The syntax is also less error-prone.



                          You'll also notice my variable naming. In my example I chose "student" instead of "n" because it's more descriptive to the reader.






                          share|improve this answer



























                            -2












                            -2








                            -2







                            If you are in c++, don't use "malloc" to allocate memory if you can use "new":



                            Student* student = new Student();


                            In addition to allocating space, "new" will also call the struct's constructor which will allow for initialization. The syntax is also less error-prone.



                            You'll also notice my variable naming. In my example I chose "student" instead of "n" because it's more descriptive to the reader.






                            share|improve this answer















                            If you are in c++, don't use "malloc" to allocate memory if you can use "new":



                            Student* student = new Student();


                            In addition to allocating space, "new" will also call the struct's constructor which will allow for initialization. The syntax is also less error-prone.



                            You'll also notice my variable naming. In my example I chose "student" instead of "n" because it's more descriptive to the reader.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited Nov 14 '18 at 21:12

























                            answered Nov 14 '18 at 6:20









                            MaddawgX9MaddawgX9

                            518




                            518





















                                -2














                                Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


                                1. malloc() return the point type "void*", should be converted to the type you need, the type of "n" is "Student *" ,not the "*Student".


                                2. the parameter of the malloc() is byte of memory. sizeof() is an operator to calculate bytes in C++, you should use sizeof(Student) here.
                                  I suggest to use this line:



                                  Student *n = (Student *) malloc(sizeof(Student));







                                share|improve this answer

























                                • I'm not sure why this answer got down-voted as it is a correct answer.

                                  – MaddawgX9
                                  Nov 14 '18 at 21:13











                                • It is not incorrect to use malloc to allocate memory, see the other answers above.

                                  – francesco
                                  Nov 15 '18 at 5:26















                                -2














                                Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


                                1. malloc() return the point type "void*", should be converted to the type you need, the type of "n" is "Student *" ,not the "*Student".


                                2. the parameter of the malloc() is byte of memory. sizeof() is an operator to calculate bytes in C++, you should use sizeof(Student) here.
                                  I suggest to use this line:



                                  Student *n = (Student *) malloc(sizeof(Student));







                                share|improve this answer

























                                • I'm not sure why this answer got down-voted as it is a correct answer.

                                  – MaddawgX9
                                  Nov 14 '18 at 21:13











                                • It is not incorrect to use malloc to allocate memory, see the other answers above.

                                  – francesco
                                  Nov 15 '18 at 5:26













                                -2












                                -2








                                -2







                                Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


                                1. malloc() return the point type "void*", should be converted to the type you need, the type of "n" is "Student *" ,not the "*Student".


                                2. the parameter of the malloc() is byte of memory. sizeof() is an operator to calculate bytes in C++, you should use sizeof(Student) here.
                                  I suggest to use this line:



                                  Student *n = (Student *) malloc(sizeof(Student));







                                share|improve this answer















                                Student *n = (*Student) malloc(sizeof(n));


                                1. malloc() return the point type "void*", should be converted to the type you need, the type of "n" is "Student *" ,not the "*Student".


                                2. the parameter of the malloc() is byte of memory. sizeof() is an operator to calculate bytes in C++, you should use sizeof(Student) here.
                                  I suggest to use this line:



                                  Student *n = (Student *) malloc(sizeof(Student));








                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited Nov 15 '18 at 3:20

























                                answered Nov 14 '18 at 6:29









                                Drake Wu - MSFTDrake Wu - MSFT

                                2925




                                2925












                                • I'm not sure why this answer got down-voted as it is a correct answer.

                                  – MaddawgX9
                                  Nov 14 '18 at 21:13











                                • It is not incorrect to use malloc to allocate memory, see the other answers above.

                                  – francesco
                                  Nov 15 '18 at 5:26

















                                • I'm not sure why this answer got down-voted as it is a correct answer.

                                  – MaddawgX9
                                  Nov 14 '18 at 21:13











                                • It is not incorrect to use malloc to allocate memory, see the other answers above.

                                  – francesco
                                  Nov 15 '18 at 5:26
















                                I'm not sure why this answer got down-voted as it is a correct answer.

                                – MaddawgX9
                                Nov 14 '18 at 21:13





                                I'm not sure why this answer got down-voted as it is a correct answer.

                                – MaddawgX9
                                Nov 14 '18 at 21:13













                                It is not incorrect to use malloc to allocate memory, see the other answers above.

                                – francesco
                                Nov 15 '18 at 5:26





                                It is not incorrect to use malloc to allocate memory, see the other answers above.

                                – francesco
                                Nov 15 '18 at 5:26



                                這個網誌中的熱門文章

                                How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

                                In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

                                Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto