World Rugby Rankings































































































































Men's World Rugby Rankings


Top 30 rankings as of 24 December 2018[1]
RankChange*TeamPoints
1
Steady
 New Zealand

092.54
2
Steady
 Ireland

091.17
3
Steady
 Wales

087.24
4
Steady
 England

086.22
5
Steady
 South Africa

084.58
6
Steady
 Australia

082.40
7
Steady
 Scotland

081.84
8
Steady
 Fiji

077.95
9
Steady
 France

077.33
10
Steady
 Argentina

077.05
11
Steady
 Japan

075.24
12
Steady
 United States

073.66
13
Steady
 Georgia

073.42
14
Steady
 Tonga

073.02
15
Steady
 Italy

072.75
16
Steady
 Samoa

068.78
17
Steady
 Uruguay

066.82
18
Steady
 Romania

065.45
19
Steady
 Russia

065.20
20
Steady
 Canada

062.95
21
Steady
 Spain

062.24
22
Steady
 Namibia

060.34
23
Steady
 Netherlands

058.45
24
Steady
 Hong Kong

058.11
25
Steady
 Belgium

058.09
26
Steady
 Germany

057.83
27
Steady
 Portugal

057.08
28
Steady
 Brazil

056.81
29
Steady
 Chile

054.36
30
Steady
 South Korea

053.59

*Change from the previous week

The World Rugby Rankings (formerly the IRB Rankings) is a ranking system for men's national teams in rugby union, managed by World Rugby, the sport's governing body. The teams of World Rugby's member nations are ranked based on their game results, with the most successful teams being ranked highest. A point system is used, with points being awarded on the basis of the results of World Rugby-recognized international matches. Rankings are based on a team's performance, with more recent results and more significant matches being more heavily weighted to help reflect the current competitive state of a team. The ranking system was introduced the month before the 2003 Rugby World Cup, with the first new rankings issued on 8 September 2003.[2]




Contents





  • 1 Rank leaders

    • 1.1 Best and worst



  • 2 Current calculation method

    • 2.1 Rules

      • 2.1.1 Match result


      • 2.1.2 Match status


      • 2.1.3 Opposition strength


      • 2.1.4 Home advantage


      • 2.1.5 New and dormant nations




  • 3 Notes and references


  • 4 External links




Rank leaders


World Rugby Ranking Leaders

New Zealand national rugby union teamSouth Africa national rugby union teamNew Zealand national rugby union teamSouth Africa national rugby union teamNew Zealand national rugby union teamSouth Africa national rugby union teamNew Zealand national rugby union teamEngland national rugby union teamNew Zealand national rugby union teamEngland national rugby union team

When the system was introduced England were the top team and maintained that position following victory in the 2003 Rugby World Cup. New Zealand took the lead from 7 June 2004. After winning the 2007 Rugby World Cup final, South Africa became the third team to achieve first place. The first two fixtures of the 2008 Tri Nations resulted in the top two teams switching places: the All Blacks regained the top spot after defeating South Africa in the Tri-Nations opener on 5 July 2008 in Wellington; a week later the Springboks returned the favour in Dunedin, scoring their first win over the All Blacks in New Zealand since 1998, reclaiming the top spot, only for the All Blacks to defeat both Australia and South Africa in August 2008 to regain the top spot by a considerable margin. South Africa regained the lead in July 2009 after beating New Zealand in Bloemfontein and kept the lead until losing to France in November of that year, allowing the All Blacks to regain the top spot.


New Zealand have been the most consistently ranked #1 team since the introduction of IRB World Rankings, having held the #1 ranking for more than 85 percent of the time during this period. South Africa and England make up the remainder.



Best and worst


Below is a list of the best and worst ranking positions for nations that have appeared in the Rugby World Cup:






































































































































Team
Best
Worst
Rank
Year(s)
Rank
Year(s)

 Argentina
3
2007–08
12
2014

 Australia
2
2003, 2004–05, 2007, 2008,
2010, 2011–12, 2015–16
7
2018

 Canada
12
2011
24
2017

 England
1
2003, 2003–04
8
2009, 2015–16

 Fiji
8
2018
16
2011, 2012

 France
2
2006, 2007
10
2018

 Georgia
11
2016
23
2009

 Ireland
2
2015, 2018
9
2013

 Italy
8
2007
15
2015, 2017, 2018

 Ivory Coast
38
2003, 2005, 2006
55
2017

 Japan
9
2014, 2016
20
2003, 2006

 Namibia
18
2017
29
2006

 New Zealand
1
2003, 2004–07, 2008,
2009, 2009–18
3
2003

 Portugal
16
2005
30
2015, 2016

 Romania
13
2003, 2006
19
2009, 2010, 2011

 Russia
16
2007, 2008, 2009, 2012
26
2005

 Samoa
7
2013
17
2018

 Scotland
5
2017, 2017–18, 2018
12
2012, 2013, 2015

 Spain
18
2012–13, 2017
32
2004–05

 South Africa
1
2007–08, 2009
7
2017, 2018

 Tonga
9
2011
20
2005, 2006

 United States
12
2018
20
2008

 Uruguay
15
2005
23
2012, 2017

 Wales
2
2015
10
2007, 2012

 Zimbabwe
25
2015
57
2007, 2008


Current calculation method


All World Rugby member countries have been given a rating that is in the range of 0 to 100 with the top side achieving a rating of about 90 points. The point system is calculated using a 'Points Exchange' system, in which sides receive points from each other on the basis of the match result – whatever one side gains, the other loses. The exchanges are based on the match result, the ranking of each team, and the margin of victory, with an allowance for home advantage. As the system aims to depict current team strengths, past successes or losses will fade and be superseded by more recent results. Thus, it is thought that it will produce an accurate picture depicting the actual current strength and thus rank of the nations.[3] The rankings are responsive to results and it is possible to climb to the top from the bottom (and vice versa) in fewer than 20 matches. As all matches are worth a net of 0 points for the two teams combined, there is no particular advantage to playing more matches. A rating stays the same until the team plays again. Although matches often result in points exchanges, 'predictable' results lead to very minor changes, and may result in no change to either side's rating.



Rules


The system ensures that it is representative of the teams' performance despite playing differing numbers of matches per annum, and the differing strength of opposition that teams have to face. The factors taken into account are as follows:


  • Match result

  • Match status

  • Opposition strength

  • Home advantage


Match result


For each match played points exchanges are awarded for the following five outcomes and was developed using results of international matches from 1871 to the present day:


  • a win or loss by more than 15 points

  • a win or loss by up to 15 points

  • a draw


Match status


Different matches have different importance to teams, and World Rugby has tried to respect this by using a weighting system, where the most significant matches are in the World Cup Finals. Points exchanges are doubled during the World Cup Finals to recognise the unique importance of this event. All other full international matches are treated the same, to be as fair as possible to countries playing a different mix of friendly and competitive matches. Matches that do not have full international status do not count.



Opposition strength


A win against a very highly ranked opponent is a considerably greater achievement than a win against a low-rated opponent, so the strength of the opposing team is a factor. Thus match results are more important than margins of victory in producing accurate rankings. This is because when a highly ranked team plays a lowly ranked team and manages to beat them by over 50 points, it does not necessarily indicate how either team will perform in the future.



Home advantage


When calculating points exchanges, the home side is handicapped by treating them as though they are three rating points better than their current rating. This results in the home side gaining fewer points for winning and losing more points for losing. Because of this, ideally, any advantage that a side may have by playing in front of their home crowd is cancelled out.



New and dormant nations


All new member nations start with 30.00 points, which is provisional until they have completed ten test matches. When countries merge, the new country inherits the higher rating of the two countries but when they split e.g., the 2010 breakup of the Arabian Gulf rugby union team into separate teams representing its current member countries, the new countries will inherit a rating at a fixed level below the rating of the original country.


Before 1 December 2012 new member nations were given 40.00 points.


Countries that have not played a test for two years are removed from the ranking system and the list. If they become active again, they resume their previous rating.


***For a full explanation of how rankings are calculated, see the World Rugby rankings website.



Notes and references




  1. ^ "Men's World Rankings". World Rugby. Retrieved 19 November 2018..mw-parser-output cite.citationfont-style:inherit.mw-parser-output qquotes:"""""""'""'".mw-parser-output code.cs1-codecolor:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-free abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-registration abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-subscription abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registrationcolor:#555.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration spanborder-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-errordisplay:none;font-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-errorfont-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-formatfont-size:95%.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-leftpadding-left:0.2em.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-rightpadding-right:0.2em


  2. ^ "England top IRB rankings, Ireland third". Times. 2003-09-09. Retrieved 2008-11-23.


  3. ^ "Rankings Explanation". Archived from the original on October 5, 2007. Retrieved 2007-09-16.



External links


  • Official World Rankings









這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto