World Rugby Rankings Men's World Rugby Rankings vteTop 30 rankings as of 24 December 2018[1]RankChange*TeamPoints1 New Zealand092.542 Ireland091.173 Wales087.244 England086.225 South Africa084.586 Australia082.407 Scotland081.848 Fiji077.959 France077.3310 Argentina077.0511 Japan075.2412 United States073.6613 Georgia073.4214 Tonga073.0215 Italy072.7516 Samoa068.7817 Uruguay066.8218 Romania065.4519 Russia065.2020 Canada062.9521 Spain062.2422 Namibia060.3423 Netherlands058.4524 Hong Kong058.1125 Belgium058.0926 Germany057.8327 Portugal057.0828 Brazil056.8129 Chile054.3630 South Korea053.59*Change from the previous weekThe World Rugby Rankings (formerly the IRB Rankings) is a ranking system for men's national teams in rugby union, managed by World Rugby, the sport's governing body. The teams of World Rugby's member nations are ranked based on their game results, with the most successful teams being ranked highest. A point system is used, with points being awarded on the basis of the results of World Rugby-recognized international matches. Rankings are based on a team's performance, with more recent results and more significant matches being more heavily weighted to help reflect the current competitive state of a team. The ranking system was introduced the month before the 2003 Rugby World Cup, with the first new rankings issued on 8 September 2003.[2]Contents1 Rank leaders1.1 Best and worst2 Current calculation method2.1 Rules2.1.1 Match result2.1.2 Match status2.1.3 Opposition strength2.1.4 Home advantage2.1.5 New and dormant nations3 Notes and references4 External linksRank leaders World Rugby Ranking LeadersWhen the system was introduced England were the top team and maintained that position following victory in the 2003 Rugby World Cup. New Zealand took the lead from 7 June 2004. After winning the 2007 Rugby World Cup final, South Africa became the third team to achieve first place. The first two fixtures of the 2008 Tri Nations resulted in the top two teams switching places: the All Blacks regained the top spot after defeating South Africa in the Tri-Nations opener on 5 July 2008 in Wellington; a week later the Springboks returned the favour in Dunedin, scoring their first win over the All Blacks in New Zealand since 1998, reclaiming the top spot, only for the All Blacks to defeat both Australia and South Africa in August 2008 to regain the top spot by a considerable margin. South Africa regained the lead in July 2009 after beating New Zealand in Bloemfontein and kept the lead until losing to France in November of that year, allowing the All Blacks to regain the top spot.New Zealand have been the most consistently ranked #1 team since the introduction of IRB World Rankings, having held the #1 ranking for more than 85 percent of the time during this period. South Africa and England make up the remainder.Best and worstBelow is a list of the best and worst ranking positions for nations that have appeared in the Rugby World Cup:TeamBestWorstRankYear(s)RankYear(s) Argentina32007–08122014 Australia22003, 2004–05, 2007, 2008,2010, 2011–12, 2015–1672018 Canada122011242017 England12003, 2003–0482009, 2015–16 Fiji82018162011, 2012 France22006, 2007102018 Georgia112016232009 Ireland22015, 201892013 Italy82007152015, 2017, 2018 Ivory Coast382003, 2005, 2006552017 Japan92014, 2016202003, 2006 Namibia182017292006 New Zealand12003, 2004–07, 2008,2009, 2009–1832003 Portugal162005302015, 2016 Romania132003, 2006192009, 2010, 2011 Russia162007, 2008, 2009, 2012262005 Samoa72013172018 Scotland52017, 2017–18, 2018122012, 2013, 2015 Spain182012–13, 2017322004–05 South Africa12007–08, 200972017, 2018 Tonga92011202005, 2006 United States122018202008 Uruguay152005232012, 2017 Wales22015102007, 2012 Zimbabwe252015572007, 2008Current calculation methodAll World Rugby member countries have been given a rating that is in the range of 0 to 100 with the top side achieving a rating of about 90 points. The point system is calculated using a 'Points Exchange' system, in which sides receive points from each other on the basis of the match result – whatever one side gains, the other loses. The exchanges are based on the match result, the ranking of each team, and the margin of victory, with an allowance for home advantage. As the system aims to depict current team strengths, past successes or losses will fade and be superseded by more recent results. Thus, it is thought that it will produce an accurate picture depicting the actual current strength and thus rank of the nations.[3] The rankings are responsive to results and it is possible to climb to the top from the bottom (and vice versa) in fewer than 20 matches. As all matches are worth a net of 0 points for the two teams combined, there is no particular advantage to playing more matches. A rating stays the same until the team plays again. Although matches often result in points exchanges, 'predictable' results lead to very minor changes, and may result in no change to either side's rating.RulesThe system ensures that it is representative of the teams' performance despite playing differing numbers of matches per annum, and the differing strength of opposition that teams have to face. The factors taken into account are as follows:Match resultMatch statusOpposition strengthHome advantageMatch resultFor each match played points exchanges are awarded for the following five outcomes and was developed using results of international matches from 1871 to the present day: a win or loss by more than 15 pointsa win or loss by up to 15 pointsa drawMatch statusDifferent matches have different importance to teams, and World Rugby has tried to respect this by using a weighting system, where the most significant matches are in the World Cup Finals. Points exchanges are doubled during the World Cup Finals to recognise the unique importance of this event. All other full international matches are treated the same, to be as fair as possible to countries playing a different mix of friendly and competitive matches. Matches that do not have full international status do not count.Opposition strengthA win against a very highly ranked opponent is a considerably greater achievement than a win against a low-rated opponent, so the strength of the opposing team is a factor. Thus match results are more important than margins of victory in producing accurate rankings. This is because when a highly ranked team plays a lowly ranked team and manages to beat them by over 50 points, it does not necessarily indicate how either team will perform in the future.Home advantageWhen calculating points exchanges, the home side is handicapped by treating them as though they are three rating points better than their current rating. This results in the home side gaining fewer points for winning and losing more points for losing. Because of this, ideally, any advantage that a side may have by playing in front of their home crowd is cancelled out.New and dormant nationsAll new member nations start with 30.00 points, which is provisional until they have completed ten test matches. When countries merge, the new country inherits the higher rating of the two countries but when they split e.g., the 2010 breakup of the Arabian Gulf rugby union team into separate teams representing its current member countries, the new countries will inherit a rating at a fixed level below the rating of the original country.Before 1 December 2012 new member nations were given 40.00 points.Countries that have not played a test for two years are removed from the ranking system and the list. If they become active again, they resume their previous rating.***For a full explanation of how rankings are calculated, see the World Rugby rankings website.Notes and references^ "Men's World Rankings". World Rugby. Retrieved 19 November 2018..mw-parser-output cite.citationfont-style:inherit.mw-parser-output qquotes:"""""""'""'".mw-parser-output code.cs1-codecolor:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-free abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-registration abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-subscription abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registrationcolor:#555.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration spanborder-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-errordisplay:none;font-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-errorfont-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-formatfont-size:95%.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-leftpadding-left:0.2em.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-rightpadding-right:0.2em^ "England top IRB rankings, Ireland third". Times. 2003-09-09. Retrieved 2008-11-23.^ "Rankings Explanation". Archived from the original on October 5, 2007. Retrieved 2007-09-16.External linksOfficial World RankingsvteInternational rugby union competitions**_Africa**_Asia**_Europe**_North_America**_South_America**_Oceania">World RugbyAfricaAsiaEuropeNorth AmericaSouth AmericaOceaniaWorldwideMenWorld CupWorld Cup SevensSevens SeriesU20 World ChampionshipU20 TrophyWomenWorld CupWorld Cup SevensSevens SeriesMulti-sport eventsOlympic Games (7s)Asian GamesCommonwealth Games (7s)Pacific GamesPan American GamesIntercontinentalAmericas Pacific ChallengeNations CupPacific Nations CupPacific Rugby ChallengeThe Rugby ChampionshipContinentalAfricaAfrica CupAfrican Development TrophyNorth African Tri NationsRugby Africa SevensAfrican Rugby Under-19 CupAsiaAsia Rugby ChampionshipAsian Sevens SeriesAsia Rugby Under-19 ChampionshipEuropeSix NationsRugby Europe International ChampionshipsEuropean Nations CupWomen's Six NationsUnder-20 Six NationsUnder-20 ChampionshipUnder-18 ChampionshipOceaniaOceania CupOceania U20 ChampionshipAmericasSouth American Rugby ChampionshipAmericas Rugby ChampionshipRugby Americas North ChampionshipSouth American U19 ChampionshipDefunctOlympic Games (15s)World Games (7s)Churchill CupCrescent CupFour NationsPacific Rim ChampionshipPan AmericanSerendib International CupSuper CupTbilisi CupU-19 World ChampionshipU-21 World ChampionshipWomen's Nations CupIRB Women's Sevens Challenge CupWomen's international rugbyWorld Rugby RankingsWorld Rugby AwardsvteInternational rugby union teamsTier 1 teamsArgentinaAustraliaEnglandFranceIrelandItalyNew ZealandScotlandSouth AfricaWalesTier 2 teamsCanadaFijiGeorgiaJapanNamibiaPortugalRomaniaRussiaSamoaSpainTongaUnited StatesUruguayTier 3 (Development One) teamsBelgiumBrazilChileGermanyHong KongIvory CoastKenyaSouth KoreaZimbabweTier 3 (Development Two) teamsAmerican SamoaAndorraArmeniaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBarbadosBermudaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBritish Virgin IslandsBruneiBulgariaBurundiCambodiaCameroonCayman IslandsChinaChinese TaipeiColombiaCook IslandsCosta RicaCroatiaCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkEswatiniFinlandGhanaGreeceGuamGuyanaHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIsraelJamaicaKazakhstanKyrgyzstanLaosLatviaLithuaniaLuxembourgMadagascarMalaysiaMaliMaltaMauritaniaMauritiusMexicoMoldovaMonacoMongoliaMoroccoNetherlandsNigeriaNiueNorwayPakistanPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPolandRwandaSenegalSerbiaSingaporeSloveniaSolomon IslandsSri LankaSt LuciaSt Vincent and the GrenadinesSwedenSwitzerlandTahitiTanzaniaThailandTogoTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuelaZambiaFrench Rugby FederationMayotteRéunionGuadeloupeMartiniqueNew CaledoniaWallis and FutunaNot affiliated to World RugbyAlgeriaBeninBasque CountryBurkina FasoCataloniaCentral AfricaChadCongoCuraçaoDemocratic Republic of the CongoDominican RepublicEcuadorEl SalvadorEgyptEstoniaGabonGibraltarGuatemalaJordanLebanonLibyaMacauMontenegroNigerQatarSan MarinoSlovakiaSt. Kitts and NevisTurkeyTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluCombination teamsAfrican LeopardsBritish and Irish LionsPacific IslandersSouth American XVDefunct teamsArabian GulfCommonwealth of Independent StatesCzechoslovakiaEast AfricaEast GermanyNyasaland (Malawi)Soviet UnionWest GermanyYugoslaviavteSports world rankingsArcheryBadminton (junior)Beach soccerBaseball & softballBasketballmenwomenBoxingChessCricketTestODIT20ICurlingCycling (road)DartsPDCFigure skatingFloorballFootballmenElo menwomenGolfmenwomenField hockeyIce hockeyKorfballNetballRugby leagueRugby unionSnookerSquashmenwomenTable tennisTennismenwomenteamVolleyballbeachThis page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here 取得連結 Facebook X Pinterest 以電子郵件傳送 其他應用程式
How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core? 6 I added .AddJsonFile("Connections.json", optional: true, reloadOnChange: true) in public Startup(IHostingEnvironment env) Connections.json contains: "ConnectionStrings": "DefaultConnection": "Server=(localdb)\mssqllocaldb;Database=DATABASE;Trusted_Connection=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=true", "COR-W81-101": "Data Source=DATASOURCE;Initial Catalog=P61_CAFM_Basic;User Id=USERID;Password=PASSWORD;Persist Security Info=False;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Packet Size=4096;", "COR-W81-100": "Data Source=DATASOURCE;Initial Catalog=Post_PS;User Id=USERID;Password=PASSWORD;Persist Security Info=False;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Packet Size=4096;", "MSEDGEWIN10": "Data Source=DATASOURCE; Initial Catalog=COR_Basic; Persist Security Info=False;Integrated Security=true;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Packet Size=4096;Application Name="COR_Basic"", "server... 閱讀完整內容
Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3 0 I'm wondering if I can run a Node.js script in my Jekyll page from GitHub Pages or Amazon S3? I think it can't run on GitHub Pages since it doesn't support server side code. Not too sure. The code is below: var Airtable = require('airtable'); var base = new Airtable(apiKey: 'YOUR_API_KEY').base('appAnZVyYqusNPV5Q'); base('Invitee list').select( // Selecting the first 3 records in Complete list: maxRecords: 3, view: "Complete list" ).eachPage(function page(records, fetchNextPage) // This function (`page`) will get called for each page of records. records.forEach(function(record) console.log('Retrieved', record.get('Email')); ); // To fetch the next page of records, call `fetchNextPage`. // If there are more records, `page` will get called again. // If there are no more records, `done` will get called. fetchNextPage(); , function done(err) if (err) console.error(err); return; ); node.js ... 閱讀完整內容
Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto Art museum in Rovereto TN, Italy Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto Museo d'arte moderna e contemporanea di Trento e Rovereto MART, Entrance Location Corso Angelo Bettini, 43, 38068 Rovereto TN, Italy Coordinates 45°53′38″N 11°02′42″E / 45.8940°N 11.0450°E / 45.8940; 11.0450 Coordinates: 45°53′38″N 11°02′42″E / 45.8940°N 11.0450°E / 45.8940; 11.0450 Type Art museum Director Gianfranco Maraniello Public transit access Trento train station. Taxis outside station. Website mart.trento.it The Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto (MART) ( Museo d'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea di Trento e Rovereto , in Italian) is a museum centre in the Italian province of Trento. The main site is in Rovereto, and contains mostly modern and contemporary artworks, including works from renowned Giorgio Morandi, Giorgio de... 閱讀完整內容