Smaller and cheaper alternative to Arduino Uno for permanent projects









up vote
10
down vote

favorite
5












I have played a bit around with a Arduino Uno that came in a kit with a breadboard and components. Soon I would like to make some more permanent things.



I would prefer a smaller and cheaper unit than the Arduino Uno but that is almost as easy to use as the Arduino Uno, and very similar to use.



Is the Arduino Pro Mini 328 - 5V/16MHz a logical next step?
At 1/6 of the size of the Arduino Uno it is plenty small.
At 10 $ a piece the price is also good.



I understand that I must solder to get it to work. That should not be a problem.



Will I also need a USB serial board to program the unit?










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    next smaller with 328p is Nano
    – Juraj
    Nov 11 at 19:55






  • 1




    ATmega32u4 chips are also a good move (same as Leonardo) for 8-bit micro. Coding is slightly different from UNO/328p (especially with serial), but you avoid the USB/serial converter. Eventually, you can make your own PCBs and use the SMD chips, for a really compact project.
    – MichaelT
    Nov 11 at 20:06






  • 1




    Pro Mini, 5V 16MHz Module With Crystal Oscillator ($2.18CDN): aliexpress.com/item/…. PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN): aliexpress.com/item/….
    – VE7JRO
    Nov 11 at 20:12














up vote
10
down vote

favorite
5












I have played a bit around with a Arduino Uno that came in a kit with a breadboard and components. Soon I would like to make some more permanent things.



I would prefer a smaller and cheaper unit than the Arduino Uno but that is almost as easy to use as the Arduino Uno, and very similar to use.



Is the Arduino Pro Mini 328 - 5V/16MHz a logical next step?
At 1/6 of the size of the Arduino Uno it is plenty small.
At 10 $ a piece the price is also good.



I understand that I must solder to get it to work. That should not be a problem.



Will I also need a USB serial board to program the unit?










share|improve this question



















  • 2




    next smaller with 328p is Nano
    – Juraj
    Nov 11 at 19:55






  • 1




    ATmega32u4 chips are also a good move (same as Leonardo) for 8-bit micro. Coding is slightly different from UNO/328p (especially with serial), but you avoid the USB/serial converter. Eventually, you can make your own PCBs and use the SMD chips, for a really compact project.
    – MichaelT
    Nov 11 at 20:06






  • 1




    Pro Mini, 5V 16MHz Module With Crystal Oscillator ($2.18CDN): aliexpress.com/item/…. PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN): aliexpress.com/item/….
    – VE7JRO
    Nov 11 at 20:12












up vote
10
down vote

favorite
5









up vote
10
down vote

favorite
5






5





I have played a bit around with a Arduino Uno that came in a kit with a breadboard and components. Soon I would like to make some more permanent things.



I would prefer a smaller and cheaper unit than the Arduino Uno but that is almost as easy to use as the Arduino Uno, and very similar to use.



Is the Arduino Pro Mini 328 - 5V/16MHz a logical next step?
At 1/6 of the size of the Arduino Uno it is plenty small.
At 10 $ a piece the price is also good.



I understand that I must solder to get it to work. That should not be a problem.



Will I also need a USB serial board to program the unit?










share|improve this question















I have played a bit around with a Arduino Uno that came in a kit with a breadboard and components. Soon I would like to make some more permanent things.



I would prefer a smaller and cheaper unit than the Arduino Uno but that is almost as easy to use as the Arduino Uno, and very similar to use.



Is the Arduino Pro Mini 328 - 5V/16MHz a logical next step?
At 1/6 of the size of the Arduino Uno it is plenty small.
At 10 $ a piece the price is also good.



I understand that I must solder to get it to work. That should not be a problem.



Will I also need a USB serial board to program the unit?







arduino-uno






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 12 at 1:21









sa_leinad

2,13211033




2,13211033










asked Nov 11 at 19:53









Andy

15315




15315







  • 2




    next smaller with 328p is Nano
    – Juraj
    Nov 11 at 19:55






  • 1




    ATmega32u4 chips are also a good move (same as Leonardo) for 8-bit micro. Coding is slightly different from UNO/328p (especially with serial), but you avoid the USB/serial converter. Eventually, you can make your own PCBs and use the SMD chips, for a really compact project.
    – MichaelT
    Nov 11 at 20:06






  • 1




    Pro Mini, 5V 16MHz Module With Crystal Oscillator ($2.18CDN): aliexpress.com/item/…. PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN): aliexpress.com/item/….
    – VE7JRO
    Nov 11 at 20:12












  • 2




    next smaller with 328p is Nano
    – Juraj
    Nov 11 at 19:55






  • 1




    ATmega32u4 chips are also a good move (same as Leonardo) for 8-bit micro. Coding is slightly different from UNO/328p (especially with serial), but you avoid the USB/serial converter. Eventually, you can make your own PCBs and use the SMD chips, for a really compact project.
    – MichaelT
    Nov 11 at 20:06






  • 1




    Pro Mini, 5V 16MHz Module With Crystal Oscillator ($2.18CDN): aliexpress.com/item/…. PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN): aliexpress.com/item/….
    – VE7JRO
    Nov 11 at 20:12







2




2




next smaller with 328p is Nano
– Juraj
Nov 11 at 19:55




next smaller with 328p is Nano
– Juraj
Nov 11 at 19:55




1




1




ATmega32u4 chips are also a good move (same as Leonardo) for 8-bit micro. Coding is slightly different from UNO/328p (especially with serial), but you avoid the USB/serial converter. Eventually, you can make your own PCBs and use the SMD chips, for a really compact project.
– MichaelT
Nov 11 at 20:06




ATmega32u4 chips are also a good move (same as Leonardo) for 8-bit micro. Coding is slightly different from UNO/328p (especially with serial), but you avoid the USB/serial converter. Eventually, you can make your own PCBs and use the SMD chips, for a really compact project.
– MichaelT
Nov 11 at 20:06




1




1




Pro Mini, 5V 16MHz Module With Crystal Oscillator ($2.18CDN): aliexpress.com/item/…. PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN): aliexpress.com/item/….
– VE7JRO
Nov 11 at 20:12




Pro Mini, 5V 16MHz Module With Crystal Oscillator ($2.18CDN): aliexpress.com/item/…. PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN): aliexpress.com/item/….
– VE7JRO
Nov 11 at 20:12










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote



accepted










I think the first best choice is to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip from your Arduino UNO and incorporate it into your final circuit.
The chips are only about $1.50.



That way, you can just use your UNO as a programmer instead of the final device that you deploy.



I'm not sure why there isn't more documentation about the proper way to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip and using it on your breadboard, after completing your programming.



I explain exactly how to do this on my blog: http://raddev.us/arduino/post/2018/07/03/arduino-uno-using-your-atmega328p-u-as-stand-alone



But, here are the basics.
First you remove the chip. It will look like the following after you do so. (Note: I'm using the Elegoo clone of an UNO).



atmega328p-pu chip removed



Next, you apply power to pin 7 and connect pin 8 to GND.



Need A 16MHz Crystal



But, the chip won't seem to run your sketch at this point.
That's because you actually need a crystal to run at 16MHz.



The UNO board has that chip installed and that is why it works.
You can see it here:



16MHz crystal on UNO



Finally you add the 16MHz crystal and a couple of 22pF caps and your chip will run standalone (no UNO).



You add the crystal to pins 9 & 10. You can see all the details by reading my blog entry or reading the atmega328 datasheet.



crystal on breadboard



Finally, Just Wire Everything Else Up



After that, just wire the rest of your circuit up to the proper pins and you can run your ATMega328p-pu standalone.



It's actually a nice learning experience too.

Just buy replacement atmega328p-pu chips for your UNO and you can create all the projects you want to for very cheap.






share|improve this answer


















  • 2




    You'd be well served to add some circuit protection in there, since the 328p doesn't have any of it's own. Otherwise, this is a great way to go.
    – SnakeDoc
    Nov 12 at 18:09










  • @SnakeDoc Thanks. And, I agree, any circuit protection is always advantageous. An interesting note: I had a circuit built on a cheap breadboard like the one shown, powered off an old phone charger and sitting on a shelf in my garage and running for over two years with no problems. We even had a lightning strike that took out another item in the garage but my atmega328p-pu based circuit (bluetooth garage door opener) kept on running. Of course, I'm not advising people to build circuits like that but it is really cool that as a hobbyist we can do things like this.
    – raddevus
    Nov 12 at 18:18






  • 1




    @duskwuff, I believe that is only when you're doing DAC. This is just a simple example to get someone started in the direction of using the chip as standalone. I assure you the code to blink the LED in the sample does run. Also, when I was starting out I created the circuit I mentioned in a comment above and I never connected AVCC and GND and the circuit ran for two years. Of course, i'm not saying that will always be true. Just mentioning the way the chip actually works. As always, check the datasheet for exact specs and especially if you experience something different. Thanks.
    – raddevus
    Nov 12 at 18:41






  • 1




    @raddevus Refer to Table 28.8 in the datasheet: "AVCC absolute min/max: 1.8V/5.5V". Leaving AVCC unpowered is out of spec, and may cause damage. The GND pin on pin 22 isn't specifically associated with the ADC, and must be connected to GND.
    – duskwuff
    Nov 12 at 18:55






  • 1




    @duskwuff Thanks for the enlightening discussion. I agree with what you are saying and will change my docs and circuits soon to insure that is always connected. FYI - I started working with ATMega328p-pu via the fantastic book AVR Programming : Learning to Write Software For Hardware (amzn.to/2PS9OOA) and in those first circuits the author, Elliott Williams, does not hook up those pins either. I think I was influenced by that. The book really is great though and the author is knowledgeable. Thanks again, great discussion.
    – raddevus
    Nov 12 at 20:45

















up vote
7
down vote













Check the STM32F103C8T6 development board, cost about $ 1.5, and is faster/has more memory than the Arduino Uno, and is much smaller.



It can work with the Arduino IDE, but not all libraries are supported, so check before you want to use it if your used libraries are supported, or if there are different libraries you can use instead.



Update



Differences:



 Arduino Uno STM32F103C8T6 Mini Dev Board

MicroController Atmega328P Cortex M3
MIPS/MHz 1 1.25
Operating Voltage [V] 5 3.3, most pins 5V tolerant
Input Voltage [V] 7-12 USB only
Input Voltage (limit) [V] 6-20 (USB)
Digital I/O Pins 16 37
From them:PWM Digital I/O Pins 6 12
Analog Input Pins 6 10
DC Current per I/O Pin [mA] 20 ?
DC Current for 3.3V Pin [mA] 50 ?
Flash [KB} 32 64
SRAM [KB] 2 20
EEPROM [KB] 1 -
Clock Speed [MHz] 16 72

I2C 1 2
SPI 1 2 (18 MBit/s)
UART 1 3
CAN 0 1
USB 0 USB 2.0 FS 12 MBit
DMA 0 7 channels (ATsP, SPI, I2C, USART)
RTC 0 1
CRC 0 1
Unique ID 0 1

Programmed by USB SWD Debug (around $5)

IDE Arduino IDE Arduino IDE, CubeMX, ...
Libraries Many Limited

Dimensions [mm] 68.6 x 53.4 53 x 22
Weight [g] 25 ?
Price (cheapest) [$] 2.50 1.50


Note: as written earlier, despite the mostly better specs, not all libraries are supported. Also a programmer need to be bought (only once, cost about $5).






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    You can also avoid getting the programmer if you get the Maple Mini clones (same uC, almost same HW, but with a bootloader already flashed)
    – frarugi87
    Nov 12 at 8:44






  • 1




    @frarugi87 Or you can use the builtin UART bootloader (activated by setting BOOT0 high) for initial programming.
    – duskwuff
    Nov 12 at 18:34










  • The STM32F103C8T6 is a great part. But it still is only 3.3v. It isn't a drop in replacement for the Uno. Try to connect it to a 5v character LCD and you will have problems, if it works at all. (the LCD)
    – Rudy
    Nov 13 at 0:47

















up vote
4
down vote













For my product, I went from an Arduino Uno:



Arduino Uno R3



to the Arduino Pro Mini:



Arduino Pro Mini



Yes you will need a FTDI cable for programming and serial coms to the PC, but providing you don't need coms all the time, you will only need the one cable to upload the program to each device. They can be found pretty cheap too.



However I notice that the Arduino Pro Mini is retired now, so it may be a bit harder to source (it is still available on AliExpress). So for this reason, I suggest that you instead try the Arduino Nano:



Arduino Nano



which has the added advantage of onboard USB, meaning you no longer need the FTDI cable for programming or coms.



The ATMega328P that is the processor of these 3 boards does not have native USB, which means that the board also needs to include the FTDI FT232RL IC that is used in the FTDI cable. Having this IC can add additional costs to your bottom line.



For a few dollars cheaper per device, you can use a microcontroller (such as the ATMega32U4) that has native USB coms (and hence you save on the FTDI IC). One such product is the Arduino Micro:



Arduino Micro



All of these boards mentioned are native within the Arduino Ecosystem and (apart from the retired Pro Mini) should be easy to source online or at your local electronics shop. Your Arduino Uno program will work for all of these alternatives - you just have to change the board in the Arduino IDE:



Arduino Board Selection



There is one more board that I would like to mention - the DigiSpark:



Digispark



It is only suitable for smaller programs, is limited in some of its features and is not an oficial Arduino board. Having said that, there is plenty of Arduino support - and its cheap!






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    If you want to stick with using Arduino and it's toolchain, you can order just a bare ATmega 328p (the microcontroller at the heart of the Arduino Uno) and use it by itself!



    They're fairly low cost ($1.50-$3.00 range) and are breadboard friendly. For a more permanent solution, you can solder them into a proto-board (perfboard), or even a custom designed circuit board once your design gets to that level.



    Here's an excellent guide from the Arduino folks about setting up an Arduino on a breadboard, using only raw components such as the ATmega 328p. This design uses an external 16MHz clock crystal, just like an Arduino Uno.



    If you're OK with using the internal 8MHz clock onboard the 328p, you can do away with most of the extra components and just run the raw chip like in this guide (using the Arduino Lilypad Bootloader instead of the default Arduino bootloader). This will save even more money!



    Either way, you'll need an AVR Programmer unit, since there is no USB port built into the 328p. This will be the most expensive part of this setup, but good news is you only need one, and it can program any 328p's you need. They can also be used to program non-standard chips that are capable of being programmed over Serial Tx/Rx pins, such as the ESP chips (you just hand-wire them). Very useful to have one of these if you're serious about these types of microcontrollers.



    ATmega 328p Microcontroller Chip



    ATMega Pin Stickers



    Perfboard



    AVR Programmer






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      If you order your ATMEGA328P-PU with the boot loader already installed: ebay.ca/itm/…, then a PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN) will work to upload "code": aliexpress.com/item/…
      – VE7JRO
      Nov 12 at 0:10










    • I always found it odd that Arduino uses a special bootloader for programming instead of using the built-in programming interface.
      – immibis
      Nov 12 at 1:57










    • @immibis not sure what you mean exactly, but the arduino bootloaders do a lot of things that make working with the arduino's (and Atmel chips) a lot easier, including resetting of pins, switching to external clock, handing-off to your code, etc. Without it, you'd essentially need to write your own... which would be a waste of time since for majority of cases, the stock Arduino bootloader does everything you want anyway.
      – SnakeDoc
      Nov 12 at 7:43






    • 1




      @immibis I think it is much easier to have a serial port interface rather than a programmer interface from the PC. Moreover, especially at the beginning, I think (personal opinion) that they wanted a complete system on a board, and integrating a programmer on the PCB was much harder than writing a serial bootloader. Consider that the first arduino boards had a serial port (Arduino RS232), so only one programmer was needed to program a lot of them (they were used at school)
      – frarugi87
      Nov 12 at 16:46






    • 1




      @frarugi87 that's probably true, but for real beginners, plugging in a USB cable and using the Arduino IDE to upload "sketches" is about as easy as it can be. I think they made the right move to make it super accessible, especially for those who have zero microcontroller experience.
      – SnakeDoc
      Nov 12 at 17:37


















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    I like the Nano and the Pro Mini. I like to work with it on a breadboard with other modules. If there is more circuitry involved I found it much more convenient than using an Uno. There are faster processors but for a lot of projects the 16Mhz 328 is more than sufficient. And like the Uno, these two are 5 volt powered parts. Sometimes what you need to connect to doesn't work well with 3.3 volt processors.



    The Pro Mini and the Nano with easily be soldered into 0.1" spaced "Veroboard" (or equivalent) If you don't mind buying cloned parts, the cost of a Nano and Pro Mini is only a couple of dollars. Buying parts off Aliexpress, or even Ebay, can save you a lot, as long as you are patient when it comes to delivery.



    The module that I am now use most often is the ESP8266. It is a powerful WiFi platform that only costs a few dollars and has quite a mature Arduino framework. Often I use this as the only processor in the design. I have even used it as the basis for a data logger and completely ignored the WiFi capability. 20x4 character LCD, current/voltage measurement chip (INA219), and a SD memory card, powered by a 18650 lithium battery.



    There are lots of good inexpensive options.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3




      you might want to point out that ESP12 modules do NOT have .1" pin spacing, which is a bit of a nuisance. There are inexpensive breakout boards, but these are quite wide and hard to use with solderless breadboards. Other than that, they're pretty handy. For about $1 more than a bare ESP12 module you can get a Wemos D1 mini (clone) that is about as easy to use as an Arduino Pro Mini or Nano.
      – Llaves
      Nov 11 at 21:58










    • Where did I say to use the ESP-12? I didn't go into a lot of detail on the ESP8266 because that really wasn't the focus of the question. I thought it was worth mentioning since a lot of people are not familiar with it. I totally support people using the Wemos D1 mini platform. It is a ready to go solution unlike ESP01, ESP12, etc. USB to serial and an onboard regulator makes a big difference. But I still feel the Nano or the Pro Mini is the most appropriate answer for the person who asked the question.
      – Rudy
      Nov 12 at 23:40

















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Arduino Pro Micro clones are super cheap and all you need to program them is a normal micro USB cable. You will probably have to solder the headers to do anything useful. They are available in a 3.3V/8MHz and a 5V/16Mhz version.



    Pro Micro






    share|improve this answer






















    • ProMicro has a 3.3v processor. That can be a problem with some designs. It isn't a drop in replacement for an Uno. But it is an interesting part.
      – Rudy
      Nov 13 at 0:35






    • 1




      No, just as with the Pro Mini there is a 5V/16MHz and a 3.3V/8MHz version.
      – AndreKR
      Nov 13 at 6:07










    • Sorry then, my mistake.
      – Rudy
      Nov 14 at 12:25










    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
    StackExchange.schematics.init();
    );
    , "cicuitlab");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "540"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2farduino.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57724%2fsmaller-and-cheaper-alternative-to-arduino-uno-for-permanent-projects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes








    6 Answers
    6






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    6
    down vote



    accepted










    I think the first best choice is to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip from your Arduino UNO and incorporate it into your final circuit.
    The chips are only about $1.50.



    That way, you can just use your UNO as a programmer instead of the final device that you deploy.



    I'm not sure why there isn't more documentation about the proper way to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip and using it on your breadboard, after completing your programming.



    I explain exactly how to do this on my blog: http://raddev.us/arduino/post/2018/07/03/arduino-uno-using-your-atmega328p-u-as-stand-alone



    But, here are the basics.
    First you remove the chip. It will look like the following after you do so. (Note: I'm using the Elegoo clone of an UNO).



    atmega328p-pu chip removed



    Next, you apply power to pin 7 and connect pin 8 to GND.



    Need A 16MHz Crystal



    But, the chip won't seem to run your sketch at this point.
    That's because you actually need a crystal to run at 16MHz.



    The UNO board has that chip installed and that is why it works.
    You can see it here:



    16MHz crystal on UNO



    Finally you add the 16MHz crystal and a couple of 22pF caps and your chip will run standalone (no UNO).



    You add the crystal to pins 9 & 10. You can see all the details by reading my blog entry or reading the atmega328 datasheet.



    crystal on breadboard



    Finally, Just Wire Everything Else Up



    After that, just wire the rest of your circuit up to the proper pins and you can run your ATMega328p-pu standalone.



    It's actually a nice learning experience too.

    Just buy replacement atmega328p-pu chips for your UNO and you can create all the projects you want to for very cheap.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2




      You'd be well served to add some circuit protection in there, since the 328p doesn't have any of it's own. Otherwise, this is a great way to go.
      – SnakeDoc
      Nov 12 at 18:09










    • @SnakeDoc Thanks. And, I agree, any circuit protection is always advantageous. An interesting note: I had a circuit built on a cheap breadboard like the one shown, powered off an old phone charger and sitting on a shelf in my garage and running for over two years with no problems. We even had a lightning strike that took out another item in the garage but my atmega328p-pu based circuit (bluetooth garage door opener) kept on running. Of course, I'm not advising people to build circuits like that but it is really cool that as a hobbyist we can do things like this.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 18:18






    • 1




      @duskwuff, I believe that is only when you're doing DAC. This is just a simple example to get someone started in the direction of using the chip as standalone. I assure you the code to blink the LED in the sample does run. Also, when I was starting out I created the circuit I mentioned in a comment above and I never connected AVCC and GND and the circuit ran for two years. Of course, i'm not saying that will always be true. Just mentioning the way the chip actually works. As always, check the datasheet for exact specs and especially if you experience something different. Thanks.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 18:41






    • 1




      @raddevus Refer to Table 28.8 in the datasheet: "AVCC absolute min/max: 1.8V/5.5V". Leaving AVCC unpowered is out of spec, and may cause damage. The GND pin on pin 22 isn't specifically associated with the ADC, and must be connected to GND.
      – duskwuff
      Nov 12 at 18:55






    • 1




      @duskwuff Thanks for the enlightening discussion. I agree with what you are saying and will change my docs and circuits soon to insure that is always connected. FYI - I started working with ATMega328p-pu via the fantastic book AVR Programming : Learning to Write Software For Hardware (amzn.to/2PS9OOA) and in those first circuits the author, Elliott Williams, does not hook up those pins either. I think I was influenced by that. The book really is great though and the author is knowledgeable. Thanks again, great discussion.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 20:45














    up vote
    6
    down vote



    accepted










    I think the first best choice is to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip from your Arduino UNO and incorporate it into your final circuit.
    The chips are only about $1.50.



    That way, you can just use your UNO as a programmer instead of the final device that you deploy.



    I'm not sure why there isn't more documentation about the proper way to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip and using it on your breadboard, after completing your programming.



    I explain exactly how to do this on my blog: http://raddev.us/arduino/post/2018/07/03/arduino-uno-using-your-atmega328p-u-as-stand-alone



    But, here are the basics.
    First you remove the chip. It will look like the following after you do so. (Note: I'm using the Elegoo clone of an UNO).



    atmega328p-pu chip removed



    Next, you apply power to pin 7 and connect pin 8 to GND.



    Need A 16MHz Crystal



    But, the chip won't seem to run your sketch at this point.
    That's because you actually need a crystal to run at 16MHz.



    The UNO board has that chip installed and that is why it works.
    You can see it here:



    16MHz crystal on UNO



    Finally you add the 16MHz crystal and a couple of 22pF caps and your chip will run standalone (no UNO).



    You add the crystal to pins 9 & 10. You can see all the details by reading my blog entry or reading the atmega328 datasheet.



    crystal on breadboard



    Finally, Just Wire Everything Else Up



    After that, just wire the rest of your circuit up to the proper pins and you can run your ATMega328p-pu standalone.



    It's actually a nice learning experience too.

    Just buy replacement atmega328p-pu chips for your UNO and you can create all the projects you want to for very cheap.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 2




      You'd be well served to add some circuit protection in there, since the 328p doesn't have any of it's own. Otherwise, this is a great way to go.
      – SnakeDoc
      Nov 12 at 18:09










    • @SnakeDoc Thanks. And, I agree, any circuit protection is always advantageous. An interesting note: I had a circuit built on a cheap breadboard like the one shown, powered off an old phone charger and sitting on a shelf in my garage and running for over two years with no problems. We even had a lightning strike that took out another item in the garage but my atmega328p-pu based circuit (bluetooth garage door opener) kept on running. Of course, I'm not advising people to build circuits like that but it is really cool that as a hobbyist we can do things like this.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 18:18






    • 1




      @duskwuff, I believe that is only when you're doing DAC. This is just a simple example to get someone started in the direction of using the chip as standalone. I assure you the code to blink the LED in the sample does run. Also, when I was starting out I created the circuit I mentioned in a comment above and I never connected AVCC and GND and the circuit ran for two years. Of course, i'm not saying that will always be true. Just mentioning the way the chip actually works. As always, check the datasheet for exact specs and especially if you experience something different. Thanks.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 18:41






    • 1




      @raddevus Refer to Table 28.8 in the datasheet: "AVCC absolute min/max: 1.8V/5.5V". Leaving AVCC unpowered is out of spec, and may cause damage. The GND pin on pin 22 isn't specifically associated with the ADC, and must be connected to GND.
      – duskwuff
      Nov 12 at 18:55






    • 1




      @duskwuff Thanks for the enlightening discussion. I agree with what you are saying and will change my docs and circuits soon to insure that is always connected. FYI - I started working with ATMega328p-pu via the fantastic book AVR Programming : Learning to Write Software For Hardware (amzn.to/2PS9OOA) and in those first circuits the author, Elliott Williams, does not hook up those pins either. I think I was influenced by that. The book really is great though and the author is knowledgeable. Thanks again, great discussion.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 20:45












    up vote
    6
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    6
    down vote



    accepted






    I think the first best choice is to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip from your Arduino UNO and incorporate it into your final circuit.
    The chips are only about $1.50.



    That way, you can just use your UNO as a programmer instead of the final device that you deploy.



    I'm not sure why there isn't more documentation about the proper way to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip and using it on your breadboard, after completing your programming.



    I explain exactly how to do this on my blog: http://raddev.us/arduino/post/2018/07/03/arduino-uno-using-your-atmega328p-u-as-stand-alone



    But, here are the basics.
    First you remove the chip. It will look like the following after you do so. (Note: I'm using the Elegoo clone of an UNO).



    atmega328p-pu chip removed



    Next, you apply power to pin 7 and connect pin 8 to GND.



    Need A 16MHz Crystal



    But, the chip won't seem to run your sketch at this point.
    That's because you actually need a crystal to run at 16MHz.



    The UNO board has that chip installed and that is why it works.
    You can see it here:



    16MHz crystal on UNO



    Finally you add the 16MHz crystal and a couple of 22pF caps and your chip will run standalone (no UNO).



    You add the crystal to pins 9 & 10. You can see all the details by reading my blog entry or reading the atmega328 datasheet.



    crystal on breadboard



    Finally, Just Wire Everything Else Up



    After that, just wire the rest of your circuit up to the proper pins and you can run your ATMega328p-pu standalone.



    It's actually a nice learning experience too.

    Just buy replacement atmega328p-pu chips for your UNO and you can create all the projects you want to for very cheap.






    share|improve this answer














    I think the first best choice is to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip from your Arduino UNO and incorporate it into your final circuit.
    The chips are only about $1.50.



    That way, you can just use your UNO as a programmer instead of the final device that you deploy.



    I'm not sure why there isn't more documentation about the proper way to remove the ATMega328p-pu chip and using it on your breadboard, after completing your programming.



    I explain exactly how to do this on my blog: http://raddev.us/arduino/post/2018/07/03/arduino-uno-using-your-atmega328p-u-as-stand-alone



    But, here are the basics.
    First you remove the chip. It will look like the following after you do so. (Note: I'm using the Elegoo clone of an UNO).



    atmega328p-pu chip removed



    Next, you apply power to pin 7 and connect pin 8 to GND.



    Need A 16MHz Crystal



    But, the chip won't seem to run your sketch at this point.
    That's because you actually need a crystal to run at 16MHz.



    The UNO board has that chip installed and that is why it works.
    You can see it here:



    16MHz crystal on UNO



    Finally you add the 16MHz crystal and a couple of 22pF caps and your chip will run standalone (no UNO).



    You add the crystal to pins 9 & 10. You can see all the details by reading my blog entry or reading the atmega328 datasheet.



    crystal on breadboard



    Finally, Just Wire Everything Else Up



    After that, just wire the rest of your circuit up to the proper pins and you can run your ATMega328p-pu standalone.



    It's actually a nice learning experience too.

    Just buy replacement atmega328p-pu chips for your UNO and you can create all the projects you want to for very cheap.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 12 at 18:47

























    answered Nov 12 at 15:12









    raddevus

    20318




    20318







    • 2




      You'd be well served to add some circuit protection in there, since the 328p doesn't have any of it's own. Otherwise, this is a great way to go.
      – SnakeDoc
      Nov 12 at 18:09










    • @SnakeDoc Thanks. And, I agree, any circuit protection is always advantageous. An interesting note: I had a circuit built on a cheap breadboard like the one shown, powered off an old phone charger and sitting on a shelf in my garage and running for over two years with no problems. We even had a lightning strike that took out another item in the garage but my atmega328p-pu based circuit (bluetooth garage door opener) kept on running. Of course, I'm not advising people to build circuits like that but it is really cool that as a hobbyist we can do things like this.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 18:18






    • 1




      @duskwuff, I believe that is only when you're doing DAC. This is just a simple example to get someone started in the direction of using the chip as standalone. I assure you the code to blink the LED in the sample does run. Also, when I was starting out I created the circuit I mentioned in a comment above and I never connected AVCC and GND and the circuit ran for two years. Of course, i'm not saying that will always be true. Just mentioning the way the chip actually works. As always, check the datasheet for exact specs and especially if you experience something different. Thanks.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 18:41






    • 1




      @raddevus Refer to Table 28.8 in the datasheet: "AVCC absolute min/max: 1.8V/5.5V". Leaving AVCC unpowered is out of spec, and may cause damage. The GND pin on pin 22 isn't specifically associated with the ADC, and must be connected to GND.
      – duskwuff
      Nov 12 at 18:55






    • 1




      @duskwuff Thanks for the enlightening discussion. I agree with what you are saying and will change my docs and circuits soon to insure that is always connected. FYI - I started working with ATMega328p-pu via the fantastic book AVR Programming : Learning to Write Software For Hardware (amzn.to/2PS9OOA) and in those first circuits the author, Elliott Williams, does not hook up those pins either. I think I was influenced by that. The book really is great though and the author is knowledgeable. Thanks again, great discussion.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 20:45












    • 2




      You'd be well served to add some circuit protection in there, since the 328p doesn't have any of it's own. Otherwise, this is a great way to go.
      – SnakeDoc
      Nov 12 at 18:09










    • @SnakeDoc Thanks. And, I agree, any circuit protection is always advantageous. An interesting note: I had a circuit built on a cheap breadboard like the one shown, powered off an old phone charger and sitting on a shelf in my garage and running for over two years with no problems. We even had a lightning strike that took out another item in the garage but my atmega328p-pu based circuit (bluetooth garage door opener) kept on running. Of course, I'm not advising people to build circuits like that but it is really cool that as a hobbyist we can do things like this.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 18:18






    • 1




      @duskwuff, I believe that is only when you're doing DAC. This is just a simple example to get someone started in the direction of using the chip as standalone. I assure you the code to blink the LED in the sample does run. Also, when I was starting out I created the circuit I mentioned in a comment above and I never connected AVCC and GND and the circuit ran for two years. Of course, i'm not saying that will always be true. Just mentioning the way the chip actually works. As always, check the datasheet for exact specs and especially if you experience something different. Thanks.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 18:41






    • 1




      @raddevus Refer to Table 28.8 in the datasheet: "AVCC absolute min/max: 1.8V/5.5V". Leaving AVCC unpowered is out of spec, and may cause damage. The GND pin on pin 22 isn't specifically associated with the ADC, and must be connected to GND.
      – duskwuff
      Nov 12 at 18:55






    • 1




      @duskwuff Thanks for the enlightening discussion. I agree with what you are saying and will change my docs and circuits soon to insure that is always connected. FYI - I started working with ATMega328p-pu via the fantastic book AVR Programming : Learning to Write Software For Hardware (amzn.to/2PS9OOA) and in those first circuits the author, Elliott Williams, does not hook up those pins either. I think I was influenced by that. The book really is great though and the author is knowledgeable. Thanks again, great discussion.
      – raddevus
      Nov 12 at 20:45







    2




    2




    You'd be well served to add some circuit protection in there, since the 328p doesn't have any of it's own. Otherwise, this is a great way to go.
    – SnakeDoc
    Nov 12 at 18:09




    You'd be well served to add some circuit protection in there, since the 328p doesn't have any of it's own. Otherwise, this is a great way to go.
    – SnakeDoc
    Nov 12 at 18:09












    @SnakeDoc Thanks. And, I agree, any circuit protection is always advantageous. An interesting note: I had a circuit built on a cheap breadboard like the one shown, powered off an old phone charger and sitting on a shelf in my garage and running for over two years with no problems. We even had a lightning strike that took out another item in the garage but my atmega328p-pu based circuit (bluetooth garage door opener) kept on running. Of course, I'm not advising people to build circuits like that but it is really cool that as a hobbyist we can do things like this.
    – raddevus
    Nov 12 at 18:18




    @SnakeDoc Thanks. And, I agree, any circuit protection is always advantageous. An interesting note: I had a circuit built on a cheap breadboard like the one shown, powered off an old phone charger and sitting on a shelf in my garage and running for over two years with no problems. We even had a lightning strike that took out another item in the garage but my atmega328p-pu based circuit (bluetooth garage door opener) kept on running. Of course, I'm not advising people to build circuits like that but it is really cool that as a hobbyist we can do things like this.
    – raddevus
    Nov 12 at 18:18




    1




    1




    @duskwuff, I believe that is only when you're doing DAC. This is just a simple example to get someone started in the direction of using the chip as standalone. I assure you the code to blink the LED in the sample does run. Also, when I was starting out I created the circuit I mentioned in a comment above and I never connected AVCC and GND and the circuit ran for two years. Of course, i'm not saying that will always be true. Just mentioning the way the chip actually works. As always, check the datasheet for exact specs and especially if you experience something different. Thanks.
    – raddevus
    Nov 12 at 18:41




    @duskwuff, I believe that is only when you're doing DAC. This is just a simple example to get someone started in the direction of using the chip as standalone. I assure you the code to blink the LED in the sample does run. Also, when I was starting out I created the circuit I mentioned in a comment above and I never connected AVCC and GND and the circuit ran for two years. Of course, i'm not saying that will always be true. Just mentioning the way the chip actually works. As always, check the datasheet for exact specs and especially if you experience something different. Thanks.
    – raddevus
    Nov 12 at 18:41




    1




    1




    @raddevus Refer to Table 28.8 in the datasheet: "AVCC absolute min/max: 1.8V/5.5V". Leaving AVCC unpowered is out of spec, and may cause damage. The GND pin on pin 22 isn't specifically associated with the ADC, and must be connected to GND.
    – duskwuff
    Nov 12 at 18:55




    @raddevus Refer to Table 28.8 in the datasheet: "AVCC absolute min/max: 1.8V/5.5V". Leaving AVCC unpowered is out of spec, and may cause damage. The GND pin on pin 22 isn't specifically associated with the ADC, and must be connected to GND.
    – duskwuff
    Nov 12 at 18:55




    1




    1




    @duskwuff Thanks for the enlightening discussion. I agree with what you are saying and will change my docs and circuits soon to insure that is always connected. FYI - I started working with ATMega328p-pu via the fantastic book AVR Programming : Learning to Write Software For Hardware (amzn.to/2PS9OOA) and in those first circuits the author, Elliott Williams, does not hook up those pins either. I think I was influenced by that. The book really is great though and the author is knowledgeable. Thanks again, great discussion.
    – raddevus
    Nov 12 at 20:45




    @duskwuff Thanks for the enlightening discussion. I agree with what you are saying and will change my docs and circuits soon to insure that is always connected. FYI - I started working with ATMega328p-pu via the fantastic book AVR Programming : Learning to Write Software For Hardware (amzn.to/2PS9OOA) and in those first circuits the author, Elliott Williams, does not hook up those pins either. I think I was influenced by that. The book really is great though and the author is knowledgeable. Thanks again, great discussion.
    – raddevus
    Nov 12 at 20:45










    up vote
    7
    down vote













    Check the STM32F103C8T6 development board, cost about $ 1.5, and is faster/has more memory than the Arduino Uno, and is much smaller.



    It can work with the Arduino IDE, but not all libraries are supported, so check before you want to use it if your used libraries are supported, or if there are different libraries you can use instead.



    Update



    Differences:



     Arduino Uno STM32F103C8T6 Mini Dev Board

    MicroController Atmega328P Cortex M3
    MIPS/MHz 1 1.25
    Operating Voltage [V] 5 3.3, most pins 5V tolerant
    Input Voltage [V] 7-12 USB only
    Input Voltage (limit) [V] 6-20 (USB)
    Digital I/O Pins 16 37
    From them:PWM Digital I/O Pins 6 12
    Analog Input Pins 6 10
    DC Current per I/O Pin [mA] 20 ?
    DC Current for 3.3V Pin [mA] 50 ?
    Flash [KB} 32 64
    SRAM [KB] 2 20
    EEPROM [KB] 1 -
    Clock Speed [MHz] 16 72

    I2C 1 2
    SPI 1 2 (18 MBit/s)
    UART 1 3
    CAN 0 1
    USB 0 USB 2.0 FS 12 MBit
    DMA 0 7 channels (ATsP, SPI, I2C, USART)
    RTC 0 1
    CRC 0 1
    Unique ID 0 1

    Programmed by USB SWD Debug (around $5)

    IDE Arduino IDE Arduino IDE, CubeMX, ...
    Libraries Many Limited

    Dimensions [mm] 68.6 x 53.4 53 x 22
    Weight [g] 25 ?
    Price (cheapest) [$] 2.50 1.50


    Note: as written earlier, despite the mostly better specs, not all libraries are supported. Also a programmer need to be bought (only once, cost about $5).






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      You can also avoid getting the programmer if you get the Maple Mini clones (same uC, almost same HW, but with a bootloader already flashed)
      – frarugi87
      Nov 12 at 8:44






    • 1




      @frarugi87 Or you can use the builtin UART bootloader (activated by setting BOOT0 high) for initial programming.
      – duskwuff
      Nov 12 at 18:34










    • The STM32F103C8T6 is a great part. But it still is only 3.3v. It isn't a drop in replacement for the Uno. Try to connect it to a 5v character LCD and you will have problems, if it works at all. (the LCD)
      – Rudy
      Nov 13 at 0:47














    up vote
    7
    down vote













    Check the STM32F103C8T6 development board, cost about $ 1.5, and is faster/has more memory than the Arduino Uno, and is much smaller.



    It can work with the Arduino IDE, but not all libraries are supported, so check before you want to use it if your used libraries are supported, or if there are different libraries you can use instead.



    Update



    Differences:



     Arduino Uno STM32F103C8T6 Mini Dev Board

    MicroController Atmega328P Cortex M3
    MIPS/MHz 1 1.25
    Operating Voltage [V] 5 3.3, most pins 5V tolerant
    Input Voltage [V] 7-12 USB only
    Input Voltage (limit) [V] 6-20 (USB)
    Digital I/O Pins 16 37
    From them:PWM Digital I/O Pins 6 12
    Analog Input Pins 6 10
    DC Current per I/O Pin [mA] 20 ?
    DC Current for 3.3V Pin [mA] 50 ?
    Flash [KB} 32 64
    SRAM [KB] 2 20
    EEPROM [KB] 1 -
    Clock Speed [MHz] 16 72

    I2C 1 2
    SPI 1 2 (18 MBit/s)
    UART 1 3
    CAN 0 1
    USB 0 USB 2.0 FS 12 MBit
    DMA 0 7 channels (ATsP, SPI, I2C, USART)
    RTC 0 1
    CRC 0 1
    Unique ID 0 1

    Programmed by USB SWD Debug (around $5)

    IDE Arduino IDE Arduino IDE, CubeMX, ...
    Libraries Many Limited

    Dimensions [mm] 68.6 x 53.4 53 x 22
    Weight [g] 25 ?
    Price (cheapest) [$] 2.50 1.50


    Note: as written earlier, despite the mostly better specs, not all libraries are supported. Also a programmer need to be bought (only once, cost about $5).






    share|improve this answer


















    • 1




      You can also avoid getting the programmer if you get the Maple Mini clones (same uC, almost same HW, but with a bootloader already flashed)
      – frarugi87
      Nov 12 at 8:44






    • 1




      @frarugi87 Or you can use the builtin UART bootloader (activated by setting BOOT0 high) for initial programming.
      – duskwuff
      Nov 12 at 18:34










    • The STM32F103C8T6 is a great part. But it still is only 3.3v. It isn't a drop in replacement for the Uno. Try to connect it to a 5v character LCD and you will have problems, if it works at all. (the LCD)
      – Rudy
      Nov 13 at 0:47












    up vote
    7
    down vote










    up vote
    7
    down vote









    Check the STM32F103C8T6 development board, cost about $ 1.5, and is faster/has more memory than the Arduino Uno, and is much smaller.



    It can work with the Arduino IDE, but not all libraries are supported, so check before you want to use it if your used libraries are supported, or if there are different libraries you can use instead.



    Update



    Differences:



     Arduino Uno STM32F103C8T6 Mini Dev Board

    MicroController Atmega328P Cortex M3
    MIPS/MHz 1 1.25
    Operating Voltage [V] 5 3.3, most pins 5V tolerant
    Input Voltage [V] 7-12 USB only
    Input Voltage (limit) [V] 6-20 (USB)
    Digital I/O Pins 16 37
    From them:PWM Digital I/O Pins 6 12
    Analog Input Pins 6 10
    DC Current per I/O Pin [mA] 20 ?
    DC Current for 3.3V Pin [mA] 50 ?
    Flash [KB} 32 64
    SRAM [KB] 2 20
    EEPROM [KB] 1 -
    Clock Speed [MHz] 16 72

    I2C 1 2
    SPI 1 2 (18 MBit/s)
    UART 1 3
    CAN 0 1
    USB 0 USB 2.0 FS 12 MBit
    DMA 0 7 channels (ATsP, SPI, I2C, USART)
    RTC 0 1
    CRC 0 1
    Unique ID 0 1

    Programmed by USB SWD Debug (around $5)

    IDE Arduino IDE Arduino IDE, CubeMX, ...
    Libraries Many Limited

    Dimensions [mm] 68.6 x 53.4 53 x 22
    Weight [g] 25 ?
    Price (cheapest) [$] 2.50 1.50


    Note: as written earlier, despite the mostly better specs, not all libraries are supported. Also a programmer need to be bought (only once, cost about $5).






    share|improve this answer














    Check the STM32F103C8T6 development board, cost about $ 1.5, and is faster/has more memory than the Arduino Uno, and is much smaller.



    It can work with the Arduino IDE, but not all libraries are supported, so check before you want to use it if your used libraries are supported, or if there are different libraries you can use instead.



    Update



    Differences:



     Arduino Uno STM32F103C8T6 Mini Dev Board

    MicroController Atmega328P Cortex M3
    MIPS/MHz 1 1.25
    Operating Voltage [V] 5 3.3, most pins 5V tolerant
    Input Voltage [V] 7-12 USB only
    Input Voltage (limit) [V] 6-20 (USB)
    Digital I/O Pins 16 37
    From them:PWM Digital I/O Pins 6 12
    Analog Input Pins 6 10
    DC Current per I/O Pin [mA] 20 ?
    DC Current for 3.3V Pin [mA] 50 ?
    Flash [KB} 32 64
    SRAM [KB] 2 20
    EEPROM [KB] 1 -
    Clock Speed [MHz] 16 72

    I2C 1 2
    SPI 1 2 (18 MBit/s)
    UART 1 3
    CAN 0 1
    USB 0 USB 2.0 FS 12 MBit
    DMA 0 7 channels (ATsP, SPI, I2C, USART)
    RTC 0 1
    CRC 0 1
    Unique ID 0 1

    Programmed by USB SWD Debug (around $5)

    IDE Arduino IDE Arduino IDE, CubeMX, ...
    Libraries Many Limited

    Dimensions [mm] 68.6 x 53.4 53 x 22
    Weight [g] 25 ?
    Price (cheapest) [$] 2.50 1.50


    Note: as written earlier, despite the mostly better specs, not all libraries are supported. Also a programmer need to be bought (only once, cost about $5).







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Nov 11 at 22:44

























    answered Nov 11 at 19:57









    Michel Keijzers

    6,27841737




    6,27841737







    • 1




      You can also avoid getting the programmer if you get the Maple Mini clones (same uC, almost same HW, but with a bootloader already flashed)
      – frarugi87
      Nov 12 at 8:44






    • 1




      @frarugi87 Or you can use the builtin UART bootloader (activated by setting BOOT0 high) for initial programming.
      – duskwuff
      Nov 12 at 18:34










    • The STM32F103C8T6 is a great part. But it still is only 3.3v. It isn't a drop in replacement for the Uno. Try to connect it to a 5v character LCD and you will have problems, if it works at all. (the LCD)
      – Rudy
      Nov 13 at 0:47












    • 1




      You can also avoid getting the programmer if you get the Maple Mini clones (same uC, almost same HW, but with a bootloader already flashed)
      – frarugi87
      Nov 12 at 8:44






    • 1




      @frarugi87 Or you can use the builtin UART bootloader (activated by setting BOOT0 high) for initial programming.
      – duskwuff
      Nov 12 at 18:34










    • The STM32F103C8T6 is a great part. But it still is only 3.3v. It isn't a drop in replacement for the Uno. Try to connect it to a 5v character LCD and you will have problems, if it works at all. (the LCD)
      – Rudy
      Nov 13 at 0:47







    1




    1




    You can also avoid getting the programmer if you get the Maple Mini clones (same uC, almost same HW, but with a bootloader already flashed)
    – frarugi87
    Nov 12 at 8:44




    You can also avoid getting the programmer if you get the Maple Mini clones (same uC, almost same HW, but with a bootloader already flashed)
    – frarugi87
    Nov 12 at 8:44




    1




    1




    @frarugi87 Or you can use the builtin UART bootloader (activated by setting BOOT0 high) for initial programming.
    – duskwuff
    Nov 12 at 18:34




    @frarugi87 Or you can use the builtin UART bootloader (activated by setting BOOT0 high) for initial programming.
    – duskwuff
    Nov 12 at 18:34












    The STM32F103C8T6 is a great part. But it still is only 3.3v. It isn't a drop in replacement for the Uno. Try to connect it to a 5v character LCD and you will have problems, if it works at all. (the LCD)
    – Rudy
    Nov 13 at 0:47




    The STM32F103C8T6 is a great part. But it still is only 3.3v. It isn't a drop in replacement for the Uno. Try to connect it to a 5v character LCD and you will have problems, if it works at all. (the LCD)
    – Rudy
    Nov 13 at 0:47










    up vote
    4
    down vote













    For my product, I went from an Arduino Uno:



    Arduino Uno R3



    to the Arduino Pro Mini:



    Arduino Pro Mini



    Yes you will need a FTDI cable for programming and serial coms to the PC, but providing you don't need coms all the time, you will only need the one cable to upload the program to each device. They can be found pretty cheap too.



    However I notice that the Arduino Pro Mini is retired now, so it may be a bit harder to source (it is still available on AliExpress). So for this reason, I suggest that you instead try the Arduino Nano:



    Arduino Nano



    which has the added advantage of onboard USB, meaning you no longer need the FTDI cable for programming or coms.



    The ATMega328P that is the processor of these 3 boards does not have native USB, which means that the board also needs to include the FTDI FT232RL IC that is used in the FTDI cable. Having this IC can add additional costs to your bottom line.



    For a few dollars cheaper per device, you can use a microcontroller (such as the ATMega32U4) that has native USB coms (and hence you save on the FTDI IC). One such product is the Arduino Micro:



    Arduino Micro



    All of these boards mentioned are native within the Arduino Ecosystem and (apart from the retired Pro Mini) should be easy to source online or at your local electronics shop. Your Arduino Uno program will work for all of these alternatives - you just have to change the board in the Arduino IDE:



    Arduino Board Selection



    There is one more board that I would like to mention - the DigiSpark:



    Digispark



    It is only suitable for smaller programs, is limited in some of its features and is not an oficial Arduino board. Having said that, there is plenty of Arduino support - and its cheap!






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      For my product, I went from an Arduino Uno:



      Arduino Uno R3



      to the Arduino Pro Mini:



      Arduino Pro Mini



      Yes you will need a FTDI cable for programming and serial coms to the PC, but providing you don't need coms all the time, you will only need the one cable to upload the program to each device. They can be found pretty cheap too.



      However I notice that the Arduino Pro Mini is retired now, so it may be a bit harder to source (it is still available on AliExpress). So for this reason, I suggest that you instead try the Arduino Nano:



      Arduino Nano



      which has the added advantage of onboard USB, meaning you no longer need the FTDI cable for programming or coms.



      The ATMega328P that is the processor of these 3 boards does not have native USB, which means that the board also needs to include the FTDI FT232RL IC that is used in the FTDI cable. Having this IC can add additional costs to your bottom line.



      For a few dollars cheaper per device, you can use a microcontroller (such as the ATMega32U4) that has native USB coms (and hence you save on the FTDI IC). One such product is the Arduino Micro:



      Arduino Micro



      All of these boards mentioned are native within the Arduino Ecosystem and (apart from the retired Pro Mini) should be easy to source online or at your local electronics shop. Your Arduino Uno program will work for all of these alternatives - you just have to change the board in the Arduino IDE:



      Arduino Board Selection



      There is one more board that I would like to mention - the DigiSpark:



      Digispark



      It is only suitable for smaller programs, is limited in some of its features and is not an oficial Arduino board. Having said that, there is plenty of Arduino support - and its cheap!






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        4
        down vote










        up vote
        4
        down vote









        For my product, I went from an Arduino Uno:



        Arduino Uno R3



        to the Arduino Pro Mini:



        Arduino Pro Mini



        Yes you will need a FTDI cable for programming and serial coms to the PC, but providing you don't need coms all the time, you will only need the one cable to upload the program to each device. They can be found pretty cheap too.



        However I notice that the Arduino Pro Mini is retired now, so it may be a bit harder to source (it is still available on AliExpress). So for this reason, I suggest that you instead try the Arduino Nano:



        Arduino Nano



        which has the added advantage of onboard USB, meaning you no longer need the FTDI cable for programming or coms.



        The ATMega328P that is the processor of these 3 boards does not have native USB, which means that the board also needs to include the FTDI FT232RL IC that is used in the FTDI cable. Having this IC can add additional costs to your bottom line.



        For a few dollars cheaper per device, you can use a microcontroller (such as the ATMega32U4) that has native USB coms (and hence you save on the FTDI IC). One such product is the Arduino Micro:



        Arduino Micro



        All of these boards mentioned are native within the Arduino Ecosystem and (apart from the retired Pro Mini) should be easy to source online or at your local electronics shop. Your Arduino Uno program will work for all of these alternatives - you just have to change the board in the Arduino IDE:



        Arduino Board Selection



        There is one more board that I would like to mention - the DigiSpark:



        Digispark



        It is only suitable for smaller programs, is limited in some of its features and is not an oficial Arduino board. Having said that, there is plenty of Arduino support - and its cheap!






        share|improve this answer














        For my product, I went from an Arduino Uno:



        Arduino Uno R3



        to the Arduino Pro Mini:



        Arduino Pro Mini



        Yes you will need a FTDI cable for programming and serial coms to the PC, but providing you don't need coms all the time, you will only need the one cable to upload the program to each device. They can be found pretty cheap too.



        However I notice that the Arduino Pro Mini is retired now, so it may be a bit harder to source (it is still available on AliExpress). So for this reason, I suggest that you instead try the Arduino Nano:



        Arduino Nano



        which has the added advantage of onboard USB, meaning you no longer need the FTDI cable for programming or coms.



        The ATMega328P that is the processor of these 3 boards does not have native USB, which means that the board also needs to include the FTDI FT232RL IC that is used in the FTDI cable. Having this IC can add additional costs to your bottom line.



        For a few dollars cheaper per device, you can use a microcontroller (such as the ATMega32U4) that has native USB coms (and hence you save on the FTDI IC). One such product is the Arduino Micro:



        Arduino Micro



        All of these boards mentioned are native within the Arduino Ecosystem and (apart from the retired Pro Mini) should be easy to source online or at your local electronics shop. Your Arduino Uno program will work for all of these alternatives - you just have to change the board in the Arduino IDE:



        Arduino Board Selection



        There is one more board that I would like to mention - the DigiSpark:



        Digispark



        It is only suitable for smaller programs, is limited in some of its features and is not an oficial Arduino board. Having said that, there is plenty of Arduino support - and its cheap!







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 12 at 4:34

























        answered Nov 12 at 2:03









        sa_leinad

        2,13211033




        2,13211033




















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            If you want to stick with using Arduino and it's toolchain, you can order just a bare ATmega 328p (the microcontroller at the heart of the Arduino Uno) and use it by itself!



            They're fairly low cost ($1.50-$3.00 range) and are breadboard friendly. For a more permanent solution, you can solder them into a proto-board (perfboard), or even a custom designed circuit board once your design gets to that level.



            Here's an excellent guide from the Arduino folks about setting up an Arduino on a breadboard, using only raw components such as the ATmega 328p. This design uses an external 16MHz clock crystal, just like an Arduino Uno.



            If you're OK with using the internal 8MHz clock onboard the 328p, you can do away with most of the extra components and just run the raw chip like in this guide (using the Arduino Lilypad Bootloader instead of the default Arduino bootloader). This will save even more money!



            Either way, you'll need an AVR Programmer unit, since there is no USB port built into the 328p. This will be the most expensive part of this setup, but good news is you only need one, and it can program any 328p's you need. They can also be used to program non-standard chips that are capable of being programmed over Serial Tx/Rx pins, such as the ESP chips (you just hand-wire them). Very useful to have one of these if you're serious about these types of microcontrollers.



            ATmega 328p Microcontroller Chip



            ATMega Pin Stickers



            Perfboard



            AVR Programmer






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              If you order your ATMEGA328P-PU with the boot loader already installed: ebay.ca/itm/…, then a PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN) will work to upload "code": aliexpress.com/item/…
              – VE7JRO
              Nov 12 at 0:10










            • I always found it odd that Arduino uses a special bootloader for programming instead of using the built-in programming interface.
              – immibis
              Nov 12 at 1:57










            • @immibis not sure what you mean exactly, but the arduino bootloaders do a lot of things that make working with the arduino's (and Atmel chips) a lot easier, including resetting of pins, switching to external clock, handing-off to your code, etc. Without it, you'd essentially need to write your own... which would be a waste of time since for majority of cases, the stock Arduino bootloader does everything you want anyway.
              – SnakeDoc
              Nov 12 at 7:43






            • 1




              @immibis I think it is much easier to have a serial port interface rather than a programmer interface from the PC. Moreover, especially at the beginning, I think (personal opinion) that they wanted a complete system on a board, and integrating a programmer on the PCB was much harder than writing a serial bootloader. Consider that the first arduino boards had a serial port (Arduino RS232), so only one programmer was needed to program a lot of them (they were used at school)
              – frarugi87
              Nov 12 at 16:46






            • 1




              @frarugi87 that's probably true, but for real beginners, plugging in a USB cable and using the Arduino IDE to upload "sketches" is about as easy as it can be. I think they made the right move to make it super accessible, especially for those who have zero microcontroller experience.
              – SnakeDoc
              Nov 12 at 17:37















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            If you want to stick with using Arduino and it's toolchain, you can order just a bare ATmega 328p (the microcontroller at the heart of the Arduino Uno) and use it by itself!



            They're fairly low cost ($1.50-$3.00 range) and are breadboard friendly. For a more permanent solution, you can solder them into a proto-board (perfboard), or even a custom designed circuit board once your design gets to that level.



            Here's an excellent guide from the Arduino folks about setting up an Arduino on a breadboard, using only raw components such as the ATmega 328p. This design uses an external 16MHz clock crystal, just like an Arduino Uno.



            If you're OK with using the internal 8MHz clock onboard the 328p, you can do away with most of the extra components and just run the raw chip like in this guide (using the Arduino Lilypad Bootloader instead of the default Arduino bootloader). This will save even more money!



            Either way, you'll need an AVR Programmer unit, since there is no USB port built into the 328p. This will be the most expensive part of this setup, but good news is you only need one, and it can program any 328p's you need. They can also be used to program non-standard chips that are capable of being programmed over Serial Tx/Rx pins, such as the ESP chips (you just hand-wire them). Very useful to have one of these if you're serious about these types of microcontrollers.



            ATmega 328p Microcontroller Chip



            ATMega Pin Stickers



            Perfboard



            AVR Programmer






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1




              If you order your ATMEGA328P-PU with the boot loader already installed: ebay.ca/itm/…, then a PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN) will work to upload "code": aliexpress.com/item/…
              – VE7JRO
              Nov 12 at 0:10










            • I always found it odd that Arduino uses a special bootloader for programming instead of using the built-in programming interface.
              – immibis
              Nov 12 at 1:57










            • @immibis not sure what you mean exactly, but the arduino bootloaders do a lot of things that make working with the arduino's (and Atmel chips) a lot easier, including resetting of pins, switching to external clock, handing-off to your code, etc. Without it, you'd essentially need to write your own... which would be a waste of time since for majority of cases, the stock Arduino bootloader does everything you want anyway.
              – SnakeDoc
              Nov 12 at 7:43






            • 1




              @immibis I think it is much easier to have a serial port interface rather than a programmer interface from the PC. Moreover, especially at the beginning, I think (personal opinion) that they wanted a complete system on a board, and integrating a programmer on the PCB was much harder than writing a serial bootloader. Consider that the first arduino boards had a serial port (Arduino RS232), so only one programmer was needed to program a lot of them (they were used at school)
              – frarugi87
              Nov 12 at 16:46






            • 1




              @frarugi87 that's probably true, but for real beginners, plugging in a USB cable and using the Arduino IDE to upload "sketches" is about as easy as it can be. I think they made the right move to make it super accessible, especially for those who have zero microcontroller experience.
              – SnakeDoc
              Nov 12 at 17:37













            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            If you want to stick with using Arduino and it's toolchain, you can order just a bare ATmega 328p (the microcontroller at the heart of the Arduino Uno) and use it by itself!



            They're fairly low cost ($1.50-$3.00 range) and are breadboard friendly. For a more permanent solution, you can solder them into a proto-board (perfboard), or even a custom designed circuit board once your design gets to that level.



            Here's an excellent guide from the Arduino folks about setting up an Arduino on a breadboard, using only raw components such as the ATmega 328p. This design uses an external 16MHz clock crystal, just like an Arduino Uno.



            If you're OK with using the internal 8MHz clock onboard the 328p, you can do away with most of the extra components and just run the raw chip like in this guide (using the Arduino Lilypad Bootloader instead of the default Arduino bootloader). This will save even more money!



            Either way, you'll need an AVR Programmer unit, since there is no USB port built into the 328p. This will be the most expensive part of this setup, but good news is you only need one, and it can program any 328p's you need. They can also be used to program non-standard chips that are capable of being programmed over Serial Tx/Rx pins, such as the ESP chips (you just hand-wire them). Very useful to have one of these if you're serious about these types of microcontrollers.



            ATmega 328p Microcontroller Chip



            ATMega Pin Stickers



            Perfboard



            AVR Programmer






            share|improve this answer














            If you want to stick with using Arduino and it's toolchain, you can order just a bare ATmega 328p (the microcontroller at the heart of the Arduino Uno) and use it by itself!



            They're fairly low cost ($1.50-$3.00 range) and are breadboard friendly. For a more permanent solution, you can solder them into a proto-board (perfboard), or even a custom designed circuit board once your design gets to that level.



            Here's an excellent guide from the Arduino folks about setting up an Arduino on a breadboard, using only raw components such as the ATmega 328p. This design uses an external 16MHz clock crystal, just like an Arduino Uno.



            If you're OK with using the internal 8MHz clock onboard the 328p, you can do away with most of the extra components and just run the raw chip like in this guide (using the Arduino Lilypad Bootloader instead of the default Arduino bootloader). This will save even more money!



            Either way, you'll need an AVR Programmer unit, since there is no USB port built into the 328p. This will be the most expensive part of this setup, but good news is you only need one, and it can program any 328p's you need. They can also be used to program non-standard chips that are capable of being programmed over Serial Tx/Rx pins, such as the ESP chips (you just hand-wire them). Very useful to have one of these if you're serious about these types of microcontrollers.



            ATmega 328p Microcontroller Chip



            ATMega Pin Stickers



            Perfboard



            AVR Programmer







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 11 at 23:39

























            answered Nov 11 at 23:21









            SnakeDoc

            1385




            1385







            • 1




              If you order your ATMEGA328P-PU with the boot loader already installed: ebay.ca/itm/…, then a PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN) will work to upload "code": aliexpress.com/item/…
              – VE7JRO
              Nov 12 at 0:10










            • I always found it odd that Arduino uses a special bootloader for programming instead of using the built-in programming interface.
              – immibis
              Nov 12 at 1:57










            • @immibis not sure what you mean exactly, but the arduino bootloaders do a lot of things that make working with the arduino's (and Atmel chips) a lot easier, including resetting of pins, switching to external clock, handing-off to your code, etc. Without it, you'd essentially need to write your own... which would be a waste of time since for majority of cases, the stock Arduino bootloader does everything you want anyway.
              – SnakeDoc
              Nov 12 at 7:43






            • 1




              @immibis I think it is much easier to have a serial port interface rather than a programmer interface from the PC. Moreover, especially at the beginning, I think (personal opinion) that they wanted a complete system on a board, and integrating a programmer on the PCB was much harder than writing a serial bootloader. Consider that the first arduino boards had a serial port (Arduino RS232), so only one programmer was needed to program a lot of them (they were used at school)
              – frarugi87
              Nov 12 at 16:46






            • 1




              @frarugi87 that's probably true, but for real beginners, plugging in a USB cable and using the Arduino IDE to upload "sketches" is about as easy as it can be. I think they made the right move to make it super accessible, especially for those who have zero microcontroller experience.
              – SnakeDoc
              Nov 12 at 17:37













            • 1




              If you order your ATMEGA328P-PU with the boot loader already installed: ebay.ca/itm/…, then a PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN) will work to upload "code": aliexpress.com/item/…
              – VE7JRO
              Nov 12 at 0:10










            • I always found it odd that Arduino uses a special bootloader for programming instead of using the built-in programming interface.
              – immibis
              Nov 12 at 1:57










            • @immibis not sure what you mean exactly, but the arduino bootloaders do a lot of things that make working with the arduino's (and Atmel chips) a lot easier, including resetting of pins, switching to external clock, handing-off to your code, etc. Without it, you'd essentially need to write your own... which would be a waste of time since for majority of cases, the stock Arduino bootloader does everything you want anyway.
              – SnakeDoc
              Nov 12 at 7:43






            • 1




              @immibis I think it is much easier to have a serial port interface rather than a programmer interface from the PC. Moreover, especially at the beginning, I think (personal opinion) that they wanted a complete system on a board, and integrating a programmer on the PCB was much harder than writing a serial bootloader. Consider that the first arduino boards had a serial port (Arduino RS232), so only one programmer was needed to program a lot of them (they were used at school)
              – frarugi87
              Nov 12 at 16:46






            • 1




              @frarugi87 that's probably true, but for real beginners, plugging in a USB cable and using the Arduino IDE to upload "sketches" is about as easy as it can be. I think they made the right move to make it super accessible, especially for those who have zero microcontroller experience.
              – SnakeDoc
              Nov 12 at 17:37








            1




            1




            If you order your ATMEGA328P-PU with the boot loader already installed: ebay.ca/itm/…, then a PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN) will work to upload "code": aliexpress.com/item/…
            – VE7JRO
            Nov 12 at 0:10




            If you order your ATMEGA328P-PU with the boot loader already installed: ebay.ca/itm/…, then a PL2303HX USB to UART adaptor ($0.70CDN) will work to upload "code": aliexpress.com/item/…
            – VE7JRO
            Nov 12 at 0:10












            I always found it odd that Arduino uses a special bootloader for programming instead of using the built-in programming interface.
            – immibis
            Nov 12 at 1:57




            I always found it odd that Arduino uses a special bootloader for programming instead of using the built-in programming interface.
            – immibis
            Nov 12 at 1:57












            @immibis not sure what you mean exactly, but the arduino bootloaders do a lot of things that make working with the arduino's (and Atmel chips) a lot easier, including resetting of pins, switching to external clock, handing-off to your code, etc. Without it, you'd essentially need to write your own... which would be a waste of time since for majority of cases, the stock Arduino bootloader does everything you want anyway.
            – SnakeDoc
            Nov 12 at 7:43




            @immibis not sure what you mean exactly, but the arduino bootloaders do a lot of things that make working with the arduino's (and Atmel chips) a lot easier, including resetting of pins, switching to external clock, handing-off to your code, etc. Without it, you'd essentially need to write your own... which would be a waste of time since for majority of cases, the stock Arduino bootloader does everything you want anyway.
            – SnakeDoc
            Nov 12 at 7:43




            1




            1




            @immibis I think it is much easier to have a serial port interface rather than a programmer interface from the PC. Moreover, especially at the beginning, I think (personal opinion) that they wanted a complete system on a board, and integrating a programmer on the PCB was much harder than writing a serial bootloader. Consider that the first arduino boards had a serial port (Arduino RS232), so only one programmer was needed to program a lot of them (they were used at school)
            – frarugi87
            Nov 12 at 16:46




            @immibis I think it is much easier to have a serial port interface rather than a programmer interface from the PC. Moreover, especially at the beginning, I think (personal opinion) that they wanted a complete system on a board, and integrating a programmer on the PCB was much harder than writing a serial bootloader. Consider that the first arduino boards had a serial port (Arduino RS232), so only one programmer was needed to program a lot of them (they were used at school)
            – frarugi87
            Nov 12 at 16:46




            1




            1




            @frarugi87 that's probably true, but for real beginners, plugging in a USB cable and using the Arduino IDE to upload "sketches" is about as easy as it can be. I think they made the right move to make it super accessible, especially for those who have zero microcontroller experience.
            – SnakeDoc
            Nov 12 at 17:37





            @frarugi87 that's probably true, but for real beginners, plugging in a USB cable and using the Arduino IDE to upload "sketches" is about as easy as it can be. I think they made the right move to make it super accessible, especially for those who have zero microcontroller experience.
            – SnakeDoc
            Nov 12 at 17:37











            up vote
            3
            down vote













            I like the Nano and the Pro Mini. I like to work with it on a breadboard with other modules. If there is more circuitry involved I found it much more convenient than using an Uno. There are faster processors but for a lot of projects the 16Mhz 328 is more than sufficient. And like the Uno, these two are 5 volt powered parts. Sometimes what you need to connect to doesn't work well with 3.3 volt processors.



            The Pro Mini and the Nano with easily be soldered into 0.1" spaced "Veroboard" (or equivalent) If you don't mind buying cloned parts, the cost of a Nano and Pro Mini is only a couple of dollars. Buying parts off Aliexpress, or even Ebay, can save you a lot, as long as you are patient when it comes to delivery.



            The module that I am now use most often is the ESP8266. It is a powerful WiFi platform that only costs a few dollars and has quite a mature Arduino framework. Often I use this as the only processor in the design. I have even used it as the basis for a data logger and completely ignored the WiFi capability. 20x4 character LCD, current/voltage measurement chip (INA219), and a SD memory card, powered by a 18650 lithium battery.



            There are lots of good inexpensive options.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              you might want to point out that ESP12 modules do NOT have .1" pin spacing, which is a bit of a nuisance. There are inexpensive breakout boards, but these are quite wide and hard to use with solderless breadboards. Other than that, they're pretty handy. For about $1 more than a bare ESP12 module you can get a Wemos D1 mini (clone) that is about as easy to use as an Arduino Pro Mini or Nano.
              – Llaves
              Nov 11 at 21:58










            • Where did I say to use the ESP-12? I didn't go into a lot of detail on the ESP8266 because that really wasn't the focus of the question. I thought it was worth mentioning since a lot of people are not familiar with it. I totally support people using the Wemos D1 mini platform. It is a ready to go solution unlike ESP01, ESP12, etc. USB to serial and an onboard regulator makes a big difference. But I still feel the Nano or the Pro Mini is the most appropriate answer for the person who asked the question.
              – Rudy
              Nov 12 at 23:40














            up vote
            3
            down vote













            I like the Nano and the Pro Mini. I like to work with it on a breadboard with other modules. If there is more circuitry involved I found it much more convenient than using an Uno. There are faster processors but for a lot of projects the 16Mhz 328 is more than sufficient. And like the Uno, these two are 5 volt powered parts. Sometimes what you need to connect to doesn't work well with 3.3 volt processors.



            The Pro Mini and the Nano with easily be soldered into 0.1" spaced "Veroboard" (or equivalent) If you don't mind buying cloned parts, the cost of a Nano and Pro Mini is only a couple of dollars. Buying parts off Aliexpress, or even Ebay, can save you a lot, as long as you are patient when it comes to delivery.



            The module that I am now use most often is the ESP8266. It is a powerful WiFi platform that only costs a few dollars and has quite a mature Arduino framework. Often I use this as the only processor in the design. I have even used it as the basis for a data logger and completely ignored the WiFi capability. 20x4 character LCD, current/voltage measurement chip (INA219), and a SD memory card, powered by a 18650 lithium battery.



            There are lots of good inexpensive options.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              you might want to point out that ESP12 modules do NOT have .1" pin spacing, which is a bit of a nuisance. There are inexpensive breakout boards, but these are quite wide and hard to use with solderless breadboards. Other than that, they're pretty handy. For about $1 more than a bare ESP12 module you can get a Wemos D1 mini (clone) that is about as easy to use as an Arduino Pro Mini or Nano.
              – Llaves
              Nov 11 at 21:58










            • Where did I say to use the ESP-12? I didn't go into a lot of detail on the ESP8266 because that really wasn't the focus of the question. I thought it was worth mentioning since a lot of people are not familiar with it. I totally support people using the Wemos D1 mini platform. It is a ready to go solution unlike ESP01, ESP12, etc. USB to serial and an onboard regulator makes a big difference. But I still feel the Nano or the Pro Mini is the most appropriate answer for the person who asked the question.
              – Rudy
              Nov 12 at 23:40












            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            I like the Nano and the Pro Mini. I like to work with it on a breadboard with other modules. If there is more circuitry involved I found it much more convenient than using an Uno. There are faster processors but for a lot of projects the 16Mhz 328 is more than sufficient. And like the Uno, these two are 5 volt powered parts. Sometimes what you need to connect to doesn't work well with 3.3 volt processors.



            The Pro Mini and the Nano with easily be soldered into 0.1" spaced "Veroboard" (or equivalent) If you don't mind buying cloned parts, the cost of a Nano and Pro Mini is only a couple of dollars. Buying parts off Aliexpress, or even Ebay, can save you a lot, as long as you are patient when it comes to delivery.



            The module that I am now use most often is the ESP8266. It is a powerful WiFi platform that only costs a few dollars and has quite a mature Arduino framework. Often I use this as the only processor in the design. I have even used it as the basis for a data logger and completely ignored the WiFi capability. 20x4 character LCD, current/voltage measurement chip (INA219), and a SD memory card, powered by a 18650 lithium battery.



            There are lots of good inexpensive options.






            share|improve this answer














            I like the Nano and the Pro Mini. I like to work with it on a breadboard with other modules. If there is more circuitry involved I found it much more convenient than using an Uno. There are faster processors but for a lot of projects the 16Mhz 328 is more than sufficient. And like the Uno, these two are 5 volt powered parts. Sometimes what you need to connect to doesn't work well with 3.3 volt processors.



            The Pro Mini and the Nano with easily be soldered into 0.1" spaced "Veroboard" (or equivalent) If you don't mind buying cloned parts, the cost of a Nano and Pro Mini is only a couple of dollars. Buying parts off Aliexpress, or even Ebay, can save you a lot, as long as you are patient when it comes to delivery.



            The module that I am now use most often is the ESP8266. It is a powerful WiFi platform that only costs a few dollars and has quite a mature Arduino framework. Often I use this as the only processor in the design. I have even used it as the basis for a data logger and completely ignored the WiFi capability. 20x4 character LCD, current/voltage measurement chip (INA219), and a SD memory card, powered by a 18650 lithium battery.



            There are lots of good inexpensive options.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 13 at 0:33

























            answered Nov 11 at 21:44









            Rudy

            65017




            65017







            • 3




              you might want to point out that ESP12 modules do NOT have .1" pin spacing, which is a bit of a nuisance. There are inexpensive breakout boards, but these are quite wide and hard to use with solderless breadboards. Other than that, they're pretty handy. For about $1 more than a bare ESP12 module you can get a Wemos D1 mini (clone) that is about as easy to use as an Arduino Pro Mini or Nano.
              – Llaves
              Nov 11 at 21:58










            • Where did I say to use the ESP-12? I didn't go into a lot of detail on the ESP8266 because that really wasn't the focus of the question. I thought it was worth mentioning since a lot of people are not familiar with it. I totally support people using the Wemos D1 mini platform. It is a ready to go solution unlike ESP01, ESP12, etc. USB to serial and an onboard regulator makes a big difference. But I still feel the Nano or the Pro Mini is the most appropriate answer for the person who asked the question.
              – Rudy
              Nov 12 at 23:40












            • 3




              you might want to point out that ESP12 modules do NOT have .1" pin spacing, which is a bit of a nuisance. There are inexpensive breakout boards, but these are quite wide and hard to use with solderless breadboards. Other than that, they're pretty handy. For about $1 more than a bare ESP12 module you can get a Wemos D1 mini (clone) that is about as easy to use as an Arduino Pro Mini or Nano.
              – Llaves
              Nov 11 at 21:58










            • Where did I say to use the ESP-12? I didn't go into a lot of detail on the ESP8266 because that really wasn't the focus of the question. I thought it was worth mentioning since a lot of people are not familiar with it. I totally support people using the Wemos D1 mini platform. It is a ready to go solution unlike ESP01, ESP12, etc. USB to serial and an onboard regulator makes a big difference. But I still feel the Nano or the Pro Mini is the most appropriate answer for the person who asked the question.
              – Rudy
              Nov 12 at 23:40







            3




            3




            you might want to point out that ESP12 modules do NOT have .1" pin spacing, which is a bit of a nuisance. There are inexpensive breakout boards, but these are quite wide and hard to use with solderless breadboards. Other than that, they're pretty handy. For about $1 more than a bare ESP12 module you can get a Wemos D1 mini (clone) that is about as easy to use as an Arduino Pro Mini or Nano.
            – Llaves
            Nov 11 at 21:58




            you might want to point out that ESP12 modules do NOT have .1" pin spacing, which is a bit of a nuisance. There are inexpensive breakout boards, but these are quite wide and hard to use with solderless breadboards. Other than that, they're pretty handy. For about $1 more than a bare ESP12 module you can get a Wemos D1 mini (clone) that is about as easy to use as an Arduino Pro Mini or Nano.
            – Llaves
            Nov 11 at 21:58












            Where did I say to use the ESP-12? I didn't go into a lot of detail on the ESP8266 because that really wasn't the focus of the question. I thought it was worth mentioning since a lot of people are not familiar with it. I totally support people using the Wemos D1 mini platform. It is a ready to go solution unlike ESP01, ESP12, etc. USB to serial and an onboard regulator makes a big difference. But I still feel the Nano or the Pro Mini is the most appropriate answer for the person who asked the question.
            – Rudy
            Nov 12 at 23:40




            Where did I say to use the ESP-12? I didn't go into a lot of detail on the ESP8266 because that really wasn't the focus of the question. I thought it was worth mentioning since a lot of people are not familiar with it. I totally support people using the Wemos D1 mini platform. It is a ready to go solution unlike ESP01, ESP12, etc. USB to serial and an onboard regulator makes a big difference. But I still feel the Nano or the Pro Mini is the most appropriate answer for the person who asked the question.
            – Rudy
            Nov 12 at 23:40










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Arduino Pro Micro clones are super cheap and all you need to program them is a normal micro USB cable. You will probably have to solder the headers to do anything useful. They are available in a 3.3V/8MHz and a 5V/16Mhz version.



            Pro Micro






            share|improve this answer






















            • ProMicro has a 3.3v processor. That can be a problem with some designs. It isn't a drop in replacement for an Uno. But it is an interesting part.
              – Rudy
              Nov 13 at 0:35






            • 1




              No, just as with the Pro Mini there is a 5V/16MHz and a 3.3V/8MHz version.
              – AndreKR
              Nov 13 at 6:07










            • Sorry then, my mistake.
              – Rudy
              Nov 14 at 12:25














            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Arduino Pro Micro clones are super cheap and all you need to program them is a normal micro USB cable. You will probably have to solder the headers to do anything useful. They are available in a 3.3V/8MHz and a 5V/16Mhz version.



            Pro Micro






            share|improve this answer






















            • ProMicro has a 3.3v processor. That can be a problem with some designs. It isn't a drop in replacement for an Uno. But it is an interesting part.
              – Rudy
              Nov 13 at 0:35






            • 1




              No, just as with the Pro Mini there is a 5V/16MHz and a 3.3V/8MHz version.
              – AndreKR
              Nov 13 at 6:07










            • Sorry then, my mistake.
              – Rudy
              Nov 14 at 12:25












            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            Arduino Pro Micro clones are super cheap and all you need to program them is a normal micro USB cable. You will probably have to solder the headers to do anything useful. They are available in a 3.3V/8MHz and a 5V/16Mhz version.



            Pro Micro






            share|improve this answer














            Arduino Pro Micro clones are super cheap and all you need to program them is a normal micro USB cable. You will probably have to solder the headers to do anything useful. They are available in a 3.3V/8MHz and a 5V/16Mhz version.



            Pro Micro







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 13 at 7:47

























            answered Nov 12 at 20:00









            AndreKR

            1215




            1215











            • ProMicro has a 3.3v processor. That can be a problem with some designs. It isn't a drop in replacement for an Uno. But it is an interesting part.
              – Rudy
              Nov 13 at 0:35






            • 1




              No, just as with the Pro Mini there is a 5V/16MHz and a 3.3V/8MHz version.
              – AndreKR
              Nov 13 at 6:07










            • Sorry then, my mistake.
              – Rudy
              Nov 14 at 12:25
















            • ProMicro has a 3.3v processor. That can be a problem with some designs. It isn't a drop in replacement for an Uno. But it is an interesting part.
              – Rudy
              Nov 13 at 0:35






            • 1




              No, just as with the Pro Mini there is a 5V/16MHz and a 3.3V/8MHz version.
              – AndreKR
              Nov 13 at 6:07










            • Sorry then, my mistake.
              – Rudy
              Nov 14 at 12:25















            ProMicro has a 3.3v processor. That can be a problem with some designs. It isn't a drop in replacement for an Uno. But it is an interesting part.
            – Rudy
            Nov 13 at 0:35




            ProMicro has a 3.3v processor. That can be a problem with some designs. It isn't a drop in replacement for an Uno. But it is an interesting part.
            – Rudy
            Nov 13 at 0:35




            1




            1




            No, just as with the Pro Mini there is a 5V/16MHz and a 3.3V/8MHz version.
            – AndreKR
            Nov 13 at 6:07




            No, just as with the Pro Mini there is a 5V/16MHz and a 3.3V/8MHz version.
            – AndreKR
            Nov 13 at 6:07












            Sorry then, my mistake.
            – Rudy
            Nov 14 at 12:25




            Sorry then, my mistake.
            – Rudy
            Nov 14 at 12:25

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Arduino Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2farduino.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57724%2fsmaller-and-cheaper-alternative-to-arduino-uno-for-permanent-projects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

            In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

            Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto