Lazy loading collection in another transaction?
Guys I get that if you load an object, close a session in hibernate and then try to get information about related objects, while the FetchType of this association is LAZY it will obviously give you LazyInitializationException. Could someone tell me why if I start another transaction and then try to load related objects I will still get this exception? Lets say I have Instructor class and one to many related Course class. Courses are lazy loaded.
Session session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
Instructor instructor= session.get(Instructor.class, id);
session.getTransaction().commit();
session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
System.out.println(instructor.getCourses());
session.getTransaction().commit();
why do I still get LazyInitializationException?
java hibernate
add a comment |
Guys I get that if you load an object, close a session in hibernate and then try to get information about related objects, while the FetchType of this association is LAZY it will obviously give you LazyInitializationException. Could someone tell me why if I start another transaction and then try to load related objects I will still get this exception? Lets say I have Instructor class and one to many related Course class. Courses are lazy loaded.
Session session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
Instructor instructor= session.get(Instructor.class, id);
session.getTransaction().commit();
session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
System.out.println(instructor.getCourses());
session.getTransaction().commit();
why do I still get LazyInitializationException?
java hibernate
add a comment |
Guys I get that if you load an object, close a session in hibernate and then try to get information about related objects, while the FetchType of this association is LAZY it will obviously give you LazyInitializationException. Could someone tell me why if I start another transaction and then try to load related objects I will still get this exception? Lets say I have Instructor class and one to many related Course class. Courses are lazy loaded.
Session session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
Instructor instructor= session.get(Instructor.class, id);
session.getTransaction().commit();
session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
System.out.println(instructor.getCourses());
session.getTransaction().commit();
why do I still get LazyInitializationException?
java hibernate
Guys I get that if you load an object, close a session in hibernate and then try to get information about related objects, while the FetchType of this association is LAZY it will obviously give you LazyInitializationException. Could someone tell me why if I start another transaction and then try to load related objects I will still get this exception? Lets say I have Instructor class and one to many related Course class. Courses are lazy loaded.
Session session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
Instructor instructor= session.get(Instructor.class, id);
session.getTransaction().commit();
session = sessionFactory.getCurrentSession();
session.beginTransaction();
System.out.println(instructor.getCourses());
session.getTransaction().commit();
why do I still get LazyInitializationException?
java hibernate
java hibernate
asked Nov 13 '18 at 1:11
SzymonSzymon
13
13
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The key issue that is that data loaded in one transaction may contradict data loaded in an earlier transaction, since another transaction may have modified the data in the meantime.
That is, each transaction will (or strive to, in the case of weaker isolation levels) give you a consistent view of the state of the database - but combining views taken at different times can result in an inconsistent view of your data, which can cause logic errors.
That said, it is possible to extend lazy loading across transactions by using an "extended persistence context" - but that feature is rarely used in my experience.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53272338%2flazy-loading-collection-in-another-transaction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The key issue that is that data loaded in one transaction may contradict data loaded in an earlier transaction, since another transaction may have modified the data in the meantime.
That is, each transaction will (or strive to, in the case of weaker isolation levels) give you a consistent view of the state of the database - but combining views taken at different times can result in an inconsistent view of your data, which can cause logic errors.
That said, it is possible to extend lazy loading across transactions by using an "extended persistence context" - but that feature is rarely used in my experience.
add a comment |
The key issue that is that data loaded in one transaction may contradict data loaded in an earlier transaction, since another transaction may have modified the data in the meantime.
That is, each transaction will (or strive to, in the case of weaker isolation levels) give you a consistent view of the state of the database - but combining views taken at different times can result in an inconsistent view of your data, which can cause logic errors.
That said, it is possible to extend lazy loading across transactions by using an "extended persistence context" - but that feature is rarely used in my experience.
add a comment |
The key issue that is that data loaded in one transaction may contradict data loaded in an earlier transaction, since another transaction may have modified the data in the meantime.
That is, each transaction will (or strive to, in the case of weaker isolation levels) give you a consistent view of the state of the database - but combining views taken at different times can result in an inconsistent view of your data, which can cause logic errors.
That said, it is possible to extend lazy loading across transactions by using an "extended persistence context" - but that feature is rarely used in my experience.
The key issue that is that data loaded in one transaction may contradict data loaded in an earlier transaction, since another transaction may have modified the data in the meantime.
That is, each transaction will (or strive to, in the case of weaker isolation levels) give you a consistent view of the state of the database - but combining views taken at different times can result in an inconsistent view of your data, which can cause logic errors.
That said, it is possible to extend lazy loading across transactions by using an "extended persistence context" - but that feature is rarely used in my experience.
answered Nov 13 '18 at 1:31
meritonmeriton
52.1k1379143
52.1k1379143
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53272338%2flazy-loading-collection-in-another-transaction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown