Laravel Auditable History Tables - Pro & Cons of SQL History or an auditing package?










1














My problem is that I'm not sure what to do. I'm thinking to build a similar database structure like this (source):



enter image description here



However, while researching I found out that there are auditing packages like this. So I wonder, what are the pro and cons?



My thoughts are:




  • SQL History:



    Pro:



    • Specific Source of Tables with specific attributes

    • easy readable each row on DB viewers

    Cons:



    • harder to implement



  • like Laravel Auditing



    Pro:



    • Easy to implement via Trait

    • Easy to get history data to Eloquent

    Cons:



    • single audit table containing all auditable changes of all tables

    • hard to read on DB viewers


Would you go the hard way or just take the package?










share|improve this question




























    1














    My problem is that I'm not sure what to do. I'm thinking to build a similar database structure like this (source):



    enter image description here



    However, while researching I found out that there are auditing packages like this. So I wonder, what are the pro and cons?



    My thoughts are:




    • SQL History:



      Pro:



      • Specific Source of Tables with specific attributes

      • easy readable each row on DB viewers

      Cons:



      • harder to implement



    • like Laravel Auditing



      Pro:



      • Easy to implement via Trait

      • Easy to get history data to Eloquent

      Cons:



      • single audit table containing all auditable changes of all tables

      • hard to read on DB viewers


    Would you go the hard way or just take the package?










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1







      My problem is that I'm not sure what to do. I'm thinking to build a similar database structure like this (source):



      enter image description here



      However, while researching I found out that there are auditing packages like this. So I wonder, what are the pro and cons?



      My thoughts are:




      • SQL History:



        Pro:



        • Specific Source of Tables with specific attributes

        • easy readable each row on DB viewers

        Cons:



        • harder to implement



      • like Laravel Auditing



        Pro:



        • Easy to implement via Trait

        • Easy to get history data to Eloquent

        Cons:



        • single audit table containing all auditable changes of all tables

        • hard to read on DB viewers


      Would you go the hard way or just take the package?










      share|improve this question















      My problem is that I'm not sure what to do. I'm thinking to build a similar database structure like this (source):



      enter image description here



      However, while researching I found out that there are auditing packages like this. So I wonder, what are the pro and cons?



      My thoughts are:




      • SQL History:



        Pro:



        • Specific Source of Tables with specific attributes

        • easy readable each row on DB viewers

        Cons:



        • harder to implement



      • like Laravel Auditing



        Pro:



        • Easy to implement via Trait

        • Easy to get history data to Eloquent

        Cons:



        • single audit table containing all auditable changes of all tables

        • hard to read on DB viewers


      Would you go the hard way or just take the package?







      laravel laravel-auditing






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 22 '18 at 10:59









      Quetzy Garcia

      1,62711317




      1,62711317










      asked Nov 12 '18 at 16:54









      Shadrix

      439313




      439313






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          I would use the package, mainly because of the ease of use and configuration.



          In regards to the cons you mention:



          • single audit table containing all auditable changes of all tables

          • hard to read on DB viewers

          The first, I can't really say it's a bad thing, since it makes it easy to relate a user to all the changes done across different models.



          Otherwise, if you had an audit table per model (order_audits, costumer_audits, ...), you would have to use JOIN statements for simple things like getting the total number of changes a user did on a system, for instance.



          The second reason you point out, I'm assuming it's because some of the data is being stored as JSON. If that's the case, you could always convert the column types that store that data from TEXT to JSON (covered in the documentation).



          One of the benefits (on RDBMS that support it), is that you can use WHERE statements on JSON type columns to apply filtering and given the JSON type has been around for a while, I bet there are database viewers that can display the data properly, instead of having a string of JSON.






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53266750%2flaravel-auditable-history-tables-pro-cons-of-sql-history-or-an-auditing-pack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            I would use the package, mainly because of the ease of use and configuration.



            In regards to the cons you mention:



            • single audit table containing all auditable changes of all tables

            • hard to read on DB viewers

            The first, I can't really say it's a bad thing, since it makes it easy to relate a user to all the changes done across different models.



            Otherwise, if you had an audit table per model (order_audits, costumer_audits, ...), you would have to use JOIN statements for simple things like getting the total number of changes a user did on a system, for instance.



            The second reason you point out, I'm assuming it's because some of the data is being stored as JSON. If that's the case, you could always convert the column types that store that data from TEXT to JSON (covered in the documentation).



            One of the benefits (on RDBMS that support it), is that you can use WHERE statements on JSON type columns to apply filtering and given the JSON type has been around for a while, I bet there are database viewers that can display the data properly, instead of having a string of JSON.






            share|improve this answer

























              1














              I would use the package, mainly because of the ease of use and configuration.



              In regards to the cons you mention:



              • single audit table containing all auditable changes of all tables

              • hard to read on DB viewers

              The first, I can't really say it's a bad thing, since it makes it easy to relate a user to all the changes done across different models.



              Otherwise, if you had an audit table per model (order_audits, costumer_audits, ...), you would have to use JOIN statements for simple things like getting the total number of changes a user did on a system, for instance.



              The second reason you point out, I'm assuming it's because some of the data is being stored as JSON. If that's the case, you could always convert the column types that store that data from TEXT to JSON (covered in the documentation).



              One of the benefits (on RDBMS that support it), is that you can use WHERE statements on JSON type columns to apply filtering and given the JSON type has been around for a while, I bet there are database viewers that can display the data properly, instead of having a string of JSON.






              share|improve this answer























                1












                1








                1






                I would use the package, mainly because of the ease of use and configuration.



                In regards to the cons you mention:



                • single audit table containing all auditable changes of all tables

                • hard to read on DB viewers

                The first, I can't really say it's a bad thing, since it makes it easy to relate a user to all the changes done across different models.



                Otherwise, if you had an audit table per model (order_audits, costumer_audits, ...), you would have to use JOIN statements for simple things like getting the total number of changes a user did on a system, for instance.



                The second reason you point out, I'm assuming it's because some of the data is being stored as JSON. If that's the case, you could always convert the column types that store that data from TEXT to JSON (covered in the documentation).



                One of the benefits (on RDBMS that support it), is that you can use WHERE statements on JSON type columns to apply filtering and given the JSON type has been around for a while, I bet there are database viewers that can display the data properly, instead of having a string of JSON.






                share|improve this answer












                I would use the package, mainly because of the ease of use and configuration.



                In regards to the cons you mention:



                • single audit table containing all auditable changes of all tables

                • hard to read on DB viewers

                The first, I can't really say it's a bad thing, since it makes it easy to relate a user to all the changes done across different models.



                Otherwise, if you had an audit table per model (order_audits, costumer_audits, ...), you would have to use JOIN statements for simple things like getting the total number of changes a user did on a system, for instance.



                The second reason you point out, I'm assuming it's because some of the data is being stored as JSON. If that's the case, you could always convert the column types that store that data from TEXT to JSON (covered in the documentation).



                One of the benefits (on RDBMS that support it), is that you can use WHERE statements on JSON type columns to apply filtering and given the JSON type has been around for a while, I bet there are database viewers that can display the data properly, instead of having a string of JSON.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 21 '18 at 21:53









                Quetzy Garcia

                1,62711317




                1,62711317



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53266750%2flaravel-auditable-history-tables-pro-cons-of-sql-history-or-an-auditing-pack%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

                    In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

                    Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto