How to make a merge of two git branches










-2















Assuming I have two branches one called stable and another called dev, and I have given commits in the dev branch. How do I merge it to the stable via command line ? thankful ;D










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    Possible duplicate of Merge development branch with master

    – bruceskyaus
    Nov 13 '18 at 4:12











  • Hello and welcome to StackOverflow. Please take some time to read the help page, especially the sections named "What topics can I ask about here?" and "What types of questions should I avoid asking?". And more importantly, please read the Stack Overflow question checklist. You might also want to learn about Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Examples.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:11











  • Take a look at git merge

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:12















-2















Assuming I have two branches one called stable and another called dev, and I have given commits in the dev branch. How do I merge it to the stable via command line ? thankful ;D










share|improve this question



















  • 6





    Possible duplicate of Merge development branch with master

    – bruceskyaus
    Nov 13 '18 at 4:12











  • Hello and welcome to StackOverflow. Please take some time to read the help page, especially the sections named "What topics can I ask about here?" and "What types of questions should I avoid asking?". And more importantly, please read the Stack Overflow question checklist. You might also want to learn about Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Examples.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:11











  • Take a look at git merge

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:12













-2












-2








-2








Assuming I have two branches one called stable and another called dev, and I have given commits in the dev branch. How do I merge it to the stable via command line ? thankful ;D










share|improve this question
















Assuming I have two branches one called stable and another called dev, and I have given commits in the dev branch. How do I merge it to the stable via command line ? thankful ;D







git merge git-merge






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 13 '18 at 4:29









JKostikiadis

2,04721121




2,04721121










asked Nov 13 '18 at 4:01









Jorge RabelloJorge Rabello

11




11







  • 6





    Possible duplicate of Merge development branch with master

    – bruceskyaus
    Nov 13 '18 at 4:12











  • Hello and welcome to StackOverflow. Please take some time to read the help page, especially the sections named "What topics can I ask about here?" and "What types of questions should I avoid asking?". And more importantly, please read the Stack Overflow question checklist. You might also want to learn about Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Examples.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:11











  • Take a look at git merge

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:12












  • 6





    Possible duplicate of Merge development branch with master

    – bruceskyaus
    Nov 13 '18 at 4:12











  • Hello and welcome to StackOverflow. Please take some time to read the help page, especially the sections named "What topics can I ask about here?" and "What types of questions should I avoid asking?". And more importantly, please read the Stack Overflow question checklist. You might also want to learn about Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Examples.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:11











  • Take a look at git merge

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:12







6




6





Possible duplicate of Merge development branch with master

– bruceskyaus
Nov 13 '18 at 4:12





Possible duplicate of Merge development branch with master

– bruceskyaus
Nov 13 '18 at 4:12













Hello and welcome to StackOverflow. Please take some time to read the help page, especially the sections named "What topics can I ask about here?" and "What types of questions should I avoid asking?". And more importantly, please read the Stack Overflow question checklist. You might also want to learn about Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Examples.

– Clijsters
Nov 13 '18 at 9:11





Hello and welcome to StackOverflow. Please take some time to read the help page, especially the sections named "What topics can I ask about here?" and "What types of questions should I avoid asking?". And more importantly, please read the Stack Overflow question checklist. You might also want to learn about Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable Examples.

– Clijsters
Nov 13 '18 at 9:11













Take a look at git merge

– Clijsters
Nov 13 '18 at 9:12





Take a look at git merge

– Clijsters
Nov 13 '18 at 9:12












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














This should work to merge dev into stable.



git checkout dev
git pull
git checkout stable
git pull
git merge dev
git push


Don't forget to commit & push your changes on dev first






share|improve this answer

























  • Why do you pull two times? A simple git merge should do the trick and is much faster.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:59











  • And also: No one said that there is a remote.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:11











  • Just helping a typical use case. If there is a remote, then you'll need to pull to make sure the local branches are up to date. If there is no remote then git checkout stable git merge dev

    – Steven McConnon
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01











  • Yes, but one pull is enough. You don't need to pull two times.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:04










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53273592%2fhow-to-make-a-merge-of-two-git-branches%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














This should work to merge dev into stable.



git checkout dev
git pull
git checkout stable
git pull
git merge dev
git push


Don't forget to commit & push your changes on dev first






share|improve this answer

























  • Why do you pull two times? A simple git merge should do the trick and is much faster.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:59











  • And also: No one said that there is a remote.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:11











  • Just helping a typical use case. If there is a remote, then you'll need to pull to make sure the local branches are up to date. If there is no remote then git checkout stable git merge dev

    – Steven McConnon
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01











  • Yes, but one pull is enough. You don't need to pull two times.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:04















2














This should work to merge dev into stable.



git checkout dev
git pull
git checkout stable
git pull
git merge dev
git push


Don't forget to commit & push your changes on dev first






share|improve this answer

























  • Why do you pull two times? A simple git merge should do the trick and is much faster.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:59











  • And also: No one said that there is a remote.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:11











  • Just helping a typical use case. If there is a remote, then you'll need to pull to make sure the local branches are up to date. If there is no remote then git checkout stable git merge dev

    – Steven McConnon
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01











  • Yes, but one pull is enough. You don't need to pull two times.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:04













2












2








2







This should work to merge dev into stable.



git checkout dev
git pull
git checkout stable
git pull
git merge dev
git push


Don't forget to commit & push your changes on dev first






share|improve this answer















This should work to merge dev into stable.



git checkout dev
git pull
git checkout stable
git pull
git merge dev
git push


Don't forget to commit & push your changes on dev first







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 13 '18 at 4:47

























answered Nov 13 '18 at 4:08









Steven McConnonSteven McConnon

980717




980717












  • Why do you pull two times? A simple git merge should do the trick and is much faster.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:59











  • And also: No one said that there is a remote.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:11











  • Just helping a typical use case. If there is a remote, then you'll need to pull to make sure the local branches are up to date. If there is no remote then git checkout stable git merge dev

    – Steven McConnon
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01











  • Yes, but one pull is enough. You don't need to pull two times.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:04

















  • Why do you pull two times? A simple git merge should do the trick and is much faster.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 8:59











  • And also: No one said that there is a remote.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 13 '18 at 9:11











  • Just helping a typical use case. If there is a remote, then you'll need to pull to make sure the local branches are up to date. If there is no remote then git checkout stable git merge dev

    – Steven McConnon
    Nov 14 '18 at 10:01











  • Yes, but one pull is enough. You don't need to pull two times.

    – Clijsters
    Nov 14 '18 at 14:04
















Why do you pull two times? A simple git merge should do the trick and is much faster.

– Clijsters
Nov 13 '18 at 8:59





Why do you pull two times? A simple git merge should do the trick and is much faster.

– Clijsters
Nov 13 '18 at 8:59













And also: No one said that there is a remote.

– Clijsters
Nov 13 '18 at 9:11





And also: No one said that there is a remote.

– Clijsters
Nov 13 '18 at 9:11













Just helping a typical use case. If there is a remote, then you'll need to pull to make sure the local branches are up to date. If there is no remote then git checkout stable git merge dev

– Steven McConnon
Nov 14 '18 at 10:01





Just helping a typical use case. If there is a remote, then you'll need to pull to make sure the local branches are up to date. If there is no remote then git checkout stable git merge dev

– Steven McConnon
Nov 14 '18 at 10:01













Yes, but one pull is enough. You don't need to pull two times.

– Clijsters
Nov 14 '18 at 14:04





Yes, but one pull is enough. You don't need to pull two times.

– Clijsters
Nov 14 '18 at 14:04

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53273592%2fhow-to-make-a-merge-of-two-git-branches%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3

Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto