Is there a POSIX (or at least a popular) utility to set the current working directory when invoking a program?
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
We have env(1) to modify the environment of the command we want to run (for example env MANPAGER=more man dtrace
). Is there something similar but for modifying the directory that the command is going to be started in?
Ideally, I would like it to look like this:
theMagicCommand /new/cwd myProgram
This way it could be "chained" with other env(1)-like commands, e.g.,
daemon -p /tmp/pid env VAR=value theMagicCommand /new/cwd myProgram
So far I can think of the following solution, which unfortunately does not have the same interface as env(1):
cd /new/cwd && myProgram
Also, I can just create a simple shell script like this:
#! /bin/sh -
cd "$1:?Missing the new working directory" || exit 1
shift
exec "$@:?Missing the command to run"
but I am looking for something that already exists (at least on macOS and FreeBSD).
myProgram
is not necessarily a desktop application (in which case I could just use the Path key in a .desktop file).
shell freebsd cwd
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
We have env(1) to modify the environment of the command we want to run (for example env MANPAGER=more man dtrace
). Is there something similar but for modifying the directory that the command is going to be started in?
Ideally, I would like it to look like this:
theMagicCommand /new/cwd myProgram
This way it could be "chained" with other env(1)-like commands, e.g.,
daemon -p /tmp/pid env VAR=value theMagicCommand /new/cwd myProgram
So far I can think of the following solution, which unfortunately does not have the same interface as env(1):
cd /new/cwd && myProgram
Also, I can just create a simple shell script like this:
#! /bin/sh -
cd "$1:?Missing the new working directory" || exit 1
shift
exec "$@:?Missing the command to run"
but I am looking for something that already exists (at least on macOS and FreeBSD).
myProgram
is not necessarily a desktop application (in which case I could just use the Path key in a .desktop file).
shell freebsd cwd
6
Why doescd /new/cwd && env VAR=value myProgram
not meet your critera?
– jpaugh
yesterday
That's already in the question, where M. Piotrowski explained that that is not the same interface asenv
. Look atenv
. Compare it tortprio
,idprio
,numactl
,jexec
,chrt
, and indeed the commands in the toolsets mentioned in the answers. There's a pattern, and it is chain loading.
– JdeBP
yesterday
2
What do you mean by “interface”? And why not use(cd the/cwd; cmd)
?
– Konrad Rudolph
13 hours ago
1
@KonradRudolph For example, you cannot easily pass(cd the/cwd; cmd)
to env(1) without wrapping it with sh(1).
– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
up vote
15
down vote
favorite
We have env(1) to modify the environment of the command we want to run (for example env MANPAGER=more man dtrace
). Is there something similar but for modifying the directory that the command is going to be started in?
Ideally, I would like it to look like this:
theMagicCommand /new/cwd myProgram
This way it could be "chained" with other env(1)-like commands, e.g.,
daemon -p /tmp/pid env VAR=value theMagicCommand /new/cwd myProgram
So far I can think of the following solution, which unfortunately does not have the same interface as env(1):
cd /new/cwd && myProgram
Also, I can just create a simple shell script like this:
#! /bin/sh -
cd "$1:?Missing the new working directory" || exit 1
shift
exec "$@:?Missing the command to run"
but I am looking for something that already exists (at least on macOS and FreeBSD).
myProgram
is not necessarily a desktop application (in which case I could just use the Path key in a .desktop file).
shell freebsd cwd
We have env(1) to modify the environment of the command we want to run (for example env MANPAGER=more man dtrace
). Is there something similar but for modifying the directory that the command is going to be started in?
Ideally, I would like it to look like this:
theMagicCommand /new/cwd myProgram
This way it could be "chained" with other env(1)-like commands, e.g.,
daemon -p /tmp/pid env VAR=value theMagicCommand /new/cwd myProgram
So far I can think of the following solution, which unfortunately does not have the same interface as env(1):
cd /new/cwd && myProgram
Also, I can just create a simple shell script like this:
#! /bin/sh -
cd "$1:?Missing the new working directory" || exit 1
shift
exec "$@:?Missing the command to run"
but I am looking for something that already exists (at least on macOS and FreeBSD).
myProgram
is not necessarily a desktop application (in which case I could just use the Path key in a .desktop file).
shell freebsd cwd
shell freebsd cwd
edited 13 hours ago
asked yesterday
Mateusz Piotrowski
1,84321540
1,84321540
6
Why doescd /new/cwd && env VAR=value myProgram
not meet your critera?
– jpaugh
yesterday
That's already in the question, where M. Piotrowski explained that that is not the same interface asenv
. Look atenv
. Compare it tortprio
,idprio
,numactl
,jexec
,chrt
, and indeed the commands in the toolsets mentioned in the answers. There's a pattern, and it is chain loading.
– JdeBP
yesterday
2
What do you mean by “interface”? And why not use(cd the/cwd; cmd)
?
– Konrad Rudolph
13 hours ago
1
@KonradRudolph For example, you cannot easily pass(cd the/cwd; cmd)
to env(1) without wrapping it with sh(1).
– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
add a comment |
6
Why doescd /new/cwd && env VAR=value myProgram
not meet your critera?
– jpaugh
yesterday
That's already in the question, where M. Piotrowski explained that that is not the same interface asenv
. Look atenv
. Compare it tortprio
,idprio
,numactl
,jexec
,chrt
, and indeed the commands in the toolsets mentioned in the answers. There's a pattern, and it is chain loading.
– JdeBP
yesterday
2
What do you mean by “interface”? And why not use(cd the/cwd; cmd)
?
– Konrad Rudolph
13 hours ago
1
@KonradRudolph For example, you cannot easily pass(cd the/cwd; cmd)
to env(1) without wrapping it with sh(1).
– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
6
6
Why does
cd /new/cwd && env VAR=value myProgram
not meet your critera?– jpaugh
yesterday
Why does
cd /new/cwd && env VAR=value myProgram
not meet your critera?– jpaugh
yesterday
That's already in the question, where M. Piotrowski explained that that is not the same interface as
env
. Look at env
. Compare it to rtprio
, idprio
, numactl
, jexec
, chrt
, and indeed the commands in the toolsets mentioned in the answers. There's a pattern, and it is chain loading.– JdeBP
yesterday
That's already in the question, where M. Piotrowski explained that that is not the same interface as
env
. Look at env
. Compare it to rtprio
, idprio
, numactl
, jexec
, chrt
, and indeed the commands in the toolsets mentioned in the answers. There's a pattern, and it is chain loading.– JdeBP
yesterday
2
2
What do you mean by “interface”? And why not use
(cd the/cwd; cmd)
?– Konrad Rudolph
13 hours ago
What do you mean by “interface”? And why not use
(cd the/cwd; cmd)
?– Konrad Rudolph
13 hours ago
1
1
@KonradRudolph For example, you cannot easily pass
(cd the/cwd; cmd)
to env(1) without wrapping it with sh(1).– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
@KonradRudolph For example, you cannot easily pass
(cd the/cwd; cmd)
to env(1) without wrapping it with sh(1).– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
AFAIK, there is no such dedicated utility in the POSIX tool chest. But it's common to invoke sh
to set up an environment (cwd, limits, stdout/in/err, umask...) before running a command as you do in your sh
script.
But you don't have to write that script in a file, you can just inline it:
sh -c 'CDPATH= cd -P -- "$1" && shift && exec "$@"' sh /some/dir cmd args
(assuming the directory is not -
). Adding CDPATH=
(in case there's one in the environment) and -P
for it to behave more like a straight chdir()
.
Alternatively, you could use perl
whose chdir()
does a straight chdir()
out of the box.
perl -e 'chdir(shift@ARGV) or die "chdir: $!"; exec @ARGV or die "exec: $!"
' /some/dir cmd args
Oh, yeah. This is indded a very handy variation of the script I included in my question. I was afraid that the utility I am looking for does not exist since its functionality is already available with a relatively short sh(1) oneliner.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
yesterday
7
If you're already runningsh
, you can also do(cd /wherever && exec /my/command)
. The()
implicitly opens a subshell to run the wrapped commands, and of course,exec
gets rid of the extra shell process as quickly as/my/command
starts running.
– jpaugh
yesterday
1
That was suggested in a now-deleted answer. The questioner explained that that was not an answer to what xe asked.
– JdeBP
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
The toolsets used in the daemontools world, and elsewhere, have this and more besides; have had for many years; and are widely available.
- Wayne Marshall's perp has
runtool
:runtool -c /new/cwd myProgram
- Laurent Bercot's execline has
cd
:cd /new/cwd myProgram
my nosh toolset haschdir
:chdir /new/cwd myProgram
All of these are chain-loading tools, designed to be used in exactly these sorts of chains. There is a wide selection of chain-loading tools in these toolkits for other purposes.
Further reading
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/353698/5132
- Laurent Bercot (2018-08-01). "Reference". execline. skarnet.org.
- Laurent Bercot (2018-11-08). "Reference". s6. skarnet.org.
- Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018). "Command and tool list". nosh Guide. Softwares.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Certain programs have an option for this, like Git:
-C <path>
Run as if
git
was started in<path>
instead of the current working
directory.
and Make:
-C dir
,--directory=dir
Change to directory
dir
before reading the makefiles or doing anything else.
and Tar:
-C
,--directory=DIR
Change to
DIR
before performing any operations. This option is
order-sensitive, i.e. it affects all options that follow.
Yes. Although my question is what ifmyProgram
does not provide such an option... Thank you for your contribution but I'm afraid it does not answer my question at all.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
There is such a popular program. It is called ... hold onto your chair... drumroll... env
. (The GNU version, since version 8.28, not POSIX).
NAME
env - run a program in a modified environment
SYNOPSIS
env [OPTION]... [-] [NAME=VALUE]... [COMMAND [ARG]...]
DESCRIPTION
Set each NAME to VALUE in the environment and run COMMAND.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options too.
-i, --ignore-environment
start with an empty environment
-0, --null
end each output line with NUL, not newline
-u, --unset=NAME
remove variable from the environment
-C, --chdir=DIR
change working directory to DIR
--help display this help and exit
--version
output version information and exit
A mere - implies -i. If no COMMAND, print the resulting environment.
why is this being downvoted?
– Adrian
1 hour ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
AFAIK, there is no such dedicated utility in the POSIX tool chest. But it's common to invoke sh
to set up an environment (cwd, limits, stdout/in/err, umask...) before running a command as you do in your sh
script.
But you don't have to write that script in a file, you can just inline it:
sh -c 'CDPATH= cd -P -- "$1" && shift && exec "$@"' sh /some/dir cmd args
(assuming the directory is not -
). Adding CDPATH=
(in case there's one in the environment) and -P
for it to behave more like a straight chdir()
.
Alternatively, you could use perl
whose chdir()
does a straight chdir()
out of the box.
perl -e 'chdir(shift@ARGV) or die "chdir: $!"; exec @ARGV or die "exec: $!"
' /some/dir cmd args
Oh, yeah. This is indded a very handy variation of the script I included in my question. I was afraid that the utility I am looking for does not exist since its functionality is already available with a relatively short sh(1) oneliner.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
yesterday
7
If you're already runningsh
, you can also do(cd /wherever && exec /my/command)
. The()
implicitly opens a subshell to run the wrapped commands, and of course,exec
gets rid of the extra shell process as quickly as/my/command
starts running.
– jpaugh
yesterday
1
That was suggested in a now-deleted answer. The questioner explained that that was not an answer to what xe asked.
– JdeBP
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
AFAIK, there is no such dedicated utility in the POSIX tool chest. But it's common to invoke sh
to set up an environment (cwd, limits, stdout/in/err, umask...) before running a command as you do in your sh
script.
But you don't have to write that script in a file, you can just inline it:
sh -c 'CDPATH= cd -P -- "$1" && shift && exec "$@"' sh /some/dir cmd args
(assuming the directory is not -
). Adding CDPATH=
(in case there's one in the environment) and -P
for it to behave more like a straight chdir()
.
Alternatively, you could use perl
whose chdir()
does a straight chdir()
out of the box.
perl -e 'chdir(shift@ARGV) or die "chdir: $!"; exec @ARGV or die "exec: $!"
' /some/dir cmd args
Oh, yeah. This is indded a very handy variation of the script I included in my question. I was afraid that the utility I am looking for does not exist since its functionality is already available with a relatively short sh(1) oneliner.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
yesterday
7
If you're already runningsh
, you can also do(cd /wherever && exec /my/command)
. The()
implicitly opens a subshell to run the wrapped commands, and of course,exec
gets rid of the extra shell process as quickly as/my/command
starts running.
– jpaugh
yesterday
1
That was suggested in a now-deleted answer. The questioner explained that that was not an answer to what xe asked.
– JdeBP
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
up vote
17
down vote
accepted
AFAIK, there is no such dedicated utility in the POSIX tool chest. But it's common to invoke sh
to set up an environment (cwd, limits, stdout/in/err, umask...) before running a command as you do in your sh
script.
But you don't have to write that script in a file, you can just inline it:
sh -c 'CDPATH= cd -P -- "$1" && shift && exec "$@"' sh /some/dir cmd args
(assuming the directory is not -
). Adding CDPATH=
(in case there's one in the environment) and -P
for it to behave more like a straight chdir()
.
Alternatively, you could use perl
whose chdir()
does a straight chdir()
out of the box.
perl -e 'chdir(shift@ARGV) or die "chdir: $!"; exec @ARGV or die "exec: $!"
' /some/dir cmd args
AFAIK, there is no such dedicated utility in the POSIX tool chest. But it's common to invoke sh
to set up an environment (cwd, limits, stdout/in/err, umask...) before running a command as you do in your sh
script.
But you don't have to write that script in a file, you can just inline it:
sh -c 'CDPATH= cd -P -- "$1" && shift && exec "$@"' sh /some/dir cmd args
(assuming the directory is not -
). Adding CDPATH=
(in case there's one in the environment) and -P
for it to behave more like a straight chdir()
.
Alternatively, you could use perl
whose chdir()
does a straight chdir()
out of the box.
perl -e 'chdir(shift@ARGV) or die "chdir: $!"; exec @ARGV or die "exec: $!"
' /some/dir cmd args
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Stéphane Chazelas
292k54546886
292k54546886
Oh, yeah. This is indded a very handy variation of the script I included in my question. I was afraid that the utility I am looking for does not exist since its functionality is already available with a relatively short sh(1) oneliner.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
yesterday
7
If you're already runningsh
, you can also do(cd /wherever && exec /my/command)
. The()
implicitly opens a subshell to run the wrapped commands, and of course,exec
gets rid of the extra shell process as quickly as/my/command
starts running.
– jpaugh
yesterday
1
That was suggested in a now-deleted answer. The questioner explained that that was not an answer to what xe asked.
– JdeBP
23 hours ago
add a comment |
Oh, yeah. This is indded a very handy variation of the script I included in my question. I was afraid that the utility I am looking for does not exist since its functionality is already available with a relatively short sh(1) oneliner.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
yesterday
7
If you're already runningsh
, you can also do(cd /wherever && exec /my/command)
. The()
implicitly opens a subshell to run the wrapped commands, and of course,exec
gets rid of the extra shell process as quickly as/my/command
starts running.
– jpaugh
yesterday
1
That was suggested in a now-deleted answer. The questioner explained that that was not an answer to what xe asked.
– JdeBP
23 hours ago
Oh, yeah. This is indded a very handy variation of the script I included in my question. I was afraid that the utility I am looking for does not exist since its functionality is already available with a relatively short sh(1) oneliner.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
yesterday
Oh, yeah. This is indded a very handy variation of the script I included in my question. I was afraid that the utility I am looking for does not exist since its functionality is already available with a relatively short sh(1) oneliner.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
yesterday
7
7
If you're already running
sh
, you can also do (cd /wherever && exec /my/command)
. The ()
implicitly opens a subshell to run the wrapped commands, and of course, exec
gets rid of the extra shell process as quickly as /my/command
starts running.– jpaugh
yesterday
If you're already running
sh
, you can also do (cd /wherever && exec /my/command)
. The ()
implicitly opens a subshell to run the wrapped commands, and of course, exec
gets rid of the extra shell process as quickly as /my/command
starts running.– jpaugh
yesterday
1
1
That was suggested in a now-deleted answer. The questioner explained that that was not an answer to what xe asked.
– JdeBP
23 hours ago
That was suggested in a now-deleted answer. The questioner explained that that was not an answer to what xe asked.
– JdeBP
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
The toolsets used in the daemontools world, and elsewhere, have this and more besides; have had for many years; and are widely available.
- Wayne Marshall's perp has
runtool
:runtool -c /new/cwd myProgram
- Laurent Bercot's execline has
cd
:cd /new/cwd myProgram
my nosh toolset haschdir
:chdir /new/cwd myProgram
All of these are chain-loading tools, designed to be used in exactly these sorts of chains. There is a wide selection of chain-loading tools in these toolkits for other purposes.
Further reading
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/353698/5132
- Laurent Bercot (2018-08-01). "Reference". execline. skarnet.org.
- Laurent Bercot (2018-11-08). "Reference". s6. skarnet.org.
- Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018). "Command and tool list". nosh Guide. Softwares.
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
The toolsets used in the daemontools world, and elsewhere, have this and more besides; have had for many years; and are widely available.
- Wayne Marshall's perp has
runtool
:runtool -c /new/cwd myProgram
- Laurent Bercot's execline has
cd
:cd /new/cwd myProgram
my nosh toolset haschdir
:chdir /new/cwd myProgram
All of these are chain-loading tools, designed to be used in exactly these sorts of chains. There is a wide selection of chain-loading tools in these toolkits for other purposes.
Further reading
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/353698/5132
- Laurent Bercot (2018-08-01). "Reference". execline. skarnet.org.
- Laurent Bercot (2018-11-08). "Reference". s6. skarnet.org.
- Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018). "Command and tool list". nosh Guide. Softwares.
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
up vote
15
down vote
The toolsets used in the daemontools world, and elsewhere, have this and more besides; have had for many years; and are widely available.
- Wayne Marshall's perp has
runtool
:runtool -c /new/cwd myProgram
- Laurent Bercot's execline has
cd
:cd /new/cwd myProgram
my nosh toolset haschdir
:chdir /new/cwd myProgram
All of these are chain-loading tools, designed to be used in exactly these sorts of chains. There is a wide selection of chain-loading tools in these toolkits for other purposes.
Further reading
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/353698/5132
- Laurent Bercot (2018-08-01). "Reference". execline. skarnet.org.
- Laurent Bercot (2018-11-08). "Reference". s6. skarnet.org.
- Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018). "Command and tool list". nosh Guide. Softwares.
The toolsets used in the daemontools world, and elsewhere, have this and more besides; have had for many years; and are widely available.
- Wayne Marshall's perp has
runtool
:runtool -c /new/cwd myProgram
- Laurent Bercot's execline has
cd
:cd /new/cwd myProgram
my nosh toolset haschdir
:chdir /new/cwd myProgram
All of these are chain-loading tools, designed to be used in exactly these sorts of chains. There is a wide selection of chain-loading tools in these toolkits for other purposes.
Further reading
- https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/353698/5132
- Laurent Bercot (2018-08-01). "Reference". execline. skarnet.org.
- Laurent Bercot (2018-11-08). "Reference". s6. skarnet.org.
- Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018). "Command and tool list". nosh Guide. Softwares.
answered yesterday
JdeBP
31.3k466144
31.3k466144
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Certain programs have an option for this, like Git:
-C <path>
Run as if
git
was started in<path>
instead of the current working
directory.
and Make:
-C dir
,--directory=dir
Change to directory
dir
before reading the makefiles or doing anything else.
and Tar:
-C
,--directory=DIR
Change to
DIR
before performing any operations. This option is
order-sensitive, i.e. it affects all options that follow.
Yes. Although my question is what ifmyProgram
does not provide such an option... Thank you for your contribution but I'm afraid it does not answer my question at all.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Certain programs have an option for this, like Git:
-C <path>
Run as if
git
was started in<path>
instead of the current working
directory.
and Make:
-C dir
,--directory=dir
Change to directory
dir
before reading the makefiles or doing anything else.
and Tar:
-C
,--directory=DIR
Change to
DIR
before performing any operations. This option is
order-sensitive, i.e. it affects all options that follow.
Yes. Although my question is what ifmyProgram
does not provide such an option... Thank you for your contribution but I'm afraid it does not answer my question at all.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Certain programs have an option for this, like Git:
-C <path>
Run as if
git
was started in<path>
instead of the current working
directory.
and Make:
-C dir
,--directory=dir
Change to directory
dir
before reading the makefiles or doing anything else.
and Tar:
-C
,--directory=DIR
Change to
DIR
before performing any operations. This option is
order-sensitive, i.e. it affects all options that follow.
Certain programs have an option for this, like Git:
-C <path>
Run as if
git
was started in<path>
instead of the current working
directory.
and Make:
-C dir
,--directory=dir
Change to directory
dir
before reading the makefiles or doing anything else.
and Tar:
-C
,--directory=DIR
Change to
DIR
before performing any operations. This option is
order-sensitive, i.e. it affects all options that follow.
edited 23 hours ago
answered yesterday
Steven Penny
2,45121637
2,45121637
Yes. Although my question is what ifmyProgram
does not provide such an option... Thank you for your contribution but I'm afraid it does not answer my question at all.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Yes. Although my question is what ifmyProgram
does not provide such an option... Thank you for your contribution but I'm afraid it does not answer my question at all.
– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
Yes. Although my question is what if
myProgram
does not provide such an option... Thank you for your contribution but I'm afraid it does not answer my question at all.– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
Yes. Although my question is what if
myProgram
does not provide such an option... Thank you for your contribution but I'm afraid it does not answer my question at all.– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
There is such a popular program. It is called ... hold onto your chair... drumroll... env
. (The GNU version, since version 8.28, not POSIX).
NAME
env - run a program in a modified environment
SYNOPSIS
env [OPTION]... [-] [NAME=VALUE]... [COMMAND [ARG]...]
DESCRIPTION
Set each NAME to VALUE in the environment and run COMMAND.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options too.
-i, --ignore-environment
start with an empty environment
-0, --null
end each output line with NUL, not newline
-u, --unset=NAME
remove variable from the environment
-C, --chdir=DIR
change working directory to DIR
--help display this help and exit
--version
output version information and exit
A mere - implies -i. If no COMMAND, print the resulting environment.
why is this being downvoted?
– Adrian
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
There is such a popular program. It is called ... hold onto your chair... drumroll... env
. (The GNU version, since version 8.28, not POSIX).
NAME
env - run a program in a modified environment
SYNOPSIS
env [OPTION]... [-] [NAME=VALUE]... [COMMAND [ARG]...]
DESCRIPTION
Set each NAME to VALUE in the environment and run COMMAND.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options too.
-i, --ignore-environment
start with an empty environment
-0, --null
end each output line with NUL, not newline
-u, --unset=NAME
remove variable from the environment
-C, --chdir=DIR
change working directory to DIR
--help display this help and exit
--version
output version information and exit
A mere - implies -i. If no COMMAND, print the resulting environment.
why is this being downvoted?
– Adrian
1 hour ago
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
There is such a popular program. It is called ... hold onto your chair... drumroll... env
. (The GNU version, since version 8.28, not POSIX).
NAME
env - run a program in a modified environment
SYNOPSIS
env [OPTION]... [-] [NAME=VALUE]... [COMMAND [ARG]...]
DESCRIPTION
Set each NAME to VALUE in the environment and run COMMAND.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options too.
-i, --ignore-environment
start with an empty environment
-0, --null
end each output line with NUL, not newline
-u, --unset=NAME
remove variable from the environment
-C, --chdir=DIR
change working directory to DIR
--help display this help and exit
--version
output version information and exit
A mere - implies -i. If no COMMAND, print the resulting environment.
There is such a popular program. It is called ... hold onto your chair... drumroll... env
. (The GNU version, since version 8.28, not POSIX).
NAME
env - run a program in a modified environment
SYNOPSIS
env [OPTION]... [-] [NAME=VALUE]... [COMMAND [ARG]...]
DESCRIPTION
Set each NAME to VALUE in the environment and run COMMAND.
Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options too.
-i, --ignore-environment
start with an empty environment
-0, --null
end each output line with NUL, not newline
-u, --unset=NAME
remove variable from the environment
-C, --chdir=DIR
change working directory to DIR
--help display this help and exit
--version
output version information and exit
A mere - implies -i. If no COMMAND, print the resulting environment.
edited 1 hour ago
Stéphane Chazelas
292k54546886
292k54546886
answered 2 hours ago
n.m.
26215
26215
why is this being downvoted?
– Adrian
1 hour ago
add a comment |
why is this being downvoted?
– Adrian
1 hour ago
why is this being downvoted?
– Adrian
1 hour ago
why is this being downvoted?
– Adrian
1 hour ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480776%2fis-there-a-posix-or-at-least-a-popular-utility-to-set-the-current-working-dire%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
6
Why does
cd /new/cwd && env VAR=value myProgram
not meet your critera?– jpaugh
yesterday
That's already in the question, where M. Piotrowski explained that that is not the same interface as
env
. Look atenv
. Compare it tortprio
,idprio
,numactl
,jexec
,chrt
, and indeed the commands in the toolsets mentioned in the answers. There's a pattern, and it is chain loading.– JdeBP
yesterday
2
What do you mean by “interface”? And why not use
(cd the/cwd; cmd)
?– Konrad Rudolph
13 hours ago
1
@KonradRudolph For example, you cannot easily pass
(cd the/cwd; cmd)
to env(1) without wrapping it with sh(1).– Mateusz Piotrowski
3 hours ago