PCC streetcar
 | This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. (March 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
| PCC streetcar | |
|---|---|
 Three PCCs on the San Francisco Municipal Railway's F-line. Pictured are an example of one double-ended streetcar and two single-ended cars. | |
 Interior of a PCC car | |
| In service | 1936–present |
| Manufacturer | St. Louis Car Company Pullman-Standard |
| Constructed | 1936–1952 |
| Scrapped | 1950s–1998 |
| Number built | 5,000 |
| Capacity | 52–61 Seats |
| Specifications | |
| Car length | 46–50.5 ft (14.02–15.39 m) |
| Width | 100–108 in (2.54–2.74 m) |
| Maximum speed | 50 mph (80 km/h) |
| Weight | 35,000–42,000 lb (15,900–19,100 kg) |
| Traction system | 4 x 55 hp (41 kW) motors, 43:6 (~7.17) gear ratio |
| Acceleration | Variable, Automatic 1.5–4.75 mph/s (2.41–7.64 km/(h⋅s)) |
| Deceleration | Service: Variable to 4.75 mph/s (7.64 km/(h⋅s)), Emergency: 9.0 mph/s (14.5 km/(h⋅s)) maximum |
| Electric system(s) | 600 V or 750 V DC Overhead lines |
| Current collection method | Pantograph or Trolley pole |
| Braking system(s) | Dynamic Service Braking; Friction; for Final Stop, Park; Magnetic |
| Track gauge | Wide, Standard, Narrow Gauges |
The PCC (Presidents’ Conference Committee) is a streetcar (tram) design that was first built in the United States in the 1930s. The design proved successful in its native country, and after World War II it was licensed for use elsewhere in the world where PCC based cars were made. The PCC car has proved to be a long-lasting icon of streetcar design, and PCC cars are still in service around the world.
Contents
1 Origins
2 Manufacturing
2.1 Performance
2.2 Body variations
3 Rapid transit cars
4 PCC fleets
5 PCCs still in active service
6 Models based on the PCC streetcar
7 See also
8 References
9 Further reading
10 External links
Origins
The "PCC" acronym originated from the design committee formed in 1929 as the "Presidents' Conference Committee", renamed the "Electric Railway Presidents' Conference Committee" (ERPCC) in 1931. The group's membership consisted primarily of representatives of several larger operators of U.S. urban electric street railways plus potential manufacturers. Three interurban lines and at least one "heavy rail", or rapid transit, operator — Chicago Rapid Transit Company — were represented as well. Also included on the membership roll were manufacturers of surface cars (streetcars) and interested component suppliers.
ERPCC's goal was to design a streamlined, comfortable, quiet, and fast accelerating and braking streetcar that would be operated by a seated operator using floor mounted pedal controls to better meet the needs of the street railways and to better appeal to riders. ERPCC prepared a detailed research plan, conducted extensive research on streetcar design, built and tested components, made necessary modifications and revisions based upon the findings, and ultimately produced a set of specifications for a standardized and fixed design (albeit one with a modest list of available options with ample room for customer customization) to be built with standard parts as opposed to a custom designed carbody with any variety of different parts added depending on the whims and requirements of the individual customer. An excellent product emerged, the PCC car, as was proved in later years by numerous national and international users.
Many design patents resulted from the work of ERPCC. These were transferred to a new business entity called the Transit Research Corporation (TRC) when ERPCC expired in 1936. Although this company continued the work of research on improvements to the basic design of the car and would issue sets of specifications three times in the ensuing years, because TRC defined a PCC car as any vehicle which used patents on which it collected royalties, it was formed for the primary purpose of controlling those patents and promoting the standardization envisioned by the ERPCC. The company was funded by its collection of patent royalties from the railways which bought PCC cars. The company was controlled by a voting trust representing the properties which had invested in the work of ERPCC.
One participant in Committee meetings, Philadelphia trolley manufacturer J. G. Brill and Company brought a competitive design — the Brilliner — to market in 1938. With Raymond Loewy designed elements and very similar to the PCC look, the Brilliner attracted no large orders, being built only for Atlantic City Transit and the Red Arrow Lines in suburban Philadelphia. Fewer than 50 were sold.[1]
A significant contribution to the PCC design was noise reduction with extensive use of rubber in springs and other components to prevent rattle, vibration, and thus noise and to provide a level of comfort not known before.[citation needed] Wheel tires were mounted between rubber sandwiches and were thus electrically isolated so that shunts were used to complete ground. Resilient wheels were used on most PCC cars with later heftier cousins known as "Super-Resilient".
Gears were another source of considerable noise, solved by employing hypoid gears which are mounted at a right angle to the axle, where three of the six teeth constantly engaged the main gear, reducing play and noise. All movable truck parts employed rubber for noise reduction as well.[2] "Satisfactory Cushion Wheel of Vital Importance; Develop New Truck Design; Generous Use of Rubber" are headings within a paper that Chief Engineer Clarence F. Hirshfeld both presented and published.[3]
After a specification document suitable for purchasing cars was generated by TRC, orders were placed by eight companies in 1935 and 1936. First was Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corporation (B&QT) for 100 cars, then Baltimore Transit Co. (BTCo) for 27 cars, Chicago Surface Lines (CSL) for 83 cars, Pittsburgh Railways Co. (PRCO) for 101 cars, San Diego Electric Railway (SDERy) for 25 cars, Los Angeles Railway (LARy) for 60 cars, and then Boston Elevated Railway (BERy) for 1 car. In late 1935 or early in 1936 Westinghouse Electric Corporation pressed for one car to be equipped with their electrical equipment for testing in Pittsburgh, since the Brooklyn order would have all cars equipped by General Electric, and Clark Equipment Company pressed for one car to be made by them of aluminum for delivery to B&QT. Agreements among the parties were reached whereby St. Louis Car Company would build 101 essentially identical cars and Clark would build one of its own body design.
Brooklyn received its first car #1001 on May 28, 1936, PRCo took delivery of car #100 on July 26, 1936, and Baltimore received its first car on September 2, 1936. In the late 1936 discussions of operating experience it was noted that the Brooklyn car had run 3000 miles by the time the Pittsburgh car had run 1000 miles. The first car to be placed in a scheduled public service was PRCO #100 in August and B&QT launched its first scheduled service with a group of cars on October 1, 1936, followed by CSL on November 13, 1936. Production continued in North America by St. Louis Car Co. and Pullman-Standard until 1952, with 4978 units being built. Under license to use the designs patented by TRC, thousands more PCC and partially PCC type cars were produced in Europe through the last half of the 20th century. The cars were well-built and many hundreds are still in operation. The majority of large North American streetcar systems surviving after 1935 purchased PCC streetcars; those systems which eventually terminated streetcar operations often sold their cars to surviving operators.
Melbourne, Australia was keen to build two new tram routes after the Second World War and these routes would be served by PCC Streetcars. The MMTB decided instead that it was too expensive and Melbourne only ever had two PCC streetcars, of which one was a prototype for a completely different class.
Several dozen remain in public transit service, such as the in Boston, and in Philadelphia, Kenosha, San Diego and San Francisco following extensive overhauling. All other surviving and functional North American PCC cars are operated by museums and heritage railways.[4] Several retired PCCs from Boston, Cleveland, and Philadelphia were purchased as scrap and have been privately stored just outside Windber, Pennsylvania since 1992.[5]
Washington, DC, PCCs were unique[6][citation needed] because of conduit plows which collected current from a slot between the rails into which the plow dipped, contacting positive and negative rails under the street on either side. At the city limits were "plow pits", where the plow was dropped and removed, the trolley pole raised, and the car then continued on its way, using overhead wire; the process was reversed in the opposite direction into Washington.
"The PCC car was not just another modular vehicle but the result of the only systems engineering approach to mass producing a rail car."[7] Research into passenger comfort resulting from vibrations, acceleration, lighting, heating and cooling, seat spacing, cushion height, space for arms, legs, standing passengers, economies of weight affecting maintenance, cost of power, reduced wear of components and track. Dimensions were established to fit the majority but could easily be changed for special situations. Windows were spaced to match seating.
While some of the components in the PCC car had been used before—resilient wheels, magnetic braking, sealed gears, and modular design to name a few—the ERPCC redesigned, refined, and perfected many of these while developing new acceleration and braking controls and put them all in one package. The PCC is far more than a good design, it is an excellent design with modern transit rail vehicles essentially upgrading the design with the most recent technology.[citation needed]
Manufacturing
A PCC streetcar at Boston's Riverside station in the early 1960s
PCC cars were initially built in the United States by the St. Louis Car Company (SLCCo) and Pullman Standard. Clark Equipment built the only aluminum-body PCC[8] as well as all narrow gauge B1 trucks for Los Angeles, all the standard and broad gauge B2 trucks both air- and all-electric, and the B2B trucks used under PRCo 1725–1799 and Toronto 4500–4549.[9][citation needed] SLCCo built all B3 trucks, both standard and broad gauge.[10][citation needed] PCC cars for Canadian cities were assembled in Montreal, Quebec by Canadian Car and Foundry from bodies and trucks supplied by St. Louis Car.[11]
Westinghouse (Westinghouse Electric, Westinghouse Air Brake Company, Canadian Westinghouse Co.) and General Electric both supplied electrical packages and brake components which were designed and built in cooperation with the ERPCC.[12][citation needed] The customer specified the equipment which was to be installed, performance was similar and most cities ordered from both suppliers.[13] Since Westinghouse was home based near Pittsburgh, PRCo ordered 75% of its PCC fleet with Westinghouse equipment, the balance with GE.[citation needed] Indeed, PCCs are often identified as either Westinghouse or GE.[clarification needed]
The last PCC streetcars built for any North American system were a batch of 25 for the San Francisco Municipal Railway, manufactured by the St. Louis Car Company and delivered in 1951-2.[14]
Approximately 4586 PCC cars were purchased by United States transit companies – 1052 Pullman Standards and 3534 by St. Louis. Most transit companies purchased one type, but Chicago, Baltimore, Cleveland, and Shaker Heights operated both examples. The Baltimore Transit Co. (BTC) considered the Pullman cars of superior construction. The St. Louis cars had a more aesthetically pleasing design with a more rounded front and rear plus other fancy frills. The BTC found the Pullman cars easier to work on. St. Louis cars had compound curved wheel wells.
Performance
Westinghouse developed the XD-323 rotary accelerator for motor control with 99 points; it was installed in the first PRCo car, #100, and minor modifications allowed use in the last PCCs produced in North America for San Francisco in 1952. Prior streetcar control, existing from the 1890s, required a standing operator at a three foot high vertical "switch stand" to rotate a handle to one of six brass points mounted within the stand to provide traction motor control and acceleration. The PCC had its accelerator under the floor where the pedal activated linkage to resistance ribbons were mounted to each PCC point around the outside edge of the accelerator. An arm rotating in the center had rollers on either end which cut out resistance alternately as it rotated approximately 180 degrees. This same accelerator was also used for dynamic braking; when the power pedal was released the accelerator sought optimum braking for the speed, which prevented a lag when the brake pedal was depressed. General Electric Developed a control system for PCC cars that mirrored the Westinghouse scheme in function, although not in simplicity or maintainability.[15] With the GE commutator motor controller operating by air pressure, it had to be redesigned with the advent of the All-Electric PCC. Acceleration was variable between 1.5- and 4.75-mph per second depending upon the depression of the power pedal with the accelerator advanced automatically by a low-voltage pilot motor. Service braking was also variable and the maximum dynamic application decreased speed by 4.75-mph/s; pressing the brake pedal into emergency also brought the friction and magnetic brakes into play providing a maximum deceleration of 9.0-mph/s. Compared to a maximum of 14 points on old time equipment, the PCC was considerably smoother.
Most PCCs employed three pedals with a dead man's switch to the left, brake in center, and power pedal on the right. Depressing the brake about half way and then releasing the deadman pedal put the PCC in "park". Lifting the deadman alone would apply all brakes, drop sand, and balance the doors so they could be pushed open easily. Chicago used "bicycle-type levers" for power and brake but converted some cars to two pedals. St. Louis Public Service Co. (SLPS) used two pedals, both with heel interlocks. The right pedal is the brake; depressing this pedal about half way while lifting away from the heel applied "park". Once the brake is released the heel need not be engaged with the interlock (although a professional driver is to cover the brake at all times.) The left pedal applied the power and the heel interlock had to be engaged at all times since it was the deadman; only when the brake was in "park" could the deadman be disengaged.
SLPS is unique in that all 300 of their PCCs are All-Electric with the 1500s ordered in late 1939, the 1600s ordered late 1940s and the 1700s in January 1945. SLPS was the rolling laboratory for All-Electrics and what was learned here was applied to the post-WW2 All-Electric Demonstrator in the Fall of 1945.
From 1936 to 1945, PCC cars were 'Air-Electrics' with friction brakes, doors, and windshield wipers operated by air pressure. PRCo PCC 1600 of 1945 was the post WW2 All-Electric Demonstrator[16] which eliminated the air compressor and associated piping while incorporating such features as standee windows, a sloped windshield to eliminate night time glare, redesigned back end, forced-air ventilation, and other features. Dynamic brakes were the service brake on all PCCs; when almost stopped, friction brakes completed the stop and held the car in "park". Dynamic brakes slowed the "Air" cars to 3.0-mph at which point a lock-out relay allowed automatic application of air-applied friction brakes against each of the eight wheels. On All-Electric cars the dynamics were effective to 0.75-mph where the lockout relay then allowed a spring applied friction brake to engage a drum on each of the four motor drive shafts; this completed the stop and held the car in park. Drum brakes were released by an electric solenoid operating from low-voltage battery power; a power failure would prevent the drums from releasing which would prevent power application, a fail-safe feature. Drum brakes were quite popular and greatly reduced maintenance thus some "Air" cars were retrofitted with drums. Four magnetic brakes, one between the wheels on each side of each truck, applied additional braking for emergency stopping where all brakes were generally employed.
"These performances [acceleration and braking] enable the P.C.C. car to out-pace the average automobile which, in America, is of substantially higher performance than the typical British vehicle."[17] This, of course, is only true when comparing to the automobiles of that period.
Body variations
Two main body standards were made, 1936 and 1945, sometimes called pre-war and post-war, the most prominent difference being the windows.
The pre-war cars usually had a right side arrangement of front door, five windows, center door, five windows, and one large rear quarter window. These cars were 46 ft (14.0 m) long and 8 ft 4 in (254 cm) wide. There were variations, Washington, D.C. ordered shorter cars, at 44 ft (13.4 m), with one less window, while Chicago ordered longer and wider cars, at 50 ft 5 in (15.4 m) by 8 ft 9 in (267 cm), with a three-door arrangement[18][19][20]
Post war cars had a rationalized window arrangement. The windows and pillars were narrower, and there were small "standee" windows above each window. Right side arrangement usually was front door, 7 windows, side door, four windows, and two rear quarter windows. Most post-war cars had a length of 46 ft 5 in (14.1 m). Other body differences were a recessed windshield and wider doors. There were far fewer variations of this style, width being the most common.[20][21]
Most double ended cars, at 50 ft 5 in (15.4 m) long by 9 ft (270 cm) wide, were larger than standard, with different door arrangements. Only Dallas ordered standard size double ended cars. All double ended cars retained the pre-war style body until the end of production.[20][22]
Toronto's PCC featured a green bull's eye light on the front of each car above the destination sign.
Rapid transit cars
There were four rapid transit companies on the committee, but the primary focus was streetcars, rapid transit development was slower. The difference in operations between the systems also made standardization difficult.
By 1940, Brooklyn had five 3 section articulated trainsets with PCC components, after WWII Chicago ordered four similar trainsets. Chicago ordered two from Pullman and two from St. Louis, with different equipment, so that competing manufacturers could be directly compared. Experience from the trainsets influenced the following car standards.
Cars were to be approximately 48 ft (14.6 m) long (the Chicago maximum, Boston had some 55 ft (16.8 m) long) with one cab per car arranged in "married" two car sets, a double ended single car variant was possible. Number and type of doors and windows, interior layout, and width of cars varied with each system. Boston had two sizes, the longest at 55 ft (16.8 m), and narrowest at 8 ft 4 in (254 cm), Cleveland had the widest at 10 ft 4 in (315 cm).
Trucks were a major focus, both Clark and St. Louis developed trucks with 28 in (710 mm) wheels and a 70 mph (110 km/h) maximum speed, but only Boston used them, Clark B10s on 40 cars. Chicago used streetcar type trucks, with 26 in (660 mm) wheels and a speed of 50 mph (80 km/h), adequate for their system. When Clark stopped building railroad equipment in 1952 PCC trucks were no longer available, Boston and Cleveland then used non PCC trucks with 28 in (710 mm) wheels.
Chicago ordered the first of 770 (720 + 50 double-ended) 6000 series cars in 1948 (before the standard, which they influenced), Boston (40, then later 100) in 1950, and Cleveland (70 + 18 double-ended) in 1952. Chicago's first 200 cars were entirely new, but in 1953 they started using components salvaged from new, but no longer needed, streetcars. Toronto, on the committee, did not buy any, nor did Brooklyn, who had bought the first five trainsets.
240 PCC rapid transit cars were built in four years, from 1948 to 1952, then 438 cars with non-PCC trucks until 1957, the last of Chicago's 570 cars built with salvaged components were delivered in 1958. Some Chicago cars were in regular service in 1990, car #30 made its last revenue run in 1999.[23][24][25][26]
PCC fleets
Mayor Ralph Day commissions Toronto′s first PCC streetcars on September 22, 1938.
A PCC streetcar in operation on the Toronto Transit Commission's 509 Harbourfront line.
| City | New | Used | Total | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Chicago | 683 | 683 | Total in 1948. By 1958 all but one of the prewar cars had been scrapped and most of the postwar cars had been stripped of parts reused in 570 new C.T.A. 1-50 and 6200 series rapid transit cars.[27][28][29] Two are preserved at the Illinois Railway Museum one prewar for display only and one postwar car in operating condition.[30] | |
| Pittsburgh | 666 | 666 | Total in 1949.
| |
 Toronto Transportation Commission/Toronto Transit Commission | 540 | 225 | 765 |
|
| Philadelphia Transportation Company | 470 | 90 | 560 | All new PCCs purchased by 1947; second-hand by 1955.[27][34]
|
| Washington DC | 489 | 489 | [35]Here's a General Electric ad about PCC cars in Washington. | |
 Mexico City | 1 | 390 | 391 | Single PCC in 1947 from St. Louis Car Company and later second-hand cars:
|
| Kansas City | 184 | 184 | 371 cars were originally planned.[37] | |
 Cairo | 140 | 140 | Purchased 1968 from Toronto. Originally numbered 901 to 1027, in random order. (13 of the 140 cars never entered service.) 28 cars converted to two-car trains in 1975-1975 and renumbered 600–627. 57 cars converted to double-ended three-car trains in 1972–1978 and renumbered 301–357. All withdrawn by 1984.[38] |
PCCs still in active service
In North America, most PCC-based systems were dismantled in the post-war period in favor of bus-based transit networks. Of the rail transit systems that survived this period, most had replaced their PCCs with modern light rail vehicles (LRVs) by the early 1980s. Beginning in the late 1990s, several cities began to make use of historic PCCs to serve historic streetcar lines that combined aspects of tourist attractions and transit. There are still a few places in North America where transit agencies employ PCCs in revenue service as opposed to a short-run or intermittent heritage railway.
| Service | Image | Location | Country | Start date | # in service | Description |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Toronto streetcar system |  | Toronto | Canada | 1950s | 2 | The first PCC cars in Canada were operated by the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) in 1937. By 1954 Toronto had the largest PCC fleet in the world, including many purchased second-hand from U.S. cities that abandoned streetcar service following the Second World War. Although it acquired new custom-designed streetcars in the late 1970s and 1980s (and which will be upgraded to modern LRVs by 2019), the TTC continued using PCCs in regular service until the mid-1990s, and retains two (#4500 and #4549) for charter purposes. |
Ashmont-Mattapan High Speed Line |  | Boston | United States | 1929 | 4 | The Ashmont-Mattapan High Speed Line in Boston is a light-rail extension of the MBTA's heavy Red Line. It runs from the Ashmont terminus of the Red Line to Mattapan, and runs PCCs exclusively. The line was shut down for reconstruction from June 24, 2006 until December 22, 2007, but PCC cars have resumed operation since the line's bridges cannot support heavier light rail vehicles (LRV) operated on the MBTA's Green Line. Not considered historic equipment, the PCC cars in use on the Mattapan-Ashmont line represent the oldest cars still in revenue service, originally built between 1943 and 1946. These cars are also the only air-electric PCCs still in regular service in North America. Several retired PCCs from Boston are now at the Seashore Trolley Museum. |
F Market Line |  | San Francisco | United States | 1995 | 24 | See also: San Francisco Municipal Railway fleet#Active PCC fleet The F Market Line (historic streetcar service) in San Francisco, opened in 1995, runs along Market Street from The Castro to the Ferry Building, then along the Embarcadero north and west to Fisherman's Wharf. This line is run by a mixture of PCC cars built between 1946 and 1952, and earlier pre-PCC cars. Due to its success, a second heritage line was inaugurated in 2015, the E Embarcadero, which serves to facilitate a one-seat ride from the Caltrain San Francisco Station to Fisherman's Wharf. Although San Francisco had removed PCCs from revenue service when the city's light rail was transformed into the Muni Metro system in 1980, they had made occasional festival trips in the ensuing years before being returned to full-time service. Car 1074 is painted in the livery of the Toronto Transportation Commission, but this car was never in the TTC roster. |
Kenosha Electric Streetcar |  | Kenosha, Wisconsin | United States | 2000 | 6 | The Kenosha Electric Streetcar in Kenosha, Wisconsin, has been operating six ex-Toronto Transit Commission PCCs (five since 2000 and the sixth since 2009) and one ex-SEPTA car since 2009. The Kenosha Electric is unique among modern PCC operations in that that PCCs had not run in the city before 2000—the original rail system was shut down in 1932 before any PCC cars had been built. Two of its cars are still painted in their original TTC colours, while the rest have been re-decorated in the liveries of several U.S. cities including Pittsburgh, Johnstown, Chicago and Cincinnati. |
SEPTA Route 15 |  | Philadelphia | United States | 2005 | N/A | SEPTA restored trolley service to the Route 15 Girard Avenue line in Philadelphia in September 2005 after a 15-year "temporary" suspension of trolley service in favor of diesel buses. The line uses restored and modernized (by the Brookville Manufacturing Company) PCC cars, known as PCC-II's, painted in their original green and cream Philadelphia Transit Company livery, rather than SEPTA's white with red and blue stripes. Modernization included all-new control systems, modern turn markers, HVAC system (which accounts for the noticeably larger roof enclosure), and ADA compliant wheelchair lifts. The line runs from Haddington to Port Richmond down the median of Girard Avenue. It crosses both the Broad Street Subway and the Market-Frankford Line, and stops at the Philadelphia Zoo, among other landmarks. SEPTA had originally planned to run modern Kawasaki trolleys along the line once service was restored, but a combination of economics and a desire to help revive the Girard Avenue corridor with a more "romantic" vehicle led to the agency restoring the old vehicles for about half the cost of new cars.[citation needed] SEPTA uses Kawasaki vehicles on the rest of its trolley lines, including the Subway-Surface Green Line linking West Philadelphia with Center City and its 69th Street Terminal with the western suburbs of Media and Sharon Hill via light rail routes 101 and 102. |
Silver Line (San Diego Trolley) |  | San Diego | United States | 2011 | 2 | San Diego Trolley currently uses 2 PCCs and is in the process of determining viability of a third car as of 2016. They are in use on the Silver Line which opened in 2011 and runs in a clockwise loop around Downtown San Diego. |
McKinney Avenue Transit Authority | N/A | Dallas, Texas | United States | 2003 | 2 | The in McKinney Avenue Transit Authority in Dallas, Texas owns 2 PCC cars. One of the PCC cars is from the Tandy Center Subway. Prior to 1977, it was rebuilt and given a boxy, more symmetrical appearance. When the MATA bought the PCC car in February 2003, it was named "Winnie" for its resemblance to a Winnebago. In addition, MATA also owns and is in the process of restoring a double-ended PCC, which originally ran from Dallas from 1945-1956 and later in Boston until the 1970s. It will return to service in Dallas in early 2017.[39] |
Models based on the PCC streetcar
The PCC license was used worldwide after World War II had ended. Adaptations based on the American PCC design were made which are included below with their respective fleet numbers.
| City | New | Used | Total | Models used |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Moscow | 2,249 | Tatra T2: 180. Tatra T3: 2,069. Other Russian/former Soviet Union cities, other than those listed below, had 20 Tatra T1s, 200 Tatra T2s and 7,398 Tatra T3s. | ||
 Warsaw | 1,400 (approx.) | Tatra T1: 2. Konstal 13N: 838. Konstal 105N: approx. 560. Approx. 400 other Konstal 105N were deployed across other cities in Poland. The Konstal designs were not produced under a PCC licence. The 13N was based on the Tatra T1; the early 105N used PCC equipment, but were later upgraded. | ||
 Prague | 1,328 | Tatra T1: 133. Tatra T2: 2. Tatra T3: 1193. Another 365 Tatra T3s were delivered to German cities apart from those listed below and 313 to other eastern European countries including former Yugoslavia, Romania and Latvia. Another 954 Tatra T4s were delivered to cities in eastern European countries including former Yugoslavia, Romania and Latvia. | ||
 Kiev | 923 | Tatra T3. | ||
| Kharkiv | 735 | Tatra T3. | ||
| Samara | 662 | Tatra T2: 43. Tatra T3: 619. | ||
 Leipzig | 597 | Tatra T4. | ||
| Yekaterinburg | 595 | Tatra T2: 65. Tatra T3: 530. | ||
| Dresden | 572 | Tatra T4. | ||
| Odessa | 484 | 80 | 564 | Tatra T3. |
| Rostov-on-Don | 465 | Tatra T1: 20. Tatra T2: 40. Tatra T3: 405. | ||
| Barnaul | 444 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Volgograd | 425 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Ulyanovsk | 401 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Tula | 401 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Ostrava | 371 | cs:Tatra T1: 44. cs:Tatra T2: 100. cs:Tatra T3: 227. | ||
 Brussels | 365 | 7000 series (one-segment wagons): 177. 7700 series (articulated, two-segment wagons): 127. 7900 series (articulated, three segment wagons): 61 trams[40] | ||
| Ufa | 360 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Tver | 306 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Kursk | 288 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Magdeburg | 274 | Tatra T4. | ||
| Izhevsk | 270 | Tatra T3 | ||
 Bratislava | 261 | Tatra T2 67. Tatra T3 194. Also another 89 articulated, PCC based Tatra K2 cars. | ||
| Brno | 244 | Tatra T2: 94. Tatra T3: 158. | ||
 The Hague | 234 | The actual GTL-8 articulated trams are not PCC trams but based on PCC-techniques and some of them still drive on recuperated bogies of demolished PCC's.[40] | ||
| Košice | 224 | Tatra T1: 11. Tatra T2: 31. Tatra T3: 182 | ||
| Nizhny Novgorod | 220 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Novokuznetsk | 215 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Voronezh | 209 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Pilsen | 187 | Tatra T1: 33. Tatra T2: 26. Tatra T3: 128. | ||
| Antwerp | 166 | Some are still in service.[40] | ||
| Most and Litvínov | 148 | Tatra T1: 34. Tatra T2: 36. Tatra T3: 78 | ||
| Vladikavkaz | 129 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Pyatigorsk | 117 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Krasnodar | 115 | Tatra T3 | ||
 Barcelona | 110 | [40] | ||
 Belgrade | 97 | 70 delivered from Washington in 1958-1961. 22 Tatra T4. 5 Belgium 7000 series.[40] | ||
 Sarajevo | 71 | 50 cars in 1958, followed by an additional 21 in 1962, all from Washington, D.C.. 20 cars spliced into 10 articulated cars between 1967-69. | ||
| Oryol | 85 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Olomouc | 83 | Tatra T1: 10. Tatra T2: 4. Tatra T3: 69. | ||
| Volzhsky | 75 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Grozny | 70 | Tatra T3 | ||
| Liberec | 67 | Tatra T2: 14. Tatra T3: 53 | ||
| Ghent | 54 | [40] | ||
| Madrid | 50 | from Fiat[40] | ||
| Irkutsk | 30 | 30 | Tatra T3 | |
 Saint-Étienne | 30 | [40] | ||
| Marseille | 21 | [40] | ||
 Rome | 20 | from Fiat[40] | ||
| Ústí nad Labem | 18 | Tatra T2 | ||
| Tampico | 10 | 10 | Purchased 1971–1972 from Toronto. System abandoned on 13 December 1974.[41] | |
| Milan | 3 | from Breda[40] | ||
| Saint Petersburg | 2 | Tatra T2 | ||
 Stockholm | 2 | Only two of the planned 300 of the PCC A28 type trams had been delivered to Stockholm by the ASJ company in 1953. This was probably due to the withdrawal of the Polish side of the contract in 1946, which primarily stated the delivery not only of the tram wagons, but also 8 locomotives and 44 electric passenger trains by the ASEA company. The only ones that were built, based on bogies and the electrical system delivered from the USA. They were the first PCC's in Europe equipped with multiple electrical steering systems and were only used in pairs (no more trams of this type were constructed) on a tourist line number 700. In 1962, the tram lines were converted to buses. One of the two produced trams was scrapped, the other one (#11) is preserved in the Tramway Museum of Malmkoping.[40] | ||
| Hamburg | 1 | The only PCC tram in the Western Germany was delivered from La Brugeoise to Hamburg in the year 1951. The car was sold to Brussels in 1957. Returned to Hamburg in 1995, where it was used as a historical tram in the VVM Schönberger Strand museum. In 1999, the tram was sold to the Danish tram museum of Skjoldenaesholm.[40] | ||
 Melbourne | 1 | One set of PCC bogies and control equipment was imported into Melbourne circa 1949 and fitted to a modified W-Class body. Additional cars were planned, but never built. The single car was numbered 980,[42] and was withdrawn from service in 1971. Z Class tram prototype car 1041 was built in 1972 using bogies salvaged from 980.[43] |
Figures for Tatra trams are from Wikipedia articles on the respective tram models.
See also
Birney Safety Car- Citytram
- Peter Witt streetcar
- Streetcars in Kenosha, Wisconsin
- Streetcars in North America
Toronto PCC-cars Technical Specifications
References
^ Brill, Debra (2001). History of the J. G. Brill Company. Indiana University Press. pp. 202–205. ISBN 0-253-33949-9..mw-parser-output cite.citationfont-style:inherit.mw-parser-output qquotes:"""""""'""'".mw-parser-output code.cs1-codecolor:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-free abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-registration abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-subscription abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registrationcolor:#555.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration spanborder-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-errordisplay:none;font-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-errorfont-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-formatfont-size:95%.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-leftpadding-left:0.2em.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-rightpadding-right:0.2em
^ Carlson, Stephen P.; Schneider III, Fred W. (1980). PCC-The Car that Fought Back. Interurban Press. pp. 117–119. ISBN 0-916374-41-6.
^ C.F. Hirshfeld, Ch.Engr., PCC; (October 1933) "Electric Transit and Bus Journal", pp.321–325, 331.
^ Proceedings of the American Transit Association, 1936, pp. 821, 822, 833, 834, 1126, 1127 & 1938 Proceedings, pp. 372, 374, 376, 378, 380, 382, 384, 408, 416, 417, 418, 420, 422, 380,382, 384, & An American Original, The PCC Car, Kashin and Demoro, pp 42,43,46, 187.
^ Hoover, Amanda (6 September 2015). "Why are old Green Line trolleys wasting away in rural Pennsylvania?". Boston.com. Retrieved 21 April 2017.
^ King, Leroy O., Jr., 100 Years of Capital Traction: The Story of Streetcars in the Nation's Capital. Dallas: Publisher Leroy O. King, Jr. (1972), page 153
^ Carlson & Schneider (1980), p. 59.
^ Carlson, Stephen P.; Schneider III, Fred W. (1980). PCC-The Car that Fought Back. Interurban Press. p. 87. ISBN 0-916374-41-6. LCCN 80-81312.
^ Carlson-Schneider (80), pages 123, 129, 236-237, supplement
^ Carlson-Schneider (80), pages 131,135, supplement
^ Carlson, S.P.; Schneider, F.W. (1983). PCC: From Coast to Coast. Interurban Press. p. 235. ISBN 0-916374-57-2.
^ Carlson-Schneider (80), pages 144-155
^ Carlson-Schneider (80), pages 239-241, supplement
^ Kashin, S.; Demoro, H. (1986). An American Original: The PCC Car, p. 79. Glendale (CA): Interurban Press,
ISBN 0-916374-73-4.
^ Carlson & Schneider (1980), p. 149.
^ Carlson & Schneider (1980), pp. 98–100.
^ H.G. McClean, B.Sc, M.I.E.E., M.I.Loco.E.; December 14, 1945, "Passenger Transport Journal:" The American P.C.C. Car, p. 348.
^ Carlson (1980), pp. 48-49, 87-89. 91, rear foldout #1.
^ Lind, Alan R. (1979). Chicago Surface Lines, An Illustrated History (3 ed.). Transport History Press. pp. 48–49, 87–89, 399. ISBN 0-934732-00-0.
^ abc "PCC-Not so standard". www.nycsubway.org. Retrieved 7 April 2014.
^ Carlson (1980), p. 74-75, 98-99, rear foldout #3.
^ Carlson (1980), pp. 94, supplement.
^ Carlson (1980), pp. 3, 136-137, 162-173, supplement.
^ Chicago's Rapid Transit v.1: Rolling Stock/1892-1947. Central Electric Railfans’ Association. 1973. pp. 215–227. ISBN 0-915348-15-2.
^ Chicago's Rapid Transit v.2: Rolling Stock/1947-1976. Central Electric Railfans’ Association. 1976. pp. 8–71, 186, 189–191, 195–196, 199. ISBN 0-915348-15-2.
^ Lind (1979), pp. 16, 37, 400, supplement.
^ abcd Dr. Harold E. Cox (1963) PCC Cars of North America.
^ Chicago's Rapid Transit V II. Central Electric Railfans’ Assoc. 1976. pp. 8–11. ISBN 0-915348-15-2.
^ Borzo, Greg (2007). The Chicago "L". Arcadia Publishing. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-7385-5100-5.
^ IRM Roster Page for CTA 4391
^ "$400,000 Flash Fire Destroys Homewood Car Barn, 14 Trolleys". The Pittsburgh Press. May 19, 1955. Retrieved December 8, 2010.
^
Mike Filey (2012-09-22). "The very first PCC streetcars went into service 74 years ago today". Toronto Sun. Retrieved 2012-11-16.It was on this day back in 1938 that Torontonians, who for decades had relied on a variety of less-than-agreeable street railway vehicles, were finally introduced to the latest model streetcar, the amazing PCC Streamliner.
^ Toronto's 'Boomer' PCCs
^ Philadelphia Trolley Track
^ "Washington Streetcar Collection". National Capital Trolley Museum. Archived from the original on 2007-02-05. Retrieved 2007-03-15.
^ http://www.tramz.com/mx/mc/mc75.html
^ "DALŠÍ AMERICKÉ MĚSTO ZAŽILO NÁVRAT K TRAMVAJÍM" (in Czech). Československý Dopravák. 13 May 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2018.
^ John F Bromley (23 October 2009). "Streetcars on the Waterfront (1968)". Steve Munro. Archived from the original on 2015-03-04. Retrieved 14 November 2010.
^ "MATA 2016 April Newsletter" (PDF).
^ abcdefghijklm [1]
^ Allen Morrison (2003). "The Tramways of Tampico". Electric Transport in Latin America: Past & Present. Allen Morrison. Retrieved 3 August 2011.
^ Jones, Russell (2010). "The remarkable PCC tramcar: why Melbourne missed out". Friends of Hawthorn Tram Museum. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
^ "Melbourne & Metropolitan Tramways Board PCC No 1041". Friends of Hawthorn Tram Museum. 2008. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
Further reading
- Carlson et al. (1986), The Colorful Streetcars We Rode, Bulletin 125 of the Central Electric Railfans' Association, Chicago, Il.
ISBN 0-915348-25-X - Kashin, S.; Demoro, H. (1986), An American Original: The PCC Car, Interurban Press,
ISBN 0-916374-73-4
(in Spanish) López Bustos, Carlos, Tranvías de Madrid, Aldaba Ediciones, Madrid 1986,
ISBN 84-86629-00-4
Wickson, Ted, ed. (November–December 2015). "The PCC streetcar in Canada" (PDF). Canadian Rail. No. 659. p. 255–298. Retrieved 26 January 2017.
External links
 | Wikimedia Commons has media related to PCC-type tramcars. |
- List of PCC Streetcars in the 21st century
- The PCC streetcar club
- PCC Car—The Industry Saviour?
- The PCC Car—Not So Standard
- PCC streetcars in NYC
- Madrid trams (in Dutch)
- Approximately 30 videos of San Francisco PCC's from the early 1980's
