How to match the list of values in an IN clause with another IN clause in a linear manner









up vote
2
down vote

favorite












--Table_1

col1 col2
............
123 abc
456 def
123 def


select * from Table_1 where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in (abc,def);


I want the output to match the row containing just '123' from "col1" and 'abc' from "col2" , and not '123' from col1 and 'def' from 'col2'.
The list in IN clause should match accordingly in a linear manner.



select * from Table_1 where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in (abc,def);


O/P



col1 col2
123 abc
456 def









share|improve this question























  • why don't just state the condition in where clause like: where (col1 = 123 and col2 = 'abc') or (col1 = 456 and col2 = 'def')?
    – assembly.jc
    Nov 11 at 6:11










  • @assembly.jc i have a huge list to put in col1 and col2 , the above method will be tedious
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:30










  • What's your dbms?
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 6:37










  • @D-Shih Oracle sql developer
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:41










  • @D-Shih, I was trying to understand your answer ,why did you remove it,it worked , can you write it back.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 9:21














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












--Table_1

col1 col2
............
123 abc
456 def
123 def


select * from Table_1 where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in (abc,def);


I want the output to match the row containing just '123' from "col1" and 'abc' from "col2" , and not '123' from col1 and 'def' from 'col2'.
The list in IN clause should match accordingly in a linear manner.



select * from Table_1 where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in (abc,def);


O/P



col1 col2
123 abc
456 def









share|improve this question























  • why don't just state the condition in where clause like: where (col1 = 123 and col2 = 'abc') or (col1 = 456 and col2 = 'def')?
    – assembly.jc
    Nov 11 at 6:11










  • @assembly.jc i have a huge list to put in col1 and col2 , the above method will be tedious
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:30










  • What's your dbms?
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 6:37










  • @D-Shih Oracle sql developer
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:41










  • @D-Shih, I was trying to understand your answer ,why did you remove it,it worked , can you write it back.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 9:21












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











--Table_1

col1 col2
............
123 abc
456 def
123 def


select * from Table_1 where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in (abc,def);


I want the output to match the row containing just '123' from "col1" and 'abc' from "col2" , and not '123' from col1 and 'def' from 'col2'.
The list in IN clause should match accordingly in a linear manner.



select * from Table_1 where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in (abc,def);


O/P



col1 col2
123 abc
456 def









share|improve this question















--Table_1

col1 col2
............
123 abc
456 def
123 def


select * from Table_1 where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in (abc,def);


I want the output to match the row containing just '123' from "col1" and 'abc' from "col2" , and not '123' from col1 and 'def' from 'col2'.
The list in IN clause should match accordingly in a linear manner.



select * from Table_1 where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in (abc,def);


O/P



col1 col2
123 abc
456 def






sql oracle






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 11 at 9:25









D-Shih

24.4k61431




24.4k61431










asked Nov 11 at 6:05









senor elanza

2110




2110











  • why don't just state the condition in where clause like: where (col1 = 123 and col2 = 'abc') or (col1 = 456 and col2 = 'def')?
    – assembly.jc
    Nov 11 at 6:11










  • @assembly.jc i have a huge list to put in col1 and col2 , the above method will be tedious
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:30










  • What's your dbms?
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 6:37










  • @D-Shih Oracle sql developer
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:41










  • @D-Shih, I was trying to understand your answer ,why did you remove it,it worked , can you write it back.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 9:21
















  • why don't just state the condition in where clause like: where (col1 = 123 and col2 = 'abc') or (col1 = 456 and col2 = 'def')?
    – assembly.jc
    Nov 11 at 6:11










  • @assembly.jc i have a huge list to put in col1 and col2 , the above method will be tedious
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:30










  • What's your dbms?
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 6:37










  • @D-Shih Oracle sql developer
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:41










  • @D-Shih, I was trying to understand your answer ,why did you remove it,it worked , can you write it back.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 9:21















why don't just state the condition in where clause like: where (col1 = 123 and col2 = 'abc') or (col1 = 456 and col2 = 'def')?
– assembly.jc
Nov 11 at 6:11




why don't just state the condition in where clause like: where (col1 = 123 and col2 = 'abc') or (col1 = 456 and col2 = 'def')?
– assembly.jc
Nov 11 at 6:11












@assembly.jc i have a huge list to put in col1 and col2 , the above method will be tedious
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 6:30




@assembly.jc i have a huge list to put in col1 and col2 , the above method will be tedious
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 6:30












What's your dbms?
– D-Shih
Nov 11 at 6:37




What's your dbms?
– D-Shih
Nov 11 at 6:37












@D-Shih Oracle sql developer
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 6:41




@D-Shih Oracle sql developer
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 6:41












@D-Shih, I was trying to understand your answer ,why did you remove it,it worked , can you write it back.
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 9:21




@D-Shih, I was trying to understand your answer ,why did you remove it,it worked , can you write it back.
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 9:21












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










You may use tuples for comparison of a combination of multiple columns.



select *
from Table_1
where (col1,col2) in ( (123,'abc'),(456,'def'), (789,'abc') );


Demo






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    @senorelanza . . . This is the correct answer. Oracle supports tuples with in. I would recommend accepting this answer.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 11 at 12:02

















up vote
1
down vote













You can try to use row_number window function to make it.



SELECT col1,col2
from (
select col1,col2,row_number() over(partition by col1 order by col2) rn
from Table_1
where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in ('abc','def')
) t1
where rn = 1


sqlfiddle






share|improve this answer






















  • But all the values of "col2" should be manually entered by using this method
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:44










  • @senorelanza Ok I see I edit my answer
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 6:56










  • why the tables are joined by the total distinct "count", I don't understand, can you elaborate.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:18










  • Because cte2 will get the amount which is col2 total, cte1 will get amount by each col1 then if amount from cte2 equal to cte1 means col1 of cte1 have full amount @senorelanza
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 7:20











  • Okay,but there will be multiple distinct values, like col2 can have two or three distinct values and it is not possible to join the tables based on the "cnt" of cte2 ,and also after joining, how is it possible to get records in a linear manner.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:32










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53246282%2fhow-to-match-the-list-of-values-in-an-in-clause-with-another-in-clause-in-a-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote



accepted










You may use tuples for comparison of a combination of multiple columns.



select *
from Table_1
where (col1,col2) in ( (123,'abc'),(456,'def'), (789,'abc') );


Demo






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    @senorelanza . . . This is the correct answer. Oracle supports tuples with in. I would recommend accepting this answer.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 11 at 12:02














up vote
3
down vote



accepted










You may use tuples for comparison of a combination of multiple columns.



select *
from Table_1
where (col1,col2) in ( (123,'abc'),(456,'def'), (789,'abc') );


Demo






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    @senorelanza . . . This is the correct answer. Oracle supports tuples with in. I would recommend accepting this answer.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 11 at 12:02












up vote
3
down vote



accepted







up vote
3
down vote



accepted






You may use tuples for comparison of a combination of multiple columns.



select *
from Table_1
where (col1,col2) in ( (123,'abc'),(456,'def'), (789,'abc') );


Demo






share|improve this answer














You may use tuples for comparison of a combination of multiple columns.



select *
from Table_1
where (col1,col2) in ( (123,'abc'),(456,'def'), (789,'abc') );


Demo







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 11 at 12:01









Gordon Linoff

747k34285390




747k34285390










answered Nov 11 at 8:14









Kaushik Nayak

16.5k41128




16.5k41128







  • 1




    @senorelanza . . . This is the correct answer. Oracle supports tuples with in. I would recommend accepting this answer.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 11 at 12:02












  • 1




    @senorelanza . . . This is the correct answer. Oracle supports tuples with in. I would recommend accepting this answer.
    – Gordon Linoff
    Nov 11 at 12:02







1




1




@senorelanza . . . This is the correct answer. Oracle supports tuples with in. I would recommend accepting this answer.
– Gordon Linoff
Nov 11 at 12:02




@senorelanza . . . This is the correct answer. Oracle supports tuples with in. I would recommend accepting this answer.
– Gordon Linoff
Nov 11 at 12:02












up vote
1
down vote













You can try to use row_number window function to make it.



SELECT col1,col2
from (
select col1,col2,row_number() over(partition by col1 order by col2) rn
from Table_1
where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in ('abc','def')
) t1
where rn = 1


sqlfiddle






share|improve this answer






















  • But all the values of "col2" should be manually entered by using this method
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:44










  • @senorelanza Ok I see I edit my answer
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 6:56










  • why the tables are joined by the total distinct "count", I don't understand, can you elaborate.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:18










  • Because cte2 will get the amount which is col2 total, cte1 will get amount by each col1 then if amount from cte2 equal to cte1 means col1 of cte1 have full amount @senorelanza
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 7:20











  • Okay,but there will be multiple distinct values, like col2 can have two or three distinct values and it is not possible to join the tables based on the "cnt" of cte2 ,and also after joining, how is it possible to get records in a linear manner.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:32














up vote
1
down vote













You can try to use row_number window function to make it.



SELECT col1,col2
from (
select col1,col2,row_number() over(partition by col1 order by col2) rn
from Table_1
where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in ('abc','def')
) t1
where rn = 1


sqlfiddle






share|improve this answer






















  • But all the values of "col2" should be manually entered by using this method
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:44










  • @senorelanza Ok I see I edit my answer
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 6:56










  • why the tables are joined by the total distinct "count", I don't understand, can you elaborate.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:18










  • Because cte2 will get the amount which is col2 total, cte1 will get amount by each col1 then if amount from cte2 equal to cte1 means col1 of cte1 have full amount @senorelanza
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 7:20











  • Okay,but there will be multiple distinct values, like col2 can have two or three distinct values and it is not possible to join the tables based on the "cnt" of cte2 ,and also after joining, how is it possible to get records in a linear manner.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:32












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









You can try to use row_number window function to make it.



SELECT col1,col2
from (
select col1,col2,row_number() over(partition by col1 order by col2) rn
from Table_1
where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in ('abc','def')
) t1
where rn = 1


sqlfiddle






share|improve this answer














You can try to use row_number window function to make it.



SELECT col1,col2
from (
select col1,col2,row_number() over(partition by col1 order by col2) rn
from Table_1
where col1 in (123,456) and col2 in ('abc','def')
) t1
where rn = 1


sqlfiddle







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 11 at 7:59

























answered Nov 11 at 6:37









D-Shih

24.4k61431




24.4k61431











  • But all the values of "col2" should be manually entered by using this method
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:44










  • @senorelanza Ok I see I edit my answer
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 6:56










  • why the tables are joined by the total distinct "count", I don't understand, can you elaborate.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:18










  • Because cte2 will get the amount which is col2 total, cte1 will get amount by each col1 then if amount from cte2 equal to cte1 means col1 of cte1 have full amount @senorelanza
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 7:20











  • Okay,but there will be multiple distinct values, like col2 can have two or three distinct values and it is not possible to join the tables based on the "cnt" of cte2 ,and also after joining, how is it possible to get records in a linear manner.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:32
















  • But all the values of "col2" should be manually entered by using this method
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 6:44










  • @senorelanza Ok I see I edit my answer
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 6:56










  • why the tables are joined by the total distinct "count", I don't understand, can you elaborate.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:18










  • Because cte2 will get the amount which is col2 total, cte1 will get amount by each col1 then if amount from cte2 equal to cte1 means col1 of cte1 have full amount @senorelanza
    – D-Shih
    Nov 11 at 7:20











  • Okay,but there will be multiple distinct values, like col2 can have two or three distinct values and it is not possible to join the tables based on the "cnt" of cte2 ,and also after joining, how is it possible to get records in a linear manner.
    – senor elanza
    Nov 11 at 7:32















But all the values of "col2" should be manually entered by using this method
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 6:44




But all the values of "col2" should be manually entered by using this method
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 6:44












@senorelanza Ok I see I edit my answer
– D-Shih
Nov 11 at 6:56




@senorelanza Ok I see I edit my answer
– D-Shih
Nov 11 at 6:56












why the tables are joined by the total distinct "count", I don't understand, can you elaborate.
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 7:18




why the tables are joined by the total distinct "count", I don't understand, can you elaborate.
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 7:18












Because cte2 will get the amount which is col2 total, cte1 will get amount by each col1 then if amount from cte2 equal to cte1 means col1 of cte1 have full amount @senorelanza
– D-Shih
Nov 11 at 7:20





Because cte2 will get the amount which is col2 total, cte1 will get amount by each col1 then if amount from cte2 equal to cte1 means col1 of cte1 have full amount @senorelanza
– D-Shih
Nov 11 at 7:20













Okay,but there will be multiple distinct values, like col2 can have two or three distinct values and it is not possible to join the tables based on the "cnt" of cte2 ,and also after joining, how is it possible to get records in a linear manner.
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 7:32




Okay,but there will be multiple distinct values, like col2 can have two or three distinct values and it is not possible to join the tables based on the "cnt" of cte2 ,and also after joining, how is it possible to get records in a linear manner.
– senor elanza
Nov 11 at 7:32

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53246282%2fhow-to-match-the-list-of-values-in-an-in-clause-with-another-in-clause-in-a-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3

Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto