Different results with intermediate prints










0















I have this function



def getDigits (num) :
check = checkNum(num)
#print('num: '+str(num))
if check is False :
strNum = str(num)
numList = map(toInt, strNum)
#print(list(numList))
squareList = map(getSquareOfDigits, numList)
#print(list(squareList))
sumOfSquares = sum(squareList)
print('sumSqr: '+str(sumOfSquares))
getDigits(sumOfSquares)
else :
return check


And the result of it is:



sumSqr: 4



sumSqr: 16



sumSqr: 37



sumSqr: 58



sumSqr: 89



sumSqr: 9



sumSqr: 81



sumSqr: 65



sumSqr: 61



sumSqr: 37



sumSqr: 58



sumSqr: 89



But if I uncomment all the prints, the result is:



[2]

sumSqr: 0
[3]

sumSqr: 0


ok, I know that the list method change the result, but I want to know it there's a way to print the object variables without changing the result, and not using an intermediate variable.



UPDATE



full example here










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Can you provide a complete and verifiable example? I suspect something unintended is going on with your return.

    – GlobalTraveler
    Nov 17 '18 at 11:42






  • 1





    Traveler is talking about this. How would we know, what checkNum, toInt, getSquareOfDigits do?

    – Mr. T
    Nov 17 '18 at 13:07















0















I have this function



def getDigits (num) :
check = checkNum(num)
#print('num: '+str(num))
if check is False :
strNum = str(num)
numList = map(toInt, strNum)
#print(list(numList))
squareList = map(getSquareOfDigits, numList)
#print(list(squareList))
sumOfSquares = sum(squareList)
print('sumSqr: '+str(sumOfSquares))
getDigits(sumOfSquares)
else :
return check


And the result of it is:



sumSqr: 4



sumSqr: 16



sumSqr: 37



sumSqr: 58



sumSqr: 89



sumSqr: 9



sumSqr: 81



sumSqr: 65



sumSqr: 61



sumSqr: 37



sumSqr: 58



sumSqr: 89



But if I uncomment all the prints, the result is:



[2]

sumSqr: 0
[3]

sumSqr: 0


ok, I know that the list method change the result, but I want to know it there's a way to print the object variables without changing the result, and not using an intermediate variable.



UPDATE



full example here










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Can you provide a complete and verifiable example? I suspect something unintended is going on with your return.

    – GlobalTraveler
    Nov 17 '18 at 11:42






  • 1





    Traveler is talking about this. How would we know, what checkNum, toInt, getSquareOfDigits do?

    – Mr. T
    Nov 17 '18 at 13:07













0












0








0








I have this function



def getDigits (num) :
check = checkNum(num)
#print('num: '+str(num))
if check is False :
strNum = str(num)
numList = map(toInt, strNum)
#print(list(numList))
squareList = map(getSquareOfDigits, numList)
#print(list(squareList))
sumOfSquares = sum(squareList)
print('sumSqr: '+str(sumOfSquares))
getDigits(sumOfSquares)
else :
return check


And the result of it is:



sumSqr: 4



sumSqr: 16



sumSqr: 37



sumSqr: 58



sumSqr: 89



sumSqr: 9



sumSqr: 81



sumSqr: 65



sumSqr: 61



sumSqr: 37



sumSqr: 58



sumSqr: 89



But if I uncomment all the prints, the result is:



[2]

sumSqr: 0
[3]

sumSqr: 0


ok, I know that the list method change the result, but I want to know it there's a way to print the object variables without changing the result, and not using an intermediate variable.



UPDATE



full example here










share|improve this question
















I have this function



def getDigits (num) :
check = checkNum(num)
#print('num: '+str(num))
if check is False :
strNum = str(num)
numList = map(toInt, strNum)
#print(list(numList))
squareList = map(getSquareOfDigits, numList)
#print(list(squareList))
sumOfSquares = sum(squareList)
print('sumSqr: '+str(sumOfSquares))
getDigits(sumOfSquares)
else :
return check


And the result of it is:



sumSqr: 4



sumSqr: 16



sumSqr: 37



sumSqr: 58



sumSqr: 89



sumSqr: 9



sumSqr: 81



sumSqr: 65



sumSqr: 61



sumSqr: 37



sumSqr: 58



sumSqr: 89



But if I uncomment all the prints, the result is:



[2]

sumSqr: 0
[3]

sumSqr: 0


ok, I know that the list method change the result, but I want to know it there's a way to print the object variables without changing the result, and not using an intermediate variable.



UPDATE



full example here







python python-3.x






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 17 '18 at 19:10

























asked Nov 15 '18 at 18:05







user10608741














  • 2





    Can you provide a complete and verifiable example? I suspect something unintended is going on with your return.

    – GlobalTraveler
    Nov 17 '18 at 11:42






  • 1





    Traveler is talking about this. How would we know, what checkNum, toInt, getSquareOfDigits do?

    – Mr. T
    Nov 17 '18 at 13:07












  • 2





    Can you provide a complete and verifiable example? I suspect something unintended is going on with your return.

    – GlobalTraveler
    Nov 17 '18 at 11:42






  • 1





    Traveler is talking about this. How would we know, what checkNum, toInt, getSquareOfDigits do?

    – Mr. T
    Nov 17 '18 at 13:07







2




2





Can you provide a complete and verifiable example? I suspect something unintended is going on with your return.

– GlobalTraveler
Nov 17 '18 at 11:42





Can you provide a complete and verifiable example? I suspect something unintended is going on with your return.

– GlobalTraveler
Nov 17 '18 at 11:42




1




1





Traveler is talking about this. How would we know, what checkNum, toInt, getSquareOfDigits do?

– Mr. T
Nov 17 '18 at 13:07





Traveler is talking about this. How would we know, what checkNum, toInt, getSquareOfDigits do?

– Mr. T
Nov 17 '18 at 13:07












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














The point is that numList = map(toInt, strNum) makes numList a iterator. After it has been iterated over once, it's exhausted and will no longer contain any values. The line print(list(numList)) does exactly that by iterating over it, creating a list, printing a string representation of that list and then throwing everything away. If the print-line is commented, the iterator returned by map will generate values; with the print in-place, numList is effectively empty.



To prevent this, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)); that way, you have a persistent list-object which you can re-use.






share|improve this answer























  • ok, good answer. But, what if I want only to see an intermediate result and not add it to my code?

    – user10608741
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:04






  • 1





    I honestly dont understand: Not add it to the code?

    – user2722968
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:21











  • in php if I have doubs about what have after some code, I can do a print of the result and see it, without change the code execution, in JS I can do a console log, and so on... I want to do the same in python, see what I have in the middle of the execution without change the variable

    – user10608741
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:01











  • As I said above, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)) instead of just numList = map(...). This will cause numList to be a list-object, not an iterator. You can then print(numList) without side-effects.

    – user2722968
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:25










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53325461%2fdifferent-results-with-intermediate-prints%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown
























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














The point is that numList = map(toInt, strNum) makes numList a iterator. After it has been iterated over once, it's exhausted and will no longer contain any values. The line print(list(numList)) does exactly that by iterating over it, creating a list, printing a string representation of that list and then throwing everything away. If the print-line is commented, the iterator returned by map will generate values; with the print in-place, numList is effectively empty.



To prevent this, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)); that way, you have a persistent list-object which you can re-use.






share|improve this answer























  • ok, good answer. But, what if I want only to see an intermediate result and not add it to my code?

    – user10608741
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:04






  • 1





    I honestly dont understand: Not add it to the code?

    – user2722968
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:21











  • in php if I have doubs about what have after some code, I can do a print of the result and see it, without change the code execution, in JS I can do a console log, and so on... I want to do the same in python, see what I have in the middle of the execution without change the variable

    – user10608741
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:01











  • As I said above, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)) instead of just numList = map(...). This will cause numList to be a list-object, not an iterator. You can then print(numList) without side-effects.

    – user2722968
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:25















0














The point is that numList = map(toInt, strNum) makes numList a iterator. After it has been iterated over once, it's exhausted and will no longer contain any values. The line print(list(numList)) does exactly that by iterating over it, creating a list, printing a string representation of that list and then throwing everything away. If the print-line is commented, the iterator returned by map will generate values; with the print in-place, numList is effectively empty.



To prevent this, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)); that way, you have a persistent list-object which you can re-use.






share|improve this answer























  • ok, good answer. But, what if I want only to see an intermediate result and not add it to my code?

    – user10608741
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:04






  • 1





    I honestly dont understand: Not add it to the code?

    – user2722968
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:21











  • in php if I have doubs about what have after some code, I can do a print of the result and see it, without change the code execution, in JS I can do a console log, and so on... I want to do the same in python, see what I have in the middle of the execution without change the variable

    – user10608741
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:01











  • As I said above, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)) instead of just numList = map(...). This will cause numList to be a list-object, not an iterator. You can then print(numList) without side-effects.

    – user2722968
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:25













0












0








0







The point is that numList = map(toInt, strNum) makes numList a iterator. After it has been iterated over once, it's exhausted and will no longer contain any values. The line print(list(numList)) does exactly that by iterating over it, creating a list, printing a string representation of that list and then throwing everything away. If the print-line is commented, the iterator returned by map will generate values; with the print in-place, numList is effectively empty.



To prevent this, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)); that way, you have a persistent list-object which you can re-use.






share|improve this answer













The point is that numList = map(toInt, strNum) makes numList a iterator. After it has been iterated over once, it's exhausted and will no longer contain any values. The line print(list(numList)) does exactly that by iterating over it, creating a list, printing a string representation of that list and then throwing everything away. If the print-line is commented, the iterator returned by map will generate values; with the print in-place, numList is effectively empty.



To prevent this, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)); that way, you have a persistent list-object which you can re-use.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 17 '18 at 15:16









user2722968user2722968

2,75411637




2,75411637












  • ok, good answer. But, what if I want only to see an intermediate result and not add it to my code?

    – user10608741
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:04






  • 1





    I honestly dont understand: Not add it to the code?

    – user2722968
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:21











  • in php if I have doubs about what have after some code, I can do a print of the result and see it, without change the code execution, in JS I can do a console log, and so on... I want to do the same in python, see what I have in the middle of the execution without change the variable

    – user10608741
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:01











  • As I said above, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)) instead of just numList = map(...). This will cause numList to be a list-object, not an iterator. You can then print(numList) without side-effects.

    – user2722968
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:25

















  • ok, good answer. But, what if I want only to see an intermediate result and not add it to my code?

    – user10608741
    Nov 21 '18 at 17:04






  • 1





    I honestly dont understand: Not add it to the code?

    – user2722968
    Nov 21 '18 at 19:21











  • in php if I have doubs about what have after some code, I can do a print of the result and see it, without change the code execution, in JS I can do a console log, and so on... I want to do the same in python, see what I have in the middle of the execution without change the variable

    – user10608741
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:01











  • As I said above, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)) instead of just numList = map(...). This will cause numList to be a list-object, not an iterator. You can then print(numList) without side-effects.

    – user2722968
    Nov 22 '18 at 16:25
















ok, good answer. But, what if I want only to see an intermediate result and not add it to my code?

– user10608741
Nov 21 '18 at 17:04





ok, good answer. But, what if I want only to see an intermediate result and not add it to my code?

– user10608741
Nov 21 '18 at 17:04




1




1





I honestly dont understand: Not add it to the code?

– user2722968
Nov 21 '18 at 19:21





I honestly dont understand: Not add it to the code?

– user2722968
Nov 21 '18 at 19:21













in php if I have doubs about what have after some code, I can do a print of the result and see it, without change the code execution, in JS I can do a console log, and so on... I want to do the same in python, see what I have in the middle of the execution without change the variable

– user10608741
Nov 22 '18 at 16:01





in php if I have doubs about what have after some code, I can do a print of the result and see it, without change the code execution, in JS I can do a console log, and so on... I want to do the same in python, see what I have in the middle of the execution without change the variable

– user10608741
Nov 22 '18 at 16:01













As I said above, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)) instead of just numList = map(...). This will cause numList to be a list-object, not an iterator. You can then print(numList) without side-effects.

– user2722968
Nov 22 '18 at 16:25





As I said above, use numList = list(map(toInt, strNum)) instead of just numList = map(...). This will cause numList to be a list-object, not an iterator. You can then print(numList) without side-effects.

– user2722968
Nov 22 '18 at 16:25



















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53325461%2fdifferent-results-with-intermediate-prints%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto