Criteria Api Vs QueryDsl Vs JPA metamodel
I am a bit confused about these three concepts.
- Criteria API
- Query Dsl
- Jpa 2.0 meta model
From what I have read, One of the major benifits of using QueryDsl or JPA metamodel is type safety.
But I can achieve type safety even with Criteria API's. (I am using JPA with eclipselink)
javax.persistence.EntityManager
has two variants
public Query createQuery(String sqlString);
public <T> TypedQuery<T> createQuery(CriteriaQuery<T> criteriaQuery);
I agree with first version where I pass sql as string I don't get type safety. But with the second version I get type safety. Or am I missing something here? Can someone explain with an example how using criteria is not type safe.
What is the difference between QueryDsl and JPA static meta model ?
java jpa-2.0 criteria querydsl type-safety
add a comment |
I am a bit confused about these three concepts.
- Criteria API
- Query Dsl
- Jpa 2.0 meta model
From what I have read, One of the major benifits of using QueryDsl or JPA metamodel is type safety.
But I can achieve type safety even with Criteria API's. (I am using JPA with eclipselink)
javax.persistence.EntityManager
has two variants
public Query createQuery(String sqlString);
public <T> TypedQuery<T> createQuery(CriteriaQuery<T> criteriaQuery);
I agree with first version where I pass sql as string I don't get type safety. But with the second version I get type safety. Or am I missing something here? Can someone explain with an example how using criteria is not type safe.
What is the difference between QueryDsl and JPA static meta model ?
java jpa-2.0 criteria querydsl type-safety
add a comment |
I am a bit confused about these three concepts.
- Criteria API
- Query Dsl
- Jpa 2.0 meta model
From what I have read, One of the major benifits of using QueryDsl or JPA metamodel is type safety.
But I can achieve type safety even with Criteria API's. (I am using JPA with eclipselink)
javax.persistence.EntityManager
has two variants
public Query createQuery(String sqlString);
public <T> TypedQuery<T> createQuery(CriteriaQuery<T> criteriaQuery);
I agree with first version where I pass sql as string I don't get type safety. But with the second version I get type safety. Or am I missing something here? Can someone explain with an example how using criteria is not type safe.
What is the difference between QueryDsl and JPA static meta model ?
java jpa-2.0 criteria querydsl type-safety
I am a bit confused about these three concepts.
- Criteria API
- Query Dsl
- Jpa 2.0 meta model
From what I have read, One of the major benifits of using QueryDsl or JPA metamodel is type safety.
But I can achieve type safety even with Criteria API's. (I am using JPA with eclipselink)
javax.persistence.EntityManager
has two variants
public Query createQuery(String sqlString);
public <T> TypedQuery<T> createQuery(CriteriaQuery<T> criteriaQuery);
I agree with first version where I pass sql as string I don't get type safety. But with the second version I get type safety. Or am I missing something here? Can someone explain with an example how using criteria is not type safe.
What is the difference between QueryDsl and JPA static meta model ?
java jpa-2.0 criteria querydsl type-safety
java jpa-2.0 criteria querydsl type-safety
edited Nov 15 '18 at 18:15
pvpkiran
asked Nov 15 '18 at 18:08
pvpkiranpvpkiran
12.2k42544
12.2k42544
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You can use JPA meta model in Criteria API for type safety, but criteria api is quite complicated comparing to QueryDSL
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53325506%2fcriteria-api-vs-querydsl-vs-jpa-metamodel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can use JPA meta model in Criteria API for type safety, but criteria api is quite complicated comparing to QueryDSL
add a comment |
You can use JPA meta model in Criteria API for type safety, but criteria api is quite complicated comparing to QueryDSL
add a comment |
You can use JPA meta model in Criteria API for type safety, but criteria api is quite complicated comparing to QueryDSL
You can use JPA meta model in Criteria API for type safety, but criteria api is quite complicated comparing to QueryDSL
answered Nov 16 '18 at 13:32
Konstantin DevyatkinKonstantin Devyatkin
661
661
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53325506%2fcriteria-api-vs-querydsl-vs-jpa-metamodel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown