It is possible to extract my current toolchain?
Hi I want to migrate to a modern operating system, but I want to conserve my current (an older) GCC and GLIBC version to be able to obtain the same binary files. I know that it is possible to download and use other toolchains for this, but I can't found my exact combination of GCC and GLIBC versions, so I want to build my toolchain with my desired combination. It is possible?
gcc glibc toolchain gnu-toolchain
edited Nov 14 '18 at 16:52
Philip Withnall
2,310819
asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:31
Xabi EXabi E
86211
add a comment |
Hi I want to migrate to a modern operating system, but I want to conserve my current (an older) GCC and GLIBC version to be able to obtain the same binary files. I know that it is possible to download and use other toolchains for this, but I can't found my exact combination of GCC and GLIBC versions, so I want to build my toolchain with my desired combination. It is possible?
gcc glibc toolchain gnu-toolchain
edited Nov 14 '18 at 16:52
Philip Withnall
2,310819
asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:31
Xabi EXabi E
86211
add a comment |
Hi I want to migrate to a modern operating system, but I want to conserve my current (an older) GCC and GLIBC version to be able to obtain the same binary files. I know that it is possible to download and use other toolchains for this, but I can't found my exact combination of GCC and GLIBC versions, so I want to build my toolchain with my desired combination. It is possible?
gcc glibc toolchain gnu-toolchain
edited Nov 14 '18 at 16:52
Philip Withnall
2,310819
asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:31
Xabi EXabi E
86211
Hi I want to migrate to a modern operating system, but I want to conserve my current (an older) GCC and GLIBC version to be able to obtain the same binary files. I know that it is possible to download and use other toolchains for this, but I can't found my exact combination of GCC and GLIBC versions, so I want to build my toolchain with my desired combination. It is possible?
gcc glibc toolchain gnu-toolchain
gcc glibc toolchain gnu-toolchain
edited Nov 14 '18 at 16:52
Philip Withnall
2,310819
asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:31
Xabi EXabi E
86211
edited Nov 14 '18 at 16:52
Philip Withnall
2,310819
asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:31
Xabi EXabi E
86211
edited Nov 14 '18 at 16:52
Philip Withnall
2,310819
edited Nov 14 '18 at 16:52
Philip Withnall
2,310819
edited Nov 14 '18 at 16:52
Philip Withnall
2,310819
2,310819
asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:31
Xabi EXabi E
86211
asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:31
Xabi EXabi E
86211
asked Nov 14 '18 at 9:31
Xabi EXabi E
86211
86211
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It is possible?
Yes: building a cross-compiler that will contain older GCC and target older GLIBC is possible.
However, it is non-trivial. It is also far from guaranteed to reproduce your existing builds.
A better approach might be to set up a chrooted environment, or a VM, containing your current toolchain and GLIBC.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 3:57
Employed RussianEmployed Russian
125k20166236
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53296906%2fit-is-possible-to-extract-my-current-toolchain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is possible?
Yes: building a cross-compiler that will contain older GCC and target older GLIBC is possible.
However, it is non-trivial. It is also far from guaranteed to reproduce your existing builds.
A better approach might be to set up a chrooted environment, or a VM, containing your current toolchain and GLIBC.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 3:57
Employed RussianEmployed Russian
125k20166236
add a comment |
It is possible?
Yes: building a cross-compiler that will contain older GCC and target older GLIBC is possible.
However, it is non-trivial. It is also far from guaranteed to reproduce your existing builds.
A better approach might be to set up a chrooted environment, or a VM, containing your current toolchain and GLIBC.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 3:57
Employed RussianEmployed Russian
125k20166236
add a comment |
It is possible?
Yes: building a cross-compiler that will contain older GCC and target older GLIBC is possible.
However, it is non-trivial. It is also far from guaranteed to reproduce your existing builds.
A better approach might be to set up a chrooted environment, or a VM, containing your current toolchain and GLIBC.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 3:57
Employed RussianEmployed Russian
125k20166236
It is possible?
Yes: building a cross-compiler that will contain older GCC and target older GLIBC is possible.
However, it is non-trivial. It is also far from guaranteed to reproduce your existing builds.
A better approach might be to set up a chrooted environment, or a VM, containing your current toolchain and GLIBC.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 3:57
Employed RussianEmployed Russian
125k20166236
answered Nov 17 '18 at 3:57
Employed RussianEmployed Russian
125k20166236
answered Nov 17 '18 at 3:57
Employed RussianEmployed Russian
125k20166236
answered Nov 17 '18 at 3:57
Employed RussianEmployed Russian
125k20166236
125k20166236
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53296906%2fit-is-possible-to-extract-my-current-toolchain%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
