how to make a string to be part of a code in javascript?
For example if I have
var x = "console";
is it possible to run
x.log("Hello");
in javascript?
I ran it using window and eval but it wasn't working or is there a specific way to use those?
javascript string
add a comment |
For example if I have
var x = "console";
is it possible to run
x.log("Hello");
in javascript?
I ran it using window and eval but it wasn't working or is there a specific way to use those?
javascript string
window[x].log('hello');
should indeed work
– danronmoon
Nov 14 '18 at 20:56
I recommend looking for an alternative to whatever problem you are trying to solve, so it doesn't involve evaluating arbitrary strings, it sounds neither safe nor performant.
– Maikel Ruiz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:15
add a comment |
For example if I have
var x = "console";
is it possible to run
x.log("Hello");
in javascript?
I ran it using window and eval but it wasn't working or is there a specific way to use those?
javascript string
For example if I have
var x = "console";
is it possible to run
x.log("Hello");
in javascript?
I ran it using window and eval but it wasn't working or is there a specific way to use those?
javascript string
javascript string
asked Nov 14 '18 at 20:54
Nah PrimeNah Prime
156
156
window[x].log('hello');
should indeed work
– danronmoon
Nov 14 '18 at 20:56
I recommend looking for an alternative to whatever problem you are trying to solve, so it doesn't involve evaluating arbitrary strings, it sounds neither safe nor performant.
– Maikel Ruiz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:15
add a comment |
window[x].log('hello');
should indeed work
– danronmoon
Nov 14 '18 at 20:56
I recommend looking for an alternative to whatever problem you are trying to solve, so it doesn't involve evaluating arbitrary strings, it sounds neither safe nor performant.
– Maikel Ruiz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:15
window[x].log('hello');
should indeed work– danronmoon
Nov 14 '18 at 20:56
window[x].log('hello');
should indeed work– danronmoon
Nov 14 '18 at 20:56
I recommend looking for an alternative to whatever problem you are trying to solve, so it doesn't involve evaluating arbitrary strings, it sounds neither safe nor performant.
– Maikel Ruiz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:15
I recommend looking for an alternative to whatever problem you are trying to solve, so it doesn't involve evaluating arbitrary strings, it sounds neither safe nor performant.
– Maikel Ruiz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:15
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Here are two ways of using a string to call the original function for console.
eval("console").log("hello world");
window["console"].log("hello world");
If the string is "log" here is how it would work.
console["log"]("hello world");
If you only wanted to use strings you could do something like so:
eval("console")["log"]("hello world");
window["console"]["log"]("hello world");
eval("console.log('hello world')");
ok. what if the string is "log" instead of "console"? would that still work?
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:02
1
in this case, you may have a look here: property accessor
– Nina Scholz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:03
@kemicofa Thank You so much!!! The code console["log"]("hello world"); worked for me. I was putting a dot after console this whole time.
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53308570%2fhow-to-make-a-string-to-be-part-of-a-code-in-javascript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Here are two ways of using a string to call the original function for console.
eval("console").log("hello world");
window["console"].log("hello world");
If the string is "log" here is how it would work.
console["log"]("hello world");
If you only wanted to use strings you could do something like so:
eval("console")["log"]("hello world");
window["console"]["log"]("hello world");
eval("console.log('hello world')");
ok. what if the string is "log" instead of "console"? would that still work?
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:02
1
in this case, you may have a look here: property accessor
– Nina Scholz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:03
@kemicofa Thank You so much!!! The code console["log"]("hello world"); worked for me. I was putting a dot after console this whole time.
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:52
add a comment |
Here are two ways of using a string to call the original function for console.
eval("console").log("hello world");
window["console"].log("hello world");
If the string is "log" here is how it would work.
console["log"]("hello world");
If you only wanted to use strings you could do something like so:
eval("console")["log"]("hello world");
window["console"]["log"]("hello world");
eval("console.log('hello world')");
ok. what if the string is "log" instead of "console"? would that still work?
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:02
1
in this case, you may have a look here: property accessor
– Nina Scholz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:03
@kemicofa Thank You so much!!! The code console["log"]("hello world"); worked for me. I was putting a dot after console this whole time.
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:52
add a comment |
Here are two ways of using a string to call the original function for console.
eval("console").log("hello world");
window["console"].log("hello world");
If the string is "log" here is how it would work.
console["log"]("hello world");
If you only wanted to use strings you could do something like so:
eval("console")["log"]("hello world");
window["console"]["log"]("hello world");
eval("console.log('hello world')");
Here are two ways of using a string to call the original function for console.
eval("console").log("hello world");
window["console"].log("hello world");
If the string is "log" here is how it would work.
console["log"]("hello world");
If you only wanted to use strings you could do something like so:
eval("console")["log"]("hello world");
window["console"]["log"]("hello world");
eval("console.log('hello world')");
eval("console").log("hello world");
window["console"].log("hello world");
eval("console").log("hello world");
window["console"].log("hello world");
console["log"]("hello world");
console["log"]("hello world");
eval("console")["log"]("hello world");
window["console"]["log"]("hello world");
eval("console.log('hello world')");
eval("console")["log"]("hello world");
window["console"]["log"]("hello world");
eval("console.log('hello world')");
edited Nov 14 '18 at 21:06
answered Nov 14 '18 at 20:59
kemicofakemicofa
10.3k43983
10.3k43983
ok. what if the string is "log" instead of "console"? would that still work?
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:02
1
in this case, you may have a look here: property accessor
– Nina Scholz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:03
@kemicofa Thank You so much!!! The code console["log"]("hello world"); worked for me. I was putting a dot after console this whole time.
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:52
add a comment |
ok. what if the string is "log" instead of "console"? would that still work?
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:02
1
in this case, you may have a look here: property accessor
– Nina Scholz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:03
@kemicofa Thank You so much!!! The code console["log"]("hello world"); worked for me. I was putting a dot after console this whole time.
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:52
ok. what if the string is "log" instead of "console"? would that still work?
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:02
ok. what if the string is "log" instead of "console"? would that still work?
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:02
1
1
in this case, you may have a look here: property accessor
– Nina Scholz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:03
in this case, you may have a look here: property accessor
– Nina Scholz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:03
@kemicofa Thank You so much!!! The code console["log"]("hello world"); worked for me. I was putting a dot after console this whole time.
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:52
@kemicofa Thank You so much!!! The code console["log"]("hello world"); worked for me. I was putting a dot after console this whole time.
– Nah Prime
Nov 14 '18 at 21:52
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53308570%2fhow-to-make-a-string-to-be-part-of-a-code-in-javascript%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
window[x].log('hello');
should indeed work– danronmoon
Nov 14 '18 at 20:56
I recommend looking for an alternative to whatever problem you are trying to solve, so it doesn't involve evaluating arbitrary strings, it sounds neither safe nor performant.
– Maikel Ruiz
Nov 14 '18 at 21:15