Extending class yields error: “Implicit super constructor Hund() is undefined for default constructor. Must define an explicit constructor.” [duplicate]
This question already has an answer here:
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined. Must explicitly invoke another constructor [duplicate]
3 answers
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined for default constructor
10 answers
I want to extend a class but it doesn't work.
Here is my code:
public class Hund
// Attribute
private String name;
private String color;
private int age;
// Konstruktoren:
public Hund(String name, String color, int age)
this.name = name;
this.color = color;
this.age = age;
public void ausgeben()
System.out.println("The dog´s race is " + name);
System.out.println("His/Her color is " + color);
System.out.println("His/Her age is " + age + " years");
public void bellen()
System.out.println("Wuff Wuff");
public static void main(String args)
Hund GermanShepherd = new Hund("GermanShepherd", "Black", 4);
GermanShepherd.ausgeben();
GermanShepherd.bellen();
I created a new class and when I type:
public class Dackel extends Hund
I get the error: "Implicit super constructor Hund() is undefined for default constructor. Must define an explicit constructor."
What am I doing wrong?
java class extend
marked as duplicate by kapex, Federico klez Culloca, nickb, Mark Rotteveel
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Nov 13 '18 at 16:16
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined. Must explicitly invoke another constructor [duplicate]
3 answers
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined for default constructor
10 answers
I want to extend a class but it doesn't work.
Here is my code:
public class Hund
// Attribute
private String name;
private String color;
private int age;
// Konstruktoren:
public Hund(String name, String color, int age)
this.name = name;
this.color = color;
this.age = age;
public void ausgeben()
System.out.println("The dog´s race is " + name);
System.out.println("His/Her color is " + color);
System.out.println("His/Her age is " + age + " years");
public void bellen()
System.out.println("Wuff Wuff");
public static void main(String args)
Hund GermanShepherd = new Hund("GermanShepherd", "Black", 4);
GermanShepherd.ausgeben();
GermanShepherd.bellen();
I created a new class and when I type:
public class Dackel extends Hund
I get the error: "Implicit super constructor Hund() is undefined for default constructor. Must define an explicit constructor."
What am I doing wrong?
java class extend
marked as duplicate by kapex, Federico klez Culloca, nickb, Mark Rotteveel
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Nov 13 '18 at 16:16
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Yes, you are right, it has been answered here: stackoverflow.com/questions/1197634/…
– Gonen I
Nov 13 '18 at 16:01
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined. Must explicitly invoke another constructor [duplicate]
3 answers
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined for default constructor
10 answers
I want to extend a class but it doesn't work.
Here is my code:
public class Hund
// Attribute
private String name;
private String color;
private int age;
// Konstruktoren:
public Hund(String name, String color, int age)
this.name = name;
this.color = color;
this.age = age;
public void ausgeben()
System.out.println("The dog´s race is " + name);
System.out.println("His/Her color is " + color);
System.out.println("His/Her age is " + age + " years");
public void bellen()
System.out.println("Wuff Wuff");
public static void main(String args)
Hund GermanShepherd = new Hund("GermanShepherd", "Black", 4);
GermanShepherd.ausgeben();
GermanShepherd.bellen();
I created a new class and when I type:
public class Dackel extends Hund
I get the error: "Implicit super constructor Hund() is undefined for default constructor. Must define an explicit constructor."
What am I doing wrong?
java class extend
This question already has an answer here:
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined. Must explicitly invoke another constructor [duplicate]
3 answers
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined for default constructor
10 answers
I want to extend a class but it doesn't work.
Here is my code:
public class Hund
// Attribute
private String name;
private String color;
private int age;
// Konstruktoren:
public Hund(String name, String color, int age)
this.name = name;
this.color = color;
this.age = age;
public void ausgeben()
System.out.println("The dog´s race is " + name);
System.out.println("His/Her color is " + color);
System.out.println("His/Her age is " + age + " years");
public void bellen()
System.out.println("Wuff Wuff");
public static void main(String args)
Hund GermanShepherd = new Hund("GermanShepherd", "Black", 4);
GermanShepherd.ausgeben();
GermanShepherd.bellen();
I created a new class and when I type:
public class Dackel extends Hund
I get the error: "Implicit super constructor Hund() is undefined for default constructor. Must define an explicit constructor."
What am I doing wrong?
This question already has an answer here:
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined. Must explicitly invoke another constructor [duplicate]
3 answers
Java error: Implicit super constructor is undefined for default constructor
10 answers
java class extend
java class extend
edited Nov 13 '18 at 16:14
Mark Rotteveel
60k1476119
60k1476119
asked Nov 13 '18 at 15:59
Lukas Lukas
1
1
marked as duplicate by kapex, Federico klez Culloca, nickb, Mark Rotteveel
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Nov 13 '18 at 16:16
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by kapex, Federico klez Culloca, nickb, Mark Rotteveel
StackExchange.ready(function()
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;
$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function()
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');
$hover.hover(
function()
$hover.showInfoMessage('',
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 ,
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
);
,
function()
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
);
);
);
Nov 13 '18 at 16:16
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
Yes, you are right, it has been answered here: stackoverflow.com/questions/1197634/…
– Gonen I
Nov 13 '18 at 16:01
add a comment |
Yes, you are right, it has been answered here: stackoverflow.com/questions/1197634/…
– Gonen I
Nov 13 '18 at 16:01
Yes, you are right, it has been answered here: stackoverflow.com/questions/1197634/…
– Gonen I
Nov 13 '18 at 16:01
Yes, you are right, it has been answered here: stackoverflow.com/questions/1197634/…
– Gonen I
Nov 13 '18 at 16:01
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Dackel needs a constructor, if you were using an IDE, Eclipse would have told you that.
So the solution would be:
public class Dackel extends Hund
public Dackel(String name, String color, int age)
super(name, color, age);
Another solution would be to add an empty constructor to the Hund
class.
Another hint: I'm German too, but really, stick to one language. Don't name classes German and fields English. This is uttlery confusing. Rather be consistent.
add a comment |
Every java class has default constructor. If you implement parameterized constructor for a class the default constructor will not be available.
Here parameterized constructor is
public Hund(String name, String color, int age)
this.name = name;
this.color = color;
this.age = age;
When you extend Dackel with Hund JVM expecting to call constructor of super class Hund.
"Every java class has default constructor." That is wrong, the default constructor is only generated for classes that don't have an explicit constructor defined.
– Mark Rotteveel
Nov 13 '18 at 16:19
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Dackel needs a constructor, if you were using an IDE, Eclipse would have told you that.
So the solution would be:
public class Dackel extends Hund
public Dackel(String name, String color, int age)
super(name, color, age);
Another solution would be to add an empty constructor to the Hund
class.
Another hint: I'm German too, but really, stick to one language. Don't name classes German and fields English. This is uttlery confusing. Rather be consistent.
add a comment |
Dackel needs a constructor, if you were using an IDE, Eclipse would have told you that.
So the solution would be:
public class Dackel extends Hund
public Dackel(String name, String color, int age)
super(name, color, age);
Another solution would be to add an empty constructor to the Hund
class.
Another hint: I'm German too, but really, stick to one language. Don't name classes German and fields English. This is uttlery confusing. Rather be consistent.
add a comment |
Dackel needs a constructor, if you were using an IDE, Eclipse would have told you that.
So the solution would be:
public class Dackel extends Hund
public Dackel(String name, String color, int age)
super(name, color, age);
Another solution would be to add an empty constructor to the Hund
class.
Another hint: I'm German too, but really, stick to one language. Don't name classes German and fields English. This is uttlery confusing. Rather be consistent.
Dackel needs a constructor, if you were using an IDE, Eclipse would have told you that.
So the solution would be:
public class Dackel extends Hund
public Dackel(String name, String color, int age)
super(name, color, age);
Another solution would be to add an empty constructor to the Hund
class.
Another hint: I'm German too, but really, stick to one language. Don't name classes German and fields English. This is uttlery confusing. Rather be consistent.
edited Nov 13 '18 at 16:11
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:03
maio290maio290
2,014414
2,014414
add a comment |
add a comment |
Every java class has default constructor. If you implement parameterized constructor for a class the default constructor will not be available.
Here parameterized constructor is
public Hund(String name, String color, int age)
this.name = name;
this.color = color;
this.age = age;
When you extend Dackel with Hund JVM expecting to call constructor of super class Hund.
"Every java class has default constructor." That is wrong, the default constructor is only generated for classes that don't have an explicit constructor defined.
– Mark Rotteveel
Nov 13 '18 at 16:19
add a comment |
Every java class has default constructor. If you implement parameterized constructor for a class the default constructor will not be available.
Here parameterized constructor is
public Hund(String name, String color, int age)
this.name = name;
this.color = color;
this.age = age;
When you extend Dackel with Hund JVM expecting to call constructor of super class Hund.
"Every java class has default constructor." That is wrong, the default constructor is only generated for classes that don't have an explicit constructor defined.
– Mark Rotteveel
Nov 13 '18 at 16:19
add a comment |
Every java class has default constructor. If you implement parameterized constructor for a class the default constructor will not be available.
Here parameterized constructor is
public Hund(String name, String color, int age)
this.name = name;
this.color = color;
this.age = age;
When you extend Dackel with Hund JVM expecting to call constructor of super class Hund.
Every java class has default constructor. If you implement parameterized constructor for a class the default constructor will not be available.
Here parameterized constructor is
public Hund(String name, String color, int age)
this.name = name;
this.color = color;
this.age = age;
When you extend Dackel with Hund JVM expecting to call constructor of super class Hund.
edited Nov 13 '18 at 16:18
Mark Rotteveel
60k1476119
60k1476119
answered Nov 13 '18 at 16:08
vamsi krishnavamsi krishna
11
11
"Every java class has default constructor." That is wrong, the default constructor is only generated for classes that don't have an explicit constructor defined.
– Mark Rotteveel
Nov 13 '18 at 16:19
add a comment |
"Every java class has default constructor." That is wrong, the default constructor is only generated for classes that don't have an explicit constructor defined.
– Mark Rotteveel
Nov 13 '18 at 16:19
"Every java class has default constructor." That is wrong, the default constructor is only generated for classes that don't have an explicit constructor defined.
– Mark Rotteveel
Nov 13 '18 at 16:19
"Every java class has default constructor." That is wrong, the default constructor is only generated for classes that don't have an explicit constructor defined.
– Mark Rotteveel
Nov 13 '18 at 16:19
add a comment |
Yes, you are right, it has been answered here: stackoverflow.com/questions/1197634/…
– Gonen I
Nov 13 '18 at 16:01