Can we use IoTConnect for UI SDK instead of API call in Application
IoTConnect Provide UI SDK and API Methods to communication with the IoT Platform. both methods is working same, which one do I need to use for my project.
iot
add a comment |
IoTConnect Provide UI SDK and API Methods to communication with the IoT Platform. both methods is working same, which one do I need to use for my project.
iot
add a comment |
IoTConnect Provide UI SDK and API Methods to communication with the IoT Platform. both methods is working same, which one do I need to use for my project.
iot
IoTConnect Provide UI SDK and API Methods to communication with the IoT Platform. both methods is working same, which one do I need to use for my project.
iot
iot
asked Nov 12 at 7:10
MANISHDAN LANGA
1,35842341
1,35842341
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Yes you can, SDK is more powerful and better solution then APIs.
APIs have a static baseURL and fixed input pramas. If APIs owner changes the baseUrl pattern or input or output params then it won't work. You need to set again baseUrl and check one by one parmas to get the result
In SDK, you just need to update the SDK library and check the documentation for updated params only. It will easy to reconfigure compare to APIs.
I suggest go ahead with SDK to ease of use and more scalable.
add a comment |
You are right, use can use any of the method UI SDK or API call to communication with your application. I suggest to go with SDK because it's easy to manage compare to API calls. Based on the Best practice document of IoTConnect on https://help.iotconnect.io, They are recommended to use SDK.
Currently they provide limited language in UI SDK, so please check your development language is listed on the document for SDK.
thanks for the quick response @mandip.
– MANISHDAN LANGA
Nov 12 at 7:21
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53257352%2fcan-we-use-iotconnect-for-ui-sdk-instead-of-api-call-in-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes you can, SDK is more powerful and better solution then APIs.
APIs have a static baseURL and fixed input pramas. If APIs owner changes the baseUrl pattern or input or output params then it won't work. You need to set again baseUrl and check one by one parmas to get the result
In SDK, you just need to update the SDK library and check the documentation for updated params only. It will easy to reconfigure compare to APIs.
I suggest go ahead with SDK to ease of use and more scalable.
add a comment |
Yes you can, SDK is more powerful and better solution then APIs.
APIs have a static baseURL and fixed input pramas. If APIs owner changes the baseUrl pattern or input or output params then it won't work. You need to set again baseUrl and check one by one parmas to get the result
In SDK, you just need to update the SDK library and check the documentation for updated params only. It will easy to reconfigure compare to APIs.
I suggest go ahead with SDK to ease of use and more scalable.
add a comment |
Yes you can, SDK is more powerful and better solution then APIs.
APIs have a static baseURL and fixed input pramas. If APIs owner changes the baseUrl pattern or input or output params then it won't work. You need to set again baseUrl and check one by one parmas to get the result
In SDK, you just need to update the SDK library and check the documentation for updated params only. It will easy to reconfigure compare to APIs.
I suggest go ahead with SDK to ease of use and more scalable.
Yes you can, SDK is more powerful and better solution then APIs.
APIs have a static baseURL and fixed input pramas. If APIs owner changes the baseUrl pattern or input or output params then it won't work. You need to set again baseUrl and check one by one parmas to get the result
In SDK, you just need to update the SDK library and check the documentation for updated params only. It will easy to reconfigure compare to APIs.
I suggest go ahead with SDK to ease of use and more scalable.
answered Nov 13 at 6:32
Mac
595
595
add a comment |
add a comment |
You are right, use can use any of the method UI SDK or API call to communication with your application. I suggest to go with SDK because it's easy to manage compare to API calls. Based on the Best practice document of IoTConnect on https://help.iotconnect.io, They are recommended to use SDK.
Currently they provide limited language in UI SDK, so please check your development language is listed on the document for SDK.
thanks for the quick response @mandip.
– MANISHDAN LANGA
Nov 12 at 7:21
add a comment |
You are right, use can use any of the method UI SDK or API call to communication with your application. I suggest to go with SDK because it's easy to manage compare to API calls. Based on the Best practice document of IoTConnect on https://help.iotconnect.io, They are recommended to use SDK.
Currently they provide limited language in UI SDK, so please check your development language is listed on the document for SDK.
thanks for the quick response @mandip.
– MANISHDAN LANGA
Nov 12 at 7:21
add a comment |
You are right, use can use any of the method UI SDK or API call to communication with your application. I suggest to go with SDK because it's easy to manage compare to API calls. Based on the Best practice document of IoTConnect on https://help.iotconnect.io, They are recommended to use SDK.
Currently they provide limited language in UI SDK, so please check your development language is listed on the document for SDK.
You are right, use can use any of the method UI SDK or API call to communication with your application. I suggest to go with SDK because it's easy to manage compare to API calls. Based on the Best practice document of IoTConnect on https://help.iotconnect.io, They are recommended to use SDK.
Currently they provide limited language in UI SDK, so please check your development language is listed on the document for SDK.
answered Nov 12 at 7:16
Mandip Vora
224113
224113
thanks for the quick response @mandip.
– MANISHDAN LANGA
Nov 12 at 7:21
add a comment |
thanks for the quick response @mandip.
– MANISHDAN LANGA
Nov 12 at 7:21
thanks for the quick response @mandip.
– MANISHDAN LANGA
Nov 12 at 7:21
thanks for the quick response @mandip.
– MANISHDAN LANGA
Nov 12 at 7:21
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53257352%2fcan-we-use-iotconnect-for-ui-sdk-instead-of-api-call-in-application%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown