pros and cons to serve compressed sitemaps from flask or nginx (wish to save space on disk)









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am have two apis serving sitemaps from flask, one for xml and one for compressed xml.gz.



I have also nginx compression enabled, and I got a problem to validate compressed gz maps, for they get compressed two times.



I would like to save space on disk (it is about 10x!), and so only to keep compressed files on the server.



What are pros and cons to serve compressed files from flask or from nginx ?



Or is it advised to keep both, and tell nginx not to compressed maps with extentions .gz ?






nginx flask sitemap







share|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I am have two apis serving sitemaps from flask, one for xml and one for compressed xml.gz.



    I have also nginx compression enabled, and I got a problem to validate compressed gz maps, for they get compressed two times.



    I would like to save space on disk (it is about 10x!), and so only to keep compressed files on the server.



    What are pros and cons to serve compressed files from flask or from nginx ?



    Or is it advised to keep both, and tell nginx not to compressed maps with extentions .gz ?






    nginx flask sitemap







    share|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I am have two apis serving sitemaps from flask, one for xml and one for compressed xml.gz.



      I have also nginx compression enabled, and I got a problem to validate compressed gz maps, for they get compressed two times.



      I would like to save space on disk (it is about 10x!), and so only to keep compressed files on the server.



      What are pros and cons to serve compressed files from flask or from nginx ?



      Or is it advised to keep both, and tell nginx not to compressed maps with extentions .gz ?






      nginx flask sitemap







      share|improve this question













      I am have two apis serving sitemaps from flask, one for xml and one for compressed xml.gz.



      I have also nginx compression enabled, and I got a problem to validate compressed gz maps, for they get compressed two times.



      I would like to save space on disk (it is about 10x!), and so only to keep compressed files on the server.



      What are pros and cons to serve compressed files from flask or from nginx ?



      Or is it advised to keep both, and tell nginx not to compressed maps with extentions .gz ?






      nginx flask sitemap




      nginx flask sitemap






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 10 at 15:00









      user305883

      5091722




      5091722



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53240193%2fpros-and-cons-to-serve-compressed-sitemaps-from-flask-or-nginx-wish-to-save-spa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53240193%2fpros-and-cons-to-serve-compressed-sitemaps-from-flask-or-nginx-wish-to-save-spa%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          Barbados

          圖片
          For other uses, see Barbados (disambiguation). Not to be confused with Barbuda. Coordinates: 13°10′N 59°33′W  /  13.167°N 59.550°W  / 13.167; -59.550 Barbados Flag Coat of arms Motto:  "Pride and Industry" Anthem:  In Plenty and In Time of Need Capital and largest city Bridgetown 13°06′N 59°37′W  /  13.100°N 59.617°W  / 13.100; -59.617 Official languages English Recognised regional languages Bajan Creole Ethnic groups (est. 2010 [1] ) 92.4% black 3.1% multiracial 2.7% white 1.3% East Indian 0.5% other/unspecified Religion 75.6% Christian 2.5% other 20.6% none 1.2% unspecified [1] Demonym(s) Barbadian Bajan (colloquial) Government Unitary parliamentary constitutional monarchy • Monarch Elizabeth II •  Governor-General Dame Sandra Mason • Prime Minister Mia Mottley Legislature Parliament • Upper house Senate • Lower house House of Assembly Independence • From the United Kingdom 30 November 1966 Area • Total 439 km 2 (169 sq mi) (183rd) • Water (%) Negligib
          閱讀完整內容

          How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

          圖片
          6 I added .AddJsonFile("Connections.json", optional: true, reloadOnChange: true) in public Startup(IHostingEnvironment env) Connections.json contains: "ConnectionStrings": "DefaultConnection": "Server=(localdb)\mssqllocaldb;Database=DATABASE;Trusted_Connection=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=true", "COR-W81-101": "Data Source=DATASOURCE;Initial Catalog=P61_CAFM_Basic;User Id=USERID;Password=PASSWORD;Persist Security Info=False;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Packet Size=4096;", "COR-W81-100": "Data Source=DATASOURCE;Initial Catalog=Post_PS;User Id=USERID;Password=PASSWORD;Persist Security Info=False;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Packet Size=4096;", "MSEDGEWIN10": "Data Source=DATASOURCE; Initial Catalog=COR_Basic; Persist Security Info=False;Integrated Security=true;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Packet Size=4096;Application Name="COR_Basic"", "server&qu
          閱讀完整內容

          Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3

          圖片
          0 I'm wondering if I can run a Node.js script in my Jekyll page from GitHub Pages or Amazon S3? I think it can't run on GitHub Pages since it doesn't support server side code. Not too sure. The code is below: var Airtable = require('airtable'); var base = new Airtable(apiKey: 'YOUR_API_KEY').base('appAnZVyYqusNPV5Q'); base('Invitee list').select( // Selecting the first 3 records in Complete list: maxRecords: 3, view: "Complete list" ).eachPage(function page(records, fetchNextPage) // This function (`page`) will get called for each page of records. records.forEach(function(record) console.log('Retrieved', record.get('Email')); ); // To fetch the next page of records, call `fetchNextPage`. // If there are more records, `page` will get called again. // If there are no more records, `done` will get called. fetchNextPage(); , function done(err) if (err) console.error(err); return; ); node.js
          閱讀完整內容