HMS Thracian (1920)
















































































HMS Thracian- IJN Patrol Boat No. 101.jpg
HMS Thracian in 1941

History

 United Kingdom
Name:
HMS Thracian (D86)
Ordered:
1915
Builder:
  • Hawthorn Leslie and Company

  • Sheerness Dockyard

Laid down:
17 January 1918
Launched:
5 March 1920
Commissioned:
1 April 1922
Fate:
Grounded on 25 December 1941 at Aberdeen, Hong Kong
General characteristics HMS Thracian
Class and type:
S-class destroyer
Displacement:
1,075 long tons (1,092 t)
Length:
276 ft (84 m) o/a
Beam:
26 ft 8 in (8.13 m)
Draught:
9 ft (2.7 m)
Installed power:
  • 27,000 shp (20,000 kW)

  • 3 × Yarrow boilers

Propulsion:
2 Shafts; 2 steam turbines
Speed:
36 knots (67 km/h; 41 mph)
Range:
2,750 nmi (5,090 km; 3,160 mi) at 15 knots (28 km/h; 17 mph)
Complement:
90
Armament:
  • 3 × QF 4-inch (102 mm) Mark IV guns

  • 1 × QF 2-pounder (40 mm) "pom-pom" anti-aircraft gun

  • 2 × twin 21-inch (533 mm) torpedo tubes

  • 2 × single 18-inch (45 cm) torpedo tubes


 Japan
Name:
  • Patrol Boat No. 101

  • (第101号哨戒艇, Dai-101-Gō Shōkaitei)

Builder:
Navy 2nd Construction Department at Hong Kong
Acquired:
1942
Commissioned:
1 October 1942
Decommissioned:
1945
In service:
1942-1945
Renamed:
  • 15 March 1944

  • Special Training Ship No. 1

  • (特第1号練習艇, Toku Dai-1-Gō Renshūtei)

Reclassified:
Training ship, 15 March 1944
Reinstated:
Returned to Royal Navy in October 1945
Fate:
Scrapped, February 1946
General characteristics Patrol Boat No.101
Class and type:
Patrol boat/Training ship
Displacement:
1,150 long tons (1,168 t) standard
Length:
80.79 m (265 ft 1 in) Lpp
Beam:
8.17 m (26 ft 10 in)
Draft:
3.01 m (9 ft 11 in)
Propulsion:
  • 2 × Brown-Curtis turbines,

  • 3 × Yarrow water tube boilers,

  • 2 shafts, 10,000 shp

Speed:
25 knots (29 mph; 46 km/h)
Complement:
  • December 1943

  • 119

  • March 1944

  • 113

Sensors and
processing systems:
Mk. 23 gunfire control radar (1944)
Armament:
  • 25 November 1942

  • 3 × QF 4-inch (101.6 mm) Mark IV guns

  • 15 March 1944

  • 4 × Type 92 610 mm TTs

  • 2 × 6th Year Type 533 mm TTs

  • 2 × Type 93 13 mm AA guns

  • 1 × Type 94 depth charge thrower

  • 10 × Type 95 depth charges

HMS Thracian was an S-class destroyer built for the Royal Navy during the First World War.




Contents





  • 1 Description


  • 2 Construction and career


  • 3 Imperial Japanese Navy service (1942 – 1945)


  • 4 Notes


  • 5 Bibliography


  • 6 Further reading




Description


The S-class destroyers were improved versions of the preceding Modified R class. They displaced 1,075 long tons (1,092 t).[1] The ships had an overall length of 276 feet (84.1 m), a beam of 26 feet 8 inches (8.1 m) and a draught of 9 feet (2.7 m). They were powered by two Brown-Curtis geared steam turbines, each driving one propeller shaft, using steam provided by two Yarrow boilers. The turbines developed a total of 27,000 shaft horsepower (20,000 kW) and gave a maximum speed of 36 knots (67 km/h; 41 mph). The ships carried a maximum of 301 long tons (306 t) of fuel oil that gave them a range of 2,750 nautical miles (5,090 km; 3,160 mi) at 15 knots (28 km/h; 17 mph). The ships' complement was 90 officers and ratings.[2]


Thracian was armed with three QF 4-inch (102 mm) Mark IV guns in single mounts and a single 2-pounder (40 mm) "pom-pom" anti-aircraft gun. The ship was fitted with two twin mounts for 21-inch (533 mm) torpedoes.[1] Two additional single mounts were positioned abreast the bridge at the break of the forecastle for 18-inch (45 cm) torpedoes. All torpedo tubes were above water and traversed to fire.[3]



Construction and career


HMS Thracian was laid down on 17 January 1918 at Hawthorn Leslie and Company, launched on 5 March 1920 and completed at Sheerness Dockyard on 1 April 1922. The ship was run aground and scuttled at Hong Kong on 25 December 1941, later captured by the Imperial Japanese Army.



Imperial Japanese Navy service (1942 – 1945)




IJN Patrol Boat No. 101 in 1942




IJN Special Training Ship No. 1 in 1945


  • 1 October 1942: Registered to naval ship list in the Imperial Japanese Navy, and classification to the Special service ship (Patrol boat). Renamed

Patrol Boat No. 101.


  • 25 November 1942: Repairs were completed by the Navy 2nd Construction Department, and assigned to the Yokosuka Naval District.

  • (after): She spent her time on convoy escort operations in the Yokosuka Area.

  • 15 August 1943: Assigned to the Torpedo warfare school (Yokosuka).

  • 15 March 1944: Classification to the miscellaneous ship (Training ship), and renamed Special Training Ship No. 1. She was used for a test bed for new weapons.

  • 15 August 1945: Survived war at Yokosuka.

  • October 1945: Returned to Royal Navy.

  • February 1946: Scrapped at Hong Kong.


Notes




  1. ^ ab Gardiner & Gray, pp. 84–85


  2. ^ Lenton, p. 137


  3. ^ Friedman, p. 169



Bibliography



  • Dittmar, F.J. & Colledge, J.J. (1972). British Warships 1914–1919. Shepperton, UK: Ian Allan. ISBN 0-7110-0380-7..mw-parser-output cite.citationfont-style:inherit.mw-parser-output qquotes:"""""""'""'".mw-parser-output code.cs1-codecolor:inherit;background:inherit;border:inherit;padding:inherit.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-free abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/65/Lock-green.svg/9px-Lock-green.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-limited a,.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-registration abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/Lock-gray-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-gray-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-lock-subscription abackground:url("//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/aa/Lock-red-alt-2.svg/9px-Lock-red-alt-2.svg.png")no-repeat;background-position:right .1em center.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registrationcolor:#555.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription span,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration spanborder-bottom:1px dotted;cursor:help.mw-parser-output .cs1-hidden-errordisplay:none;font-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-visible-errorfont-size:100%.mw-parser-output .cs1-subscription,.mw-parser-output .cs1-registration,.mw-parser-output .cs1-formatfont-size:95%.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-left,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-leftpadding-left:0.2em.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-right,.mw-parser-output .cs1-kern-wl-rightpadding-right:0.2em


  • Friedman, Norman (2009). British Destroyers: From Earliest Days to the Second World War. Barnsley, UK: Seaforth Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84832-049-9.


  • Gardiner, Robert & Gray, Randal (1985). Conway's All The World's Fighting Ships 1906–1921. London: Conway Maritime Press. ISBN 0-85177-245-5.


  • Lenton, H. T. (1998). British & Empire Warships of the Second World War. Annapolis, Maryland: Naval Institute Press. ISBN 1-55750-048-7.


Further reading


  • Rekishi Gunzō, History of Pacific War Vol.45, Truth histories of the Imperial Japanese Naval Vessels, Gakken (Japanese publisher), May 2004,
    ISBN 4-05-603412-5.


  • Ships of the World, special issue Vol.45, Escort Vessels of the Imperial Japanese Navy, "Kaijinsha"., (Japan), 1996.


  • The Maru Special, Japanese Naval Vessels No.49, "Japanese submarine chasers and patrol boats", "Ushio Shobō". (Japan), 1981.









-

這個網誌中的熱門文章

Dutch intervention in Lombok and Karangasem

圖片
Dutch intervention in Lombok and Karangasem (1894) Attack of the Dutch on a Balinese stronghold in Lombok in 1894. Date July–November 1894 Location Lombok Result Decisive Dutch victory. Dutch control of Lombok and Karangasem. Belligerents Netherlands Eastern Sasak Lombok Mataram Western Sasak Commanders and leaders General-Major Jacobus Augustinus Vetter (Commander) General-Major P.P.H. van Ham (Second in command)   † Strength 2,200 (July expedition) Casualties and losses 500 (August 1894) 166 (November 1894) Thousands v t e Dutch interventions in Bali Northern Bali (1846) Northern Bali (1848) Bali (1849) Lombok and Karangasem (1894) Southern Bali (1906) Southern Bali (1908) v t e Dutch colonial campaigns 17th Century Bantam (1601) Malacca (1606) Cape Rachado (1606) Banda Islands (1621) Macau (1622) Pescadores (1622–1624) Bahia (1624) Persian Gulf (1625) Elmina (1625) Cuba (1628) Recife (1630) Albrolhos (1631) Liaoluo Bay (1633) Taiwan (1635–36) Lamey...
閱讀完整內容

Último Guerrero

圖片
This name uses Spanish naming customs: the first or paternal family name is Gutiérrez  and the second or maternal family name is Hernández . Último Guerrero Guerrero in January 2017 Birth name José Gutiérrez Hernández Born ( 1972-03-01 ) March 1, 1972 (age 46) [1] Gómez Palacio, Durango, Mexico [2] Professional wrestling career Ring name(s) Cóndor Dorado [1] El Flanagan [1] Último Guerrero [1] Billed height 1.73 m (5 ft 8 in) [1] Billed weight 93 kg (205 lb) [2] Billed from Gómez Palacio, Durango, Mexico [2] Trained by Tinito [1] Halcón Suriano [1] Debut September 19, 1990 José Gutiérrez Hernández (born March 1, 1972), better known under the ring name Último Guerrero (Spanish for Last Warrior ), is a Mexican Luchador , or professional wrestler, currently working for Consejo Mundial de Lucha Libre (CMLL), where he is the current CMLL World Heavyweight Champion in his secon...
閱讀完整內容

Using Rectangle.Intersects for Collision detection causes objects to “stick” to surfaces (Java)

圖片
1 1 I am trying to develop a top - down shooter game. Currently I am doing everything from scratch because I want to learn Java better. My problem right now is with collision detection. I am using Rectangle.Intersects(as seen in code) to determine whether the player is intersecting with walls. It almost perfectly, except that when the player is colliding on just one axis (ie running into a vertical wall), they are locked in both directions. I want to implement sliding for more smooth gameplay. I have a slight idea on how to do this, which would involve checking the x and y planes individually. However, I don't know if this is possible using my current method. I am a little new to Java so I don't know much about different kinds of libraries I could use instead of Rectangles but they have been working great and I would like to stick to them. If there is a solution using Rectangles, that would be great. If there isn't, I'm open to new ideas. Thanks. Here is t...
閱讀完整內容