What's the elegant way to replace following code in java 8?










1















I have the following code in my java program (paraphrased from the actual program):



import java.util.Objects;
import java.util.function.BiPredicate;

class Class1
String propertyA;
boolean propertyANot;
String propertyB; //Not all members have corresponding negate indicator
String propertyC;
String propertyD;
boolean propertyDNot;
....



class Class2
String propertyX;
String propertyY;
String propertyZ;
String propertyW;
....


public class Main

//Fail early without inspecting all properties
private BiPredicate<Class1,Class2> matchObjects = (obj1,obj2) ->

if(obj1.propertyA != null && obj2.propertyX != null)
//property1Not is a boolean indicates negation
if(obj1.propertyANot && !Objects.equals(obj1.propertyA,obj2.propertyX))
return false;

else if(!obj1.propertyANot && Objects.equals(obj1.propertyA,obj2.propertyX))
return false;



if(obj1.propertyB != null && obj2.propertyY != null)
if(!Objects.equals(obj1.propertyB,obj2.propertyY))
return false;


....

return true;
;



As indicated in the comments, I want the matchObjects method to fail as soon as one of the matching conditions fail. Also the input objects don't have one-to-one correspondence to generalize the code in a loop.



I have following question:




What's the best way to rewrite this code using functional programming
concepts of java8?




Having too many if conditions are making me think there is a scope for improvement here.



I also wrote a custom predicate that takes multiple & Optional parameters to generalize the testing of property equivalence in the if conditions.



However this is not helping me to get rid of multiple if conditions.



Please help & thanks in advance.










share|improve this question


























    1















    I have the following code in my java program (paraphrased from the actual program):



    import java.util.Objects;
    import java.util.function.BiPredicate;

    class Class1
    String propertyA;
    boolean propertyANot;
    String propertyB; //Not all members have corresponding negate indicator
    String propertyC;
    String propertyD;
    boolean propertyDNot;
    ....



    class Class2
    String propertyX;
    String propertyY;
    String propertyZ;
    String propertyW;
    ....


    public class Main

    //Fail early without inspecting all properties
    private BiPredicate<Class1,Class2> matchObjects = (obj1,obj2) ->

    if(obj1.propertyA != null && obj2.propertyX != null)
    //property1Not is a boolean indicates negation
    if(obj1.propertyANot && !Objects.equals(obj1.propertyA,obj2.propertyX))
    return false;

    else if(!obj1.propertyANot && Objects.equals(obj1.propertyA,obj2.propertyX))
    return false;



    if(obj1.propertyB != null && obj2.propertyY != null)
    if(!Objects.equals(obj1.propertyB,obj2.propertyY))
    return false;


    ....

    return true;
    ;



    As indicated in the comments, I want the matchObjects method to fail as soon as one of the matching conditions fail. Also the input objects don't have one-to-one correspondence to generalize the code in a loop.



    I have following question:




    What's the best way to rewrite this code using functional programming
    concepts of java8?




    Having too many if conditions are making me think there is a scope for improvement here.



    I also wrote a custom predicate that takes multiple & Optional parameters to generalize the testing of property equivalence in the if conditions.



    However this is not helping me to get rid of multiple if conditions.



    Please help & thanks in advance.










    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      I have the following code in my java program (paraphrased from the actual program):



      import java.util.Objects;
      import java.util.function.BiPredicate;

      class Class1
      String propertyA;
      boolean propertyANot;
      String propertyB; //Not all members have corresponding negate indicator
      String propertyC;
      String propertyD;
      boolean propertyDNot;
      ....



      class Class2
      String propertyX;
      String propertyY;
      String propertyZ;
      String propertyW;
      ....


      public class Main

      //Fail early without inspecting all properties
      private BiPredicate<Class1,Class2> matchObjects = (obj1,obj2) ->

      if(obj1.propertyA != null && obj2.propertyX != null)
      //property1Not is a boolean indicates negation
      if(obj1.propertyANot && !Objects.equals(obj1.propertyA,obj2.propertyX))
      return false;

      else if(!obj1.propertyANot && Objects.equals(obj1.propertyA,obj2.propertyX))
      return false;



      if(obj1.propertyB != null && obj2.propertyY != null)
      if(!Objects.equals(obj1.propertyB,obj2.propertyY))
      return false;


      ....

      return true;
      ;



      As indicated in the comments, I want the matchObjects method to fail as soon as one of the matching conditions fail. Also the input objects don't have one-to-one correspondence to generalize the code in a loop.



      I have following question:




      What's the best way to rewrite this code using functional programming
      concepts of java8?




      Having too many if conditions are making me think there is a scope for improvement here.



      I also wrote a custom predicate that takes multiple & Optional parameters to generalize the testing of property equivalence in the if conditions.



      However this is not helping me to get rid of multiple if conditions.



      Please help & thanks in advance.










      share|improve this question














      I have the following code in my java program (paraphrased from the actual program):



      import java.util.Objects;
      import java.util.function.BiPredicate;

      class Class1
      String propertyA;
      boolean propertyANot;
      String propertyB; //Not all members have corresponding negate indicator
      String propertyC;
      String propertyD;
      boolean propertyDNot;
      ....



      class Class2
      String propertyX;
      String propertyY;
      String propertyZ;
      String propertyW;
      ....


      public class Main

      //Fail early without inspecting all properties
      private BiPredicate<Class1,Class2> matchObjects = (obj1,obj2) ->

      if(obj1.propertyA != null && obj2.propertyX != null)
      //property1Not is a boolean indicates negation
      if(obj1.propertyANot && !Objects.equals(obj1.propertyA,obj2.propertyX))
      return false;

      else if(!obj1.propertyANot && Objects.equals(obj1.propertyA,obj2.propertyX))
      return false;



      if(obj1.propertyB != null && obj2.propertyY != null)
      if(!Objects.equals(obj1.propertyB,obj2.propertyY))
      return false;


      ....

      return true;
      ;



      As indicated in the comments, I want the matchObjects method to fail as soon as one of the matching conditions fail. Also the input objects don't have one-to-one correspondence to generalize the code in a loop.



      I have following question:




      What's the best way to rewrite this code using functional programming
      concepts of java8?




      Having too many if conditions are making me think there is a scope for improvement here.



      I also wrote a custom predicate that takes multiple & Optional parameters to generalize the testing of property equivalence in the if conditions.



      However this is not helping me to get rid of multiple if conditions.



      Please help & thanks in advance.







      lambda java-8






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 15 '18 at 17:20









      Bhanuprakash DBhanuprakash D

      570514




      570514






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          You can try something like this:



          @FunctionalInterface interface TriPredicate<A, B, C> 
          boolean test (A a, B b, C c);


          private BiPredicate<Class1, Class2> matchObjects = (obj1, obj2) ->
          (cond == null ;





          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            +1. The issue is that I have 2 digit properties in both my classes in which case, the return statement becomes too large. I am on the lookout for chaining lambda functions of sorts.

            – Bhanuprakash D
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:47











          • What means too large? Doesn't it compile?

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:54











          • @Federico Peralta Schaffner : yes, I think this may be possible. Good point.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:16







          • 1





            @Federico Peralta Schaffner : Yes, I have checked. It is possible.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 21:02










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324805%2fwhats-the-elegant-way-to-replace-following-code-in-java-8%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          You can try something like this:



          @FunctionalInterface interface TriPredicate<A, B, C> 
          boolean test (A a, B b, C c);


          private BiPredicate<Class1, Class2> matchObjects = (obj1, obj2) ->
          (cond == null ;





          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            +1. The issue is that I have 2 digit properties in both my classes in which case, the return statement becomes too large. I am on the lookout for chaining lambda functions of sorts.

            – Bhanuprakash D
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:47











          • What means too large? Doesn't it compile?

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:54











          • @Federico Peralta Schaffner : yes, I think this may be possible. Good point.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:16







          • 1





            @Federico Peralta Schaffner : Yes, I have checked. It is possible.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 21:02















          3














          You can try something like this:



          @FunctionalInterface interface TriPredicate<A, B, C> 
          boolean test (A a, B b, C c);


          private BiPredicate<Class1, Class2> matchObjects = (obj1, obj2) ->
          (cond == null ;





          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            +1. The issue is that I have 2 digit properties in both my classes in which case, the return statement becomes too large. I am on the lookout for chaining lambda functions of sorts.

            – Bhanuprakash D
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:47











          • What means too large? Doesn't it compile?

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:54











          • @Federico Peralta Schaffner : yes, I think this may be possible. Good point.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:16







          • 1





            @Federico Peralta Schaffner : Yes, I have checked. It is possible.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 21:02













          3












          3








          3







          You can try something like this:



          @FunctionalInterface interface TriPredicate<A, B, C> 
          boolean test (A a, B b, C c);


          private BiPredicate<Class1, Class2> matchObjects = (obj1, obj2) ->
          (cond == null ;





          share|improve this answer















          You can try something like this:



          @FunctionalInterface interface TriPredicate<A, B, C> 
          boolean test (A a, B b, C c);


          private BiPredicate<Class1, Class2> matchObjects = (obj1, obj2) ->
          (cond == null ;






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 15 '18 at 21:01

























          answered Nov 15 '18 at 18:25









          DonatDonat

          848128




          848128







          • 1





            +1. The issue is that I have 2 digit properties in both my classes in which case, the return statement becomes too large. I am on the lookout for chaining lambda functions of sorts.

            – Bhanuprakash D
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:47











          • What means too large? Doesn't it compile?

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:54











          • @Federico Peralta Schaffner : yes, I think this may be possible. Good point.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:16







          • 1





            @Federico Peralta Schaffner : Yes, I have checked. It is possible.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 21:02












          • 1





            +1. The issue is that I have 2 digit properties in both my classes in which case, the return statement becomes too large. I am on the lookout for chaining lambda functions of sorts.

            – Bhanuprakash D
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:47











          • What means too large? Doesn't it compile?

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 18:54











          • @Federico Peralta Schaffner : yes, I think this may be possible. Good point.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 20:16







          • 1





            @Federico Peralta Schaffner : Yes, I have checked. It is possible.

            – Donat
            Nov 15 '18 at 21:02







          1




          1





          +1. The issue is that I have 2 digit properties in both my classes in which case, the return statement becomes too large. I am on the lookout for chaining lambda functions of sorts.

          – Bhanuprakash D
          Nov 15 '18 at 18:47





          +1. The issue is that I have 2 digit properties in both my classes in which case, the return statement becomes too large. I am on the lookout for chaining lambda functions of sorts.

          – Bhanuprakash D
          Nov 15 '18 at 18:47













          What means too large? Doesn't it compile?

          – Donat
          Nov 15 '18 at 18:54





          What means too large? Doesn't it compile?

          – Donat
          Nov 15 '18 at 18:54













          @Federico Peralta Schaffner : yes, I think this may be possible. Good point.

          – Donat
          Nov 15 '18 at 20:16






          @Federico Peralta Schaffner : yes, I think this may be possible. Good point.

          – Donat
          Nov 15 '18 at 20:16





          1




          1





          @Federico Peralta Schaffner : Yes, I have checked. It is possible.

          – Donat
          Nov 15 '18 at 21:02





          @Federico Peralta Schaffner : Yes, I have checked. It is possible.

          – Donat
          Nov 15 '18 at 21:02



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53324805%2fwhats-the-elegant-way-to-replace-following-code-in-java-8%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

          Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3

          Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto