Slow Dask performance compared to native sklearn
I'm new to using Dask but have experienced painfully slow performance when attempting to re-write native sklearn functions in Dask. I've simplified the use-case as much as possible in hope of getting some help.
Using standard sklearn/numpy/pandas etc I have the following:
df = pd.read_csv(location, index_col=False) # A ~75MB CSV
# Build feature list and dependent variables, code irrelevant
from sklearn import linear_model
model = linear_model.Lasso(alpha=0.1, normalize=False, max_iter=100, tol=Tol)
model.fit(features.values, dependent)
print(model.coef_)
print(model.intercept_)
This takes a few seconds to compute. I then have the following in Dask:
# Read in CSV and prepare params like before but using dask arrays/dataframes instead
with joblib.parallel_backend('dask'):
from dask_glm.estimators import LinearRegression
# Coerce data
X = self.features.to_dask_array(lengths=True)
y = self.dependents
# Build regression
lr = LinearRegression(fit_intercept=True, solver='admm', tol=self.tolerance, regularizer='l1', max_iter=100, lamduh=0.1)
lr.fit(X, y)
print(lr.coef_)
print(lr.intercept_)
Which takes ages to compute (about 30 minutes). I only have 1 Dask worker in my development cluster but that has 16GB ram and unbounded CPU.
Has anyone any idea why this is so slow?
Hopefully my code omissions aren't significant!
NB: This is the simplest use-case before people ask why even use Dask - this was used as a proof of concept exercise to check that things would function as expected.
python scikit-learn dask
add a comment |
I'm new to using Dask but have experienced painfully slow performance when attempting to re-write native sklearn functions in Dask. I've simplified the use-case as much as possible in hope of getting some help.
Using standard sklearn/numpy/pandas etc I have the following:
df = pd.read_csv(location, index_col=False) # A ~75MB CSV
# Build feature list and dependent variables, code irrelevant
from sklearn import linear_model
model = linear_model.Lasso(alpha=0.1, normalize=False, max_iter=100, tol=Tol)
model.fit(features.values, dependent)
print(model.coef_)
print(model.intercept_)
This takes a few seconds to compute. I then have the following in Dask:
# Read in CSV and prepare params like before but using dask arrays/dataframes instead
with joblib.parallel_backend('dask'):
from dask_glm.estimators import LinearRegression
# Coerce data
X = self.features.to_dask_array(lengths=True)
y = self.dependents
# Build regression
lr = LinearRegression(fit_intercept=True, solver='admm', tol=self.tolerance, regularizer='l1', max_iter=100, lamduh=0.1)
lr.fit(X, y)
print(lr.coef_)
print(lr.intercept_)
Which takes ages to compute (about 30 minutes). I only have 1 Dask worker in my development cluster but that has 16GB ram and unbounded CPU.
Has anyone any idea why this is so slow?
Hopefully my code omissions aren't significant!
NB: This is the simplest use-case before people ask why even use Dask - this was used as a proof of concept exercise to check that things would function as expected.
python scikit-learn dask
2
You are comparing two completely different algorithms (hint: Coordinate descent/first-order vs. Newton/second-order=hessian-opt).
– sascha
Nov 15 '18 at 13:52
@sascha Sorry was supposed to read admm - although what you said may still be true! Left over from me trying to figure out the speed
– Sykomaniac
Nov 15 '18 at 14:03
In addition to the above (different algorithms), are you getting burned on IPC overhead?
– shadowtalker
Nov 15 '18 at 14:09
add a comment |
I'm new to using Dask but have experienced painfully slow performance when attempting to re-write native sklearn functions in Dask. I've simplified the use-case as much as possible in hope of getting some help.
Using standard sklearn/numpy/pandas etc I have the following:
df = pd.read_csv(location, index_col=False) # A ~75MB CSV
# Build feature list and dependent variables, code irrelevant
from sklearn import linear_model
model = linear_model.Lasso(alpha=0.1, normalize=False, max_iter=100, tol=Tol)
model.fit(features.values, dependent)
print(model.coef_)
print(model.intercept_)
This takes a few seconds to compute. I then have the following in Dask:
# Read in CSV and prepare params like before but using dask arrays/dataframes instead
with joblib.parallel_backend('dask'):
from dask_glm.estimators import LinearRegression
# Coerce data
X = self.features.to_dask_array(lengths=True)
y = self.dependents
# Build regression
lr = LinearRegression(fit_intercept=True, solver='admm', tol=self.tolerance, regularizer='l1', max_iter=100, lamduh=0.1)
lr.fit(X, y)
print(lr.coef_)
print(lr.intercept_)
Which takes ages to compute (about 30 minutes). I only have 1 Dask worker in my development cluster but that has 16GB ram and unbounded CPU.
Has anyone any idea why this is so slow?
Hopefully my code omissions aren't significant!
NB: This is the simplest use-case before people ask why even use Dask - this was used as a proof of concept exercise to check that things would function as expected.
python scikit-learn dask
I'm new to using Dask but have experienced painfully slow performance when attempting to re-write native sklearn functions in Dask. I've simplified the use-case as much as possible in hope of getting some help.
Using standard sklearn/numpy/pandas etc I have the following:
df = pd.read_csv(location, index_col=False) # A ~75MB CSV
# Build feature list and dependent variables, code irrelevant
from sklearn import linear_model
model = linear_model.Lasso(alpha=0.1, normalize=False, max_iter=100, tol=Tol)
model.fit(features.values, dependent)
print(model.coef_)
print(model.intercept_)
This takes a few seconds to compute. I then have the following in Dask:
# Read in CSV and prepare params like before but using dask arrays/dataframes instead
with joblib.parallel_backend('dask'):
from dask_glm.estimators import LinearRegression
# Coerce data
X = self.features.to_dask_array(lengths=True)
y = self.dependents
# Build regression
lr = LinearRegression(fit_intercept=True, solver='admm', tol=self.tolerance, regularizer='l1', max_iter=100, lamduh=0.1)
lr.fit(X, y)
print(lr.coef_)
print(lr.intercept_)
Which takes ages to compute (about 30 minutes). I only have 1 Dask worker in my development cluster but that has 16GB ram and unbounded CPU.
Has anyone any idea why this is so slow?
Hopefully my code omissions aren't significant!
NB: This is the simplest use-case before people ask why even use Dask - this was used as a proof of concept exercise to check that things would function as expected.
python scikit-learn dask
python scikit-learn dask
edited Nov 15 '18 at 14:04
Sykomaniac
asked Nov 15 '18 at 13:32
SykomaniacSykomaniac
6511
6511
2
You are comparing two completely different algorithms (hint: Coordinate descent/first-order vs. Newton/second-order=hessian-opt).
– sascha
Nov 15 '18 at 13:52
@sascha Sorry was supposed to read admm - although what you said may still be true! Left over from me trying to figure out the speed
– Sykomaniac
Nov 15 '18 at 14:03
In addition to the above (different algorithms), are you getting burned on IPC overhead?
– shadowtalker
Nov 15 '18 at 14:09
add a comment |
2
You are comparing two completely different algorithms (hint: Coordinate descent/first-order vs. Newton/second-order=hessian-opt).
– sascha
Nov 15 '18 at 13:52
@sascha Sorry was supposed to read admm - although what you said may still be true! Left over from me trying to figure out the speed
– Sykomaniac
Nov 15 '18 at 14:03
In addition to the above (different algorithms), are you getting burned on IPC overhead?
– shadowtalker
Nov 15 '18 at 14:09
2
2
You are comparing two completely different algorithms (hint: Coordinate descent/first-order vs. Newton/second-order=hessian-opt).
– sascha
Nov 15 '18 at 13:52
You are comparing two completely different algorithms (hint: Coordinate descent/first-order vs. Newton/second-order=hessian-opt).
– sascha
Nov 15 '18 at 13:52
@sascha Sorry was supposed to read admm - although what you said may still be true! Left over from me trying to figure out the speed
– Sykomaniac
Nov 15 '18 at 14:03
@sascha Sorry was supposed to read admm - although what you said may still be true! Left over from me trying to figure out the speed
– Sykomaniac
Nov 15 '18 at 14:03
In addition to the above (different algorithms), are you getting burned on IPC overhead?
– shadowtalker
Nov 15 '18 at 14:09
In addition to the above (different algorithms), are you getting burned on IPC overhead?
– shadowtalker
Nov 15 '18 at 14:09
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
A quote from the documentation you may want to consider:
For large arguments that are used by multiple tasks, it may be more efficient to pre-scatter the data to every worker, rather than serializing it once for every task. This can be done using the scatter keyword argument, which takes an iterable of objects to send to each worker.
But in general, Dask has a lot of diagnostics available to you, especially the scheduler's dashboard, to help figure out what your workers are doing and how time is being spent - you would do well to investigate it. Other system-wide factors are also very important, as with any computation: how close are you coming to your memory capacity, for instance?
In general, though, Dask is not magic, and when data fits comfortable into memory anyway, there will certainly be cases where dask add significant overhead. Read the documentation carefully on the intended use for the method you are considering - is it supposed to speed things up, or merely allow you to process more data than would normally fit on your system?
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53320649%2fslow-dask-performance-compared-to-native-sklearn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
A quote from the documentation you may want to consider:
For large arguments that are used by multiple tasks, it may be more efficient to pre-scatter the data to every worker, rather than serializing it once for every task. This can be done using the scatter keyword argument, which takes an iterable of objects to send to each worker.
But in general, Dask has a lot of diagnostics available to you, especially the scheduler's dashboard, to help figure out what your workers are doing and how time is being spent - you would do well to investigate it. Other system-wide factors are also very important, as with any computation: how close are you coming to your memory capacity, for instance?
In general, though, Dask is not magic, and when data fits comfortable into memory anyway, there will certainly be cases where dask add significant overhead. Read the documentation carefully on the intended use for the method you are considering - is it supposed to speed things up, or merely allow you to process more data than would normally fit on your system?
add a comment |
A quote from the documentation you may want to consider:
For large arguments that are used by multiple tasks, it may be more efficient to pre-scatter the data to every worker, rather than serializing it once for every task. This can be done using the scatter keyword argument, which takes an iterable of objects to send to each worker.
But in general, Dask has a lot of diagnostics available to you, especially the scheduler's dashboard, to help figure out what your workers are doing and how time is being spent - you would do well to investigate it. Other system-wide factors are also very important, as with any computation: how close are you coming to your memory capacity, for instance?
In general, though, Dask is not magic, and when data fits comfortable into memory anyway, there will certainly be cases where dask add significant overhead. Read the documentation carefully on the intended use for the method you are considering - is it supposed to speed things up, or merely allow you to process more data than would normally fit on your system?
add a comment |
A quote from the documentation you may want to consider:
For large arguments that are used by multiple tasks, it may be more efficient to pre-scatter the data to every worker, rather than serializing it once for every task. This can be done using the scatter keyword argument, which takes an iterable of objects to send to each worker.
But in general, Dask has a lot of diagnostics available to you, especially the scheduler's dashboard, to help figure out what your workers are doing and how time is being spent - you would do well to investigate it. Other system-wide factors are also very important, as with any computation: how close are you coming to your memory capacity, for instance?
In general, though, Dask is not magic, and when data fits comfortable into memory anyway, there will certainly be cases where dask add significant overhead. Read the documentation carefully on the intended use for the method you are considering - is it supposed to speed things up, or merely allow you to process more data than would normally fit on your system?
A quote from the documentation you may want to consider:
For large arguments that are used by multiple tasks, it may be more efficient to pre-scatter the data to every worker, rather than serializing it once for every task. This can be done using the scatter keyword argument, which takes an iterable of objects to send to each worker.
But in general, Dask has a lot of diagnostics available to you, especially the scheduler's dashboard, to help figure out what your workers are doing and how time is being spent - you would do well to investigate it. Other system-wide factors are also very important, as with any computation: how close are you coming to your memory capacity, for instance?
In general, though, Dask is not magic, and when data fits comfortable into memory anyway, there will certainly be cases where dask add significant overhead. Read the documentation carefully on the intended use for the method you are considering - is it supposed to speed things up, or merely allow you to process more data than would normally fit on your system?
answered Nov 18 '18 at 17:35
mdurantmdurant
11.3k11741
11.3k11741
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53320649%2fslow-dask-performance-compared-to-native-sklearn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
You are comparing two completely different algorithms (hint: Coordinate descent/first-order vs. Newton/second-order=hessian-opt).
– sascha
Nov 15 '18 at 13:52
@sascha Sorry was supposed to read admm - although what you said may still be true! Left over from me trying to figure out the speed
– Sykomaniac
Nov 15 '18 at 14:03
In addition to the above (different algorithms), are you getting burned on IPC overhead?
– shadowtalker
Nov 15 '18 at 14:09