Pandas: check whether at least one of values in duplicates' rows is 1










2















This problem may be rather specific, but I bet many may encounter this as well.
So I have a DataFrame in a form like:



asd = pd.DataFrame('Col1': ['a', 'b', 'b','a','a'], 'Col2': [0,0,0,1,1])


The resulting table looks like this:



I -- Col1 -- Col2
1 -- a -- 0
2 -- b -- 0
3 -- b -- 0
4 -- a -- 1
5 -- a -- 1


What I am trying to do is to:

if at least one "a" value in Col1 has a corresponding value of 1 in Col2, then in Col3 we put 1 for all values of "a"

otherwise (if not even one "a" has a value of 1), then we put "0" for all values of "a"

And then repeat for all other values in Col1.



The result of the operation should look like this:



I -- Col1 -- Col2 -- Col3
1 -- a -- 0 -- 1 because "a" has value of 1 in 4th and 5th lines
2 -- b -- 0 -- 0 because all "b" have values of 0
3 -- b -- 0 -- 0
4 -- a -- 1 -- 1
5 -- a -- 1 -- 1


Currently I am doing this:



asd['Col3'] = 0
col1_uniques = asd.drop_duplicates(subset='Col1')['Col1']
small_dataframes =

for i in col1_uniques:
small_df = asd.loc[asd.Col1 == i]
if small_df.Col2.max() == 1:
small_df['Col3'] = 1

small_dataframes.append(small_df)


I then reassemble the dataframe back.



However, that takes too much time (I have about 80000 unique values in Col1). In fact, while I was writing this, it hasn't finished even a quarter of that job.



Is there a better way to do it?










share|improve this question




























    2















    This problem may be rather specific, but I bet many may encounter this as well.
    So I have a DataFrame in a form like:



    asd = pd.DataFrame('Col1': ['a', 'b', 'b','a','a'], 'Col2': [0,0,0,1,1])


    The resulting table looks like this:



    I -- Col1 -- Col2
    1 -- a -- 0
    2 -- b -- 0
    3 -- b -- 0
    4 -- a -- 1
    5 -- a -- 1


    What I am trying to do is to:

    if at least one "a" value in Col1 has a corresponding value of 1 in Col2, then in Col3 we put 1 for all values of "a"

    otherwise (if not even one "a" has a value of 1), then we put "0" for all values of "a"

    And then repeat for all other values in Col1.



    The result of the operation should look like this:



    I -- Col1 -- Col2 -- Col3
    1 -- a -- 0 -- 1 because "a" has value of 1 in 4th and 5th lines
    2 -- b -- 0 -- 0 because all "b" have values of 0
    3 -- b -- 0 -- 0
    4 -- a -- 1 -- 1
    5 -- a -- 1 -- 1


    Currently I am doing this:



    asd['Col3'] = 0
    col1_uniques = asd.drop_duplicates(subset='Col1')['Col1']
    small_dataframes =

    for i in col1_uniques:
    small_df = asd.loc[asd.Col1 == i]
    if small_df.Col2.max() == 1:
    small_df['Col3'] = 1

    small_dataframes.append(small_df)


    I then reassemble the dataframe back.



    However, that takes too much time (I have about 80000 unique values in Col1). In fact, while I was writing this, it hasn't finished even a quarter of that job.



    Is there a better way to do it?










    share|improve this question


























      2












      2








      2








      This problem may be rather specific, but I bet many may encounter this as well.
      So I have a DataFrame in a form like:



      asd = pd.DataFrame('Col1': ['a', 'b', 'b','a','a'], 'Col2': [0,0,0,1,1])


      The resulting table looks like this:



      I -- Col1 -- Col2
      1 -- a -- 0
      2 -- b -- 0
      3 -- b -- 0
      4 -- a -- 1
      5 -- a -- 1


      What I am trying to do is to:

      if at least one "a" value in Col1 has a corresponding value of 1 in Col2, then in Col3 we put 1 for all values of "a"

      otherwise (if not even one "a" has a value of 1), then we put "0" for all values of "a"

      And then repeat for all other values in Col1.



      The result of the operation should look like this:



      I -- Col1 -- Col2 -- Col3
      1 -- a -- 0 -- 1 because "a" has value of 1 in 4th and 5th lines
      2 -- b -- 0 -- 0 because all "b" have values of 0
      3 -- b -- 0 -- 0
      4 -- a -- 1 -- 1
      5 -- a -- 1 -- 1


      Currently I am doing this:



      asd['Col3'] = 0
      col1_uniques = asd.drop_duplicates(subset='Col1')['Col1']
      small_dataframes =

      for i in col1_uniques:
      small_df = asd.loc[asd.Col1 == i]
      if small_df.Col2.max() == 1:
      small_df['Col3'] = 1

      small_dataframes.append(small_df)


      I then reassemble the dataframe back.



      However, that takes too much time (I have about 80000 unique values in Col1). In fact, while I was writing this, it hasn't finished even a quarter of that job.



      Is there a better way to do it?










      share|improve this question
















      This problem may be rather specific, but I bet many may encounter this as well.
      So I have a DataFrame in a form like:



      asd = pd.DataFrame('Col1': ['a', 'b', 'b','a','a'], 'Col2': [0,0,0,1,1])


      The resulting table looks like this:



      I -- Col1 -- Col2
      1 -- a -- 0
      2 -- b -- 0
      3 -- b -- 0
      4 -- a -- 1
      5 -- a -- 1


      What I am trying to do is to:

      if at least one "a" value in Col1 has a corresponding value of 1 in Col2, then in Col3 we put 1 for all values of "a"

      otherwise (if not even one "a" has a value of 1), then we put "0" for all values of "a"

      And then repeat for all other values in Col1.



      The result of the operation should look like this:



      I -- Col1 -- Col2 -- Col3
      1 -- a -- 0 -- 1 because "a" has value of 1 in 4th and 5th lines
      2 -- b -- 0 -- 0 because all "b" have values of 0
      3 -- b -- 0 -- 0
      4 -- a -- 1 -- 1
      5 -- a -- 1 -- 1


      Currently I am doing this:



      asd['Col3'] = 0
      col1_uniques = asd.drop_duplicates(subset='Col1')['Col1']
      small_dataframes =

      for i in col1_uniques:
      small_df = asd.loc[asd.Col1 == i]
      if small_df.Col2.max() == 1:
      small_df['Col3'] = 1

      small_dataframes.append(small_df)


      I then reassemble the dataframe back.



      However, that takes too much time (I have about 80000 unique values in Col1). In fact, while I was writing this, it hasn't finished even a quarter of that job.



      Is there a better way to do it?







      python pandas






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 '18 at 5:32







      Askar Akhmedov

















      asked Nov 15 '18 at 4:09









      Askar AkhmedovAskar Akhmedov

      405




      405






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Another method without groupby and faster using np.where and isin:



          v = asd.loc[asd['Col2'].eq(1), 'Col1'].unique()
          asd['Col3'] = np.where(asd['Col1'].isin(v), 1, 0)

          print(asd)
          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1





          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            By far the fastest method and the most intuitive. Thanks a lot.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:33


















          2














          My understanding is that you need to repeat the process for all unique values in Col1, you will need groupby,



          asd['Col3'] = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.transform(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int))

          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1


          Option 2: Similar solution as above but using map



          d = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.apply(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int)).to_dict()
          asd['Col3'] = asd['Col1'].map(d)





          share|improve this answer

























          • Thank you! Both methods worked and finished in 34 and 24 seconds, respectively.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:01











          • @AskarAkhmedov, thats great. The second solution works faster as it has to do the grouping only once per unique value in Col1.

            – Vaishali
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:03


















          0














          You can do this with a groupby and an if statement. First group all items by Col1:



          lists = asd.groupby("Col1").agg(lambda x: tuple(x))


          This gives you:



           Col2
          Col1
          a (0, 1, 1)
          b (0, 0)


          You can then iterate through the unique index values in lists, masking the original DataFrame and setting Col3 to 1 if a 1 is found in lists["Col2"].



          asd["Col3"] = 0
          for i in lists.index:
          if 1 in lists.loc[i, "Col2"]:
          asd.loc[asd["Col1"]==i, "Col3"] = 1


          This results in:



           Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1





          share|improve this answer























          • Abhi's answer is better, and likely much faster. I also didn't realize you could use np.where within Pandas.

            – jake.nunemaker
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:33






          • 1





            you can use all np functions in pandas, as pandas is built on numpy

            – d_kennetz
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:35











          • In general, if you're writing loops for dataframes, there's a better way :)

            – Evan
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:39










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53312302%2fpandas-check-whether-at-least-one-of-values-in-duplicates-rows-is-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes








          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Another method without groupby and faster using np.where and isin:



          v = asd.loc[asd['Col2'].eq(1), 'Col1'].unique()
          asd['Col3'] = np.where(asd['Col1'].isin(v), 1, 0)

          print(asd)
          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1





          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            By far the fastest method and the most intuitive. Thanks a lot.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:33















          1














          Another method without groupby and faster using np.where and isin:



          v = asd.loc[asd['Col2'].eq(1), 'Col1'].unique()
          asd['Col3'] = np.where(asd['Col1'].isin(v), 1, 0)

          print(asd)
          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1





          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            By far the fastest method and the most intuitive. Thanks a lot.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:33













          1












          1








          1







          Another method without groupby and faster using np.where and isin:



          v = asd.loc[asd['Col2'].eq(1), 'Col1'].unique()
          asd['Col3'] = np.where(asd['Col1'].isin(v), 1, 0)

          print(asd)
          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1





          share|improve this answer













          Another method without groupby and faster using np.where and isin:



          v = asd.loc[asd['Col2'].eq(1), 'Col1'].unique()
          asd['Col3'] = np.where(asd['Col1'].isin(v), 1, 0)

          print(asd)
          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 15 '18 at 5:10









          Sandeep KadapaSandeep Kadapa

          7,248831




          7,248831







          • 1





            By far the fastest method and the most intuitive. Thanks a lot.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:33












          • 1





            By far the fastest method and the most intuitive. Thanks a lot.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:33







          1




          1





          By far the fastest method and the most intuitive. Thanks a lot.

          – Askar Akhmedov
          Nov 15 '18 at 5:33





          By far the fastest method and the most intuitive. Thanks a lot.

          – Askar Akhmedov
          Nov 15 '18 at 5:33













          2














          My understanding is that you need to repeat the process for all unique values in Col1, you will need groupby,



          asd['Col3'] = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.transform(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int))

          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1


          Option 2: Similar solution as above but using map



          d = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.apply(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int)).to_dict()
          asd['Col3'] = asd['Col1'].map(d)





          share|improve this answer

























          • Thank you! Both methods worked and finished in 34 and 24 seconds, respectively.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:01











          • @AskarAkhmedov, thats great. The second solution works faster as it has to do the grouping only once per unique value in Col1.

            – Vaishali
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:03















          2














          My understanding is that you need to repeat the process for all unique values in Col1, you will need groupby,



          asd['Col3'] = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.transform(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int))

          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1


          Option 2: Similar solution as above but using map



          d = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.apply(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int)).to_dict()
          asd['Col3'] = asd['Col1'].map(d)





          share|improve this answer

























          • Thank you! Both methods worked and finished in 34 and 24 seconds, respectively.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:01











          • @AskarAkhmedov, thats great. The second solution works faster as it has to do the grouping only once per unique value in Col1.

            – Vaishali
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:03













          2












          2








          2







          My understanding is that you need to repeat the process for all unique values in Col1, you will need groupby,



          asd['Col3'] = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.transform(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int))

          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1


          Option 2: Similar solution as above but using map



          d = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.apply(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int)).to_dict()
          asd['Col3'] = asd['Col1'].map(d)





          share|improve this answer















          My understanding is that you need to repeat the process for all unique values in Col1, you will need groupby,



          asd['Col3'] = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.transform(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int))

          Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1


          Option 2: Similar solution as above but using map



          d = asd.groupby('Col1').Col2.apply(lambda x: x.eq(1).any().astype(int)).to_dict()
          asd['Col3'] = asd['Col1'].map(d)






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 15 '18 at 4:47

























          answered Nov 15 '18 at 4:42









          VaishaliVaishali

          21.7k41336




          21.7k41336












          • Thank you! Both methods worked and finished in 34 and 24 seconds, respectively.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:01











          • @AskarAkhmedov, thats great. The second solution works faster as it has to do the grouping only once per unique value in Col1.

            – Vaishali
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:03

















          • Thank you! Both methods worked and finished in 34 and 24 seconds, respectively.

            – Askar Akhmedov
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:01











          • @AskarAkhmedov, thats great. The second solution works faster as it has to do the grouping only once per unique value in Col1.

            – Vaishali
            Nov 15 '18 at 5:03
















          Thank you! Both methods worked and finished in 34 and 24 seconds, respectively.

          – Askar Akhmedov
          Nov 15 '18 at 5:01





          Thank you! Both methods worked and finished in 34 and 24 seconds, respectively.

          – Askar Akhmedov
          Nov 15 '18 at 5:01













          @AskarAkhmedov, thats great. The second solution works faster as it has to do the grouping only once per unique value in Col1.

          – Vaishali
          Nov 15 '18 at 5:03





          @AskarAkhmedov, thats great. The second solution works faster as it has to do the grouping only once per unique value in Col1.

          – Vaishali
          Nov 15 '18 at 5:03











          0














          You can do this with a groupby and an if statement. First group all items by Col1:



          lists = asd.groupby("Col1").agg(lambda x: tuple(x))


          This gives you:



           Col2
          Col1
          a (0, 1, 1)
          b (0, 0)


          You can then iterate through the unique index values in lists, masking the original DataFrame and setting Col3 to 1 if a 1 is found in lists["Col2"].



          asd["Col3"] = 0
          for i in lists.index:
          if 1 in lists.loc[i, "Col2"]:
          asd.loc[asd["Col1"]==i, "Col3"] = 1


          This results in:



           Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1





          share|improve this answer























          • Abhi's answer is better, and likely much faster. I also didn't realize you could use np.where within Pandas.

            – jake.nunemaker
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:33






          • 1





            you can use all np functions in pandas, as pandas is built on numpy

            – d_kennetz
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:35











          • In general, if you're writing loops for dataframes, there's a better way :)

            – Evan
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:39















          0














          You can do this with a groupby and an if statement. First group all items by Col1:



          lists = asd.groupby("Col1").agg(lambda x: tuple(x))


          This gives you:



           Col2
          Col1
          a (0, 1, 1)
          b (0, 0)


          You can then iterate through the unique index values in lists, masking the original DataFrame and setting Col3 to 1 if a 1 is found in lists["Col2"].



          asd["Col3"] = 0
          for i in lists.index:
          if 1 in lists.loc[i, "Col2"]:
          asd.loc[asd["Col1"]==i, "Col3"] = 1


          This results in:



           Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1





          share|improve this answer























          • Abhi's answer is better, and likely much faster. I also didn't realize you could use np.where within Pandas.

            – jake.nunemaker
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:33






          • 1





            you can use all np functions in pandas, as pandas is built on numpy

            – d_kennetz
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:35











          • In general, if you're writing loops for dataframes, there's a better way :)

            – Evan
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:39













          0












          0








          0







          You can do this with a groupby and an if statement. First group all items by Col1:



          lists = asd.groupby("Col1").agg(lambda x: tuple(x))


          This gives you:



           Col2
          Col1
          a (0, 1, 1)
          b (0, 0)


          You can then iterate through the unique index values in lists, masking the original DataFrame and setting Col3 to 1 if a 1 is found in lists["Col2"].



          asd["Col3"] = 0
          for i in lists.index:
          if 1 in lists.loc[i, "Col2"]:
          asd.loc[asd["Col1"]==i, "Col3"] = 1


          This results in:



           Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1





          share|improve this answer













          You can do this with a groupby and an if statement. First group all items by Col1:



          lists = asd.groupby("Col1").agg(lambda x: tuple(x))


          This gives you:



           Col2
          Col1
          a (0, 1, 1)
          b (0, 0)


          You can then iterate through the unique index values in lists, masking the original DataFrame and setting Col3 to 1 if a 1 is found in lists["Col2"].



          asd["Col3"] = 0
          for i in lists.index:
          if 1 in lists.loc[i, "Col2"]:
          asd.loc[asd["Col1"]==i, "Col3"] = 1


          This results in:



           Col1 Col2 Col3
          0 a 0 1
          1 b 0 0
          2 b 0 0
          3 a 1 1
          4 a 1 1






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 15 '18 at 4:30









          jake.nunemakerjake.nunemaker

          11




          11












          • Abhi's answer is better, and likely much faster. I also didn't realize you could use np.where within Pandas.

            – jake.nunemaker
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:33






          • 1





            you can use all np functions in pandas, as pandas is built on numpy

            – d_kennetz
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:35











          • In general, if you're writing loops for dataframes, there's a better way :)

            – Evan
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:39

















          • Abhi's answer is better, and likely much faster. I also didn't realize you could use np.where within Pandas.

            – jake.nunemaker
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:33






          • 1





            you can use all np functions in pandas, as pandas is built on numpy

            – d_kennetz
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:35











          • In general, if you're writing loops for dataframes, there's a better way :)

            – Evan
            Nov 15 '18 at 4:39
















          Abhi's answer is better, and likely much faster. I also didn't realize you could use np.where within Pandas.

          – jake.nunemaker
          Nov 15 '18 at 4:33





          Abhi's answer is better, and likely much faster. I also didn't realize you could use np.where within Pandas.

          – jake.nunemaker
          Nov 15 '18 at 4:33




          1




          1





          you can use all np functions in pandas, as pandas is built on numpy

          – d_kennetz
          Nov 15 '18 at 4:35





          you can use all np functions in pandas, as pandas is built on numpy

          – d_kennetz
          Nov 15 '18 at 4:35













          In general, if you're writing loops for dataframes, there's a better way :)

          – Evan
          Nov 15 '18 at 4:39





          In general, if you're writing loops for dataframes, there's a better way :)

          – Evan
          Nov 15 '18 at 4:39

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53312302%2fpandas-check-whether-at-least-one-of-values-in-duplicates-rows-is-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

          In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

          Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto