How to write kernelized version of Pearson Correlation without any inbuilt function?










0















I want to compute kernelized version of Pearson correlation, so I have to write the code instead of using the corrcoef command, according to formula I have to write the cov and std separately, I used dot product trick for cov and when I am using it for std the result is not true (this trick)



Actually I font know exactly how to input kernel (for example Gaussian in std )



for i=1:p;
one_vector(1:size(Signalsi,1,1)) = 1;
mu = (one_vector * Signalsi,1) / size(Signalsi,1,1);
A_mean_subtract = Signalsi,1 - mu(one_vector, :);
for j=1:116
u=(A_mean_subtract(:,j));
for z=1:116;
v=(A_mean_subtract(:,z));
r=sqrt(sum((u-v).^2)); ---- cov in Gaussian form ( instead of u'*v) I put u and v in gaussian kernel formula
gamma=1/(2*100^2);
k=exp(-gamma*(r^2));
covB(j,z) = k / (size(Signalsi,1,1) - 1);---- it is correct
K_R(j,z)= covB(j,z)/sqrt((u'*u)*(v'*v);---- I know that I have to kernelized this part like above but before that the result is not correct in sipmle form (not kernelized) let alone kernel form
end
end









share|improve this question




























    0















    I want to compute kernelized version of Pearson correlation, so I have to write the code instead of using the corrcoef command, according to formula I have to write the cov and std separately, I used dot product trick for cov and when I am using it for std the result is not true (this trick)



    Actually I font know exactly how to input kernel (for example Gaussian in std )



    for i=1:p;
    one_vector(1:size(Signalsi,1,1)) = 1;
    mu = (one_vector * Signalsi,1) / size(Signalsi,1,1);
    A_mean_subtract = Signalsi,1 - mu(one_vector, :);
    for j=1:116
    u=(A_mean_subtract(:,j));
    for z=1:116;
    v=(A_mean_subtract(:,z));
    r=sqrt(sum((u-v).^2)); ---- cov in Gaussian form ( instead of u'*v) I put u and v in gaussian kernel formula
    gamma=1/(2*100^2);
    k=exp(-gamma*(r^2));
    covB(j,z) = k / (size(Signalsi,1,1) - 1);---- it is correct
    K_R(j,z)= covB(j,z)/sqrt((u'*u)*(v'*v);---- I know that I have to kernelized this part like above but before that the result is not correct in sipmle form (not kernelized) let alone kernel form
    end
    end









    share|improve this question


























      0












      0








      0








      I want to compute kernelized version of Pearson correlation, so I have to write the code instead of using the corrcoef command, according to formula I have to write the cov and std separately, I used dot product trick for cov and when I am using it for std the result is not true (this trick)



      Actually I font know exactly how to input kernel (for example Gaussian in std )



      for i=1:p;
      one_vector(1:size(Signalsi,1,1)) = 1;
      mu = (one_vector * Signalsi,1) / size(Signalsi,1,1);
      A_mean_subtract = Signalsi,1 - mu(one_vector, :);
      for j=1:116
      u=(A_mean_subtract(:,j));
      for z=1:116;
      v=(A_mean_subtract(:,z));
      r=sqrt(sum((u-v).^2)); ---- cov in Gaussian form ( instead of u'*v) I put u and v in gaussian kernel formula
      gamma=1/(2*100^2);
      k=exp(-gamma*(r^2));
      covB(j,z) = k / (size(Signalsi,1,1) - 1);---- it is correct
      K_R(j,z)= covB(j,z)/sqrt((u'*u)*(v'*v);---- I know that I have to kernelized this part like above but before that the result is not correct in sipmle form (not kernelized) let alone kernel form
      end
      end









      share|improve this question
















      I want to compute kernelized version of Pearson correlation, so I have to write the code instead of using the corrcoef command, according to formula I have to write the cov and std separately, I used dot product trick for cov and when I am using it for std the result is not true (this trick)



      Actually I font know exactly how to input kernel (for example Gaussian in std )



      for i=1:p;
      one_vector(1:size(Signalsi,1,1)) = 1;
      mu = (one_vector * Signalsi,1) / size(Signalsi,1,1);
      A_mean_subtract = Signalsi,1 - mu(one_vector, :);
      for j=1:116
      u=(A_mean_subtract(:,j));
      for z=1:116;
      v=(A_mean_subtract(:,z));
      r=sqrt(sum((u-v).^2)); ---- cov in Gaussian form ( instead of u'*v) I put u and v in gaussian kernel formula
      gamma=1/(2*100^2);
      k=exp(-gamma*(r^2));
      covB(j,z) = k / (size(Signalsi,1,1) - 1);---- it is correct
      K_R(j,z)= covB(j,z)/sqrt((u'*u)*(v'*v);---- I know that I have to kernelized this part like above but before that the result is not correct in sipmle form (not kernelized) let alone kernel form
      end
      end






      kernel correlation






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 '18 at 9:11









      Sagar Zala

      2,38441337




      2,38441337










      asked Nov 15 '18 at 8:27









      Hessam AhmadiHessam Ahmadi

      11




      11






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315155%2fhow-to-write-kernelized-version-of-pearson-correlation-without-any-inbuilt-funct%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315155%2fhow-to-write-kernelized-version-of-pearson-correlation-without-any-inbuilt-funct%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

          In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

          Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto