Change Plan's Owner/Group - Required Permissions missing
When attempting to update a Planner Plan's group using PATCH, updates to the owner field fail with 403. The attempt is being made using the Graph Explorer (and also fails using PostMan).
An attempt to change the title field succeeds (no issue with permissions, using eTag, etc.) for the call.
The documentation indicate Groups.ReadWrite.All are required, and that the owner can only be changed by the Group Owner, but the account being used is the owner of the unified group.
Are there any additional permissions required?
Example info:
If-Match: W/"JzEtUGxhbiAgQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARCc="
PATCH https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/planner/plans/Vk_27olfLESU6vWJNgzVT2UABrBj
BODY:
"title": "Updated plan with new group owner",
"owner": "0ab4b389-7c7c-4757-ac75-2ba5de8c8197"
RESPONSE:
"error":
"code": "",
"message": "You do not have the required permissions to access this item, or the item may not exist.",
"innerError":
"request-id": "7696b78c-474f-4fc0-bba9-4554bfe303c4",
"date": "2018-11-14T16:50:59"
microsoft-graph microsoft-planner
edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:08
Marc LaFleur
19.3k31933
asked Nov 14 '18 at 17:10
Pete SkellyPete Skelly
705616
add a comment |
When attempting to update a Planner Plan's group using PATCH, updates to the owner field fail with 403. The attempt is being made using the Graph Explorer (and also fails using PostMan).
An attempt to change the title field succeeds (no issue with permissions, using eTag, etc.) for the call.
The documentation indicate Groups.ReadWrite.All are required, and that the owner can only be changed by the Group Owner, but the account being used is the owner of the unified group.
Are there any additional permissions required?
Example info:
If-Match: W/"JzEtUGxhbiAgQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARCc="
PATCH https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/planner/plans/Vk_27olfLESU6vWJNgzVT2UABrBj
BODY:
"title": "Updated plan with new group owner",
"owner": "0ab4b389-7c7c-4757-ac75-2ba5de8c8197"
RESPONSE:
"error":
"code": "",
"message": "You do not have the required permissions to access this item, or the item may not exist.",
"innerError":
"request-id": "7696b78c-474f-4fc0-bba9-4554bfe303c4",
"date": "2018-11-14T16:50:59"
microsoft-graph microsoft-planner
edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:08
Marc LaFleur
19.3k31933
asked Nov 14 '18 at 17:10
Pete SkellyPete Skelly
705616
add a comment |
When attempting to update a Planner Plan's group using PATCH, updates to the owner field fail with 403. The attempt is being made using the Graph Explorer (and also fails using PostMan).
An attempt to change the title field succeeds (no issue with permissions, using eTag, etc.) for the call.
The documentation indicate Groups.ReadWrite.All are required, and that the owner can only be changed by the Group Owner, but the account being used is the owner of the unified group.
Are there any additional permissions required?
Example info:
If-Match: W/"JzEtUGxhbiAgQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARCc="
PATCH https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/planner/plans/Vk_27olfLESU6vWJNgzVT2UABrBj
BODY:
"title": "Updated plan with new group owner",
"owner": "0ab4b389-7c7c-4757-ac75-2ba5de8c8197"
RESPONSE:
"error":
"code": "",
"message": "You do not have the required permissions to access this item, or the item may not exist.",
"innerError":
"request-id": "7696b78c-474f-4fc0-bba9-4554bfe303c4",
"date": "2018-11-14T16:50:59"
microsoft-graph microsoft-planner
edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:08
Marc LaFleur
19.3k31933
asked Nov 14 '18 at 17:10
Pete SkellyPete Skelly
705616
When attempting to update a Planner Plan's group using PATCH, updates to the owner field fail with 403. The attempt is being made using the Graph Explorer (and also fails using PostMan).
An attempt to change the title field succeeds (no issue with permissions, using eTag, etc.) for the call.
The documentation indicate Groups.ReadWrite.All are required, and that the owner can only be changed by the Group Owner, but the account being used is the owner of the unified group.
Are there any additional permissions required?
Example info:
If-Match: W/"JzEtUGxhbiAgQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARCc="
PATCH https://graph.microsoft.com/beta/planner/plans/Vk_27olfLESU6vWJNgzVT2UABrBj
BODY:
"title": "Updated plan with new group owner",
"owner": "0ab4b389-7c7c-4757-ac75-2ba5de8c8197"
RESPONSE:
"error":
"code": "",
"message": "You do not have the required permissions to access this item, or the item may not exist.",
"innerError":
"request-id": "7696b78c-474f-4fc0-bba9-4554bfe303c4",
"date": "2018-11-14T16:50:59"
microsoft-graph microsoft-planner
microsoft-graph microsoft-planner
edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:08
Marc LaFleur
19.3k31933
asked Nov 14 '18 at 17:10
Pete SkellyPete Skelly
705616
edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:08
Marc LaFleur
19.3k31933
asked Nov 14 '18 at 17:10
Pete SkellyPete Skelly
705616
edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:08
Marc LaFleur
19.3k31933
edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:08
Marc LaFleur
19.3k31933
edited Nov 15 '18 at 0:08
Marc LaFleur
19.3k31933
19.3k31933
asked Nov 14 '18 at 17:10
Pete SkellyPete Skelly
705616
asked Nov 14 '18 at 17:10
Pete SkellyPete Skelly
705616
asked Nov 14 '18 at 17:10
Pete SkellyPete Skelly
705616
705616
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The documentation in this case is misleading/incorrect (it is trying to say the field owner can only be updated by the principal identified by the value of the owner field, which is a group that cannot actually perform operations, not the owner of that group). We'll update the documentation and clarify.
We currently do not allow Plans to be moved between groups, as some of the related items mostly live within the group itself (e.g. membership, comments, document links). We'd like to understand your scenario better to see if we could support it, so please provide feedback on https://planner.uservoice.com.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 16:05
Tarkan SevilmisTarkan Sevilmis
47115
Mark - thanks for the response. Yes, doc updates would suffice. My use case is very narrow - someone created a planner for the wrong group, no changes to the group so he wanted to simply move. I knew it was a shot in the dark. Thanks for clarifying. Given the resources associated with a group, NOT allowing this makes perfect sense.
– Pete Skelly
Nov 19 '18 at 14:53
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53305458%2fchange-plans-owner-group-required-permissions-missing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The documentation in this case is misleading/incorrect (it is trying to say the field owner can only be updated by the principal identified by the value of the owner field, which is a group that cannot actually perform operations, not the owner of that group). We'll update the documentation and clarify.
We currently do not allow Plans to be moved between groups, as some of the related items mostly live within the group itself (e.g. membership, comments, document links). We'd like to understand your scenario better to see if we could support it, so please provide feedback on https://planner.uservoice.com.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 16:05
Tarkan SevilmisTarkan Sevilmis
47115
Mark - thanks for the response. Yes, doc updates would suffice. My use case is very narrow - someone created a planner for the wrong group, no changes to the group so he wanted to simply move. I knew it was a shot in the dark. Thanks for clarifying. Given the resources associated with a group, NOT allowing this makes perfect sense.
– Pete Skelly
Nov 19 '18 at 14:53
add a comment |
The documentation in this case is misleading/incorrect (it is trying to say the field owner can only be updated by the principal identified by the value of the owner field, which is a group that cannot actually perform operations, not the owner of that group). We'll update the documentation and clarify.
We currently do not allow Plans to be moved between groups, as some of the related items mostly live within the group itself (e.g. membership, comments, document links). We'd like to understand your scenario better to see if we could support it, so please provide feedback on https://planner.uservoice.com.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 16:05
Tarkan SevilmisTarkan Sevilmis
47115
Mark - thanks for the response. Yes, doc updates would suffice. My use case is very narrow - someone created a planner for the wrong group, no changes to the group so he wanted to simply move. I knew it was a shot in the dark. Thanks for clarifying. Given the resources associated with a group, NOT allowing this makes perfect sense.
– Pete Skelly
Nov 19 '18 at 14:53
add a comment |
The documentation in this case is misleading/incorrect (it is trying to say the field owner can only be updated by the principal identified by the value of the owner field, which is a group that cannot actually perform operations, not the owner of that group). We'll update the documentation and clarify.
We currently do not allow Plans to be moved between groups, as some of the related items mostly live within the group itself (e.g. membership, comments, document links). We'd like to understand your scenario better to see if we could support it, so please provide feedback on https://planner.uservoice.com.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 16:05
Tarkan SevilmisTarkan Sevilmis
47115
The documentation in this case is misleading/incorrect (it is trying to say the field owner can only be updated by the principal identified by the value of the owner field, which is a group that cannot actually perform operations, not the owner of that group). We'll update the documentation and clarify.
We currently do not allow Plans to be moved between groups, as some of the related items mostly live within the group itself (e.g. membership, comments, document links). We'd like to understand your scenario better to see if we could support it, so please provide feedback on https://planner.uservoice.com.
answered Nov 17 '18 at 16:05
Tarkan SevilmisTarkan Sevilmis
47115
answered Nov 17 '18 at 16:05
Tarkan SevilmisTarkan Sevilmis
47115
answered Nov 17 '18 at 16:05
Tarkan SevilmisTarkan Sevilmis
47115
answered Nov 17 '18 at 16:05
Tarkan SevilmisTarkan Sevilmis
47115
47115
Mark - thanks for the response. Yes, doc updates would suffice. My use case is very narrow - someone created a planner for the wrong group, no changes to the group so he wanted to simply move. I knew it was a shot in the dark. Thanks for clarifying. Given the resources associated with a group, NOT allowing this makes perfect sense.
– Pete Skelly
Nov 19 '18 at 14:53
add a comment |
Mark - thanks for the response. Yes, doc updates would suffice. My use case is very narrow - someone created a planner for the wrong group, no changes to the group so he wanted to simply move. I knew it was a shot in the dark. Thanks for clarifying. Given the resources associated with a group, NOT allowing this makes perfect sense.
– Pete Skelly
Nov 19 '18 at 14:53
Mark - thanks for the response. Yes, doc updates would suffice. My use case is very narrow - someone created a planner for the wrong group, no changes to the group so he wanted to simply move. I knew it was a shot in the dark. Thanks for clarifying. Given the resources associated with a group, NOT allowing this makes perfect sense.
– Pete Skelly
Nov 19 '18 at 14:53
Mark - thanks for the response. Yes, doc updates would suffice. My use case is very narrow - someone created a planner for the wrong group, no changes to the group so he wanted to simply move. I knew it was a shot in the dark. Thanks for clarifying. Given the resources associated with a group, NOT allowing this makes perfect sense.
– Pete Skelly
Nov 19 '18 at 14:53
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53305458%2fchange-plans-owner-group-required-permissions-missing%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
