High level prototype functions










0















I'm trying to create a wrapper in nodejs that abstracts different functions depending on the input of the main wrapper. So for example, lets say I have two different files, one called usa and one called uk and they both have the same functions, but they have different functionalities. I'm trying to have write a function, that given either the string us or uk, I get a wrapper function that I can call like this:



const Wrapper = MyWrapper('uk')
const func1Output = Wrapper.func1(10)


I currently have the above working, the uk file just defines the functions inside it as prototypes as follows:



function MyWrapper () 
MyWrapper.prototype.func1 = (input) => console.log(input)
return new MyWrapper()


This is working fine. My current situation is that there are lots of functions across different files that should be accessible by the wrapper. Its not just func and whatever else is in that specific file. This is my folder structure



wrappers
- feed
-- uk
-- us
- news
-- uk
-- us

//etc


Where each file titled uk/us has the prototype functions like in the second code snippet. So whenever I want to use the feed module for example, I have to do like in the first code snippet. So its a per-module prototype, its not high level where it would be per string (ie uk/us).



What I'm trying to do is have just one file, index.js in my wrappers folder which is responsible for giving me one wrapper for all of the modules. Something like MyWrapper('uk').feed.func1()



This is kind of a hard question to explain but I'd be happy to edit the post for more clarification if needed.










share|improve this question






















  • You may find proxies helpful for these situations.Take a look at MDN: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

    – Mehmet Baker
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:18















0















I'm trying to create a wrapper in nodejs that abstracts different functions depending on the input of the main wrapper. So for example, lets say I have two different files, one called usa and one called uk and they both have the same functions, but they have different functionalities. I'm trying to have write a function, that given either the string us or uk, I get a wrapper function that I can call like this:



const Wrapper = MyWrapper('uk')
const func1Output = Wrapper.func1(10)


I currently have the above working, the uk file just defines the functions inside it as prototypes as follows:



function MyWrapper () 
MyWrapper.prototype.func1 = (input) => console.log(input)
return new MyWrapper()


This is working fine. My current situation is that there are lots of functions across different files that should be accessible by the wrapper. Its not just func and whatever else is in that specific file. This is my folder structure



wrappers
- feed
-- uk
-- us
- news
-- uk
-- us

//etc


Where each file titled uk/us has the prototype functions like in the second code snippet. So whenever I want to use the feed module for example, I have to do like in the first code snippet. So its a per-module prototype, its not high level where it would be per string (ie uk/us).



What I'm trying to do is have just one file, index.js in my wrappers folder which is responsible for giving me one wrapper for all of the modules. Something like MyWrapper('uk').feed.func1()



This is kind of a hard question to explain but I'd be happy to edit the post for more clarification if needed.










share|improve this question






















  • You may find proxies helpful for these situations.Take a look at MDN: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

    – Mehmet Baker
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:18













0












0








0








I'm trying to create a wrapper in nodejs that abstracts different functions depending on the input of the main wrapper. So for example, lets say I have two different files, one called usa and one called uk and they both have the same functions, but they have different functionalities. I'm trying to have write a function, that given either the string us or uk, I get a wrapper function that I can call like this:



const Wrapper = MyWrapper('uk')
const func1Output = Wrapper.func1(10)


I currently have the above working, the uk file just defines the functions inside it as prototypes as follows:



function MyWrapper () 
MyWrapper.prototype.func1 = (input) => console.log(input)
return new MyWrapper()


This is working fine. My current situation is that there are lots of functions across different files that should be accessible by the wrapper. Its not just func and whatever else is in that specific file. This is my folder structure



wrappers
- feed
-- uk
-- us
- news
-- uk
-- us

//etc


Where each file titled uk/us has the prototype functions like in the second code snippet. So whenever I want to use the feed module for example, I have to do like in the first code snippet. So its a per-module prototype, its not high level where it would be per string (ie uk/us).



What I'm trying to do is have just one file, index.js in my wrappers folder which is responsible for giving me one wrapper for all of the modules. Something like MyWrapper('uk').feed.func1()



This is kind of a hard question to explain but I'd be happy to edit the post for more clarification if needed.










share|improve this question














I'm trying to create a wrapper in nodejs that abstracts different functions depending on the input of the main wrapper. So for example, lets say I have two different files, one called usa and one called uk and they both have the same functions, but they have different functionalities. I'm trying to have write a function, that given either the string us or uk, I get a wrapper function that I can call like this:



const Wrapper = MyWrapper('uk')
const func1Output = Wrapper.func1(10)


I currently have the above working, the uk file just defines the functions inside it as prototypes as follows:



function MyWrapper () 
MyWrapper.prototype.func1 = (input) => console.log(input)
return new MyWrapper()


This is working fine. My current situation is that there are lots of functions across different files that should be accessible by the wrapper. Its not just func and whatever else is in that specific file. This is my folder structure



wrappers
- feed
-- uk
-- us
- news
-- uk
-- us

//etc


Where each file titled uk/us has the prototype functions like in the second code snippet. So whenever I want to use the feed module for example, I have to do like in the first code snippet. So its a per-module prototype, its not high level where it would be per string (ie uk/us).



What I'm trying to do is have just one file, index.js in my wrappers folder which is responsible for giving me one wrapper for all of the modules. Something like MyWrapper('uk').feed.func1()



This is kind of a hard question to explain but I'd be happy to edit the post for more clarification if needed.







javascript node.js design-patterns prototype wrapper






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 14 '18 at 17:01









ninesaltninesalt

1,42411229




1,42411229












  • You may find proxies helpful for these situations.Take a look at MDN: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

    – Mehmet Baker
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:18

















  • You may find proxies helpful for these situations.Take a look at MDN: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

    – Mehmet Baker
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:18
















You may find proxies helpful for these situations.Take a look at MDN: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

– Mehmet Baker
Nov 14 '18 at 17:18





You may find proxies helpful for these situations.Take a look at MDN: developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/…

– Mehmet Baker
Nov 14 '18 at 17:18












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Why not just return regular objects ?



 // wrapper/index.js
const wrappers =
uk:
func1() /*...*/
,

us:
func1() /*...*/

;

module.exports = country => wrappers[country];


That can be used as:



 const wrapper = require("./wrapper/")("uk");
wrapper.func1();





share|improve this answer























  • I was so occupied trying to think of a complicated solution, I didn't even consider the simplest one.

    – ninesalt
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:33











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53305317%2fhigh-level-prototype-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Why not just return regular objects ?



 // wrapper/index.js
const wrappers =
uk:
func1() /*...*/
,

us:
func1() /*...*/

;

module.exports = country => wrappers[country];


That can be used as:



 const wrapper = require("./wrapper/")("uk");
wrapper.func1();





share|improve this answer























  • I was so occupied trying to think of a complicated solution, I didn't even consider the simplest one.

    – ninesalt
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:33
















1














Why not just return regular objects ?



 // wrapper/index.js
const wrappers =
uk:
func1() /*...*/
,

us:
func1() /*...*/

;

module.exports = country => wrappers[country];


That can be used as:



 const wrapper = require("./wrapper/")("uk");
wrapper.func1();





share|improve this answer























  • I was so occupied trying to think of a complicated solution, I didn't even consider the simplest one.

    – ninesalt
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:33














1












1








1







Why not just return regular objects ?



 // wrapper/index.js
const wrappers =
uk:
func1() /*...*/
,

us:
func1() /*...*/

;

module.exports = country => wrappers[country];


That can be used as:



 const wrapper = require("./wrapper/")("uk");
wrapper.func1();





share|improve this answer













Why not just return regular objects ?



 // wrapper/index.js
const wrappers =
uk:
func1() /*...*/
,

us:
func1() /*...*/

;

module.exports = country => wrappers[country];


That can be used as:



 const wrapper = require("./wrapper/")("uk");
wrapper.func1();






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Nov 14 '18 at 17:14









Jonas WilmsJonas Wilms

58.8k53152




58.8k53152












  • I was so occupied trying to think of a complicated solution, I didn't even consider the simplest one.

    – ninesalt
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:33


















  • I was so occupied trying to think of a complicated solution, I didn't even consider the simplest one.

    – ninesalt
    Nov 14 '18 at 17:33

















I was so occupied trying to think of a complicated solution, I didn't even consider the simplest one.

– ninesalt
Nov 14 '18 at 17:33






I was so occupied trying to think of a complicated solution, I didn't even consider the simplest one.

– ninesalt
Nov 14 '18 at 17:33




















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53305317%2fhigh-level-prototype-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto