R: Survminer double graph










0















I am involved in a project where we are plotting survival curves for an event with a pretty low incidence, and the Kaplan-Meier curves (plotted using survminer) are pretty flat. I do not want to simply zoom in on the Y-axis as I think the incidence rates may then be misinterpreted by the reader. One way to show both the 'true' rate and zoom in on eventual small differences is to do it as NEJM does it:



https://www.nejm.org/na101/home/literatum/publisher/mms/journals/content/nejm/2011/nejm_2011.364.issue-9/nejmoa1007432/production/images/img_large/nejmoa1007432_f1.jpeg.



I have, however, not found a way to do this directly in survminer. For reproducibility's sake, I would like to avoid involving any Adobe software.



Does anyone know a way to get a small, zoomed in version included on top of the original graph? I would like to accomplish this with survminer but tips on any other good ggplot-based KM packages are appreciated.



Small example:



library(survival)
library(survminer)

df <- genfan
df$treat<-sample(c(0,1),nrow(df),replace=TRUE)
fit <- survfit(Surv(hours, status) ~ treat, data = df)

p <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = TRUE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, 1))
p # Normal flat, singular graph









share|improve this question






















  • do you care about the at risk table?

    – Mike
    Nov 13 '18 at 21:31











  • It would be preferable to keep it under the main graph yes.

    – Wernicke
    Nov 14 '18 at 5:43















0















I am involved in a project where we are plotting survival curves for an event with a pretty low incidence, and the Kaplan-Meier curves (plotted using survminer) are pretty flat. I do not want to simply zoom in on the Y-axis as I think the incidence rates may then be misinterpreted by the reader. One way to show both the 'true' rate and zoom in on eventual small differences is to do it as NEJM does it:



https://www.nejm.org/na101/home/literatum/publisher/mms/journals/content/nejm/2011/nejm_2011.364.issue-9/nejmoa1007432/production/images/img_large/nejmoa1007432_f1.jpeg.



I have, however, not found a way to do this directly in survminer. For reproducibility's sake, I would like to avoid involving any Adobe software.



Does anyone know a way to get a small, zoomed in version included on top of the original graph? I would like to accomplish this with survminer but tips on any other good ggplot-based KM packages are appreciated.



Small example:



library(survival)
library(survminer)

df <- genfan
df$treat<-sample(c(0,1),nrow(df),replace=TRUE)
fit <- survfit(Surv(hours, status) ~ treat, data = df)

p <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = TRUE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, 1))
p # Normal flat, singular graph









share|improve this question






















  • do you care about the at risk table?

    – Mike
    Nov 13 '18 at 21:31











  • It would be preferable to keep it under the main graph yes.

    – Wernicke
    Nov 14 '18 at 5:43













0












0








0








I am involved in a project where we are plotting survival curves for an event with a pretty low incidence, and the Kaplan-Meier curves (plotted using survminer) are pretty flat. I do not want to simply zoom in on the Y-axis as I think the incidence rates may then be misinterpreted by the reader. One way to show both the 'true' rate and zoom in on eventual small differences is to do it as NEJM does it:



https://www.nejm.org/na101/home/literatum/publisher/mms/journals/content/nejm/2011/nejm_2011.364.issue-9/nejmoa1007432/production/images/img_large/nejmoa1007432_f1.jpeg.



I have, however, not found a way to do this directly in survminer. For reproducibility's sake, I would like to avoid involving any Adobe software.



Does anyone know a way to get a small, zoomed in version included on top of the original graph? I would like to accomplish this with survminer but tips on any other good ggplot-based KM packages are appreciated.



Small example:



library(survival)
library(survminer)

df <- genfan
df$treat<-sample(c(0,1),nrow(df),replace=TRUE)
fit <- survfit(Surv(hours, status) ~ treat, data = df)

p <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = TRUE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, 1))
p # Normal flat, singular graph









share|improve this question














I am involved in a project where we are plotting survival curves for an event with a pretty low incidence, and the Kaplan-Meier curves (plotted using survminer) are pretty flat. I do not want to simply zoom in on the Y-axis as I think the incidence rates may then be misinterpreted by the reader. One way to show both the 'true' rate and zoom in on eventual small differences is to do it as NEJM does it:



https://www.nejm.org/na101/home/literatum/publisher/mms/journals/content/nejm/2011/nejm_2011.364.issue-9/nejmoa1007432/production/images/img_large/nejmoa1007432_f1.jpeg.



I have, however, not found a way to do this directly in survminer. For reproducibility's sake, I would like to avoid involving any Adobe software.



Does anyone know a way to get a small, zoomed in version included on top of the original graph? I would like to accomplish this with survminer but tips on any other good ggplot-based KM packages are appreciated.



Small example:



library(survival)
library(survminer)

df <- genfan
df$treat<-sample(c(0,1),nrow(df),replace=TRUE)
fit <- survfit(Surv(hours, status) ~ treat, data = df)

p <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = TRUE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, 1))
p # Normal flat, singular graph






r survival-analysis






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 13 '18 at 20:08









WernickeWernicke

31




31












  • do you care about the at risk table?

    – Mike
    Nov 13 '18 at 21:31











  • It would be preferable to keep it under the main graph yes.

    – Wernicke
    Nov 14 '18 at 5:43

















  • do you care about the at risk table?

    – Mike
    Nov 13 '18 at 21:31











  • It would be preferable to keep it under the main graph yes.

    – Wernicke
    Nov 14 '18 at 5:43
















do you care about the at risk table?

– Mike
Nov 13 '18 at 21:31





do you care about the at risk table?

– Mike
Nov 13 '18 at 21:31













It would be preferable to keep it under the main graph yes.

– Wernicke
Nov 14 '18 at 5:43





It would be preferable to keep it under the main graph yes.

– Wernicke
Nov 14 '18 at 5:43












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














There are a few ways to do this but one suggestion is too make the two plots you have and arrange them with grid.arrange. First make the two plots. Then pull out the risk table and plot separately for the first plot (you cannot put a ggsurvplot object in a grid.arrange). Nest the second plot in plot one with a annotation_custom. Finally, use layout_matrix to specify the dimensions of your plot and put it back together with grid.arrange.



library(survival)
library(survminer)
library(grid)
library(gridExtra)

df <- genfan
df$treat<-sample(c(0,1),nrow(df),replace=TRUE)
fit <- survfit(Surv(hours, status) ~ treat, data = df)

p <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = TRUE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, 1))
#zoomed plot and remove risk table
g <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = FALSE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, .5))

risktab <- p$table

justplot <- p$plot

p2 <- justplot +
annotation_custom(grob = ggplotGrob(g$plot+
theme(legend.position = "none")),
xmin = 60,xmax=Inf,ymin = .5,ymax = Inf)

lay <- rbind(c(1,1),
c(1,1),
c(2,2))

gridExtra::grid.arrange(p2, risktab,
#use layout matrix to set sizes
layout_matrix=lay
)


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Thanks! The annotation_custom and ggplotGrob combination seems like a very useful solution, not only in this setting.

    – Wernicke
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:40










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53288724%2fr-survminer-double-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









0














There are a few ways to do this but one suggestion is too make the two plots you have and arrange them with grid.arrange. First make the two plots. Then pull out the risk table and plot separately for the first plot (you cannot put a ggsurvplot object in a grid.arrange). Nest the second plot in plot one with a annotation_custom. Finally, use layout_matrix to specify the dimensions of your plot and put it back together with grid.arrange.



library(survival)
library(survminer)
library(grid)
library(gridExtra)

df <- genfan
df$treat<-sample(c(0,1),nrow(df),replace=TRUE)
fit <- survfit(Surv(hours, status) ~ treat, data = df)

p <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = TRUE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, 1))
#zoomed plot and remove risk table
g <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = FALSE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, .5))

risktab <- p$table

justplot <- p$plot

p2 <- justplot +
annotation_custom(grob = ggplotGrob(g$plot+
theme(legend.position = "none")),
xmin = 60,xmax=Inf,ymin = .5,ymax = Inf)

lay <- rbind(c(1,1),
c(1,1),
c(2,2))

gridExtra::grid.arrange(p2, risktab,
#use layout matrix to set sizes
layout_matrix=lay
)


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Thanks! The annotation_custom and ggplotGrob combination seems like a very useful solution, not only in this setting.

    – Wernicke
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:40















0














There are a few ways to do this but one suggestion is too make the two plots you have and arrange them with grid.arrange. First make the two plots. Then pull out the risk table and plot separately for the first plot (you cannot put a ggsurvplot object in a grid.arrange). Nest the second plot in plot one with a annotation_custom. Finally, use layout_matrix to specify the dimensions of your plot and put it back together with grid.arrange.



library(survival)
library(survminer)
library(grid)
library(gridExtra)

df <- genfan
df$treat<-sample(c(0,1),nrow(df),replace=TRUE)
fit <- survfit(Surv(hours, status) ~ treat, data = df)

p <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = TRUE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, 1))
#zoomed plot and remove risk table
g <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = FALSE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, .5))

risktab <- p$table

justplot <- p$plot

p2 <- justplot +
annotation_custom(grob = ggplotGrob(g$plot+
theme(legend.position = "none")),
xmin = 60,xmax=Inf,ymin = .5,ymax = Inf)

lay <- rbind(c(1,1),
c(1,1),
c(2,2))

gridExtra::grid.arrange(p2, risktab,
#use layout matrix to set sizes
layout_matrix=lay
)


enter image description here






share|improve this answer




















  • 1





    Thanks! The annotation_custom and ggplotGrob combination seems like a very useful solution, not only in this setting.

    – Wernicke
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:40













0












0








0







There are a few ways to do this but one suggestion is too make the two plots you have and arrange them with grid.arrange. First make the two plots. Then pull out the risk table and plot separately for the first plot (you cannot put a ggsurvplot object in a grid.arrange). Nest the second plot in plot one with a annotation_custom. Finally, use layout_matrix to specify the dimensions of your plot and put it back together with grid.arrange.



library(survival)
library(survminer)
library(grid)
library(gridExtra)

df <- genfan
df$treat<-sample(c(0,1),nrow(df),replace=TRUE)
fit <- survfit(Surv(hours, status) ~ treat, data = df)

p <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = TRUE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, 1))
#zoomed plot and remove risk table
g <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = FALSE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, .5))

risktab <- p$table

justplot <- p$plot

p2 <- justplot +
annotation_custom(grob = ggplotGrob(g$plot+
theme(legend.position = "none")),
xmin = 60,xmax=Inf,ymin = .5,ymax = Inf)

lay <- rbind(c(1,1),
c(1,1),
c(2,2))

gridExtra::grid.arrange(p2, risktab,
#use layout matrix to set sizes
layout_matrix=lay
)


enter image description here






share|improve this answer















There are a few ways to do this but one suggestion is too make the two plots you have and arrange them with grid.arrange. First make the two plots. Then pull out the risk table and plot separately for the first plot (you cannot put a ggsurvplot object in a grid.arrange). Nest the second plot in plot one with a annotation_custom. Finally, use layout_matrix to specify the dimensions of your plot and put it back together with grid.arrange.



library(survival)
library(survminer)
library(grid)
library(gridExtra)

df <- genfan
df$treat<-sample(c(0,1),nrow(df),replace=TRUE)
fit <- survfit(Surv(hours, status) ~ treat, data = df)

p <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = TRUE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, 1))
#zoomed plot and remove risk table
g <- ggsurvplot(fit, data = df, risk.table = FALSE, fun = 'event', ylim = c(0, .5))

risktab <- p$table

justplot <- p$plot

p2 <- justplot +
annotation_custom(grob = ggplotGrob(g$plot+
theme(legend.position = "none")),
xmin = 60,xmax=Inf,ymin = .5,ymax = Inf)

lay <- rbind(c(1,1),
c(1,1),
c(2,2))

gridExtra::grid.arrange(p2, risktab,
#use layout matrix to set sizes
layout_matrix=lay
)


enter image description here







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 14 '18 at 14:47

























answered Nov 14 '18 at 14:39









MikeMike

903417




903417







  • 1





    Thanks! The annotation_custom and ggplotGrob combination seems like a very useful solution, not only in this setting.

    – Wernicke
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:40












  • 1





    Thanks! The annotation_custom and ggplotGrob combination seems like a very useful solution, not only in this setting.

    – Wernicke
    Nov 15 '18 at 19:40







1




1





Thanks! The annotation_custom and ggplotGrob combination seems like a very useful solution, not only in this setting.

– Wernicke
Nov 15 '18 at 19:40





Thanks! The annotation_custom and ggplotGrob combination seems like a very useful solution, not only in this setting.

– Wernicke
Nov 15 '18 at 19:40

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53288724%2fr-survminer-double-graph%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto