Prevent collision on multiple database calls in Web API










0














I have a table of random unique number that they served as account Id for a user.



This scenario will use in Register method of Web API to get first unique Number and attached it into a user and after a successful creation, the fetched unique Number will be removed from database:



 public async Task<ActionResult> Register([FromBody] RegisterDto model)


//get the first unique number from the database
var UniqueNumber = _context.UniqueNumbers.First();


var user = new User

UserName = model.Email,
Email = model.Email,
PhoneNumber = model.PhoneNumber,
FirstName = model.FirstName,
LastName = model.LastName,
UserProfile = new UserProfile()

AccountNumber = UniqueNumber.Number,
,
;

//creating user
var createResult = await _userManager.CreateAsync(user, model.Password);
if (!createResult.Succeeded) return BadRequest(new isSucceeded = createResult.Succeeded, errors = createResult.Errors );

//Delete the fetched UniqueId from the database
_context.UniqueNumbers.Remove(UniqueNumber);
_context.SaveChanges();

return Ok(new

isSucceeded = true
);



My question is how do I prevent collision in multiple calls on API since it may return same unique number for multiple calls?










share|improve this question





















  • What database? What version of EF? There's not a generic way to do this.
    – David Browne - Microsoft
    Nov 12 '18 at 22:16











  • @DavidBrowne-Microsoft I'm using EF Core 2.1 and MSSQL, I Was thinking about use Transaction Scope but I'm not sure how this works...
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 12 '18 at 22:32










  • Why even go to a table for this? Could you just use a guide type and generate it using a combguid from you c# code.
    – Fran
    Nov 13 '18 at 13:01










  • @Fran Well I really need this Id to be a integer value and 10 digits only. (business logic), So no I can't use a GUID.
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 13 '18 at 17:40















0














I have a table of random unique number that they served as account Id for a user.



This scenario will use in Register method of Web API to get first unique Number and attached it into a user and after a successful creation, the fetched unique Number will be removed from database:



 public async Task<ActionResult> Register([FromBody] RegisterDto model)


//get the first unique number from the database
var UniqueNumber = _context.UniqueNumbers.First();


var user = new User

UserName = model.Email,
Email = model.Email,
PhoneNumber = model.PhoneNumber,
FirstName = model.FirstName,
LastName = model.LastName,
UserProfile = new UserProfile()

AccountNumber = UniqueNumber.Number,
,
;

//creating user
var createResult = await _userManager.CreateAsync(user, model.Password);
if (!createResult.Succeeded) return BadRequest(new isSucceeded = createResult.Succeeded, errors = createResult.Errors );

//Delete the fetched UniqueId from the database
_context.UniqueNumbers.Remove(UniqueNumber);
_context.SaveChanges();

return Ok(new

isSucceeded = true
);



My question is how do I prevent collision in multiple calls on API since it may return same unique number for multiple calls?










share|improve this question





















  • What database? What version of EF? There's not a generic way to do this.
    – David Browne - Microsoft
    Nov 12 '18 at 22:16











  • @DavidBrowne-Microsoft I'm using EF Core 2.1 and MSSQL, I Was thinking about use Transaction Scope but I'm not sure how this works...
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 12 '18 at 22:32










  • Why even go to a table for this? Could you just use a guide type and generate it using a combguid from you c# code.
    – Fran
    Nov 13 '18 at 13:01










  • @Fran Well I really need this Id to be a integer value and 10 digits only. (business logic), So no I can't use a GUID.
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 13 '18 at 17:40













0












0








0







I have a table of random unique number that they served as account Id for a user.



This scenario will use in Register method of Web API to get first unique Number and attached it into a user and after a successful creation, the fetched unique Number will be removed from database:



 public async Task<ActionResult> Register([FromBody] RegisterDto model)


//get the first unique number from the database
var UniqueNumber = _context.UniqueNumbers.First();


var user = new User

UserName = model.Email,
Email = model.Email,
PhoneNumber = model.PhoneNumber,
FirstName = model.FirstName,
LastName = model.LastName,
UserProfile = new UserProfile()

AccountNumber = UniqueNumber.Number,
,
;

//creating user
var createResult = await _userManager.CreateAsync(user, model.Password);
if (!createResult.Succeeded) return BadRequest(new isSucceeded = createResult.Succeeded, errors = createResult.Errors );

//Delete the fetched UniqueId from the database
_context.UniqueNumbers.Remove(UniqueNumber);
_context.SaveChanges();

return Ok(new

isSucceeded = true
);



My question is how do I prevent collision in multiple calls on API since it may return same unique number for multiple calls?










share|improve this question













I have a table of random unique number that they served as account Id for a user.



This scenario will use in Register method of Web API to get first unique Number and attached it into a user and after a successful creation, the fetched unique Number will be removed from database:



 public async Task<ActionResult> Register([FromBody] RegisterDto model)


//get the first unique number from the database
var UniqueNumber = _context.UniqueNumbers.First();


var user = new User

UserName = model.Email,
Email = model.Email,
PhoneNumber = model.PhoneNumber,
FirstName = model.FirstName,
LastName = model.LastName,
UserProfile = new UserProfile()

AccountNumber = UniqueNumber.Number,
,
;

//creating user
var createResult = await _userManager.CreateAsync(user, model.Password);
if (!createResult.Succeeded) return BadRequest(new isSucceeded = createResult.Succeeded, errors = createResult.Errors );

//Delete the fetched UniqueId from the database
_context.UniqueNumbers.Remove(UniqueNumber);
_context.SaveChanges();

return Ok(new

isSucceeded = true
);



My question is how do I prevent collision in multiple calls on API since it may return same unique number for multiple calls?







c# .net entity-framework rest asp.net-web-api






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 12 '18 at 22:01









Mehrdad Kamali

4019




4019











  • What database? What version of EF? There's not a generic way to do this.
    – David Browne - Microsoft
    Nov 12 '18 at 22:16











  • @DavidBrowne-Microsoft I'm using EF Core 2.1 and MSSQL, I Was thinking about use Transaction Scope but I'm not sure how this works...
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 12 '18 at 22:32










  • Why even go to a table for this? Could you just use a guide type and generate it using a combguid from you c# code.
    – Fran
    Nov 13 '18 at 13:01










  • @Fran Well I really need this Id to be a integer value and 10 digits only. (business logic), So no I can't use a GUID.
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 13 '18 at 17:40
















  • What database? What version of EF? There's not a generic way to do this.
    – David Browne - Microsoft
    Nov 12 '18 at 22:16











  • @DavidBrowne-Microsoft I'm using EF Core 2.1 and MSSQL, I Was thinking about use Transaction Scope but I'm not sure how this works...
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 12 '18 at 22:32










  • Why even go to a table for this? Could you just use a guide type and generate it using a combguid from you c# code.
    – Fran
    Nov 13 '18 at 13:01










  • @Fran Well I really need this Id to be a integer value and 10 digits only. (business logic), So no I can't use a GUID.
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 13 '18 at 17:40















What database? What version of EF? There's not a generic way to do this.
– David Browne - Microsoft
Nov 12 '18 at 22:16





What database? What version of EF? There's not a generic way to do this.
– David Browne - Microsoft
Nov 12 '18 at 22:16













@DavidBrowne-Microsoft I'm using EF Core 2.1 and MSSQL, I Was thinking about use Transaction Scope but I'm not sure how this works...
– Mehrdad Kamali
Nov 12 '18 at 22:32




@DavidBrowne-Microsoft I'm using EF Core 2.1 and MSSQL, I Was thinking about use Transaction Scope but I'm not sure how this works...
– Mehrdad Kamali
Nov 12 '18 at 22:32












Why even go to a table for this? Could you just use a guide type and generate it using a combguid from you c# code.
– Fran
Nov 13 '18 at 13:01




Why even go to a table for this? Could you just use a guide type and generate it using a combguid from you c# code.
– Fran
Nov 13 '18 at 13:01












@Fran Well I really need this Id to be a integer value and 10 digits only. (business logic), So no I can't use a GUID.
– Mehrdad Kamali
Nov 13 '18 at 17:40




@Fran Well I really need this Id to be a integer value and 10 digits only. (business logic), So no I can't use a GUID.
– Mehrdad Kamali
Nov 13 '18 at 17:40












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














On EF Core and Microsoft SQL Server you should simply use a SEQUENCE object to generate your keys. See Sequences - EF Core



If really, really want to proceed with your original design you could use FromSql to run a DELETE … OUTPUT, something like:



var UniqueNumber = _context.UniqueNumbers.FromSql("delete top (1) from UniqueNumbers output deleted.*").Single();





share|improve this answer






















  • Well the Sequences does not meet my requirement as I said (Not Randomly Generated.), So I think I should stick to my design. However this command will do my work perfectly I think, Many thanks!
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 13 '18 at 17:56










Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53270736%2fprevent-collision-on-multiple-database-calls-in-web-api%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














On EF Core and Microsoft SQL Server you should simply use a SEQUENCE object to generate your keys. See Sequences - EF Core



If really, really want to proceed with your original design you could use FromSql to run a DELETE … OUTPUT, something like:



var UniqueNumber = _context.UniqueNumbers.FromSql("delete top (1) from UniqueNumbers output deleted.*").Single();





share|improve this answer






















  • Well the Sequences does not meet my requirement as I said (Not Randomly Generated.), So I think I should stick to my design. However this command will do my work perfectly I think, Many thanks!
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 13 '18 at 17:56















1














On EF Core and Microsoft SQL Server you should simply use a SEQUENCE object to generate your keys. See Sequences - EF Core



If really, really want to proceed with your original design you could use FromSql to run a DELETE … OUTPUT, something like:



var UniqueNumber = _context.UniqueNumbers.FromSql("delete top (1) from UniqueNumbers output deleted.*").Single();





share|improve this answer






















  • Well the Sequences does not meet my requirement as I said (Not Randomly Generated.), So I think I should stick to my design. However this command will do my work perfectly I think, Many thanks!
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 13 '18 at 17:56













1












1








1






On EF Core and Microsoft SQL Server you should simply use a SEQUENCE object to generate your keys. See Sequences - EF Core



If really, really want to proceed with your original design you could use FromSql to run a DELETE … OUTPUT, something like:



var UniqueNumber = _context.UniqueNumbers.FromSql("delete top (1) from UniqueNumbers output deleted.*").Single();





share|improve this answer














On EF Core and Microsoft SQL Server you should simply use a SEQUENCE object to generate your keys. See Sequences - EF Core



If really, really want to proceed with your original design you could use FromSql to run a DELETE … OUTPUT, something like:



var UniqueNumber = _context.UniqueNumbers.FromSql("delete top (1) from UniqueNumbers output deleted.*").Single();






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 13 '18 at 18:16

























answered Nov 13 '18 at 0:05









David Browne - Microsoft

14k2624




14k2624











  • Well the Sequences does not meet my requirement as I said (Not Randomly Generated.), So I think I should stick to my design. However this command will do my work perfectly I think, Many thanks!
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 13 '18 at 17:56
















  • Well the Sequences does not meet my requirement as I said (Not Randomly Generated.), So I think I should stick to my design. However this command will do my work perfectly I think, Many thanks!
    – Mehrdad Kamali
    Nov 13 '18 at 17:56















Well the Sequences does not meet my requirement as I said (Not Randomly Generated.), So I think I should stick to my design. However this command will do my work perfectly I think, Many thanks!
– Mehrdad Kamali
Nov 13 '18 at 17:56




Well the Sequences does not meet my requirement as I said (Not Randomly Generated.), So I think I should stick to my design. However this command will do my work perfectly I think, Many thanks!
– Mehrdad Kamali
Nov 13 '18 at 17:56

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53270736%2fprevent-collision-on-multiple-database-calls-in-web-api%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3

Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto