What's the point of composing music for the violin in D flat?
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I think of this question because I want to play Romance from Gadfly by Shostakovich, but being in D flat makes it more difficult to play than if it were a semitone higher. I don't see any interest in composing in D flat for the violin because in this way you lose the open strings and the natural harmonics.
Thanks in advance for your answer.
violin key
New contributor
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I think of this question because I want to play Romance from Gadfly by Shostakovich, but being in D flat makes it more difficult to play than if it were a semitone higher. I don't see any interest in composing in D flat for the violin because in this way you lose the open strings and the natural harmonics.
Thanks in advance for your answer.
violin key
New contributor
You could always imagine there are two sharps in the key sig. instead. That would put your playing into an easier D major. By yourself that's a good option, but if others are playing with you, with transposing instruments, things could get awkward for them. Or - you tune down a semitone, which really wouldn't hurt too much.
– Tim
Nov 10 at 12:47
20
Or you could imagine he did it so you wouldn't be able to use open strings, quite intentionally.
– Tetsujin
Nov 10 at 13:00
2
@Tetsujin - That sounds quite plausible to me, including the fact that the absence of sympathetic vibrations from the open strings softens the sound too. But without knowing more about Shostakovich's motivations, it's probably impossible to say for sure.
– Scott Wallace
Nov 10 at 14:27
5
@Testujin That was exactly what I was thinking -- Gadfly is a slower, sweeter piece. No need for bright, annoying open strings. I used to have a conductor who would stop the entire orchestra whenever she heard an open string from the string section. "They hit me like darts!"
– General Nuisance
Nov 10 at 16:52
1
Another reason to avoid open strings is that you can't do vibrato on them.
– rlms
Nov 10 at 20:55
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I think of this question because I want to play Romance from Gadfly by Shostakovich, but being in D flat makes it more difficult to play than if it were a semitone higher. I don't see any interest in composing in D flat for the violin because in this way you lose the open strings and the natural harmonics.
Thanks in advance for your answer.
violin key
New contributor
I think of this question because I want to play Romance from Gadfly by Shostakovich, but being in D flat makes it more difficult to play than if it were a semitone higher. I don't see any interest in composing in D flat for the violin because in this way you lose the open strings and the natural harmonics.
Thanks in advance for your answer.
violin key
violin key
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Nov 10 at 12:09
Jiu
1342
1342
New contributor
New contributor
You could always imagine there are two sharps in the key sig. instead. That would put your playing into an easier D major. By yourself that's a good option, but if others are playing with you, with transposing instruments, things could get awkward for them. Or - you tune down a semitone, which really wouldn't hurt too much.
– Tim
Nov 10 at 12:47
20
Or you could imagine he did it so you wouldn't be able to use open strings, quite intentionally.
– Tetsujin
Nov 10 at 13:00
2
@Tetsujin - That sounds quite plausible to me, including the fact that the absence of sympathetic vibrations from the open strings softens the sound too. But without knowing more about Shostakovich's motivations, it's probably impossible to say for sure.
– Scott Wallace
Nov 10 at 14:27
5
@Testujin That was exactly what I was thinking -- Gadfly is a slower, sweeter piece. No need for bright, annoying open strings. I used to have a conductor who would stop the entire orchestra whenever she heard an open string from the string section. "They hit me like darts!"
– General Nuisance
Nov 10 at 16:52
1
Another reason to avoid open strings is that you can't do vibrato on them.
– rlms
Nov 10 at 20:55
|
show 1 more comment
You could always imagine there are two sharps in the key sig. instead. That would put your playing into an easier D major. By yourself that's a good option, but if others are playing with you, with transposing instruments, things could get awkward for them. Or - you tune down a semitone, which really wouldn't hurt too much.
– Tim
Nov 10 at 12:47
20
Or you could imagine he did it so you wouldn't be able to use open strings, quite intentionally.
– Tetsujin
Nov 10 at 13:00
2
@Tetsujin - That sounds quite plausible to me, including the fact that the absence of sympathetic vibrations from the open strings softens the sound too. But without knowing more about Shostakovich's motivations, it's probably impossible to say for sure.
– Scott Wallace
Nov 10 at 14:27
5
@Testujin That was exactly what I was thinking -- Gadfly is a slower, sweeter piece. No need for bright, annoying open strings. I used to have a conductor who would stop the entire orchestra whenever she heard an open string from the string section. "They hit me like darts!"
– General Nuisance
Nov 10 at 16:52
1
Another reason to avoid open strings is that you can't do vibrato on them.
– rlms
Nov 10 at 20:55
You could always imagine there are two sharps in the key sig. instead. That would put your playing into an easier D major. By yourself that's a good option, but if others are playing with you, with transposing instruments, things could get awkward for them. Or - you tune down a semitone, which really wouldn't hurt too much.
– Tim
Nov 10 at 12:47
You could always imagine there are two sharps in the key sig. instead. That would put your playing into an easier D major. By yourself that's a good option, but if others are playing with you, with transposing instruments, things could get awkward for them. Or - you tune down a semitone, which really wouldn't hurt too much.
– Tim
Nov 10 at 12:47
20
20
Or you could imagine he did it so you wouldn't be able to use open strings, quite intentionally.
– Tetsujin
Nov 10 at 13:00
Or you could imagine he did it so you wouldn't be able to use open strings, quite intentionally.
– Tetsujin
Nov 10 at 13:00
2
2
@Tetsujin - That sounds quite plausible to me, including the fact that the absence of sympathetic vibrations from the open strings softens the sound too. But without knowing more about Shostakovich's motivations, it's probably impossible to say for sure.
– Scott Wallace
Nov 10 at 14:27
@Tetsujin - That sounds quite plausible to me, including the fact that the absence of sympathetic vibrations from the open strings softens the sound too. But without knowing more about Shostakovich's motivations, it's probably impossible to say for sure.
– Scott Wallace
Nov 10 at 14:27
5
5
@Testujin That was exactly what I was thinking -- Gadfly is a slower, sweeter piece. No need for bright, annoying open strings. I used to have a conductor who would stop the entire orchestra whenever she heard an open string from the string section. "They hit me like darts!"
– General Nuisance
Nov 10 at 16:52
@Testujin That was exactly what I was thinking -- Gadfly is a slower, sweeter piece. No need for bright, annoying open strings. I used to have a conductor who would stop the entire orchestra whenever she heard an open string from the string section. "They hit me like darts!"
– General Nuisance
Nov 10 at 16:52
1
1
Another reason to avoid open strings is that you can't do vibrato on them.
– rlms
Nov 10 at 20:55
Another reason to avoid open strings is that you can't do vibrato on them.
– rlms
Nov 10 at 20:55
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
The example you gave, Shostakovich's Gadfly suite, gives you quite a lot of the answer: music is often written for several instruments at once, only one of which is a violin. The Bb clarinet is no doubt thinking "whew, this score's key signature no longer looks so crazy".
Maybe Shostakovich associated his initial idea for that Romance so strongly with D flat major that he did not care how good that prominent violin sounds in that key, or maybe he only came up with the prominent violin part later in the compositional process.
Another reason that violin music is written in D flat major and other keys with no prominent open strings may be precisely because it's harder to make those keys sound good. There must be a reason why a recording of that Romance ended up on an album named "Virtuoso Violin".
And if you really want open strings in D flat major, there may be a scordatura tuning that allows for this. (Saint-Saens's "Danse Macabre" famously uses scordatura tuning so its violins can play those Eb-A parts easier.)
Oddly, I just Googled score images for the Romance from the Gadfly suite, and none of them are in D flat major. (They're most commonly in C major or D major.) Granted, Shostakovich's works not being in the public domain makes his original scores tough to verify without listening to them, and I have reason to believe that all of those scores are of arrangements.
Curious was this piece written when equal temperament tuning was wide spread or before? If it was before each key would sound very different.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 13:11
4
@b3ko 1906 to 1975, i think equal temperament was quite widespread.
– badjohn
Nov 10 at 14:11
@badjohn for sure. I wasn't familiar with the composer or piece. So that's not the reason.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 14:29
2
His 12th string quartet is in Db as well, so obviously there are times he prefers the muddier, duskier sound of non-open keys even when there aren’t winds involved.
– Pat Muchmore
Nov 10 at 16:04
chandos.net/chanimages/Booklets/NX3747.pdf contains an image of the start of the manuscript. (on page 6) It is C major.
– James K
Nov 10 at 21:11
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Here's a slightly more Occam's Razor answer: it doesn't answer the specifics of your query, but in the general case of your title question it bears repeating.
I was once asked almost the same question about a piece i wrote -- a choral piece with recurring C♯ in the altos which provided a tonal anchor (i'm loath to say key). Anyway, i was asked, "Why C♯ in the altos? Why not C?" to which i answered: "It's what i heard." Perhaps composers of music in "difficult" keys would answer the same were they asked.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
The example you gave, Shostakovich's Gadfly suite, gives you quite a lot of the answer: music is often written for several instruments at once, only one of which is a violin. The Bb clarinet is no doubt thinking "whew, this score's key signature no longer looks so crazy".
Maybe Shostakovich associated his initial idea for that Romance so strongly with D flat major that he did not care how good that prominent violin sounds in that key, or maybe he only came up with the prominent violin part later in the compositional process.
Another reason that violin music is written in D flat major and other keys with no prominent open strings may be precisely because it's harder to make those keys sound good. There must be a reason why a recording of that Romance ended up on an album named "Virtuoso Violin".
And if you really want open strings in D flat major, there may be a scordatura tuning that allows for this. (Saint-Saens's "Danse Macabre" famously uses scordatura tuning so its violins can play those Eb-A parts easier.)
Oddly, I just Googled score images for the Romance from the Gadfly suite, and none of them are in D flat major. (They're most commonly in C major or D major.) Granted, Shostakovich's works not being in the public domain makes his original scores tough to verify without listening to them, and I have reason to believe that all of those scores are of arrangements.
Curious was this piece written when equal temperament tuning was wide spread or before? If it was before each key would sound very different.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 13:11
4
@b3ko 1906 to 1975, i think equal temperament was quite widespread.
– badjohn
Nov 10 at 14:11
@badjohn for sure. I wasn't familiar with the composer or piece. So that's not the reason.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 14:29
2
His 12th string quartet is in Db as well, so obviously there are times he prefers the muddier, duskier sound of non-open keys even when there aren’t winds involved.
– Pat Muchmore
Nov 10 at 16:04
chandos.net/chanimages/Booklets/NX3747.pdf contains an image of the start of the manuscript. (on page 6) It is C major.
– James K
Nov 10 at 21:11
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
The example you gave, Shostakovich's Gadfly suite, gives you quite a lot of the answer: music is often written for several instruments at once, only one of which is a violin. The Bb clarinet is no doubt thinking "whew, this score's key signature no longer looks so crazy".
Maybe Shostakovich associated his initial idea for that Romance so strongly with D flat major that he did not care how good that prominent violin sounds in that key, or maybe he only came up with the prominent violin part later in the compositional process.
Another reason that violin music is written in D flat major and other keys with no prominent open strings may be precisely because it's harder to make those keys sound good. There must be a reason why a recording of that Romance ended up on an album named "Virtuoso Violin".
And if you really want open strings in D flat major, there may be a scordatura tuning that allows for this. (Saint-Saens's "Danse Macabre" famously uses scordatura tuning so its violins can play those Eb-A parts easier.)
Oddly, I just Googled score images for the Romance from the Gadfly suite, and none of them are in D flat major. (They're most commonly in C major or D major.) Granted, Shostakovich's works not being in the public domain makes his original scores tough to verify without listening to them, and I have reason to believe that all of those scores are of arrangements.
Curious was this piece written when equal temperament tuning was wide spread or before? If it was before each key would sound very different.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 13:11
4
@b3ko 1906 to 1975, i think equal temperament was quite widespread.
– badjohn
Nov 10 at 14:11
@badjohn for sure. I wasn't familiar with the composer or piece. So that's not the reason.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 14:29
2
His 12th string quartet is in Db as well, so obviously there are times he prefers the muddier, duskier sound of non-open keys even when there aren’t winds involved.
– Pat Muchmore
Nov 10 at 16:04
chandos.net/chanimages/Booklets/NX3747.pdf contains an image of the start of the manuscript. (on page 6) It is C major.
– James K
Nov 10 at 21:11
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
up vote
15
down vote
The example you gave, Shostakovich's Gadfly suite, gives you quite a lot of the answer: music is often written for several instruments at once, only one of which is a violin. The Bb clarinet is no doubt thinking "whew, this score's key signature no longer looks so crazy".
Maybe Shostakovich associated his initial idea for that Romance so strongly with D flat major that he did not care how good that prominent violin sounds in that key, or maybe he only came up with the prominent violin part later in the compositional process.
Another reason that violin music is written in D flat major and other keys with no prominent open strings may be precisely because it's harder to make those keys sound good. There must be a reason why a recording of that Romance ended up on an album named "Virtuoso Violin".
And if you really want open strings in D flat major, there may be a scordatura tuning that allows for this. (Saint-Saens's "Danse Macabre" famously uses scordatura tuning so its violins can play those Eb-A parts easier.)
Oddly, I just Googled score images for the Romance from the Gadfly suite, and none of them are in D flat major. (They're most commonly in C major or D major.) Granted, Shostakovich's works not being in the public domain makes his original scores tough to verify without listening to them, and I have reason to believe that all of those scores are of arrangements.
The example you gave, Shostakovich's Gadfly suite, gives you quite a lot of the answer: music is often written for several instruments at once, only one of which is a violin. The Bb clarinet is no doubt thinking "whew, this score's key signature no longer looks so crazy".
Maybe Shostakovich associated his initial idea for that Romance so strongly with D flat major that he did not care how good that prominent violin sounds in that key, or maybe he only came up with the prominent violin part later in the compositional process.
Another reason that violin music is written in D flat major and other keys with no prominent open strings may be precisely because it's harder to make those keys sound good. There must be a reason why a recording of that Romance ended up on an album named "Virtuoso Violin".
And if you really want open strings in D flat major, there may be a scordatura tuning that allows for this. (Saint-Saens's "Danse Macabre" famously uses scordatura tuning so its violins can play those Eb-A parts easier.)
Oddly, I just Googled score images for the Romance from the Gadfly suite, and none of them are in D flat major. (They're most commonly in C major or D major.) Granted, Shostakovich's works not being in the public domain makes his original scores tough to verify without listening to them, and I have reason to believe that all of those scores are of arrangements.
answered Nov 10 at 12:28
Dekkadeci
3,7572917
3,7572917
Curious was this piece written when equal temperament tuning was wide spread or before? If it was before each key would sound very different.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 13:11
4
@b3ko 1906 to 1975, i think equal temperament was quite widespread.
– badjohn
Nov 10 at 14:11
@badjohn for sure. I wasn't familiar with the composer or piece. So that's not the reason.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 14:29
2
His 12th string quartet is in Db as well, so obviously there are times he prefers the muddier, duskier sound of non-open keys even when there aren’t winds involved.
– Pat Muchmore
Nov 10 at 16:04
chandos.net/chanimages/Booklets/NX3747.pdf contains an image of the start of the manuscript. (on page 6) It is C major.
– James K
Nov 10 at 21:11
add a comment |
Curious was this piece written when equal temperament tuning was wide spread or before? If it was before each key would sound very different.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 13:11
4
@b3ko 1906 to 1975, i think equal temperament was quite widespread.
– badjohn
Nov 10 at 14:11
@badjohn for sure. I wasn't familiar with the composer or piece. So that's not the reason.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 14:29
2
His 12th string quartet is in Db as well, so obviously there are times he prefers the muddier, duskier sound of non-open keys even when there aren’t winds involved.
– Pat Muchmore
Nov 10 at 16:04
chandos.net/chanimages/Booklets/NX3747.pdf contains an image of the start of the manuscript. (on page 6) It is C major.
– James K
Nov 10 at 21:11
Curious was this piece written when equal temperament tuning was wide spread or before? If it was before each key would sound very different.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 13:11
Curious was this piece written when equal temperament tuning was wide spread or before? If it was before each key would sound very different.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 13:11
4
4
@b3ko 1906 to 1975, i think equal temperament was quite widespread.
– badjohn
Nov 10 at 14:11
@b3ko 1906 to 1975, i think equal temperament was quite widespread.
– badjohn
Nov 10 at 14:11
@badjohn for sure. I wasn't familiar with the composer or piece. So that's not the reason.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 14:29
@badjohn for sure. I wasn't familiar with the composer or piece. So that's not the reason.
– b3ko
Nov 10 at 14:29
2
2
His 12th string quartet is in Db as well, so obviously there are times he prefers the muddier, duskier sound of non-open keys even when there aren’t winds involved.
– Pat Muchmore
Nov 10 at 16:04
His 12th string quartet is in Db as well, so obviously there are times he prefers the muddier, duskier sound of non-open keys even when there aren’t winds involved.
– Pat Muchmore
Nov 10 at 16:04
chandos.net/chanimages/Booklets/NX3747.pdf contains an image of the start of the manuscript. (on page 6) It is C major.
– James K
Nov 10 at 21:11
chandos.net/chanimages/Booklets/NX3747.pdf contains an image of the start of the manuscript. (on page 6) It is C major.
– James K
Nov 10 at 21:11
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Here's a slightly more Occam's Razor answer: it doesn't answer the specifics of your query, but in the general case of your title question it bears repeating.
I was once asked almost the same question about a piece i wrote -- a choral piece with recurring C♯ in the altos which provided a tonal anchor (i'm loath to say key). Anyway, i was asked, "Why C♯ in the altos? Why not C?" to which i answered: "It's what i heard." Perhaps composers of music in "difficult" keys would answer the same were they asked.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
Here's a slightly more Occam's Razor answer: it doesn't answer the specifics of your query, but in the general case of your title question it bears repeating.
I was once asked almost the same question about a piece i wrote -- a choral piece with recurring C♯ in the altos which provided a tonal anchor (i'm loath to say key). Anyway, i was asked, "Why C♯ in the altos? Why not C?" to which i answered: "It's what i heard." Perhaps composers of music in "difficult" keys would answer the same were they asked.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
Here's a slightly more Occam's Razor answer: it doesn't answer the specifics of your query, but in the general case of your title question it bears repeating.
I was once asked almost the same question about a piece i wrote -- a choral piece with recurring C♯ in the altos which provided a tonal anchor (i'm loath to say key). Anyway, i was asked, "Why C♯ in the altos? Why not C?" to which i answered: "It's what i heard." Perhaps composers of music in "difficult" keys would answer the same were they asked.
Here's a slightly more Occam's Razor answer: it doesn't answer the specifics of your query, but in the general case of your title question it bears repeating.
I was once asked almost the same question about a piece i wrote -- a choral piece with recurring C♯ in the altos which provided a tonal anchor (i'm loath to say key). Anyway, i was asked, "Why C♯ in the altos? Why not C?" to which i answered: "It's what i heard." Perhaps composers of music in "difficult" keys would answer the same were they asked.
answered yesterday
Dean Ransevycz
1,309514
1,309514
add a comment |
add a comment |
Jiu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jiu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jiu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Jiu is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76353%2fwhats-the-point-of-composing-music-for-the-violin-in-d-flat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You could always imagine there are two sharps in the key sig. instead. That would put your playing into an easier D major. By yourself that's a good option, but if others are playing with you, with transposing instruments, things could get awkward for them. Or - you tune down a semitone, which really wouldn't hurt too much.
– Tim
Nov 10 at 12:47
20
Or you could imagine he did it so you wouldn't be able to use open strings, quite intentionally.
– Tetsujin
Nov 10 at 13:00
2
@Tetsujin - That sounds quite plausible to me, including the fact that the absence of sympathetic vibrations from the open strings softens the sound too. But without knowing more about Shostakovich's motivations, it's probably impossible to say for sure.
– Scott Wallace
Nov 10 at 14:27
5
@Testujin That was exactly what I was thinking -- Gadfly is a slower, sweeter piece. No need for bright, annoying open strings. I used to have a conductor who would stop the entire orchestra whenever she heard an open string from the string section. "They hit me like darts!"
– General Nuisance
Nov 10 at 16:52
1
Another reason to avoid open strings is that you can't do vibrato on them.
– rlms
Nov 10 at 20:55