Can't get HTTP PUT-request to work in Asp.Net Core
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.
This is controller in ASP.net:
[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)
result = update;
context.SaveChanges();
return Created("", result);
And this is the code I use in Angular:
url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;
putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);
Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.
This is controller in ASP.net:
[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)
result = update;
context.SaveChanges();
return Created("", result);
And this is the code I use in Angular:
url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;
putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);
Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 at 23:59
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.
This is controller in ASP.net:
[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)
result = update;
context.SaveChanges();
return Created("", result);
And this is the code I use in Angular:
url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;
putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);
Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
I'm trying to update an entry in the "game" table. However, my put-request in ASP.net never seems to trigger, and I can't figure out why.
This is controller in ASP.net:
[Route("game/update.GameID")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
var result = context.Games.SingleOrDefault(g => g.GameID == update.GameID);
if (result != null)
result = update;
context.SaveChanges();
return Created("", result);
And this is the code I use in Angular:
url:string;
constructor(private _http: HttpClient)
this.url = "https://localhost:44359/api/v1/"
;
putGame(id:number, game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game/" + id, game);
Edit 1: I do have a list of GET-requests, which all work just fine. It's only the PUT-request that fails.
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
c# angular rest asp.net-core asp.net-core-routing
edited Nov 11 at 12:43
asked Nov 10 at 23:48
MyNameIsGuzse
298
298
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 at 23:59
add a comment |
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 at 23:59
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 at 23:59
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 at 23:59
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The route template parameter update.GameID
is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
Yup.result = update
doesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()
and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 at 12:54
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
If you are using PUT
request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The route template parameter update.GameID
is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
Yup.result = update
doesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()
and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 at 12:54
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The route template parameter update.GameID
is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
Yup.result = update
doesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()
and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 at 12:54
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The route template parameter update.GameID
is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
The route template parameter update.GameID
is not standard to what is suggested by documentation
Assuming the game id is an integer review the following
//PUT .../game/5
[Route("game/id:int")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
Reference Routing to controller actions in ASP.NET Core
I would also suggest you review the logic of the action as I do not believe it is doing what you think it does with updating the entity returned from the context.
answered Nov 11 at 0:10
Nkosi
105k15111179
105k15111179
Yup.result = update
doesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()
and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 at 12:54
add a comment |
Yup.result = update
doesn't do what you think it does.
– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint onupdateGame()
and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.
– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 at 12:54
Yup.
result = update
doesn't do what you think it does.– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 at 1:07
Yup.
result = update
doesn't do what you think it does.– Gabriel Luci
Nov 11 at 1:07
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on
updateGame()
and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 at 12:42
I did this, but it still won't call when I try out the put-request. I have added a breakpoint on
updateGame()
and attempt a put-request via postman, but it never triggers.– MyNameIsGuzse
Nov 11 at 12:42
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 at 12:54
As @Nkosi suggests, it may not do what you expect it should. Also check out docs.microsoft.com/en-us/aspnet/core/tutorials/…, there is an PUT example.
– Andre Artus
Nov 11 at 12:54
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
If you are using PUT
request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
If you are using PUT
request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
If you are using PUT
request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
If you are using PUT
request you need to add a resource id either to update or create new - so just don't combine your id with your object
[HttpPut("game/id")]
public IActionResult UpdateGame(int id, [FromBody]Game update)
//...
If you are using Asp.net Core you can just re-write your URL on your HTTP verbs attribute like the code above - So pass your resource id in the URL and bind your object in the body - Your URL should read as https://localhost:44359/api/v1/game/2
Hope this helps you - Happy coding !!
answered Nov 11 at 5:09
Rahul Swamynathan
8361313
8361313
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
Can you modify your defining route just like
[Route("game")]
[HttpPut]
public IActionResult updateGame([FromBody]Game update)
//your code
And call from angular like
putGame(game:Game)
return this._http.put(this.url + "game", game);
you can receive gameid from game object so don't need from url
answered Nov 11 at 2:10
Md. Abdul Alim
346215
346215
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53244551%2fcant-get-http-put-request-to-work-in-asp-net-core%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do your other ASP.Net controllers successfully invoke Angular? Q: Have you tried using RouteDebugger?
– paulsm4
Nov 10 at 23:59