How to test ngrx pipe select in Rxjs 6










1















Previously I could test the below store select



this.store.select(fromRoot.someselector).pipe(map(r => this.store.dispatch(new Action())));


This was in my test



{provide: Store, useValue: jasmine.createSpyObj('store', ['select']);

store.select.and.returnValue(of());


But now it has changed to pipes



this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector));

this.store.pipe(
select(fromRoot.someselector),
filter(result => !!result),
map(r =>
if (result === ' hello')
this.store.dispatch(new Action());


));


How to test this especially when you have map after select and within it you are dispatching an action and you want verify action was called.










share|improve this question




























    1















    Previously I could test the below store select



    this.store.select(fromRoot.someselector).pipe(map(r => this.store.dispatch(new Action())));


    This was in my test



    {provide: Store, useValue: jasmine.createSpyObj('store', ['select']);

    store.select.and.returnValue(of());


    But now it has changed to pipes



    this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector));

    this.store.pipe(
    select(fromRoot.someselector),
    filter(result => !!result),
    map(r =>
    if (result === ' hello')
    this.store.dispatch(new Action());


    ));


    How to test this especially when you have map after select and within it you are dispatching an action and you want verify action was called.










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1








      Previously I could test the below store select



      this.store.select(fromRoot.someselector).pipe(map(r => this.store.dispatch(new Action())));


      This was in my test



      {provide: Store, useValue: jasmine.createSpyObj('store', ['select']);

      store.select.and.returnValue(of());


      But now it has changed to pipes



      this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector));

      this.store.pipe(
      select(fromRoot.someselector),
      filter(result => !!result),
      map(r =>
      if (result === ' hello')
      this.store.dispatch(new Action());


      ));


      How to test this especially when you have map after select and within it you are dispatching an action and you want verify action was called.










      share|improve this question
















      Previously I could test the below store select



      this.store.select(fromRoot.someselector).pipe(map(r => this.store.dispatch(new Action())));


      This was in my test



      {provide: Store, useValue: jasmine.createSpyObj('store', ['select']);

      store.select.and.returnValue(of());


      But now it has changed to pipes



      this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector));

      this.store.pipe(
      select(fromRoot.someselector),
      filter(result => !!result),
      map(r =>
      if (result === ' hello')
      this.store.dispatch(new Action());


      ));


      How to test this especially when you have map after select and within it you are dispatching an action and you want verify action was called.







      angular typescript jasmine ngrx






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 15 '18 at 14:21







      Angad

















      asked Nov 15 '18 at 8:23









      AngadAngad

      2791620




      2791620






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Skip the operators and test directly the result of the stream :



          store
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(theMockedValSentToTheSpy))


          To explain further :



          • create a mock of your store

          • create a mock of your value

          • return this mocked value in your mocked store

          • expect your component variable to return the mocked value

          This gives :



          const mockedValue = id: 1 ;
          const storeSubjectMock = new BehaviorSubject(mockedValue);
          const mockedStore =
          pipe: () => storeSubjectMock.asObservable(),
          ;

          // provide: Sotre, useValue: mockedStore ; in your testbed

          it('should return an unaltered value', () =>
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(mockedValue))
          );


          Now the good thing about that is that you can test all operators like that. Say your component variable is



          storeValue$ = this.store.pipe(
          select('selector'),
          map(value => ( ...value, name: 'customName' ))
          )


          Then your tests just changes to



          it('should return an altered value with a name property set to customName', () => {
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toEqual( ...mockedValue, name: 'customName'))
          );





          share|improve this answer

























          • Can you elaborate? I have to provide store in my test and spy on pipe so question is what would i returnValue of pipe ...store.pipe.and.returnValue(of()); Also, there is some logic going on in my pipe as shown in the example e.g. map() ..I want to test that also

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:46












          • @Angad I have updated my answer.

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:55











          • No sure if I fully understand it. How would this be test this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector), filter(result => !!result), map(r => if (result === ' hello') this.store.dispatch(new Action()); ));

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:20











          • I have edited the store statement with a bit complex one to get an idea how that would be tested. Can you please tell me how to go about this one?

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22











          • If you don't know how to test your code, I suggest you make another question. I'm not answering you on that through comments ...

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315111%2fhow-to-test-ngrx-pipe-select-in-rxjs-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Skip the operators and test directly the result of the stream :



          store
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(theMockedValSentToTheSpy))


          To explain further :



          • create a mock of your store

          • create a mock of your value

          • return this mocked value in your mocked store

          • expect your component variable to return the mocked value

          This gives :



          const mockedValue = id: 1 ;
          const storeSubjectMock = new BehaviorSubject(mockedValue);
          const mockedStore =
          pipe: () => storeSubjectMock.asObservable(),
          ;

          // provide: Sotre, useValue: mockedStore ; in your testbed

          it('should return an unaltered value', () =>
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(mockedValue))
          );


          Now the good thing about that is that you can test all operators like that. Say your component variable is



          storeValue$ = this.store.pipe(
          select('selector'),
          map(value => ( ...value, name: 'customName' ))
          )


          Then your tests just changes to



          it('should return an altered value with a name property set to customName', () => {
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toEqual( ...mockedValue, name: 'customName'))
          );





          share|improve this answer

























          • Can you elaborate? I have to provide store in my test and spy on pipe so question is what would i returnValue of pipe ...store.pipe.and.returnValue(of()); Also, there is some logic going on in my pipe as shown in the example e.g. map() ..I want to test that also

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:46












          • @Angad I have updated my answer.

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:55











          • No sure if I fully understand it. How would this be test this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector), filter(result => !!result), map(r => if (result === ' hello') this.store.dispatch(new Action()); ));

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:20











          • I have edited the store statement with a bit complex one to get an idea how that would be tested. Can you please tell me how to go about this one?

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22











          • If you don't know how to test your code, I suggest you make another question. I'm not answering you on that through comments ...

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22















          1














          Skip the operators and test directly the result of the stream :



          store
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(theMockedValSentToTheSpy))


          To explain further :



          • create a mock of your store

          • create a mock of your value

          • return this mocked value in your mocked store

          • expect your component variable to return the mocked value

          This gives :



          const mockedValue = id: 1 ;
          const storeSubjectMock = new BehaviorSubject(mockedValue);
          const mockedStore =
          pipe: () => storeSubjectMock.asObservable(),
          ;

          // provide: Sotre, useValue: mockedStore ; in your testbed

          it('should return an unaltered value', () =>
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(mockedValue))
          );


          Now the good thing about that is that you can test all operators like that. Say your component variable is



          storeValue$ = this.store.pipe(
          select('selector'),
          map(value => ( ...value, name: 'customName' ))
          )


          Then your tests just changes to



          it('should return an altered value with a name property set to customName', () => {
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toEqual( ...mockedValue, name: 'customName'))
          );





          share|improve this answer

























          • Can you elaborate? I have to provide store in my test and spy on pipe so question is what would i returnValue of pipe ...store.pipe.and.returnValue(of()); Also, there is some logic going on in my pipe as shown in the example e.g. map() ..I want to test that also

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:46












          • @Angad I have updated my answer.

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:55











          • No sure if I fully understand it. How would this be test this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector), filter(result => !!result), map(r => if (result === ' hello') this.store.dispatch(new Action()); ));

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:20











          • I have edited the store statement with a bit complex one to get an idea how that would be tested. Can you please tell me how to go about this one?

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22











          • If you don't know how to test your code, I suggest you make another question. I'm not answering you on that through comments ...

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22













          1












          1








          1







          Skip the operators and test directly the result of the stream :



          store
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(theMockedValSentToTheSpy))


          To explain further :



          • create a mock of your store

          • create a mock of your value

          • return this mocked value in your mocked store

          • expect your component variable to return the mocked value

          This gives :



          const mockedValue = id: 1 ;
          const storeSubjectMock = new BehaviorSubject(mockedValue);
          const mockedStore =
          pipe: () => storeSubjectMock.asObservable(),
          ;

          // provide: Sotre, useValue: mockedStore ; in your testbed

          it('should return an unaltered value', () =>
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(mockedValue))
          );


          Now the good thing about that is that you can test all operators like that. Say your component variable is



          storeValue$ = this.store.pipe(
          select('selector'),
          map(value => ( ...value, name: 'customName' ))
          )


          Then your tests just changes to



          it('should return an altered value with a name property set to customName', () => {
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toEqual( ...mockedValue, name: 'customName'))
          );





          share|improve this answer















          Skip the operators and test directly the result of the stream :



          store
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(theMockedValSentToTheSpy))


          To explain further :



          • create a mock of your store

          • create a mock of your value

          • return this mocked value in your mocked store

          • expect your component variable to return the mocked value

          This gives :



          const mockedValue = id: 1 ;
          const storeSubjectMock = new BehaviorSubject(mockedValue);
          const mockedStore =
          pipe: () => storeSubjectMock.asObservable(),
          ;

          // provide: Sotre, useValue: mockedStore ; in your testbed

          it('should return an unaltered value', () =>
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toBe(mockedValue))
          );


          Now the good thing about that is that you can test all operators like that. Say your component variable is



          storeValue$ = this.store.pipe(
          select('selector'),
          map(value => ( ...value, name: 'customName' ))
          )


          Then your tests just changes to



          it('should return an altered value with a name property set to customName', () => {
          component.variableReferencingStore
          .pipe(select('selector'))
          .subscribe(val => expect(val).toEqual( ...mockedValue, name: 'customName'))
          );






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 15 '18 at 8:55

























          answered Nov 15 '18 at 8:39









          trichetrichetrichetriche

          28.4k42560




          28.4k42560












          • Can you elaborate? I have to provide store in my test and spy on pipe so question is what would i returnValue of pipe ...store.pipe.and.returnValue(of()); Also, there is some logic going on in my pipe as shown in the example e.g. map() ..I want to test that also

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:46












          • @Angad I have updated my answer.

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:55











          • No sure if I fully understand it. How would this be test this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector), filter(result => !!result), map(r => if (result === ' hello') this.store.dispatch(new Action()); ));

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:20











          • I have edited the store statement with a bit complex one to get an idea how that would be tested. Can you please tell me how to go about this one?

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22











          • If you don't know how to test your code, I suggest you make another question. I'm not answering you on that through comments ...

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22

















          • Can you elaborate? I have to provide store in my test and spy on pipe so question is what would i returnValue of pipe ...store.pipe.and.returnValue(of()); Also, there is some logic going on in my pipe as shown in the example e.g. map() ..I want to test that also

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:46












          • @Angad I have updated my answer.

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 8:55











          • No sure if I fully understand it. How would this be test this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector), filter(result => !!result), map(r => if (result === ' hello') this.store.dispatch(new Action()); ));

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:20











          • I have edited the store statement with a bit complex one to get an idea how that would be tested. Can you please tell me how to go about this one?

            – Angad
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22











          • If you don't know how to test your code, I suggest you make another question. I'm not answering you on that through comments ...

            – trichetriche
            Nov 15 '18 at 14:22
















          Can you elaborate? I have to provide store in my test and spy on pipe so question is what would i returnValue of pipe ...store.pipe.and.returnValue(of()); Also, there is some logic going on in my pipe as shown in the example e.g. map() ..I want to test that also

          – Angad
          Nov 15 '18 at 8:46






          Can you elaborate? I have to provide store in my test and spy on pipe so question is what would i returnValue of pipe ...store.pipe.and.returnValue(of()); Also, there is some logic going on in my pipe as shown in the example e.g. map() ..I want to test that also

          – Angad
          Nov 15 '18 at 8:46














          @Angad I have updated my answer.

          – trichetriche
          Nov 15 '18 at 8:55





          @Angad I have updated my answer.

          – trichetriche
          Nov 15 '18 at 8:55













          No sure if I fully understand it. How would this be test this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector), filter(result => !!result), map(r => if (result === ' hello') this.store.dispatch(new Action()); ));

          – Angad
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:20





          No sure if I fully understand it. How would this be test this.store.pipe(select(fromRoot.someselector), filter(result => !!result), map(r => if (result === ' hello') this.store.dispatch(new Action()); ));

          – Angad
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:20













          I have edited the store statement with a bit complex one to get an idea how that would be tested. Can you please tell me how to go about this one?

          – Angad
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:22





          I have edited the store statement with a bit complex one to get an idea how that would be tested. Can you please tell me how to go about this one?

          – Angad
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:22













          If you don't know how to test your code, I suggest you make another question. I'm not answering you on that through comments ...

          – trichetriche
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:22





          If you don't know how to test your code, I suggest you make another question. I'm not answering you on that through comments ...

          – trichetriche
          Nov 15 '18 at 14:22



















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53315111%2fhow-to-test-ngrx-pipe-select-in-rxjs-6%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

          Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3

          Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto