How to compute $(-1)^n+1n!(1-esum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!)$?
$begingroup$
I was doing some work on the integral $int_0^1 x^ne^x dx$ and I eventually came to this expression in terms of n $$int_0^1 x^ne^x dx=(-1)^n+1n!biggl(1-esum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!biggr)$$ Now my question is this, how do I compute the limit of this expression as $n$ goes to $infty$? I recognize that $$lim_ntoinftyesum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!=1$$ per the series expression of $e^x$ at $-1$. This gives me an indeterminate form, but I can't apply L'Hopital's rule because I can't differentiate $n!$ (or $1/n!$ as the case would be after re-arranging), and I also can't think of a variable substitution that would help me here. Common sense and wolfram definitely imply that the limit is in fact $0$, but how can I show this?
calculus integration limits definite-integrals exponential-function
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was doing some work on the integral $int_0^1 x^ne^x dx$ and I eventually came to this expression in terms of n $$int_0^1 x^ne^x dx=(-1)^n+1n!biggl(1-esum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!biggr)$$ Now my question is this, how do I compute the limit of this expression as $n$ goes to $infty$? I recognize that $$lim_ntoinftyesum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!=1$$ per the series expression of $e^x$ at $-1$. This gives me an indeterminate form, but I can't apply L'Hopital's rule because I can't differentiate $n!$ (or $1/n!$ as the case would be after re-arranging), and I also can't think of a variable substitution that would help me here. Common sense and wolfram definitely imply that the limit is in fact $0$, but how can I show this?
calculus integration limits definite-integrals exponential-function
$endgroup$
3
$begingroup$
$n!=Gamma(n+1)$ is differentiable.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Nov 15 '18 at 7:01
1
$begingroup$
perhaps some properties of the gamma function/complex analysis would be useful
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Nov 15 '18 at 7:04
$begingroup$
I'm not very familiar with the gamma function, is there any other way? And if not, how could I use the gamma function to do this? Also, would it be sufficient to show that the integrand approaches $0$ on the interval?
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:06
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I was doing some work on the integral $int_0^1 x^ne^x dx$ and I eventually came to this expression in terms of n $$int_0^1 x^ne^x dx=(-1)^n+1n!biggl(1-esum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!biggr)$$ Now my question is this, how do I compute the limit of this expression as $n$ goes to $infty$? I recognize that $$lim_ntoinftyesum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!=1$$ per the series expression of $e^x$ at $-1$. This gives me an indeterminate form, but I can't apply L'Hopital's rule because I can't differentiate $n!$ (or $1/n!$ as the case would be after re-arranging), and I also can't think of a variable substitution that would help me here. Common sense and wolfram definitely imply that the limit is in fact $0$, but how can I show this?
calculus integration limits definite-integrals exponential-function
$endgroup$
I was doing some work on the integral $int_0^1 x^ne^x dx$ and I eventually came to this expression in terms of n $$int_0^1 x^ne^x dx=(-1)^n+1n!biggl(1-esum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!biggr)$$ Now my question is this, how do I compute the limit of this expression as $n$ goes to $infty$? I recognize that $$lim_ntoinftyesum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!=1$$ per the series expression of $e^x$ at $-1$. This gives me an indeterminate form, but I can't apply L'Hopital's rule because I can't differentiate $n!$ (or $1/n!$ as the case would be after re-arranging), and I also can't think of a variable substitution that would help me here. Common sense and wolfram definitely imply that the limit is in fact $0$, but how can I show this?
calculus integration limits definite-integrals exponential-function
calculus integration limits definite-integrals exponential-function
edited Nov 15 '18 at 12:11
user21820
39.4k543155
39.4k543155
asked Nov 15 '18 at 6:51
JacksonFitzsimmonsJacksonFitzsimmons
551212
551212
3
$begingroup$
$n!=Gamma(n+1)$ is differentiable.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Nov 15 '18 at 7:01
1
$begingroup$
perhaps some properties of the gamma function/complex analysis would be useful
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Nov 15 '18 at 7:04
$begingroup$
I'm not very familiar with the gamma function, is there any other way? And if not, how could I use the gamma function to do this? Also, would it be sufficient to show that the integrand approaches $0$ on the interval?
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:06
add a comment |
3
$begingroup$
$n!=Gamma(n+1)$ is differentiable.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Nov 15 '18 at 7:01
1
$begingroup$
perhaps some properties of the gamma function/complex analysis would be useful
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Nov 15 '18 at 7:04
$begingroup$
I'm not very familiar with the gamma function, is there any other way? And if not, how could I use the gamma function to do this? Also, would it be sufficient to show that the integrand approaches $0$ on the interval?
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:06
3
3
$begingroup$
$n!=Gamma(n+1)$ is differentiable.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Nov 15 '18 at 7:01
$begingroup$
$n!=Gamma(n+1)$ is differentiable.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Nov 15 '18 at 7:01
1
1
$begingroup$
perhaps some properties of the gamma function/complex analysis would be useful
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Nov 15 '18 at 7:04
$begingroup$
perhaps some properties of the gamma function/complex analysis would be useful
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Nov 15 '18 at 7:04
$begingroup$
I'm not very familiar with the gamma function, is there any other way? And if not, how could I use the gamma function to do this? Also, would it be sufficient to show that the integrand approaches $0$ on the interval?
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:06
$begingroup$
I'm not very familiar with the gamma function, is there any other way? And if not, how could I use the gamma function to do this? Also, would it be sufficient to show that the integrand approaches $0$ on the interval?
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:06
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When $xin [0,1]$, $e^xle e$, by first mean value theorem for definite integrals,
beginalign*
I_n&lemax_xin[0,1]e^xint_0^1x^n~mathrm dx\
&=fracen+1to0.
endalign*
Since $I_n>0$, the limit is $0$ by squeeze theorem.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, I never remember the squeeze theorem
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not as slick as Tianlalu's method, but for $yin (0,,1)$ we have
$$
lim_ntoinftyint_0^y x^n e^x dx le
lim_ntoinftyy^nint_0^y e^x dx=0.
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't know what you are 'allowed' to use but you could use the lagrange remainer for the exponential function:
$$exp(-1)=sum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!+frace^xi(n+1)!(-1)^n+1$$
for some $-1<xi<0$. If you estimate $e^xi $ and replace the sum you get convergence to $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999327%2fhow-to-compute-1n1n1-e-sum-k-0n-frac-1kk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
When $xin [0,1]$, $e^xle e$, by first mean value theorem for definite integrals,
beginalign*
I_n&lemax_xin[0,1]e^xint_0^1x^n~mathrm dx\
&=fracen+1to0.
endalign*
Since $I_n>0$, the limit is $0$ by squeeze theorem.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, I never remember the squeeze theorem
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When $xin [0,1]$, $e^xle e$, by first mean value theorem for definite integrals,
beginalign*
I_n&lemax_xin[0,1]e^xint_0^1x^n~mathrm dx\
&=fracen+1to0.
endalign*
Since $I_n>0$, the limit is $0$ by squeeze theorem.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thanks, I never remember the squeeze theorem
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
When $xin [0,1]$, $e^xle e$, by first mean value theorem for definite integrals,
beginalign*
I_n&lemax_xin[0,1]e^xint_0^1x^n~mathrm dx\
&=fracen+1to0.
endalign*
Since $I_n>0$, the limit is $0$ by squeeze theorem.
$endgroup$
When $xin [0,1]$, $e^xle e$, by first mean value theorem for definite integrals,
beginalign*
I_n&lemax_xin[0,1]e^xint_0^1x^n~mathrm dx\
&=fracen+1to0.
endalign*
Since $I_n>0$, the limit is $0$ by squeeze theorem.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 7:05
TianlaluTianlalu
3,08421138
3,08421138
$begingroup$
Thanks, I never remember the squeeze theorem
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thanks, I never remember the squeeze theorem
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:08
$begingroup$
Thanks, I never remember the squeeze theorem
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:08
$begingroup$
Thanks, I never remember the squeeze theorem
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:08
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not as slick as Tianlalu's method, but for $yin (0,,1)$ we have
$$
lim_ntoinftyint_0^y x^n e^x dx le
lim_ntoinftyy^nint_0^y e^x dx=0.
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not as slick as Tianlalu's method, but for $yin (0,,1)$ we have
$$
lim_ntoinftyint_0^y x^n e^x dx le
lim_ntoinftyy^nint_0^y e^x dx=0.
$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not as slick as Tianlalu's method, but for $yin (0,,1)$ we have
$$
lim_ntoinftyint_0^y x^n e^x dx le
lim_ntoinftyy^nint_0^y e^x dx=0.
$$
$endgroup$
Not as slick as Tianlalu's method, but for $yin (0,,1)$ we have
$$
lim_ntoinftyint_0^y x^n e^x dx le
lim_ntoinftyy^nint_0^y e^x dx=0.
$$
edited Nov 15 '18 at 7:31
Tianlalu
3,08421138
3,08421138
answered Nov 15 '18 at 7:28
J.G.J.G.
29.6k22946
29.6k22946
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't know what you are 'allowed' to use but you could use the lagrange remainer for the exponential function:
$$exp(-1)=sum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!+frace^xi(n+1)!(-1)^n+1$$
for some $-1<xi<0$. If you estimate $e^xi $ and replace the sum you get convergence to $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't know what you are 'allowed' to use but you could use the lagrange remainer for the exponential function:
$$exp(-1)=sum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!+frace^xi(n+1)!(-1)^n+1$$
for some $-1<xi<0$. If you estimate $e^xi $ and replace the sum you get convergence to $0$.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I don't know what you are 'allowed' to use but you could use the lagrange remainer for the exponential function:
$$exp(-1)=sum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!+frace^xi(n+1)!(-1)^n+1$$
for some $-1<xi<0$. If you estimate $e^xi $ and replace the sum you get convergence to $0$.
$endgroup$
I don't know what you are 'allowed' to use but you could use the lagrange remainer for the exponential function:
$$exp(-1)=sum_k=0^nfrac(-1)^kk!+frace^xi(n+1)!(-1)^n+1$$
for some $-1<xi<0$. If you estimate $e^xi $ and replace the sum you get convergence to $0$.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 7:13
maxmilgrammaxmilgram
7607
7607
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999327%2fhow-to-compute-1n1n1-e-sum-k-0n-frac-1kk%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
$begingroup$
$n!=Gamma(n+1)$ is differentiable.
$endgroup$
– J.G.
Nov 15 '18 at 7:01
1
$begingroup$
perhaps some properties of the gamma function/complex analysis would be useful
$endgroup$
– rubikscube09
Nov 15 '18 at 7:04
$begingroup$
I'm not very familiar with the gamma function, is there any other way? And if not, how could I use the gamma function to do this? Also, would it be sufficient to show that the integrand approaches $0$ on the interval?
$endgroup$
– JacksonFitzsimmons
Nov 15 '18 at 7:06