Why isn't letbfrelax working for bibliography?
documentclassarticle
usepackageharvard
bibliographystyleagsm
usepackagefilecontents
begindocument
beginfilecontents*mybib.bib
@articleroth2007,
title=Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,
author=Roth, Alvin E,
journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives,
volume=21,
number=3,
pages=37--58,
year=2007
endfilecontents*
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletemrelaxoldthebibliography
nocite*
%setcitestylenumbers
bibliographymybib
enddocument
As I understand, the line renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
should remove any bold numbering in the bibliography. But if you compile it, you'll see that the bold numbering is still there.
What's going wrong?
bibliographies harvard-style
add a comment |
documentclassarticle
usepackageharvard
bibliographystyleagsm
usepackagefilecontents
begindocument
beginfilecontents*mybib.bib
@articleroth2007,
title=Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,
author=Roth, Alvin E,
journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives,
volume=21,
number=3,
pages=37--58,
year=2007
endfilecontents*
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletemrelaxoldthebibliography
nocite*
%setcitestylenumbers
bibliographymybib
enddocument
As I understand, the line renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
should remove any bold numbering in the bibliography. But if you compile it, you'll see that the bold numbering is still there.
What's going wrong?
bibliographies harvard-style
add a comment |
documentclassarticle
usepackageharvard
bibliographystyleagsm
usepackagefilecontents
begindocument
beginfilecontents*mybib.bib
@articleroth2007,
title=Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,
author=Roth, Alvin E,
journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives,
volume=21,
number=3,
pages=37--58,
year=2007
endfilecontents*
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletemrelaxoldthebibliography
nocite*
%setcitestylenumbers
bibliographymybib
enddocument
As I understand, the line renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
should remove any bold numbering in the bibliography. But if you compile it, you'll see that the bold numbering is still there.
What's going wrong?
bibliographies harvard-style
documentclassarticle
usepackageharvard
bibliographystyleagsm
usepackagefilecontents
begindocument
beginfilecontents*mybib.bib
@articleroth2007,
title=Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,
author=Roth, Alvin E,
journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives,
volume=21,
number=3,
pages=37--58,
year=2007
endfilecontents*
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletemrelaxoldthebibliography
nocite*
%setcitestylenumbers
bibliographymybib
enddocument
As I understand, the line renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
should remove any bold numbering in the bibliography. But if you compile it, you'll see that the bold numbering is still there.
What's going wrong?
bibliographies harvard-style
bibliographies harvard-style
asked Nov 12 at 1:16
Thevesh Theva
513114
513114
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Your patching of thebibliography
is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliographyletemrelaxoldthebibliography
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography
is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf
and em
.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclassarticle
usepackageharvard
bibliographystyleagsm
usepackagefilecontents
begindocument
beginfilecontents*mybib.bib
@articleroth2007,
title=Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,
author=Roth, Alvin E,
journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives,
volume=21,
number=3,
pages=37--58,
year=2007
endfilecontents*
nocite*
%setcitestylenumbers
begingroup
renewcommandbf
renewcommandem
bibliographymybib
endgroup
enddocument
add a comment |
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommandoldthebibliography
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old
into OLD
or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch
and do
usepackagexpatch % in the package loading part
pretocmdthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelax
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459539%2fwhy-isnt-let-bf-relax-working-for-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your patching of thebibliography
is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliographyletemrelaxoldthebibliography
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography
is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf
and em
.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclassarticle
usepackageharvard
bibliographystyleagsm
usepackagefilecontents
begindocument
beginfilecontents*mybib.bib
@articleroth2007,
title=Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,
author=Roth, Alvin E,
journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives,
volume=21,
number=3,
pages=37--58,
year=2007
endfilecontents*
nocite*
%setcitestylenumbers
begingroup
renewcommandbf
renewcommandem
bibliographymybib
endgroup
enddocument
add a comment |
Your patching of thebibliography
is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliographyletemrelaxoldthebibliography
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography
is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf
and em
.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclassarticle
usepackageharvard
bibliographystyleagsm
usepackagefilecontents
begindocument
beginfilecontents*mybib.bib
@articleroth2007,
title=Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,
author=Roth, Alvin E,
journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives,
volume=21,
number=3,
pages=37--58,
year=2007
endfilecontents*
nocite*
%setcitestylenumbers
begingroup
renewcommandbf
renewcommandem
bibliographymybib
endgroup
enddocument
add a comment |
Your patching of thebibliography
is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliographyletemrelaxoldthebibliography
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography
is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf
and em
.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclassarticle
usepackageharvard
bibliographystyleagsm
usepackagefilecontents
begindocument
beginfilecontents*mybib.bib
@articleroth2007,
title=Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,
author=Roth, Alvin E,
journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives,
volume=21,
number=3,
pages=37--58,
year=2007
endfilecontents*
nocite*
%setcitestylenumbers
begingroup
renewcommandbf
renewcommandem
bibliographymybib
endgroup
enddocument
Your patching of thebibliography
is wrong. First you patch
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxoldthebibliography
but then in the next line you do
renewcommandthebibliographyletemrelaxoldthebibliography
which means that the previous redefinition of thebibliography
is going to be forgotten. Better just locally redefine bf
and em
.
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: bibtex
% arara: pdflatex
% arara: pdflatex
documentclassarticle
usepackageharvard
bibliographystyleagsm
usepackagefilecontents
begindocument
beginfilecontents*mybib.bib
@articleroth2007,
title=Repugnance as a Constraint on Markets,
author=Roth, Alvin E,
journal=Journal of Economic Perspectives,
volume=21,
number=3,
pages=37--58,
year=2007
endfilecontents*
nocite*
%setcitestylenumbers
begingroup
renewcommandbf
renewcommandem
bibliographymybib
endgroup
enddocument
answered Nov 12 at 1:34
Henri Menke
69.7k8155258
69.7k8155258
add a comment |
add a comment |
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommandoldthebibliography
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old
into OLD
or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch
and do
usepackagexpatch % in the package loading part
pretocmdthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelax
add a comment |
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommandoldthebibliography
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old
into OLD
or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch
and do
usepackagexpatch % in the package loading part
pretocmdthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelax
add a comment |
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommandoldthebibliography
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old
into OLD
or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch
and do
usepackagexpatch % in the package loading part
pretocmdthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelax
Just do both redefinitions together
newcommandoldthebibliography
letoldthebibliographythebibliography
renewcommandthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelaxoldthebibliography
I recommend the seemingly useless top line: if some package you load does a similar trick, you'd be informed. Changing old
into OLD
or whatever will solve the problem.
It becomes less clumsy if you load xpatch
and do
usepackagexpatch % in the package loading part
pretocmdthebibliographyletbfrelaxletemrelax
edited Nov 12 at 8:54
answered Nov 12 at 8:31
egreg
707k8618793160
707k8618793160
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f459539%2fwhy-isnt-let-bf-relax-working-for-bibliography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown