Lookup same keys in multiple hiera files in puppet using lookup command










1














I am trying to read a key present in multiple hiera files and merge the values.
My hiera file contains:



hierarchy:
 - name: "Per-env secrets"
 paths:
 - "puppet/hiera/dict-1.yaml"
 - "puppet/hiera/dict-2.yaml"


and My puppet script contains:



lookup(dictionaries,Hash).each |String $keyDico, Hash $valueDico| {
 notify"The value of dictionary is: $keyDico":


The key 'dictionaries' is present in both dict-1.yaml and dict-2.yaml. However, It always reads and prints the Key from the first matched hiera file.

I tried changing 'Hash' in lookup function's argument to 'Unique' or 'Deep'. But it didn't work.


Getting error:
Error: Evaluation Error: Resource type not found: Deep and Error: Evaluation Error: Resource type not found: Unique


Is there any way to achieve this?



Thanks in advance.






puppet hiera







share|improve this question




























    1














    I am trying to read a key present in multiple hiera files and merge the values.
    My hiera file contains:



    hierarchy:
     - name: "Per-env secrets"
     paths:
     - "puppet/hiera/dict-1.yaml"
     - "puppet/hiera/dict-2.yaml"


    and My puppet script contains:



    lookup(dictionaries,Hash).each |String $keyDico, Hash $valueDico| {
     notify"The value of dictionary is: $keyDico":


    The key 'dictionaries' is present in both dict-1.yaml and dict-2.yaml. However, It always reads and prints the Key from the first matched hiera file.

    I tried changing 'Hash' in lookup function's argument to 'Unique' or 'Deep'. But it didn't work.


    Getting error:
    Error: Evaluation Error: Resource type not found: Deep and Error: Evaluation Error: Resource type not found: Unique


    Is there any way to achieve this?



    Thanks in advance.






    puppet hiera







    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1







      I am trying to read a key present in multiple hiera files and merge the values.
      My hiera file contains:



      hierarchy:
       - name: "Per-env secrets"
       paths:
       - "puppet/hiera/dict-1.yaml"
       - "puppet/hiera/dict-2.yaml"


      and My puppet script contains:



      lookup(dictionaries,Hash).each |String $keyDico, Hash $valueDico| {
       notify"The value of dictionary is: $keyDico":


      The key 'dictionaries' is present in both dict-1.yaml and dict-2.yaml. However, It always reads and prints the Key from the first matched hiera file.

      I tried changing 'Hash' in lookup function's argument to 'Unique' or 'Deep'. But it didn't work.


      Getting error:
      Error: Evaluation Error: Resource type not found: Deep and Error: Evaluation Error: Resource type not found: Unique


      Is there any way to achieve this?



      Thanks in advance.






      puppet hiera







      share|improve this question















      I am trying to read a key present in multiple hiera files and merge the values.
      My hiera file contains:



      hierarchy:
       - name: "Per-env secrets"
       paths:
       - "puppet/hiera/dict-1.yaml"
       - "puppet/hiera/dict-2.yaml"


      and My puppet script contains:



      lookup(dictionaries,Hash).each |String $keyDico, Hash $valueDico| {
       notify"The value of dictionary is: $keyDico":


      The key 'dictionaries' is present in both dict-1.yaml and dict-2.yaml. However, It always reads and prints the Key from the first matched hiera file.

      I tried changing 'Hash' in lookup function's argument to 'Unique' or 'Deep'. But it didn't work.


      Getting error:
      Error: Evaluation Error: Resource type not found: Deep and Error: Evaluation Error: Resource type not found: Unique


      Is there any way to achieve this?



      Thanks in advance.






      puppet hiera




      puppet hiera






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 12 at 10:31

























      asked Nov 12 at 10:07









      Praveen

      5911618




      5911618






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          If you look at the docs for specifying merge behaviours (ref), you can see that you need to specify the optional third argument to lookup, and you are getting that error because "unique" is being interpreted as the data type.



          Try either:



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'unique')


          or



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'strategy' => 'unique')


          according to whichever you find more readable.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 1




            Thank you Alex!!
            – Praveen
            Nov 13 at 10:32










          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          );
          );
          , "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53259878%2flookup-same-keys-in-multiple-hiera-files-in-puppet-using-lookup-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3














          If you look at the docs for specifying merge behaviours (ref), you can see that you need to specify the optional third argument to lookup, and you are getting that error because "unique" is being interpreted as the data type.



          Try either:



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'unique')


          or



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'strategy' => 'unique')


          according to whichever you find more readable.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 1




            Thank you Alex!!
            – Praveen
            Nov 13 at 10:32















          3














          If you look at the docs for specifying merge behaviours (ref), you can see that you need to specify the optional third argument to lookup, and you are getting that error because "unique" is being interpreted as the data type.



          Try either:



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'unique')


          or



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'strategy' => 'unique')


          according to whichever you find more readable.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 1




            Thank you Alex!!
            – Praveen
            Nov 13 at 10:32













          3












          3








          3






          If you look at the docs for specifying merge behaviours (ref), you can see that you need to specify the optional third argument to lookup, and you are getting that error because "unique" is being interpreted as the data type.



          Try either:



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'unique')


          or



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'strategy' => 'unique')


          according to whichever you find more readable.






          share|improve this answer












          If you look at the docs for specifying merge behaviours (ref), you can see that you need to specify the optional third argument to lookup, and you are getting that error because "unique" is being interpreted as the data type.



          Try either:



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'unique')


          or



          lookup(dictionaries, Hash, 'strategy' => 'unique')


          according to whichever you find more readable.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 12 at 10:47









          Alex Harvey

          3,7101823




          3,7101823







          • 1




            Thank you Alex!!
            – Praveen
            Nov 13 at 10:32












          • 1




            Thank you Alex!!
            – Praveen
            Nov 13 at 10:32







          1




          1




          Thank you Alex!!
          – Praveen
          Nov 13 at 10:32




          Thank you Alex!!
          – Praveen
          Nov 13 at 10:32

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53259878%2flookup-same-keys-in-multiple-hiera-files-in-puppet-using-lookup-command%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          這個網誌中的熱門文章

          How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

          圖片
          6 I added .AddJsonFile("Connections.json", optional: true, reloadOnChange: true) in public Startup(IHostingEnvironment env) Connections.json contains: "ConnectionStrings": "DefaultConnection": "Server=(localdb)\mssqllocaldb;Database=DATABASE;Trusted_Connection=True;MultipleActiveResultSets=true", "COR-W81-101": "Data Source=DATASOURCE;Initial Catalog=P61_CAFM_Basic;User Id=USERID;Password=PASSWORD;Persist Security Info=False;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Packet Size=4096;", "COR-W81-100": "Data Source=DATASOURCE;Initial Catalog=Post_PS;User Id=USERID;Password=PASSWORD;Persist Security Info=False;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Packet Size=4096;", "MSEDGEWIN10": "Data Source=DATASOURCE; Initial Catalog=COR_Basic; Persist Security Info=False;Integrated Security=true;MultipleActiveResultSets=False;Packet Size=4096;Application Name="COR_Basic"", "server...
          閱讀完整內容

          Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3

          圖片
          0 I'm wondering if I can run a Node.js script in my Jekyll page from GitHub Pages or Amazon S3? I think it can't run on GitHub Pages since it doesn't support server side code. Not too sure. The code is below: var Airtable = require('airtable'); var base = new Airtable(apiKey: 'YOUR_API_KEY').base('appAnZVyYqusNPV5Q'); base('Invitee list').select( // Selecting the first 3 records in Complete list: maxRecords: 3, view: "Complete list" ).eachPage(function page(records, fetchNextPage) // This function (`page`) will get called for each page of records. records.forEach(function(record) console.log('Retrieved', record.get('Email')); ); // To fetch the next page of records, call `fetchNextPage`. // If there are more records, `page` will get called again. // If there are no more records, `done` will get called. fetchNextPage(); , function done(err) if (err) console.error(err); return; ); node.js ...
          閱讀完整內容

          Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto

          圖片
          Art museum in Rovereto TN, Italy Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto Museo d'arte moderna e contemporanea di Trento e Rovereto MART, Entrance Location Corso Angelo Bettini, 43, 38068 Rovereto TN, Italy Coordinates 45°53′38″N 11°02′42″E  /  45.8940°N 11.0450°E  / 45.8940; 11.0450 Coordinates: 45°53′38″N 11°02′42″E  /  45.8940°N 11.0450°E  / 45.8940; 11.0450 Type Art museum Director Gianfranco Maraniello Public transit access Trento train station. Taxis outside station. Website mart.trento.it The Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto (MART) ( Museo d'Arte Moderna e Contemporanea di Trento e Rovereto , in Italian) is a museum centre in the Italian province of Trento. The main site is in Rovereto, and contains mostly modern and contemporary artworks, including works from renowned Giorgio Morandi, Giorgio de...
          閱讀完整內容