Creating public methods in class and not in interface










0














I've come across an issue whether it is a good idea to create public methods/properties inside a class



public class MyClass : IMyClass


but not in the interface



public interface IMyClass


mainly for the purpose of unit testing implemented methods from IMyClass inside MyClass. I want to have access from my unit tests to implementation details inside class MyClass to check if some fields meet the expectations. Additionaly, I don't want to expose these details through my interface.



On the other hand, I have a feeling that everything public inside MyClass should be exposed in the interface IMyClass, since this is the case of access modifiers:
public to expose information, private to hide details.



So, my the question is: Is it good to create public methods/properties inside a class MyClass, but not in the interface IMyClass?










share|improve this question


























    0














    I've come across an issue whether it is a good idea to create public methods/properties inside a class



    public class MyClass : IMyClass


    but not in the interface



    public interface IMyClass


    mainly for the purpose of unit testing implemented methods from IMyClass inside MyClass. I want to have access from my unit tests to implementation details inside class MyClass to check if some fields meet the expectations. Additionaly, I don't want to expose these details through my interface.



    On the other hand, I have a feeling that everything public inside MyClass should be exposed in the interface IMyClass, since this is the case of access modifiers:
    public to expose information, private to hide details.



    So, my the question is: Is it good to create public methods/properties inside a class MyClass, but not in the interface IMyClass?










    share|improve this question
























      0












      0








      0







      I've come across an issue whether it is a good idea to create public methods/properties inside a class



      public class MyClass : IMyClass


      but not in the interface



      public interface IMyClass


      mainly for the purpose of unit testing implemented methods from IMyClass inside MyClass. I want to have access from my unit tests to implementation details inside class MyClass to check if some fields meet the expectations. Additionaly, I don't want to expose these details through my interface.



      On the other hand, I have a feeling that everything public inside MyClass should be exposed in the interface IMyClass, since this is the case of access modifiers:
      public to expose information, private to hide details.



      So, my the question is: Is it good to create public methods/properties inside a class MyClass, but not in the interface IMyClass?










      share|improve this question













      I've come across an issue whether it is a good idea to create public methods/properties inside a class



      public class MyClass : IMyClass


      but not in the interface



      public interface IMyClass


      mainly for the purpose of unit testing implemented methods from IMyClass inside MyClass. I want to have access from my unit tests to implementation details inside class MyClass to check if some fields meet the expectations. Additionaly, I don't want to expose these details through my interface.



      On the other hand, I have a feeling that everything public inside MyClass should be exposed in the interface IMyClass, since this is the case of access modifiers:
      public to expose information, private to hide details.



      So, my the question is: Is it good to create public methods/properties inside a class MyClass, but not in the interface IMyClass?







      unit-testing oop language-agnostic access-modifiers






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 12 at 11:13









      Donios

      375




      375






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          A test is supposed to be a client of your code, using your code through its interface.



          Writing a test that knows how your code works couples your test to your code, which makes a brittle test - every change to the code will break the test.



          Instead, try to exercise your code using only the API. Since it sounds like your class has state in it, your test code will need to query that state in another API call.



          If your API doesn't have a querying mechanism, perhaps the test is trying to tell you that such a feature is missing from your code.






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53260961%2fcreating-public-methods-in-class-and-not-in-interface%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1














            A test is supposed to be a client of your code, using your code through its interface.



            Writing a test that knows how your code works couples your test to your code, which makes a brittle test - every change to the code will break the test.



            Instead, try to exercise your code using only the API. Since it sounds like your class has state in it, your test code will need to query that state in another API call.



            If your API doesn't have a querying mechanism, perhaps the test is trying to tell you that such a feature is missing from your code.






            share|improve this answer

























              1














              A test is supposed to be a client of your code, using your code through its interface.



              Writing a test that knows how your code works couples your test to your code, which makes a brittle test - every change to the code will break the test.



              Instead, try to exercise your code using only the API. Since it sounds like your class has state in it, your test code will need to query that state in another API call.



              If your API doesn't have a querying mechanism, perhaps the test is trying to tell you that such a feature is missing from your code.






              share|improve this answer























                1












                1








                1






                A test is supposed to be a client of your code, using your code through its interface.



                Writing a test that knows how your code works couples your test to your code, which makes a brittle test - every change to the code will break the test.



                Instead, try to exercise your code using only the API. Since it sounds like your class has state in it, your test code will need to query that state in another API call.



                If your API doesn't have a querying mechanism, perhaps the test is trying to tell you that such a feature is missing from your code.






                share|improve this answer












                A test is supposed to be a client of your code, using your code through its interface.



                Writing a test that knows how your code works couples your test to your code, which makes a brittle test - every change to the code will break the test.



                Instead, try to exercise your code using only the API. Since it sounds like your class has state in it, your test code will need to query that state in another API call.



                If your API doesn't have a querying mechanism, perhaps the test is trying to tell you that such a feature is missing from your code.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 12 at 12:44









                Kraylog

                4,54311323




                4,54311323



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53260961%2fcreating-public-methods-in-class-and-not-in-interface%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

                    Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3

                    Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto