BLE not reading properly?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm creating a scanning app for BLE sensors. I'm curious to know if its just me or if anyone is experiencing my problem.
I'm trying to scan roughly 1,000 ble sensors passing by my gateway. However I'm getting a good amount of missed reads. Is it just me or is anyone experiencing this, where not all BLE sensors are read? Could it just be purely a volume thing or something I haven't considered?
Thanks
bluetooth-lowenergy
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm creating a scanning app for BLE sensors. I'm curious to know if its just me or if anyone is experiencing my problem.
I'm trying to scan roughly 1,000 ble sensors passing by my gateway. However I'm getting a good amount of missed reads. Is it just me or is anyone experiencing this, where not all BLE sensors are read? Could it just be purely a volume thing or something I haven't considered?
Thanks
bluetooth-lowenergy
I forgot to mention, the 1000 take around 2-5 minutes to pass by the gateway.
– aroo
Nov 11 at 6:30
Please share your code. Please edit the question to show what you've tried, so as to illustrate a specific problem you're having in a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example <stackoverflow.com/help/mcve>. For more information, please see How to Ask<stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask> and take the tour<stackoverflow.com/tour>.
– quant
Nov 11 at 6:35
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I'm creating a scanning app for BLE sensors. I'm curious to know if its just me or if anyone is experiencing my problem.
I'm trying to scan roughly 1,000 ble sensors passing by my gateway. However I'm getting a good amount of missed reads. Is it just me or is anyone experiencing this, where not all BLE sensors are read? Could it just be purely a volume thing or something I haven't considered?
Thanks
bluetooth-lowenergy
I'm creating a scanning app for BLE sensors. I'm curious to know if its just me or if anyone is experiencing my problem.
I'm trying to scan roughly 1,000 ble sensors passing by my gateway. However I'm getting a good amount of missed reads. Is it just me or is anyone experiencing this, where not all BLE sensors are read? Could it just be purely a volume thing or something I haven't considered?
Thanks
bluetooth-lowenergy
bluetooth-lowenergy
asked Nov 11 at 6:29
aroo
1
1
I forgot to mention, the 1000 take around 2-5 minutes to pass by the gateway.
– aroo
Nov 11 at 6:30
Please share your code. Please edit the question to show what you've tried, so as to illustrate a specific problem you're having in a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example <stackoverflow.com/help/mcve>. For more information, please see How to Ask<stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask> and take the tour<stackoverflow.com/tour>.
– quant
Nov 11 at 6:35
add a comment |
I forgot to mention, the 1000 take around 2-5 minutes to pass by the gateway.
– aroo
Nov 11 at 6:30
Please share your code. Please edit the question to show what you've tried, so as to illustrate a specific problem you're having in a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example <stackoverflow.com/help/mcve>. For more information, please see How to Ask<stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask> and take the tour<stackoverflow.com/tour>.
– quant
Nov 11 at 6:35
I forgot to mention, the 1000 take around 2-5 minutes to pass by the gateway.
– aroo
Nov 11 at 6:30
I forgot to mention, the 1000 take around 2-5 minutes to pass by the gateway.
– aroo
Nov 11 at 6:30
Please share your code. Please edit the question to show what you've tried, so as to illustrate a specific problem you're having in a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example <stackoverflow.com/help/mcve>. For more information, please see How to Ask<stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask> and take the tour<stackoverflow.com/tour>.
– quant
Nov 11 at 6:35
Please share your code. Please edit the question to show what you've tried, so as to illustrate a specific problem you're having in a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example <stackoverflow.com/help/mcve>. For more information, please see How to Ask<stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask> and take the tour<stackoverflow.com/tour>.
– quant
Nov 11 at 6:35
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
This is purely a question of statistics. Your scanner has a certain scan interval during which it cycles through the three advertisement channels (37, 38, 39), and each sensor has an advertisement interval, during which it does the same. So there is always a probability that the scanner is currently on another channel than the advertisement being sent, in which case it will be missed.
What that probability is exactly depends on the interval settings of the scanner and the sensor, and also on how long each sensor will be within reception range.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
This is purely a question of statistics. Your scanner has a certain scan interval during which it cycles through the three advertisement channels (37, 38, 39), and each sensor has an advertisement interval, during which it does the same. So there is always a probability that the scanner is currently on another channel than the advertisement being sent, in which case it will be missed.
What that probability is exactly depends on the interval settings of the scanner and the sensor, and also on how long each sensor will be within reception range.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
This is purely a question of statistics. Your scanner has a certain scan interval during which it cycles through the three advertisement channels (37, 38, 39), and each sensor has an advertisement interval, during which it does the same. So there is always a probability that the scanner is currently on another channel than the advertisement being sent, in which case it will be missed.
What that probability is exactly depends on the interval settings of the scanner and the sensor, and also on how long each sensor will be within reception range.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
This is purely a question of statistics. Your scanner has a certain scan interval during which it cycles through the three advertisement channels (37, 38, 39), and each sensor has an advertisement interval, during which it does the same. So there is always a probability that the scanner is currently on another channel than the advertisement being sent, in which case it will be missed.
What that probability is exactly depends on the interval settings of the scanner and the sensor, and also on how long each sensor will be within reception range.
This is purely a question of statistics. Your scanner has a certain scan interval during which it cycles through the three advertisement channels (37, 38, 39), and each sensor has an advertisement interval, during which it does the same. So there is always a probability that the scanner is currently on another channel than the advertisement being sent, in which case it will be missed.
What that probability is exactly depends on the interval settings of the scanner and the sensor, and also on how long each sensor will be within reception range.
answered Nov 11 at 8:04
Florian Echtler
446314
446314
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53246395%2fble-not-reading-properly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I forgot to mention, the 1000 take around 2-5 minutes to pass by the gateway.
– aroo
Nov 11 at 6:30
Please share your code. Please edit the question to show what you've tried, so as to illustrate a specific problem you're having in a Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable example <stackoverflow.com/help/mcve>. For more information, please see How to Ask<stackoverflow.com/help/how-to-ask> and take the tour<stackoverflow.com/tour>.
– quant
Nov 11 at 6:35