Why does valgrind report a memory leak when calling `pcap_open_offline`?
I am trying to figure out if I'm having an idiot moment or if there really is a memory leak in libpcap. I'm running Ubuntu 17.10 and libpcap 1.8.1-5ubuntu1. It seems unlikely that such a mature library would have a leak.
I've cut out everything to make a MVCE, so as a consequence, this code doesn't really do much of anything except demonstrate the leak:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pcap.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
char errbuf[PCAP_ERRBUF_SIZE];
pcap_t *fd = pcap_open_offline(argv[1], errbuf);
if (!fd)
printf("error: %sn", errbuf);
free(fd); fd = 0;
return 0;
The valgrind report (emphasis added):
==6871==
==6871== HEAP SUMMARY:
==6871== in use at exit: 262,696 bytes in 2 blocks
==6871== total heap usage: 4 allocs, 2 frees, 267,432 bytes allocated
==6871==
==6871== Searching for pointers to 2 not-freed blocks
==6871== Checked 73,072 bytes
==6871==
==6871== 262,144 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 2
==6871== at 0x4C2FB0F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6871== by 0x4E5B89F: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x4E5AE5C: pcap_fopen_offline_with_tstamp_precision (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x4E5B05D: pcap_open_offline_with_tstamp_precision (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x1087A0: main (test.c:9)
==6871==
==6871== LEAK SUMMARY:
==6871== definitely lost: 262,144 bytes in 1 blocks
==6871== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== still reachable: 552 bytes in 1 blocks
==6871== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==6871== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==6871==
==6871== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
==6871== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
c linux memory-leaks valgrind libpcap
add a comment |
I am trying to figure out if I'm having an idiot moment or if there really is a memory leak in libpcap. I'm running Ubuntu 17.10 and libpcap 1.8.1-5ubuntu1. It seems unlikely that such a mature library would have a leak.
I've cut out everything to make a MVCE, so as a consequence, this code doesn't really do much of anything except demonstrate the leak:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pcap.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
char errbuf[PCAP_ERRBUF_SIZE];
pcap_t *fd = pcap_open_offline(argv[1], errbuf);
if (!fd)
printf("error: %sn", errbuf);
free(fd); fd = 0;
return 0;
The valgrind report (emphasis added):
==6871==
==6871== HEAP SUMMARY:
==6871== in use at exit: 262,696 bytes in 2 blocks
==6871== total heap usage: 4 allocs, 2 frees, 267,432 bytes allocated
==6871==
==6871== Searching for pointers to 2 not-freed blocks
==6871== Checked 73,072 bytes
==6871==
==6871== 262,144 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 2
==6871== at 0x4C2FB0F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6871== by 0x4E5B89F: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x4E5AE5C: pcap_fopen_offline_with_tstamp_precision (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x4E5B05D: pcap_open_offline_with_tstamp_precision (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x1087A0: main (test.c:9)
==6871==
==6871== LEAK SUMMARY:
==6871== definitely lost: 262,144 bytes in 1 blocks
==6871== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== still reachable: 552 bytes in 1 blocks
==6871== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==6871== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==6871==
==6871== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
==6871== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
c linux memory-leaks valgrind libpcap
add a comment |
I am trying to figure out if I'm having an idiot moment or if there really is a memory leak in libpcap. I'm running Ubuntu 17.10 and libpcap 1.8.1-5ubuntu1. It seems unlikely that such a mature library would have a leak.
I've cut out everything to make a MVCE, so as a consequence, this code doesn't really do much of anything except demonstrate the leak:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pcap.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
char errbuf[PCAP_ERRBUF_SIZE];
pcap_t *fd = pcap_open_offline(argv[1], errbuf);
if (!fd)
printf("error: %sn", errbuf);
free(fd); fd = 0;
return 0;
The valgrind report (emphasis added):
==6871==
==6871== HEAP SUMMARY:
==6871== in use at exit: 262,696 bytes in 2 blocks
==6871== total heap usage: 4 allocs, 2 frees, 267,432 bytes allocated
==6871==
==6871== Searching for pointers to 2 not-freed blocks
==6871== Checked 73,072 bytes
==6871==
==6871== 262,144 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 2
==6871== at 0x4C2FB0F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6871== by 0x4E5B89F: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x4E5AE5C: pcap_fopen_offline_with_tstamp_precision (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x4E5B05D: pcap_open_offline_with_tstamp_precision (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x1087A0: main (test.c:9)
==6871==
==6871== LEAK SUMMARY:
==6871== definitely lost: 262,144 bytes in 1 blocks
==6871== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== still reachable: 552 bytes in 1 blocks
==6871== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==6871== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==6871==
==6871== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
==6871== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
c linux memory-leaks valgrind libpcap
I am trying to figure out if I'm having an idiot moment or if there really is a memory leak in libpcap. I'm running Ubuntu 17.10 and libpcap 1.8.1-5ubuntu1. It seems unlikely that such a mature library would have a leak.
I've cut out everything to make a MVCE, so as a consequence, this code doesn't really do much of anything except demonstrate the leak:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <pcap.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
char errbuf[PCAP_ERRBUF_SIZE];
pcap_t *fd = pcap_open_offline(argv[1], errbuf);
if (!fd)
printf("error: %sn", errbuf);
free(fd); fd = 0;
return 0;
The valgrind report (emphasis added):
==6871==
==6871== HEAP SUMMARY:
==6871== in use at exit: 262,696 bytes in 2 blocks
==6871== total heap usage: 4 allocs, 2 frees, 267,432 bytes allocated
==6871==
==6871== Searching for pointers to 2 not-freed blocks
==6871== Checked 73,072 bytes
==6871==
==6871== 262,144 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 2
==6871== at 0x4C2FB0F: malloc (in /usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
==6871== by 0x4E5B89F: ??? (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x4E5AE5C: pcap_fopen_offline_with_tstamp_precision (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x4E5B05D: pcap_open_offline_with_tstamp_precision (in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcap.so.1.8.1)
==6871== by 0x1087A0: main (test.c:9)
==6871==
==6871== LEAK SUMMARY:
==6871== definitely lost: 262,144 bytes in 1 blocks
==6871== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== still reachable: 552 bytes in 1 blocks
==6871== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==6871== Reachable blocks (those to which a pointer was found) are not shown.
==6871== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full --show-leak-kinds=all
==6871==
==6871== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
==6871== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
c linux memory-leaks valgrind libpcap
c linux memory-leaks valgrind libpcap
asked Nov 15 '18 at 4:41
Greg SchmitGreg Schmit
2,21121227
2,21121227
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
From the libpcap manpage,
edited slightly:
pcap_fopen_offline()
return[s] a pointer to apcap_t
, which is the handle used for reading packets… To close a handle, usepcap_close()
.
free(fd)
just frees a single block of memory, since free()
knows nothing about the internals of a pcap_t
. In order to properly dispose of allocated resources, you need to use pcap_close(fd)
instead, as the documentation indicates.
Ah, thanks! I was looking at the man page ofpcap_open_offline()
(tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_open_offline.3pcap.html) and it didn't mention that.
– Greg Schmit
Nov 16 '18 at 0:26
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53312543%2fwhy-does-valgrind-report-a-memory-leak-when-calling-pcap-open-offline%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From the libpcap manpage,
edited slightly:
pcap_fopen_offline()
return[s] a pointer to apcap_t
, which is the handle used for reading packets… To close a handle, usepcap_close()
.
free(fd)
just frees a single block of memory, since free()
knows nothing about the internals of a pcap_t
. In order to properly dispose of allocated resources, you need to use pcap_close(fd)
instead, as the documentation indicates.
Ah, thanks! I was looking at the man page ofpcap_open_offline()
(tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_open_offline.3pcap.html) and it didn't mention that.
– Greg Schmit
Nov 16 '18 at 0:26
add a comment |
From the libpcap manpage,
edited slightly:
pcap_fopen_offline()
return[s] a pointer to apcap_t
, which is the handle used for reading packets… To close a handle, usepcap_close()
.
free(fd)
just frees a single block of memory, since free()
knows nothing about the internals of a pcap_t
. In order to properly dispose of allocated resources, you need to use pcap_close(fd)
instead, as the documentation indicates.
Ah, thanks! I was looking at the man page ofpcap_open_offline()
(tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_open_offline.3pcap.html) and it didn't mention that.
– Greg Schmit
Nov 16 '18 at 0:26
add a comment |
From the libpcap manpage,
edited slightly:
pcap_fopen_offline()
return[s] a pointer to apcap_t
, which is the handle used for reading packets… To close a handle, usepcap_close()
.
free(fd)
just frees a single block of memory, since free()
knows nothing about the internals of a pcap_t
. In order to properly dispose of allocated resources, you need to use pcap_close(fd)
instead, as the documentation indicates.
From the libpcap manpage,
edited slightly:
pcap_fopen_offline()
return[s] a pointer to apcap_t
, which is the handle used for reading packets… To close a handle, usepcap_close()
.
free(fd)
just frees a single block of memory, since free()
knows nothing about the internals of a pcap_t
. In order to properly dispose of allocated resources, you need to use pcap_close(fd)
instead, as the documentation indicates.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 5:31
ricirici
156k20135205
156k20135205
Ah, thanks! I was looking at the man page ofpcap_open_offline()
(tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_open_offline.3pcap.html) and it didn't mention that.
– Greg Schmit
Nov 16 '18 at 0:26
add a comment |
Ah, thanks! I was looking at the man page ofpcap_open_offline()
(tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_open_offline.3pcap.html) and it didn't mention that.
– Greg Schmit
Nov 16 '18 at 0:26
Ah, thanks! I was looking at the man page of
pcap_open_offline()
(tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_open_offline.3pcap.html) and it didn't mention that.– Greg Schmit
Nov 16 '18 at 0:26
Ah, thanks! I was looking at the man page of
pcap_open_offline()
(tcpdump.org/manpages/pcap_open_offline.3pcap.html) and it didn't mention that.– Greg Schmit
Nov 16 '18 at 0:26
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53312543%2fwhy-does-valgrind-report-a-memory-leak-when-calling-pcap-open-offline%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown