referencing an object's key as a variable - js










1















is there a way to reference an object's key as a variable and then change its value? I'm trying this






const obj = 
x:
y:
z: 'test'




const func = () =>
let root = obj['x'];
root = 'test 2';


func();

console.log(obj);





I'm trying to figure this out as I'm writing a recursive function in order to change root to something more like obj['x']['y']










share|improve this question






















  • const key = 'x'; obj[key] = 'test 2';

    – Robby Cornelissen
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:22






  • 1





    Can you illustrate what you want to do? And more importantly show an example of what you want the result to be?

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:22











  • I'm trying to figure out why this isn't working stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… so I simplified a part of that question as a new post

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:23






  • 1





    I'm thinking this question must have been asked before, but in two minutes of searching S.O. I couldn't find a duplicate. Can someone find a dupe? This seems like a super common problem with a relatively simple answer....

    – Ray Toal
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:26






  • 1





    @RayToal There's a canonical duplicate somewhere, but am also coming up blank.

    – Robby Cornelissen
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:27
















1















is there a way to reference an object's key as a variable and then change its value? I'm trying this






const obj = 
x:
y:
z: 'test'




const func = () =>
let root = obj['x'];
root = 'test 2';


func();

console.log(obj);





I'm trying to figure this out as I'm writing a recursive function in order to change root to something more like obj['x']['y']










share|improve this question






















  • const key = 'x'; obj[key] = 'test 2';

    – Robby Cornelissen
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:22






  • 1





    Can you illustrate what you want to do? And more importantly show an example of what you want the result to be?

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:22











  • I'm trying to figure out why this isn't working stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… so I simplified a part of that question as a new post

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:23






  • 1





    I'm thinking this question must have been asked before, but in two minutes of searching S.O. I couldn't find a duplicate. Can someone find a dupe? This seems like a super common problem with a relatively simple answer....

    – Ray Toal
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:26






  • 1





    @RayToal There's a canonical duplicate somewhere, but am also coming up blank.

    – Robby Cornelissen
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:27














1












1








1








is there a way to reference an object's key as a variable and then change its value? I'm trying this






const obj = 
x:
y:
z: 'test'




const func = () =>
let root = obj['x'];
root = 'test 2';


func();

console.log(obj);





I'm trying to figure this out as I'm writing a recursive function in order to change root to something more like obj['x']['y']










share|improve this question














is there a way to reference an object's key as a variable and then change its value? I'm trying this






const obj = 
x:
y:
z: 'test'




const func = () =>
let root = obj['x'];
root = 'test 2';


func();

console.log(obj);





I'm trying to figure this out as I'm writing a recursive function in order to change root to something more like obj['x']['y']






const obj = 
x:
y:
z: 'test'




const func = () =>
let root = obj['x'];
root = 'test 2';


func();

console.log(obj);





const obj = 
x:
y:
z: 'test'




const func = () =>
let root = obj['x'];
root = 'test 2';


func();

console.log(obj);






javascript






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 15 '18 at 6:20









totalnoobtotalnoob

4241933




4241933












  • const key = 'x'; obj[key] = 'test 2';

    – Robby Cornelissen
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:22






  • 1





    Can you illustrate what you want to do? And more importantly show an example of what you want the result to be?

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:22











  • I'm trying to figure out why this isn't working stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… so I simplified a part of that question as a new post

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:23






  • 1





    I'm thinking this question must have been asked before, but in two minutes of searching S.O. I couldn't find a duplicate. Can someone find a dupe? This seems like a super common problem with a relatively simple answer....

    – Ray Toal
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:26






  • 1





    @RayToal There's a canonical duplicate somewhere, but am also coming up blank.

    – Robby Cornelissen
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:27


















  • const key = 'x'; obj[key] = 'test 2';

    – Robby Cornelissen
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:22






  • 1





    Can you illustrate what you want to do? And more importantly show an example of what you want the result to be?

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:22











  • I'm trying to figure out why this isn't working stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… so I simplified a part of that question as a new post

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:23






  • 1





    I'm thinking this question must have been asked before, but in two minutes of searching S.O. I couldn't find a duplicate. Can someone find a dupe? This seems like a super common problem with a relatively simple answer....

    – Ray Toal
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:26






  • 1





    @RayToal There's a canonical duplicate somewhere, but am also coming up blank.

    – Robby Cornelissen
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:27

















const key = 'x'; obj[key] = 'test 2';

– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 6:22





const key = 'x'; obj[key] = 'test 2';

– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 6:22




1




1





Can you illustrate what you want to do? And more importantly show an example of what you want the result to be?

– Code-Apprentice
Nov 15 '18 at 6:22





Can you illustrate what you want to do? And more importantly show an example of what you want the result to be?

– Code-Apprentice
Nov 15 '18 at 6:22













I'm trying to figure out why this isn't working stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… so I simplified a part of that question as a new post

– totalnoob
Nov 15 '18 at 6:23





I'm trying to figure out why this isn't working stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… so I simplified a part of that question as a new post

– totalnoob
Nov 15 '18 at 6:23




1




1





I'm thinking this question must have been asked before, but in two minutes of searching S.O. I couldn't find a duplicate. Can someone find a dupe? This seems like a super common problem with a relatively simple answer....

– Ray Toal
Nov 15 '18 at 6:26





I'm thinking this question must have been asked before, but in two minutes of searching S.O. I couldn't find a duplicate. Can someone find a dupe? This seems like a super common problem with a relatively simple answer....

– Ray Toal
Nov 15 '18 at 6:26




1




1





@RayToal There's a canonical duplicate somewhere, but am also coming up blank.

– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 6:27






@RayToal There's a canonical duplicate somewhere, but am also coming up blank.

– Robby Cornelissen
Nov 15 '18 at 6:27













3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















2














If I understand your question correctly, the answer is probably "not without doing really weird stuff." What I believe you are asking is this. Given:



const obj = 
x:
y:
z: 'test'





you want to store obj.x (equivalently, obj['x']) into a variable, in such a way that assigning to that variable will actually mutate the x field of object obj. Now you cannot do that. Once you make the binding:



let root = obj.x


Then reassigning root will NOT change obj at all: root is a distinct variable from obj. Draw a picture, it will help. However, root is essentially a pointer to obj.x so if you did:



root.y = 'test 2'


than this does mutate obj.x.y.



But, note you cannot assign obj.x to a variable and then use that variable to mutate the x field of obj. You can only mutate fields WITHIN obj.x. JavaScript does not have the ability to alias things (or make lvalues) like C++, for instance.



If you really want to update the x property of obj then you should put ONLY the string x into a variable like this:



root = 'x'


then you can do:



obj[root] = 'a new value for obj.x'


and this will mutate obj.x. But remember, you cannot first evaluate obj.x and then use that result to mutate obj.x. Well, I mean, not without doing some really nasty stuff like this:



root = 'obj.x';
eval(`$root = 'a new value for obj.x';`);


But don't.



By the way, if obj was also a variable, then you could do this:



receiver = obj;
prop = 'x';
Reflect.set(receiver, prop, 'the new value')


Hopefully I guessed what you were trying to do. At any rate, maybe this answer will give some ideas.






share|improve this answer























  • I think this is the best answer and the one I was looking for. I was confused with why stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… didn't work

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 7:22


















0














const func = () => 
let root = obj['x'];
root = 'test 2';



This reassigns the variable root to a new value and does not affect the object. Instead, assign to the object directly:



obj['x'] = 'test 2'





const obj = 
x:
y:
z: 'test'




const func = () =>
obj['x'] = 'test 2';


func();

console.log(obj);





Or you can change the value at a key via the root variable:






const obj = 
x:
y:
z: 'test'




const func = () =>
let root = obj['x'];
root['y'] = 'test 3';


func();

console.log(obj);








share|improve this answer























  • right, but if I were creating a recursive function like in stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… where I needed a variable retain and to set its parent eg obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] then that wouldn't work?

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:28











  • @totalnoob I don't understand what you mean by "I needed a variable retain and to set its parent". Reassigning a variable only changes the value of that variable and does not affect anything about its previous value. On the other hand, assigning to a key via a variable will affect all other references to the same object.

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:30







  • 1





    @totalnoob These kinds of side effects are the source of many difficult-to-find bugs. I suggest you rethink your approach.

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:33











  • I was trying to create a recursive function that iterated through an array and create nested values in an object. that function needed to know what root it's in and that root variable needed to change each time if there were multiple items in the array.

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 7:28











  • so if the array was ['x','y','z'], it'd create an object map like the one in this post, recursively and root would be obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] => obj['x']['y']['z']

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 7:29


















0














Just pass the values




const obj = x:
y:
z: 'test'



delete Object.assign(obj, newKey: obj.oldKey ).oldKey;







share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53313539%2freferencing-an-objects-key-as-a-variable-js%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    If I understand your question correctly, the answer is probably "not without doing really weird stuff." What I believe you are asking is this. Given:



    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'





    you want to store obj.x (equivalently, obj['x']) into a variable, in such a way that assigning to that variable will actually mutate the x field of object obj. Now you cannot do that. Once you make the binding:



    let root = obj.x


    Then reassigning root will NOT change obj at all: root is a distinct variable from obj. Draw a picture, it will help. However, root is essentially a pointer to obj.x so if you did:



    root.y = 'test 2'


    than this does mutate obj.x.y.



    But, note you cannot assign obj.x to a variable and then use that variable to mutate the x field of obj. You can only mutate fields WITHIN obj.x. JavaScript does not have the ability to alias things (or make lvalues) like C++, for instance.



    If you really want to update the x property of obj then you should put ONLY the string x into a variable like this:



    root = 'x'


    then you can do:



    obj[root] = 'a new value for obj.x'


    and this will mutate obj.x. But remember, you cannot first evaluate obj.x and then use that result to mutate obj.x. Well, I mean, not without doing some really nasty stuff like this:



    root = 'obj.x';
    eval(`$root = 'a new value for obj.x';`);


    But don't.



    By the way, if obj was also a variable, then you could do this:



    receiver = obj;
    prop = 'x';
    Reflect.set(receiver, prop, 'the new value')


    Hopefully I guessed what you were trying to do. At any rate, maybe this answer will give some ideas.






    share|improve this answer























    • I think this is the best answer and the one I was looking for. I was confused with why stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… didn't work

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:22















    2














    If I understand your question correctly, the answer is probably "not without doing really weird stuff." What I believe you are asking is this. Given:



    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'





    you want to store obj.x (equivalently, obj['x']) into a variable, in such a way that assigning to that variable will actually mutate the x field of object obj. Now you cannot do that. Once you make the binding:



    let root = obj.x


    Then reassigning root will NOT change obj at all: root is a distinct variable from obj. Draw a picture, it will help. However, root is essentially a pointer to obj.x so if you did:



    root.y = 'test 2'


    than this does mutate obj.x.y.



    But, note you cannot assign obj.x to a variable and then use that variable to mutate the x field of obj. You can only mutate fields WITHIN obj.x. JavaScript does not have the ability to alias things (or make lvalues) like C++, for instance.



    If you really want to update the x property of obj then you should put ONLY the string x into a variable like this:



    root = 'x'


    then you can do:



    obj[root] = 'a new value for obj.x'


    and this will mutate obj.x. But remember, you cannot first evaluate obj.x and then use that result to mutate obj.x. Well, I mean, not without doing some really nasty stuff like this:



    root = 'obj.x';
    eval(`$root = 'a new value for obj.x';`);


    But don't.



    By the way, if obj was also a variable, then you could do this:



    receiver = obj;
    prop = 'x';
    Reflect.set(receiver, prop, 'the new value')


    Hopefully I guessed what you were trying to do. At any rate, maybe this answer will give some ideas.






    share|improve this answer























    • I think this is the best answer and the one I was looking for. I was confused with why stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… didn't work

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:22













    2












    2








    2







    If I understand your question correctly, the answer is probably "not without doing really weird stuff." What I believe you are asking is this. Given:



    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'





    you want to store obj.x (equivalently, obj['x']) into a variable, in such a way that assigning to that variable will actually mutate the x field of object obj. Now you cannot do that. Once you make the binding:



    let root = obj.x


    Then reassigning root will NOT change obj at all: root is a distinct variable from obj. Draw a picture, it will help. However, root is essentially a pointer to obj.x so if you did:



    root.y = 'test 2'


    than this does mutate obj.x.y.



    But, note you cannot assign obj.x to a variable and then use that variable to mutate the x field of obj. You can only mutate fields WITHIN obj.x. JavaScript does not have the ability to alias things (or make lvalues) like C++, for instance.



    If you really want to update the x property of obj then you should put ONLY the string x into a variable like this:



    root = 'x'


    then you can do:



    obj[root] = 'a new value for obj.x'


    and this will mutate obj.x. But remember, you cannot first evaluate obj.x and then use that result to mutate obj.x. Well, I mean, not without doing some really nasty stuff like this:



    root = 'obj.x';
    eval(`$root = 'a new value for obj.x';`);


    But don't.



    By the way, if obj was also a variable, then you could do this:



    receiver = obj;
    prop = 'x';
    Reflect.set(receiver, prop, 'the new value')


    Hopefully I guessed what you were trying to do. At any rate, maybe this answer will give some ideas.






    share|improve this answer













    If I understand your question correctly, the answer is probably "not without doing really weird stuff." What I believe you are asking is this. Given:



    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'





    you want to store obj.x (equivalently, obj['x']) into a variable, in such a way that assigning to that variable will actually mutate the x field of object obj. Now you cannot do that. Once you make the binding:



    let root = obj.x


    Then reassigning root will NOT change obj at all: root is a distinct variable from obj. Draw a picture, it will help. However, root is essentially a pointer to obj.x so if you did:



    root.y = 'test 2'


    than this does mutate obj.x.y.



    But, note you cannot assign obj.x to a variable and then use that variable to mutate the x field of obj. You can only mutate fields WITHIN obj.x. JavaScript does not have the ability to alias things (or make lvalues) like C++, for instance.



    If you really want to update the x property of obj then you should put ONLY the string x into a variable like this:



    root = 'x'


    then you can do:



    obj[root] = 'a new value for obj.x'


    and this will mutate obj.x. But remember, you cannot first evaluate obj.x and then use that result to mutate obj.x. Well, I mean, not without doing some really nasty stuff like this:



    root = 'obj.x';
    eval(`$root = 'a new value for obj.x';`);


    But don't.



    By the way, if obj was also a variable, then you could do this:



    receiver = obj;
    prop = 'x';
    Reflect.set(receiver, prop, 'the new value')


    Hopefully I guessed what you were trying to do. At any rate, maybe this answer will give some ideas.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 15 '18 at 6:56









    Ray ToalRay Toal

    66.4k11124183




    66.4k11124183












    • I think this is the best answer and the one I was looking for. I was confused with why stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… didn't work

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:22

















    • I think this is the best answer and the one I was looking for. I was confused with why stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… didn't work

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:22
















    I think this is the best answer and the one I was looking for. I was confused with why stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… didn't work

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 7:22





    I think this is the best answer and the one I was looking for. I was confused with why stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… didn't work

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 7:22













    0














    const func = () => 
    let root = obj['x'];
    root = 'test 2';



    This reassigns the variable root to a new value and does not affect the object. Instead, assign to the object directly:



    obj['x'] = 'test 2'





    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    obj['x'] = 'test 2';


    func();

    console.log(obj);





    Or you can change the value at a key via the root variable:






    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    let root = obj['x'];
    root['y'] = 'test 3';


    func();

    console.log(obj);








    share|improve this answer























    • right, but if I were creating a recursive function like in stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… where I needed a variable retain and to set its parent eg obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] then that wouldn't work?

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:28











    • @totalnoob I don't understand what you mean by "I needed a variable retain and to set its parent". Reassigning a variable only changes the value of that variable and does not affect anything about its previous value. On the other hand, assigning to a key via a variable will affect all other references to the same object.

      – Code-Apprentice
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:30







    • 1





      @totalnoob These kinds of side effects are the source of many difficult-to-find bugs. I suggest you rethink your approach.

      – Code-Apprentice
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:33











    • I was trying to create a recursive function that iterated through an array and create nested values in an object. that function needed to know what root it's in and that root variable needed to change each time if there were multiple items in the array.

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:28











    • so if the array was ['x','y','z'], it'd create an object map like the one in this post, recursively and root would be obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] => obj['x']['y']['z']

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:29















    0














    const func = () => 
    let root = obj['x'];
    root = 'test 2';



    This reassigns the variable root to a new value and does not affect the object. Instead, assign to the object directly:



    obj['x'] = 'test 2'





    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    obj['x'] = 'test 2';


    func();

    console.log(obj);





    Or you can change the value at a key via the root variable:






    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    let root = obj['x'];
    root['y'] = 'test 3';


    func();

    console.log(obj);








    share|improve this answer























    • right, but if I were creating a recursive function like in stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… where I needed a variable retain and to set its parent eg obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] then that wouldn't work?

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:28











    • @totalnoob I don't understand what you mean by "I needed a variable retain and to set its parent". Reassigning a variable only changes the value of that variable and does not affect anything about its previous value. On the other hand, assigning to a key via a variable will affect all other references to the same object.

      – Code-Apprentice
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:30







    • 1





      @totalnoob These kinds of side effects are the source of many difficult-to-find bugs. I suggest you rethink your approach.

      – Code-Apprentice
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:33











    • I was trying to create a recursive function that iterated through an array and create nested values in an object. that function needed to know what root it's in and that root variable needed to change each time if there were multiple items in the array.

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:28











    • so if the array was ['x','y','z'], it'd create an object map like the one in this post, recursively and root would be obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] => obj['x']['y']['z']

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:29













    0












    0








    0







    const func = () => 
    let root = obj['x'];
    root = 'test 2';



    This reassigns the variable root to a new value and does not affect the object. Instead, assign to the object directly:



    obj['x'] = 'test 2'





    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    obj['x'] = 'test 2';


    func();

    console.log(obj);





    Or you can change the value at a key via the root variable:






    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    let root = obj['x'];
    root['y'] = 'test 3';


    func();

    console.log(obj);








    share|improve this answer













    const func = () => 
    let root = obj['x'];
    root = 'test 2';



    This reassigns the variable root to a new value and does not affect the object. Instead, assign to the object directly:



    obj['x'] = 'test 2'





    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    obj['x'] = 'test 2';


    func();

    console.log(obj);





    Or you can change the value at a key via the root variable:






    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    let root = obj['x'];
    root['y'] = 'test 3';


    func();

    console.log(obj);








    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    obj['x'] = 'test 2';


    func();

    console.log(obj);





    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    obj['x'] = 'test 2';


    func();

    console.log(obj);





    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    let root = obj['x'];
    root['y'] = 'test 3';


    func();

    console.log(obj);





    const obj = 
    x:
    y:
    z: 'test'




    const func = () =>
    let root = obj['x'];
    root['y'] = 'test 3';


    func();

    console.log(obj);






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 15 '18 at 6:24









    Code-ApprenticeCode-Apprentice

    48.1k1490178




    48.1k1490178












    • right, but if I were creating a recursive function like in stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… where I needed a variable retain and to set its parent eg obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] then that wouldn't work?

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:28











    • @totalnoob I don't understand what you mean by "I needed a variable retain and to set its parent". Reassigning a variable only changes the value of that variable and does not affect anything about its previous value. On the other hand, assigning to a key via a variable will affect all other references to the same object.

      – Code-Apprentice
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:30







    • 1





      @totalnoob These kinds of side effects are the source of many difficult-to-find bugs. I suggest you rethink your approach.

      – Code-Apprentice
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:33











    • I was trying to create a recursive function that iterated through an array and create nested values in an object. that function needed to know what root it's in and that root variable needed to change each time if there were multiple items in the array.

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:28











    • so if the array was ['x','y','z'], it'd create an object map like the one in this post, recursively and root would be obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] => obj['x']['y']['z']

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:29

















    • right, but if I were creating a recursive function like in stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… where I needed a variable retain and to set its parent eg obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] then that wouldn't work?

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:28











    • @totalnoob I don't understand what you mean by "I needed a variable retain and to set its parent". Reassigning a variable only changes the value of that variable and does not affect anything about its previous value. On the other hand, assigning to a key via a variable will affect all other references to the same object.

      – Code-Apprentice
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:30







    • 1





      @totalnoob These kinds of side effects are the source of many difficult-to-find bugs. I suggest you rethink your approach.

      – Code-Apprentice
      Nov 15 '18 at 6:33











    • I was trying to create a recursive function that iterated through an array and create nested values in an object. that function needed to know what root it's in and that root variable needed to change each time if there were multiple items in the array.

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:28











    • so if the array was ['x','y','z'], it'd create an object map like the one in this post, recursively and root would be obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] => obj['x']['y']['z']

      – totalnoob
      Nov 15 '18 at 7:29
















    right, but if I were creating a recursive function like in stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… where I needed a variable retain and to set its parent eg obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] then that wouldn't work?

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:28





    right, but if I were creating a recursive function like in stackoverflow.com/questions/53308903/… where I needed a variable retain and to set its parent eg obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] then that wouldn't work?

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:28













    @totalnoob I don't understand what you mean by "I needed a variable retain and to set its parent". Reassigning a variable only changes the value of that variable and does not affect anything about its previous value. On the other hand, assigning to a key via a variable will affect all other references to the same object.

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:30






    @totalnoob I don't understand what you mean by "I needed a variable retain and to set its parent". Reassigning a variable only changes the value of that variable and does not affect anything about its previous value. On the other hand, assigning to a key via a variable will affect all other references to the same object.

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:30





    1




    1





    @totalnoob These kinds of side effects are the source of many difficult-to-find bugs. I suggest you rethink your approach.

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:33





    @totalnoob These kinds of side effects are the source of many difficult-to-find bugs. I suggest you rethink your approach.

    – Code-Apprentice
    Nov 15 '18 at 6:33













    I was trying to create a recursive function that iterated through an array and create nested values in an object. that function needed to know what root it's in and that root variable needed to change each time if there were multiple items in the array.

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 7:28





    I was trying to create a recursive function that iterated through an array and create nested values in an object. that function needed to know what root it's in and that root variable needed to change each time if there were multiple items in the array.

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 7:28













    so if the array was ['x','y','z'], it'd create an object map like the one in this post, recursively and root would be obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] => obj['x']['y']['z']

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 7:29





    so if the array was ['x','y','z'], it'd create an object map like the one in this post, recursively and root would be obj['x'] => obj['x']['y'] => obj['x']['y']['z']

    – totalnoob
    Nov 15 '18 at 7:29











    0














    Just pass the values




    const obj = x:
    y:
    z: 'test'



    delete Object.assign(obj, newKey: obj.oldKey ).oldKey;







    share|improve this answer



























      0














      Just pass the values




      const obj = x:
      y:
      z: 'test'



      delete Object.assign(obj, newKey: obj.oldKey ).oldKey;







      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        Just pass the values




        const obj = x:
        y:
        z: 'test'



        delete Object.assign(obj, newKey: obj.oldKey ).oldKey;







        share|improve this answer













        Just pass the values




        const obj = x:
        y:
        z: 'test'



        delete Object.assign(obj, newKey: obj.oldKey ).oldKey;








        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Nov 15 '18 at 6:42









        Shubham SharmaShubham Sharma

        126112




        126112



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53313539%2freferencing-an-objects-key-as-a-variable-js%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            這個網誌中的熱門文章

            How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

            In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully

            Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto