AppSync Batch Update Item?
According to the documentation, it seems like AppSync doesn't support BatchUpdateItem (only supports BatchPutItem and BatchGetItem). I have a use case where I want to update a particular attribute of multiple items in a table. Is there an efficient way to do this in AppSync and DynamoDB? I cannot do a batchPutItem because I could be overwriting the item with expired attributes (another client updated an attribute). So the only option is to do UpdateItem one item at a time. I am thinking of having a loop in my iOS app that calls UpdateItem n times. Does this mean that there would be n network rounds? I want to be efficient with my design. Is there anyway I can do all the updates in one network round trip? Thank you.
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
asked Nov 14 '18 at 22:20
Sarah GuoSarah Guo
668
add a comment |
According to the documentation, it seems like AppSync doesn't support BatchUpdateItem (only supports BatchPutItem and BatchGetItem). I have a use case where I want to update a particular attribute of multiple items in a table. Is there an efficient way to do this in AppSync and DynamoDB? I cannot do a batchPutItem because I could be overwriting the item with expired attributes (another client updated an attribute). So the only option is to do UpdateItem one item at a time. I am thinking of having a loop in my iOS app that calls UpdateItem n times. Does this mean that there would be n network rounds? I want to be efficient with my design. Is there anyway I can do all the updates in one network round trip? Thank you.
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
asked Nov 14 '18 at 22:20
Sarah GuoSarah Guo
668
add a comment |
According to the documentation, it seems like AppSync doesn't support BatchUpdateItem (only supports BatchPutItem and BatchGetItem). I have a use case where I want to update a particular attribute of multiple items in a table. Is there an efficient way to do this in AppSync and DynamoDB? I cannot do a batchPutItem because I could be overwriting the item with expired attributes (another client updated an attribute). So the only option is to do UpdateItem one item at a time. I am thinking of having a loop in my iOS app that calls UpdateItem n times. Does this mean that there would be n network rounds? I want to be efficient with my design. Is there anyway I can do all the updates in one network round trip? Thank you.
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
asked Nov 14 '18 at 22:20
Sarah GuoSarah Guo
668
According to the documentation, it seems like AppSync doesn't support BatchUpdateItem (only supports BatchPutItem and BatchGetItem). I have a use case where I want to update a particular attribute of multiple items in a table. Is there an efficient way to do this in AppSync and DynamoDB? I cannot do a batchPutItem because I could be overwriting the item with expired attributes (another client updated an attribute). So the only option is to do UpdateItem one item at a time. I am thinking of having a loop in my iOS app that calls UpdateItem n times. Does this mean that there would be n network rounds? I want to be efficient with my design. Is there anyway I can do all the updates in one network round trip? Thank you.
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
amazon-web-services amazon-dynamodb aws-appsync
asked Nov 14 '18 at 22:20
Sarah GuoSarah Guo
668
asked Nov 14 '18 at 22:20
Sarah GuoSarah Guo
668
edited Nov 14 '18 at 22:46
Sarah Guo
asked Nov 14 '18 at 22:20
Sarah GuoSarah Guo
668
asked Nov 14 '18 at 22:20
Sarah GuoSarah Guo
668
asked Nov 14 '18 at 22:20
Sarah GuoSarah Guo
668
668
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Is there anyway I can do all the updates in one network round trip?
I think you're on to a reasonable approach with this line of questioning.
You could try setting up a mutation to be handled by a Lambda function data source. Have the Lambda function do your looping and report back with any conflicts. That way you can do it all in one network call.
More about Lambda resolvers here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/appsync/latest/devguide/tutorial-lambda-resolvers.html
answered Nov 15 '18 at 1:28
Gabe HollombeGabe Hollombe
5,78333240
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53309596%2fappsync-batch-update-item%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Is there anyway I can do all the updates in one network round trip?
I think you're on to a reasonable approach with this line of questioning.
You could try setting up a mutation to be handled by a Lambda function data source. Have the Lambda function do your looping and report back with any conflicts. That way you can do it all in one network call.
More about Lambda resolvers here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/appsync/latest/devguide/tutorial-lambda-resolvers.html
answered Nov 15 '18 at 1:28
Gabe HollombeGabe Hollombe
5,78333240
add a comment |
Is there anyway I can do all the updates in one network round trip?
I think you're on to a reasonable approach with this line of questioning.
You could try setting up a mutation to be handled by a Lambda function data source. Have the Lambda function do your looping and report back with any conflicts. That way you can do it all in one network call.
More about Lambda resolvers here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/appsync/latest/devguide/tutorial-lambda-resolvers.html
answered Nov 15 '18 at 1:28
Gabe HollombeGabe Hollombe
5,78333240
add a comment |
Is there anyway I can do all the updates in one network round trip?
I think you're on to a reasonable approach with this line of questioning.
You could try setting up a mutation to be handled by a Lambda function data source. Have the Lambda function do your looping and report back with any conflicts. That way you can do it all in one network call.
More about Lambda resolvers here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/appsync/latest/devguide/tutorial-lambda-resolvers.html
answered Nov 15 '18 at 1:28
Gabe HollombeGabe Hollombe
5,78333240
Is there anyway I can do all the updates in one network round trip?
I think you're on to a reasonable approach with this line of questioning.
You could try setting up a mutation to be handled by a Lambda function data source. Have the Lambda function do your looping and report back with any conflicts. That way you can do it all in one network call.
More about Lambda resolvers here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/appsync/latest/devguide/tutorial-lambda-resolvers.html
answered Nov 15 '18 at 1:28
Gabe HollombeGabe Hollombe
5,78333240
answered Nov 15 '18 at 1:28
Gabe HollombeGabe Hollombe
5,78333240
answered Nov 15 '18 at 1:28
Gabe HollombeGabe Hollombe
5,78333240
answered Nov 15 '18 at 1:28
Gabe HollombeGabe Hollombe
5,78333240
5,78333240
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53309596%2fappsync-batch-update-item%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
