choosing between # of set associative cache
Suppose you have several chips that implement the same x86-64 instruction set. The chip east chip uses a direct-mapped cache, the next-cheapest one uses a 2-way set-associative cache; the next-cheapest on a 4-way ... and so on for 8-way and 16-way. All the caches use a 64- byte cache line and they all contain 1 MiB of data. If you are interested in executing a function that multiply array of floats on many small arrays( with typical size 256 bytes), which of these chips will you be most interested in using, if you want to maximize the bang for you buck?
caching
add a comment |
Suppose you have several chips that implement the same x86-64 instruction set. The chip east chip uses a direct-mapped cache, the next-cheapest one uses a 2-way set-associative cache; the next-cheapest on a 4-way ... and so on for 8-way and 16-way. All the caches use a 64- byte cache line and they all contain 1 MiB of data. If you are interested in executing a function that multiply array of floats on many small arrays( with typical size 256 bytes), which of these chips will you be most interested in using, if you want to maximize the bang for you buck?
caching
add a comment |
Suppose you have several chips that implement the same x86-64 instruction set. The chip east chip uses a direct-mapped cache, the next-cheapest one uses a 2-way set-associative cache; the next-cheapest on a 4-way ... and so on for 8-way and 16-way. All the caches use a 64- byte cache line and they all contain 1 MiB of data. If you are interested in executing a function that multiply array of floats on many small arrays( with typical size 256 bytes), which of these chips will you be most interested in using, if you want to maximize the bang for you buck?
caching
Suppose you have several chips that implement the same x86-64 instruction set. The chip east chip uses a direct-mapped cache, the next-cheapest one uses a 2-way set-associative cache; the next-cheapest on a 4-way ... and so on for 8-way and 16-way. All the caches use a 64- byte cache line and they all contain 1 MiB of data. If you are interested in executing a function that multiply array of floats on many small arrays( with typical size 256 bytes), which of these chips will you be most interested in using, if you want to maximize the bang for you buck?
caching
caching
asked Nov 13 '18 at 4:42
Dchen236Dchen236
62
62
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53273941%2fchoosing-between-of-set-associative-cache%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53273941%2fchoosing-between-of-set-associative-cache%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown