Is there a way to only invisible ItemTemplate of ListView?









up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I find IsVisible attribute only in the <ListView> itself but don't find in neither <ListView.ItemTemplate> nor <ListView.Header>, So is there a way to only invisible <ListView.ItemTemplate> and keep <ListView.Header> visible?










share|improve this question





















  • Why not to remove an item from the list instead of hiding it?
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 11:55










  • As I want to show them again if user taps something, So IsVisible-like attribute will be much better in performance.
    – Ahmed Salah
    Nov 11 at 11:58










  • Sounds like you have performance issues that you should solve instead of trying to create hacks.I would recommend to keep it simple and remove the items that should not be represented by the ListView.
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 12:01











  • No I don't have but I think IsVisible-like attribute is better than removing/readding items, Isn't it?
    – Ahmed Salah
    Nov 11 at 12:06











  • Link to official docs regarding ListView performance considerations: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/xamarin-forms/user-interface/…
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 12:09














up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I find IsVisible attribute only in the <ListView> itself but don't find in neither <ListView.ItemTemplate> nor <ListView.Header>, So is there a way to only invisible <ListView.ItemTemplate> and keep <ListView.Header> visible?










share|improve this question





















  • Why not to remove an item from the list instead of hiding it?
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 11:55










  • As I want to show them again if user taps something, So IsVisible-like attribute will be much better in performance.
    – Ahmed Salah
    Nov 11 at 11:58










  • Sounds like you have performance issues that you should solve instead of trying to create hacks.I would recommend to keep it simple and remove the items that should not be represented by the ListView.
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 12:01











  • No I don't have but I think IsVisible-like attribute is better than removing/readding items, Isn't it?
    – Ahmed Salah
    Nov 11 at 12:06











  • Link to official docs regarding ListView performance considerations: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/xamarin-forms/user-interface/…
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 12:09












up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











I find IsVisible attribute only in the <ListView> itself but don't find in neither <ListView.ItemTemplate> nor <ListView.Header>, So is there a way to only invisible <ListView.ItemTemplate> and keep <ListView.Header> visible?










share|improve this question













I find IsVisible attribute only in the <ListView> itself but don't find in neither <ListView.ItemTemplate> nor <ListView.Header>, So is there a way to only invisible <ListView.ItemTemplate> and keep <ListView.Header> visible?







listview xamarin.forms






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Nov 11 at 11:53









Ahmed Salah

1731213




1731213











  • Why not to remove an item from the list instead of hiding it?
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 11:55










  • As I want to show them again if user taps something, So IsVisible-like attribute will be much better in performance.
    – Ahmed Salah
    Nov 11 at 11:58










  • Sounds like you have performance issues that you should solve instead of trying to create hacks.I would recommend to keep it simple and remove the items that should not be represented by the ListView.
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 12:01











  • No I don't have but I think IsVisible-like attribute is better than removing/readding items, Isn't it?
    – Ahmed Salah
    Nov 11 at 12:06











  • Link to official docs regarding ListView performance considerations: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/xamarin-forms/user-interface/…
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 12:09
















  • Why not to remove an item from the list instead of hiding it?
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 11:55










  • As I want to show them again if user taps something, So IsVisible-like attribute will be much better in performance.
    – Ahmed Salah
    Nov 11 at 11:58










  • Sounds like you have performance issues that you should solve instead of trying to create hacks.I would recommend to keep it simple and remove the items that should not be represented by the ListView.
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 12:01











  • No I don't have but I think IsVisible-like attribute is better than removing/readding items, Isn't it?
    – Ahmed Salah
    Nov 11 at 12:06











  • Link to official docs regarding ListView performance considerations: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/xamarin-forms/user-interface/…
    – EvZ
    Nov 11 at 12:09















Why not to remove an item from the list instead of hiding it?
– EvZ
Nov 11 at 11:55




Why not to remove an item from the list instead of hiding it?
– EvZ
Nov 11 at 11:55












As I want to show them again if user taps something, So IsVisible-like attribute will be much better in performance.
– Ahmed Salah
Nov 11 at 11:58




As I want to show them again if user taps something, So IsVisible-like attribute will be much better in performance.
– Ahmed Salah
Nov 11 at 11:58












Sounds like you have performance issues that you should solve instead of trying to create hacks.I would recommend to keep it simple and remove the items that should not be represented by the ListView.
– EvZ
Nov 11 at 12:01





Sounds like you have performance issues that you should solve instead of trying to create hacks.I would recommend to keep it simple and remove the items that should not be represented by the ListView.
– EvZ
Nov 11 at 12:01













No I don't have but I think IsVisible-like attribute is better than removing/readding items, Isn't it?
– Ahmed Salah
Nov 11 at 12:06





No I don't have but I think IsVisible-like attribute is better than removing/readding items, Isn't it?
– Ahmed Salah
Nov 11 at 12:06













Link to official docs regarding ListView performance considerations: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/xamarin-forms/user-interface/…
– EvZ
Nov 11 at 12:09




Link to official docs regarding ListView performance considerations: docs.microsoft.com/en-us/xamarin/xamarin-forms/user-interface/…
– EvZ
Nov 11 at 12:09

















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer






StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53248468%2fis-there-a-way-to-only-invisible-itemtemplate-of-listview%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53248468%2fis-there-a-way-to-only-invisible-itemtemplate-of-listview%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







這個網誌中的熱門文章

How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

Node.js Script on GitHub Pages or Amazon S3

Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto