Is there a way to enable support in Debezium Postgres Connector to capture Composite Types columns?
I'm using the Debezium Postgres connector, and I'm finding that the connector doesn't capture columns that are composite types, or arrays of composite types. Is there some configuration involved in enabling this or is this not supported? I'm not seeing the definition of the composite type in the schema portion of the debezium message nor the composite type itself in the payload. Thanks.
postgresql apache-kafka apache-kafka-connect debezium
edited Nov 16 '18 at 8:02
cricket_007
83.6k1146116
asked Nov 15 '18 at 19:01
smackinsmackin
1
add a comment |
I'm using the Debezium Postgres connector, and I'm finding that the connector doesn't capture columns that are composite types, or arrays of composite types. Is there some configuration involved in enabling this or is this not supported? I'm not seeing the definition of the composite type in the schema portion of the debezium message nor the composite type itself in the payload. Thanks.
postgresql apache-kafka apache-kafka-connect debezium
edited Nov 16 '18 at 8:02
cricket_007
83.6k1146116
asked Nov 15 '18 at 19:01
smackinsmackin
1
add a comment |
I'm using the Debezium Postgres connector, and I'm finding that the connector doesn't capture columns that are composite types, or arrays of composite types. Is there some configuration involved in enabling this or is this not supported? I'm not seeing the definition of the composite type in the schema portion of the debezium message nor the composite type itself in the payload. Thanks.
postgresql apache-kafka apache-kafka-connect debezium
edited Nov 16 '18 at 8:02
cricket_007
83.6k1146116
asked Nov 15 '18 at 19:01
smackinsmackin
1
I'm using the Debezium Postgres connector, and I'm finding that the connector doesn't capture columns that are composite types, or arrays of composite types. Is there some configuration involved in enabling this or is this not supported? I'm not seeing the definition of the composite type in the schema portion of the debezium message nor the composite type itself in the payload. Thanks.
postgresql apache-kafka apache-kafka-connect debezium
postgresql apache-kafka apache-kafka-connect debezium
edited Nov 16 '18 at 8:02
cricket_007
83.6k1146116
asked Nov 15 '18 at 19:01
smackinsmackin
1
edited Nov 16 '18 at 8:02
cricket_007
83.6k1146116
asked Nov 15 '18 at 19:01
smackinsmackin
1
edited Nov 16 '18 at 8:02
cricket_007
83.6k1146116
edited Nov 16 '18 at 8:02
cricket_007
83.6k1146116
edited Nov 16 '18 at 8:02
cricket_007
83.6k1146116
83.6k1146116
asked Nov 15 '18 at 19:01
smackinsmackin
1
asked Nov 15 '18 at 19:01
smackinsmackin
1
asked Nov 15 '18 at 19:01
smackinsmackin
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Custom types and thus composite types are not supported yet. There's a feature request about enum types already, perhaps you can file one for composite types.
If you feel adventureous, you could try and use the include.unknown.datatypes connector option, which will propagate the raw representation as the connector obtains it from the WAL. But you should keep in mind that consumers deal with a PG-internal representation that way which might change down the road.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
GunnarGunnar
11.8k12949
Ah, forgot to mention: of course any help with implementing custom type support would be much appreciated :)
– Gunnar
Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53326265%2fis-there-a-way-to-enable-support-in-debezium-postgres-connector-to-capture-compo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Custom types and thus composite types are not supported yet. There's a feature request about enum types already, perhaps you can file one for composite types.
If you feel adventureous, you could try and use the include.unknown.datatypes connector option, which will propagate the raw representation as the connector obtains it from the WAL. But you should keep in mind that consumers deal with a PG-internal representation that way which might change down the road.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
GunnarGunnar
11.8k12949
Ah, forgot to mention: of course any help with implementing custom type support would be much appreciated :)
– Gunnar
Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
add a comment |
Custom types and thus composite types are not supported yet. There's a feature request about enum types already, perhaps you can file one for composite types.
If you feel adventureous, you could try and use the include.unknown.datatypes connector option, which will propagate the raw representation as the connector obtains it from the WAL. But you should keep in mind that consumers deal with a PG-internal representation that way which might change down the road.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
GunnarGunnar
11.8k12949
Ah, forgot to mention: of course any help with implementing custom type support would be much appreciated :)
– Gunnar
Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
add a comment |
Custom types and thus composite types are not supported yet. There's a feature request about enum types already, perhaps you can file one for composite types.
If you feel adventureous, you could try and use the include.unknown.datatypes connector option, which will propagate the raw representation as the connector obtains it from the WAL. But you should keep in mind that consumers deal with a PG-internal representation that way which might change down the road.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
GunnarGunnar
11.8k12949
Custom types and thus composite types are not supported yet. There's a feature request about enum types already, perhaps you can file one for composite types.
If you feel adventureous, you could try and use the include.unknown.datatypes connector option, which will propagate the raw representation as the connector obtains it from the WAL. But you should keep in mind that consumers deal with a PG-internal representation that way which might change down the road.
answered Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
GunnarGunnar
11.8k12949
answered Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
GunnarGunnar
11.8k12949
answered Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
GunnarGunnar
11.8k12949
answered Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
GunnarGunnar
11.8k12949
11.8k12949
Ah, forgot to mention: of course any help with implementing custom type support would be much appreciated :)
– Gunnar
Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
add a comment |
Ah, forgot to mention: of course any help with implementing custom type support would be much appreciated :)
– Gunnar
Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
Ah, forgot to mention: of course any help with implementing custom type support would be much appreciated :)
– Gunnar
Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
Ah, forgot to mention: of course any help with implementing custom type support would be much appreciated :)
– Gunnar
Nov 15 '18 at 19:24
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53326265%2fis-there-a-way-to-enable-support-in-debezium-postgres-connector-to-capture-compo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
