Odtnhj

up vote 4 down vote favorite 3 I tested the next code with Google Benchmark framework to measure memory access latency with different array sizes: int64_t MemoryAccessAllElements(const int64_t *data, size_t length) for (size_t id = 0; id < length; id++) volatile int64_t ignored = data[id]; return 0; int64_t MemoryAccessEvery4th(const int64_t *data, size_t length) for (size_t id = 0; id < length; id += 4) volatile int64_t ignored = data[id]; return 0; And I get next results (the results are averaged by google benchmark, for big arrays, there is about ~10 iterations and much more work performed for smaller one): There is a lot of different stuff happened on this picture and unfortunately, I can't explain all changes in the graph. I tested this code on single core CPU with next caches configuration: CPU Caches: L1 Data 32K (x1), 8 way associative L1 Instruction 32K (x1), 8 way associative L2 Unified 256K (x1), 8 way associative L3 Unified 30720K (x1), 20 ...

up vote 1 down vote favorite I have a very simple and short Code. It works, kind of. It doesn't really randomly send Images, just 2 of them over and over again. Maybe you can help me out a bit. if (message.content.startsWith (prefix + "aot")) number = 14; imageNumber = Math.floor (Math.random() * (number = 1 + 1)) + 1; message.channel.send (files: ["./images/" + imageNumber + ".png"]) javascript bots discord share | improve this question asked Nov 11 at 13:13 Queen 9 2 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I have a very simple and short Code. It works, kind of. It doesn't really randomly send Images, just 2 of them over and over again. Maybe you can help me out a bit. if (message.content.startsWith (prefix + "aot")) number = 14; imageNumber = Math.floor (Math.random() * (number = 1 + 1)) + 1; message.channel.send (files: ["./images/" + imageNumber + ...