Queries regarding precision_threshold setting in cardinality aggregation
We are using cardinality aggregation in our project. We have around 1400000 documents each document consist field named url. I want to count unique url wise document count. Hence I am using term aggregation along with cardinality. However I observed that count is not correct. From ELK documentation we can set precision_threshold to 40000 at max. Does that mean if unique count is more that 40000 then elastic query results will be in accurate. Could you please confirm.
elasticsearch elasticsearch-aggregation
add a comment |
We are using cardinality aggregation in our project. We have around 1400000 documents each document consist field named url. I want to count unique url wise document count. Hence I am using term aggregation along with cardinality. However I observed that count is not correct. From ELK documentation we can set precision_threshold to 40000 at max. Does that mean if unique count is more that 40000 then elastic query results will be in accurate. Could you please confirm.
elasticsearch elasticsearch-aggregation
add a comment |
We are using cardinality aggregation in our project. We have around 1400000 documents each document consist field named url. I want to count unique url wise document count. Hence I am using term aggregation along with cardinality. However I observed that count is not correct. From ELK documentation we can set precision_threshold to 40000 at max. Does that mean if unique count is more that 40000 then elastic query results will be in accurate. Could you please confirm.
elasticsearch elasticsearch-aggregation
We are using cardinality aggregation in our project. We have around 1400000 documents each document consist field named url. I want to count unique url wise document count. Hence I am using term aggregation along with cardinality. However I observed that count is not correct. From ELK documentation we can set precision_threshold to 40000 at max. Does that mean if unique count is more that 40000 then elastic query results will be in accurate. Could you please confirm.
elasticsearch elasticsearch-aggregation
elasticsearch elasticsearch-aggregation
asked Nov 13 '18 at 16:57
ShaileshShailesh
16
16
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53285987%2fqueries-regarding-precision-threshold-setting-in-cardinality-aggregation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53285987%2fqueries-regarding-precision-threshold-setting-in-cardinality-aggregation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown