Julia - console behaving differently than include(“myfile.jl”)









up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I would like to execute the following code, which works perfectly well when I type every line into my Julia console on Windows 10, but throws an error because of the mismatching type LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2 (my subsequent code expects ArrayFloat64,2).



This is the code:



x = [0.2, 0.1, 0.2]
y = [-0.5 0.0 0.5]

fx = x * y
fy = fx'

return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::ArrayFloat64,2


There is a TypeError, because fy seems to be of type LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2 instead of ArrayFloat64,2.



How can I do a transpose and get a "normal" ArrayFloat64,2 object ?



And why does this work when I type every line into my Julia console, but does not when I run the file via include("myfile.jl") ?










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I would like to execute the following code, which works perfectly well when I type every line into my Julia console on Windows 10, but throws an error because of the mismatching type LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2 (my subsequent code expects ArrayFloat64,2).



    This is the code:



    x = [0.2, 0.1, 0.2]
    y = [-0.5 0.0 0.5]

    fx = x * y
    fy = fx'

    return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::ArrayFloat64,2


    There is a TypeError, because fy seems to be of type LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2 instead of ArrayFloat64,2.



    How can I do a transpose and get a "normal" ArrayFloat64,2 object ?



    And why does this work when I type every line into my Julia console, but does not when I run the file via include("myfile.jl") ?










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I would like to execute the following code, which works perfectly well when I type every line into my Julia console on Windows 10, but throws an error because of the mismatching type LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2 (my subsequent code expects ArrayFloat64,2).



      This is the code:



      x = [0.2, 0.1, 0.2]
      y = [-0.5 0.0 0.5]

      fx = x * y
      fy = fx'

      return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::ArrayFloat64,2


      There is a TypeError, because fy seems to be of type LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2 instead of ArrayFloat64,2.



      How can I do a transpose and get a "normal" ArrayFloat64,2 object ?



      And why does this work when I type every line into my Julia console, but does not when I run the file via include("myfile.jl") ?










      share|improve this question













      I would like to execute the following code, which works perfectly well when I type every line into my Julia console on Windows 10, but throws an error because of the mismatching type LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2 (my subsequent code expects ArrayFloat64,2).



      This is the code:



      x = [0.2, 0.1, 0.2]
      y = [-0.5 0.0 0.5]

      fx = x * y
      fy = fx'

      return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::ArrayFloat64,2


      There is a TypeError, because fy seems to be of type LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2 instead of ArrayFloat64,2.



      How can I do a transpose and get a "normal" ArrayFloat64,2 object ?



      And why does this work when I type every line into my Julia console, but does not when I run the file via include("myfile.jl") ?







      julia-lang






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 10 at 14:35









      cookiedealer

      82212




      82212






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Use collect to have a copy of actual data rather than a transformed view of the original (note that this rule applies to many other similar situations):



          julia> x = [0.2, 0.1, 0.2]; 
          julia> y = [-0.5 0.0 0.5];

          julia> fx = x * y
          3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
          -0.1 0.0 0.1
          -0.05 0.0 0.05
          -0.1 0.0 0.1

          julia> fy = fx'
          3×3 LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2:
          -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
          0.0 0.0 0.0
          0.1 0.05 0.1

          julia> fy = collect(fx')
          3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
          -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
          0.0 0.0 0.0
          0.1 0.05 0.1





          share|improve this answer




















          • This is a good solution, but one should make sure that fx' really gives them what they expected and if materializing fx' is really needed as I have outlined in my answer.
            – Bogumił Kamiński
            Nov 10 at 15:31










          • Thank you, this was what I was looking for! :-)
            – cookiedealer
            Nov 10 at 15:35

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          To get a normal MatrixFloat64 use:



          fy = permutedims(fx)


          or



          fy = Matrix(fx')


          Those two are not 100% equivalent in general as fx' is a recursive adjoint operation (conjugate transpose), while permutedims is a non-recursive transpose, but in your case they will give the same result.



          What does recursive adjoint mean exactly?



          • recursive: the conjugate transpose is applied recursively to all entries of the array (in your case you have array of numbers and transpose of a number is the same number so this does not change anything);

          • adjoint: if you would have complex numbers then the operation would return their complex conjugates (in your case you have real numbers so this does not change anything);

          Here is an example when both things matter:



          julia> x = [[im, -im], [1-im 1+im]]
          2-element ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,1:
          [0+1im, 0-1im]
          [1-1im 1+1im]

          julia> permutedims(x)
          1×2 ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
          [0+1im, 0-1im] [1-1im 1+1im]

          julia> Matrix(x')
          1×2 ArrayAbstractArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
          [0-1im 0+1im] [1+1im; 1-1im]


          However, unless you really need to you do not have to do it if you really need to get a conjugate transpose of your data. It is enough to change type assertion to



          return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::AbstractArrayFloat64,2


          or



          return fx::MatrixFloat64, fy::AbstractMatrixFloat64


          Conjugate transpose was designed to avoid unnecessary allocation of data and most of the time this will be more efficient for you (especially with large matrices).



          Finally the line:



          return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::ArrayFloat64,2


          throws an error also in the Julia command line (not only when run from a script).






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            );
            );
            , "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53239982%2fjulia-console-behaving-differently-than-includemyfile-jl%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            Use collect to have a copy of actual data rather than a transformed view of the original (note that this rule applies to many other similar situations):



            julia> x = [0.2, 0.1, 0.2]; 
            julia> y = [-0.5 0.0 0.5];

            julia> fx = x * y
            3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 0.0 0.1
            -0.05 0.0 0.05
            -0.1 0.0 0.1

            julia> fy = fx'
            3×3 LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
            0.0 0.0 0.0
            0.1 0.05 0.1

            julia> fy = collect(fx')
            3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
            0.0 0.0 0.0
            0.1 0.05 0.1





            share|improve this answer




















            • This is a good solution, but one should make sure that fx' really gives them what they expected and if materializing fx' is really needed as I have outlined in my answer.
              – Bogumił Kamiński
              Nov 10 at 15:31










            • Thank you, this was what I was looking for! :-)
              – cookiedealer
              Nov 10 at 15:35














            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted










            Use collect to have a copy of actual data rather than a transformed view of the original (note that this rule applies to many other similar situations):



            julia> x = [0.2, 0.1, 0.2]; 
            julia> y = [-0.5 0.0 0.5];

            julia> fx = x * y
            3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 0.0 0.1
            -0.05 0.0 0.05
            -0.1 0.0 0.1

            julia> fy = fx'
            3×3 LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
            0.0 0.0 0.0
            0.1 0.05 0.1

            julia> fy = collect(fx')
            3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
            0.0 0.0 0.0
            0.1 0.05 0.1





            share|improve this answer




















            • This is a good solution, but one should make sure that fx' really gives them what they expected and if materializing fx' is really needed as I have outlined in my answer.
              – Bogumił Kamiński
              Nov 10 at 15:31










            • Thank you, this was what I was looking for! :-)
              – cookiedealer
              Nov 10 at 15:35












            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted






            Use collect to have a copy of actual data rather than a transformed view of the original (note that this rule applies to many other similar situations):



            julia> x = [0.2, 0.1, 0.2]; 
            julia> y = [-0.5 0.0 0.5];

            julia> fx = x * y
            3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 0.0 0.1
            -0.05 0.0 0.05
            -0.1 0.0 0.1

            julia> fy = fx'
            3×3 LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
            0.0 0.0 0.0
            0.1 0.05 0.1

            julia> fy = collect(fx')
            3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
            0.0 0.0 0.0
            0.1 0.05 0.1





            share|improve this answer












            Use collect to have a copy of actual data rather than a transformed view of the original (note that this rule applies to many other similar situations):



            julia> x = [0.2, 0.1, 0.2]; 
            julia> y = [-0.5 0.0 0.5];

            julia> fx = x * y
            3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 0.0 0.1
            -0.05 0.0 0.05
            -0.1 0.0 0.1

            julia> fy = fx'
            3×3 LinearAlgebra.AdjointFloat64,ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
            0.0 0.0 0.0
            0.1 0.05 0.1

            julia> fy = collect(fx')
            3×3 ArrayFloat64,2:
            -0.1 -0.05 -0.1
            0.0 0.0 0.0
            0.1 0.05 0.1






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 10 at 15:15









            Przemyslaw Szufel

            1,184110




            1,184110











            • This is a good solution, but one should make sure that fx' really gives them what they expected and if materializing fx' is really needed as I have outlined in my answer.
              – Bogumił Kamiński
              Nov 10 at 15:31










            • Thank you, this was what I was looking for! :-)
              – cookiedealer
              Nov 10 at 15:35
















            • This is a good solution, but one should make sure that fx' really gives them what they expected and if materializing fx' is really needed as I have outlined in my answer.
              – Bogumił Kamiński
              Nov 10 at 15:31










            • Thank you, this was what I was looking for! :-)
              – cookiedealer
              Nov 10 at 15:35















            This is a good solution, but one should make sure that fx' really gives them what they expected and if materializing fx' is really needed as I have outlined in my answer.
            – Bogumił Kamiński
            Nov 10 at 15:31




            This is a good solution, but one should make sure that fx' really gives them what they expected and if materializing fx' is really needed as I have outlined in my answer.
            – Bogumił Kamiński
            Nov 10 at 15:31












            Thank you, this was what I was looking for! :-)
            – cookiedealer
            Nov 10 at 15:35




            Thank you, this was what I was looking for! :-)
            – cookiedealer
            Nov 10 at 15:35












            up vote
            2
            down vote













            To get a normal MatrixFloat64 use:



            fy = permutedims(fx)


            or



            fy = Matrix(fx')


            Those two are not 100% equivalent in general as fx' is a recursive adjoint operation (conjugate transpose), while permutedims is a non-recursive transpose, but in your case they will give the same result.



            What does recursive adjoint mean exactly?



            • recursive: the conjugate transpose is applied recursively to all entries of the array (in your case you have array of numbers and transpose of a number is the same number so this does not change anything);

            • adjoint: if you would have complex numbers then the operation would return their complex conjugates (in your case you have real numbers so this does not change anything);

            Here is an example when both things matter:



            julia> x = [[im, -im], [1-im 1+im]]
            2-element ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,1:
            [0+1im, 0-1im]
            [1-1im 1+1im]

            julia> permutedims(x)
            1×2 ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
            [0+1im, 0-1im] [1-1im 1+1im]

            julia> Matrix(x')
            1×2 ArrayAbstractArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
            [0-1im 0+1im] [1+1im; 1-1im]


            However, unless you really need to you do not have to do it if you really need to get a conjugate transpose of your data. It is enough to change type assertion to



            return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::AbstractArrayFloat64,2


            or



            return fx::MatrixFloat64, fy::AbstractMatrixFloat64


            Conjugate transpose was designed to avoid unnecessary allocation of data and most of the time this will be more efficient for you (especially with large matrices).



            Finally the line:



            return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::ArrayFloat64,2


            throws an error also in the Julia command line (not only when run from a script).






            share|improve this answer


























              up vote
              2
              down vote













              To get a normal MatrixFloat64 use:



              fy = permutedims(fx)


              or



              fy = Matrix(fx')


              Those two are not 100% equivalent in general as fx' is a recursive adjoint operation (conjugate transpose), while permutedims is a non-recursive transpose, but in your case they will give the same result.



              What does recursive adjoint mean exactly?



              • recursive: the conjugate transpose is applied recursively to all entries of the array (in your case you have array of numbers and transpose of a number is the same number so this does not change anything);

              • adjoint: if you would have complex numbers then the operation would return their complex conjugates (in your case you have real numbers so this does not change anything);

              Here is an example when both things matter:



              julia> x = [[im, -im], [1-im 1+im]]
              2-element ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,1:
              [0+1im, 0-1im]
              [1-1im 1+1im]

              julia> permutedims(x)
              1×2 ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
              [0+1im, 0-1im] [1-1im 1+1im]

              julia> Matrix(x')
              1×2 ArrayAbstractArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
              [0-1im 0+1im] [1+1im; 1-1im]


              However, unless you really need to you do not have to do it if you really need to get a conjugate transpose of your data. It is enough to change type assertion to



              return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::AbstractArrayFloat64,2


              or



              return fx::MatrixFloat64, fy::AbstractMatrixFloat64


              Conjugate transpose was designed to avoid unnecessary allocation of data and most of the time this will be more efficient for you (especially with large matrices).



              Finally the line:



              return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::ArrayFloat64,2


              throws an error also in the Julia command line (not only when run from a script).






              share|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote










                up vote
                2
                down vote









                To get a normal MatrixFloat64 use:



                fy = permutedims(fx)


                or



                fy = Matrix(fx')


                Those two are not 100% equivalent in general as fx' is a recursive adjoint operation (conjugate transpose), while permutedims is a non-recursive transpose, but in your case they will give the same result.



                What does recursive adjoint mean exactly?



                • recursive: the conjugate transpose is applied recursively to all entries of the array (in your case you have array of numbers and transpose of a number is the same number so this does not change anything);

                • adjoint: if you would have complex numbers then the operation would return their complex conjugates (in your case you have real numbers so this does not change anything);

                Here is an example when both things matter:



                julia> x = [[im, -im], [1-im 1+im]]
                2-element ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,1:
                [0+1im, 0-1im]
                [1-1im 1+1im]

                julia> permutedims(x)
                1×2 ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
                [0+1im, 0-1im] [1-1im 1+1im]

                julia> Matrix(x')
                1×2 ArrayAbstractArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
                [0-1im 0+1im] [1+1im; 1-1im]


                However, unless you really need to you do not have to do it if you really need to get a conjugate transpose of your data. It is enough to change type assertion to



                return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::AbstractArrayFloat64,2


                or



                return fx::MatrixFloat64, fy::AbstractMatrixFloat64


                Conjugate transpose was designed to avoid unnecessary allocation of data and most of the time this will be more efficient for you (especially with large matrices).



                Finally the line:



                return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::ArrayFloat64,2


                throws an error also in the Julia command line (not only when run from a script).






                share|improve this answer














                To get a normal MatrixFloat64 use:



                fy = permutedims(fx)


                or



                fy = Matrix(fx')


                Those two are not 100% equivalent in general as fx' is a recursive adjoint operation (conjugate transpose), while permutedims is a non-recursive transpose, but in your case they will give the same result.



                What does recursive adjoint mean exactly?



                • recursive: the conjugate transpose is applied recursively to all entries of the array (in your case you have array of numbers and transpose of a number is the same number so this does not change anything);

                • adjoint: if you would have complex numbers then the operation would return their complex conjugates (in your case you have real numbers so this does not change anything);

                Here is an example when both things matter:



                julia> x = [[im, -im], [1-im 1+im]]
                2-element ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,1:
                [0+1im, 0-1im]
                [1-1im 1+1im]

                julia> permutedims(x)
                1×2 ArrayArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
                [0+1im, 0-1im] [1-1im 1+1im]

                julia> Matrix(x')
                1×2 ArrayAbstractArrayComplexInt64,N where N,2:
                [0-1im 0+1im] [1+1im; 1-1im]


                However, unless you really need to you do not have to do it if you really need to get a conjugate transpose of your data. It is enough to change type assertion to



                return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::AbstractArrayFloat64,2


                or



                return fx::MatrixFloat64, fy::AbstractMatrixFloat64


                Conjugate transpose was designed to avoid unnecessary allocation of data and most of the time this will be more efficient for you (especially with large matrices).



                Finally the line:



                return fx::ArrayFloat64,2, fy::ArrayFloat64,2


                throws an error also in the Julia command line (not only when run from a script).







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Nov 10 at 15:21

























                answered Nov 10 at 15:16









                Bogumił Kamiński

                10.7k11019




                10.7k11019



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53239982%2fjulia-console-behaving-differently-than-includemyfile-jl%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    這個網誌中的熱門文章

                    How to read a connectionString WITH PROVIDER in .NET Core?

                    Museum of Modern and Contemporary Art of Trento and Rovereto

                    In R, how to develop a multiplot heatmap.2 figure showing key labels successfully